Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Maricor Gaan, RN
YR & SEC: BSN 4B Clinical Area: ZCMC- Ward 4
Rotation Date: 12|Sept. 13-15, 2010
ENDARTERECTOMY
Endarterectomy is a surgical procedure to remove the atheromatous plaque material, or blockage, in the lining of an
artery constricted by the buildup of soft/hardening deposits. It is carried out by separating the plaque from the arterial
wall.
The procedure is widely used on the carotid artery of the neck as a way to reduce the risk of stroke, particularly when
the carotid artery is narrowed by more than 70%. A carotid endarterectomy may itself cause a stroke at the time of
operation.
Endarterectomy is also used as a supplement to a vein bypass graft to open up distal segments.
Pulmonary hypertension caused by chronic thromboembolic disease (CTEPH) may be amenable to endarterectomy of
the pulmonary artery. This is a highly specialized procedure.
Procedure
The internal, common and external carotid arteries are clamped, the lumen of the internal carotid artery is opened, and the
atheromatous plaque substance removed. The artery is closed, hemostasis achieved, and the overlying layers closed. Many
surgeons lay a temporary shunt to ensure blood supply to the brain during the procedure. The procedure may be
performed under general or local anaesthesia. The latter allows for direct monitoring of neurological status by intra-
operative verbal contact and testing of grip strength. With general anaesthesia indirect methods of assessing cerebral
perfusion must be used, such as electroencephalography (EEG), transcranial doppler analysis and carotid artery stump
pressure monitoring. At present there is no good evidence to show any major difference in outcome between local and
general anaesthesia.
Minimally-invasive procedures have been developed, by threading catheters through the femoral artery, up through the
aorta, then inflating a balloon to dilate the carotid artery, with a wire-mesh stent and a device to protect the brain from
embolization of plaque material. The FDA has approved 5 carotid stent systems as safe and effective in patients at
increased risk of complications for neck surgery. In the SAPPHIRE study, Yadav concluded that this procedure, known as
carotid stenting, was non-inferior to carotid endarterectomy in total adverse events, and lowered event rates for major
stroke, cranial nerve palsy, and myocardial infarction, in patients at high risk for surgery.[11] It is the consensus of experts in
the field that carotid artery stenting should be considered an option for patients who require carotid artery
revascularization to prevent stroke and who are at increased risk of having surgical complications.
The pooled data from both trials provides the firmest evidence of benefit. Carotid endarterectomy was only helpful in patients with
greater than 50% narrowing of the internal carotid artery. The more severe the narrowing the greater the benefit in reducing further
strokes. There is no benefit in having an operation once the artery is blocked.
In patients with 50-69% narrowing the risks of stroke or death were reduced by 7-9% at 5 years after surgery. In patients with more
severe narrowing greater than 70% the risks of stroke or death were reduced by 14-19% at 5 years after surgery. In certain groups of
patients with very narrowed arteries the benefits of surgery can be even greater.
It is important to realise that these reductions in risk for a patient are very great when compared with other medical measures to prevent
stroke or death. For instance the use of drugs to lower the cholesterol level only reduces the risk of death by 1-2%. The benefits for
carotid endarterectomy are many times greater than taking tablets.
Be careful when reading claims regarding reductions in risk particularly for medications used to lower blood pressure and cholesterol. For
instance a reduction in the risk of dying from 2% (2 in 100) to 1% (1 in 100) is only an absolute benefit of 1%. That is only 1 person in
every 100 will be helped. Ninety nine patients in every 100 will take tablets with no benefit. Unfortunately, to make this 1% absolute
benefit appear greater, it is sometimes expressed as a 50% relative risk reduction because the risk has been halved from 2% to 1%. There
is still true benefit in these circumstances, but it is much less than it first appears. The old saying that there are lies, damn lies and
statistics is nearly true.
Nursing
diagnosis Interventions ** using a surgical drain if needed.
References:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FSL/is_2_75/ai_83141045/pg_10/?tag=content;col1
&& http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carotid_endarterectomy