Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Ghapter 10
Two-Dimensional Surface Analysis
@@ffi
Understand the basic assumptions for
2D elements.
Understand the Basic differences
between H-Element and P-Element.
t Create and Refine 2D Surface elements.
a Understand the Stress concentration
effects on Shapes.
Perform Basic Plane Stress Analysis
using SolidWorks Simulation.
lntroduction
The recent developments in computer technology have triggered tremendous
advancements in the development and use of2D surface, iD surface
and 3D solid
elements in FFA. Many problems that once required sophisticated
analyticar procedures
and the use of empirical equations can now be analyzed through the
use offga.
At the same time, users of FEA software must be cautioned that it is very easy to
fali into
the trap of blind acceptance ofthe answers produced by the FEA
software. unlike the
line elements (Truss and Beam elements), where the analytical solutions
and the FEA
solutions usually matched perfectly, more care must be taken w ith 2D/3D
surface and 3D
solid elements since only very few analytical solutions can be eas y
obtained. on the
other hand, the steps required to perfom finite element analysis
using 2Dl3D surface and
3D solid elements are in general less complicated than that of line elements.
0.25 in.
T 300 lb.
2.0
->
I
A .75 in.
Preliminary Analysis
o Maximum Normal Stress
The nominal normal stress developed at the smallest cross section (through the center of
the hole) in the plate is
Onominal : P
A
: Tifr-" = e6oPsi'
3.0
2.75
F I' + { -t- {- -t-
Stress Concentration
factor K J. -
75
L
\ + -,t
L ! I \ J- {- -t-
2.25
2.0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.s 0.6 0.7 0.8
Maximum Displacement
We will also estimate the displacement under the loading condition. For a statically
determinant system the stress results depend mainly on the geometry. The material
properties can be in eruor and still the FEA analysis comes up with the same stresses.
However, the displacements always depend on the material properlies. Thus, it is
necessary to always estimate both the stress and displacement prior to a computer
FEA analysis.
cPL
EA
Where P:force, L:length, A-area, E: elastic modulus, and 3 : deflection.
0.25 in.
300 lb.
<-- I 300 lb.
2. 0 in.
-}
I
A .75 in.
A lower bound of the displacement ofthe right-edge, measured from the center of the
plate, is obtained by using the full area:
pL _ 300x3
61o*", :
E'A - tonO x 1z x o:s) : 1'8E-4 in'
and an upper bound ofthe displacement would come from the reduced section:
: PL 300x3
6upp",
EA l0E6x(1.25x0.25) = 2.88E-4 in.
6ur.rur"
_ PL _ 300 x 0.375 300 x2.625
EA l0E6 x (1.25 x 0.2s) 10E6x(2.0x0.2s)
: 3.6E-5 + 1.58E-4 :1.948-4 in.
Two-DimensionalSurlaceAnalvsis 10-5
For our plate problem, there are two planes of symmetry. Thus, we only need to create an
FE model that is one-fourth of the actual system. By taking advantage of symmetry, we
can use a finer subdivision of elements that can provide more accurate and faster results.
In performing a plane stress analysis, although only the selected surface is analyzed, it is
necessary to consider the constraints in all directions. For our plate model, deformations
will occur along the axes of symmetry; we will therefore place rol1er constraints along
the two center lines as shown in the figure below.
.:. One should also be cautious of using symmetrical characteristics in FEA. The
symmetry characteristics of boundary conditions and loads should be considered.
Also note the symmetry characteristic that is used in the Zrnear Statics Analysis does
not imply similar symmetrical results in vibration or buckling modes.
Starting SolidWorks
t ----------r .
I Rtfi $ t. SolidWorks
Setect the SolidWorks option on the ,S/a// menu or select the
I -qfli
: I Solidworks main icon on rhe desktop to start Solidltor*s. The
f window will appear on the screen.
I Edition h
L.'w-.*@wg{
f;- -r
I
L*_ry P
+. Click on the OK button to accept the settings.
--ffiae*ffit
5. Select the options icon from the Menu toolbar to open the options dialogbox.
The SolidWork Simulation product line leatures two areas of Finite Element Anaiysis:
Structure and Thermal. Stnrcture focuses on the structural integrity of the design, and
thermal ey aluates heat-transfer characteristics.
$ Lofted eos:€ase
trffi
Extruded HEle 1. Stafi SolidWorks Simulation by selecting
Cut ',{i?ard the Office Products tab in the
B Eoundary BossjBase
CommandManager area as shown.
i_
i,EE ft
Solididnrks i SolidilErkt
ir 2. In the SolidWorks Office list, choose SolidWorks
-.
|.(ouEfig :lntutd , t!- Simulation as shown.
I,n To0lbo
I "'J
' :1 ti, jl
.f. Note that lhe SolidWorks Simulation module is integrated as part of SolidWortrs. All
of the SolidWorks Simulation commands are accessible through the icon panel in the
CommandManager area.
.!. Note the defined surface model is a 3D FEA model, but only the front face
geometry of the CAD is referenced.
Assign the Element Material Property
} Next we will set tp the Material Property for the elements. The Material property
contains the general material information, stch as Modulus of Elasticity, poisson's
Ratio, etc. that is necessary for the FEA analysis.
'f' Note the default list of materials, which are available in the pre-define d sotidl{orks
Simulation material library, is displayed.
i.*aruryS4-.__-:l
E€tr""-.--__:
:: -. 1rf,.,1;c1,. - :
l5al
rri: ,a
:
i'r..,'ltt""'' .,i.";h";5.;' .
4. Click Apply to assign the material property then click Close to exit
the material assignment command.
10-14 Introduction to Finite Element Analysis
.1. The small arrows indicate constraints have been applied to the
associated edge.
l0-16 Introduction to Finite Element Analysis
* For the vertical edge on the left, we will apply a separate constraint set.
19. Set the Along Plane Dir I and Along Plctne Dir 2
angles lo 0 as shown.
t Note the applied constraints, to the two associated edges, account for the
symmetry of the system.
Applying the External Load
A new type of element. P-element, was developed in late 1980s. The p-element is unique
because convergence is obtained by increasing the order of the interpolating polynomials
in each individual element. Generally speaking, the P-method uses a constant mesh,
which is usually coarser than an H-element mesh. The FEI Solver will detect the areas
where high gradients occur and those elements have their order ofthe interyolating
polynomials automatically increased. This allows for the monitoring of expected error in
the solution and then automatically increases polynomial order as needed. This is the
main benefit of using P-elements. We can use a mesh that is relatively coarse, thus
computational time will be low, and still get reasonable results. One should realize that
despite the automatic process ofthe P-elements analysis, areas of the model that are of
particular interest or with more complex geometry or loading could still benefit from the
user specifliing an increase in mesh density.
Create the first FEA Mesh - Coarse Mesh
F As a rule in creating the first FEA mesh in using the H-element approach is to start
with a relatively small number of elements and progressively move to more refined
models. The main objective of the first coarse mesh analysis is to obtain a rough idea
of the overall stress distribution. In most cases, use ofa complex and/or a very
refined FEA model is notjustifiable since it most likely provides computational
accuracy at the expense ofunnecessarily increased processing time.
E
ltt
r*-
ll,il 1. Choose Create Mesh by clicking the icon in the
Run, RerultE ,. !E
Ad!,i!Er :r:i:,]-r-t*n f,ompare toolbar as shown.
1aSujr Results
riol
'7
. In the FEA Slr;d-r window, click once with
the rightmouse-button on the Mesh item
to display the option list and select
Details as shown.
8. Click on the [X] icon to close the Mesh Details dialog box.
Two-DimensionalSurfaceAnalysis 10-23
t
-Rae$!.!*s&f"jas,Qq"ry!qry
{' Note the FEr4 sorver carcurated Max. Stress is a bit lower
than the result from the
preliminary analysis on page 10-4.
E Standa.d mesh
- Cur,/ifurE bnsed mE h
3. Enter 0.10inchasthe Global Element size.
!n
i3 AutomEtic bEnEition
l. The FEA Solver calculated the Max. Stress with the refinement to be 2022.7 psi.
URES (in)
* The Max. Displacement is 2.054e4, which is very similar to the
2.054e-004
result from the first mesh.
Lgl0e-004
1 .766e-004
1.622e-004
Two-DimensionalSurlbceAnalysis I0-27
t?t n- :
lri -H
RunLResults iDEt
H i qa.ooi :l- . . Conpare . ir Dc'-
'---- [{I o-^-,
6. Click on the Run button to start the
FEA Solver to calculate the results.
Run
SliriE the salver lor the nciive ltudy,
7. The FEA Solver calctiated the Max. Stress with the refinement to be 2175.7 psi.
r::::1
ffi -'-
s..
a
l** r,,,.
URES (in)
1 .764e-004
Refinement of the FEA Mesh - Global Element Size 0.03
'i' we will next adjust the Global Element size to 0.03 inch and observe the chanses in
the results-
t
Introduclion to Finite Elenent
lg4 Fr-
{,8 t:l
Run Resuli.s
Adri16r Cofitpare 1. Choose Create Mesh by clicking the icon in the
Res!lt5
toolbar as shown.
ffi r.un
!f Run Deliqn Srenario:
areateJ
Potl./p3 srat.nodal3lEss(dpJSrrE:sl
Comparison of Results
The accuracy of the sotidworks simuration resurts for this problem
can be checked by
comparing them to the anallicar results presented earlier. In the preriminary
Anarysis
section, the maximum stress was calculated using a stress concentration
factor and ihe
value obtained was 2180 psi. one should realizelhe analytical result
is obtained through
the use ofcharts from empirical data and therefore involves some
degrees of error. The
stress obtained by finite element analysis using so/l dworis simutation
lraximum ranging
from 1938 to 2249 psi. rt the preriminary Anaiysis sectiln, the maximum
dispracemlni"
was also estimated to be around r.94E-4 inches, measured
from the center of ihe hole to
one end of the plate. The maximum displacement obtained
by finite element analysis
using solidworks simulation was around 2.050E-4 inches. The
agreement between the
analytical results and those ftom sotidllortu simulation demonstrates
the potential of
SolidWorks Simulation as a very powerful design tool.
N
o)
OF
,-i oi
(.)
o,
&H€XSpHBEEH
<")sro(or--oootdc.i("i+
Questions:
1. What are the four basic types of two-dimensional solid elements?
2. what type of situation is more suitable to perform a plane stress analysis than a
Plane Strain analysis?
3. For plane stress analysis using two-dimensional surface elements. how was the
surface created?
4. which type of two-dimensional solid elements is most suitable for members that are
thin and whose loads act only in the plane?
6. why is it important to notjust concentrate on the stress results but also examine the
displacements of FEA results?
'7. In the tutorial, did the changes in the refinement of the elements help the stress
results? By how much?
Exercises:
Determine the maximum stress produced by the loads.
1.
A 750 nrn
T 0.15 m
.3m
I
5KN
->
Material: Steel
Thickness: 8 mm
Introduction to Finite Element Analysrs 1 1-l
Chapter 11
Three-Dimensional Solid Elements
,::::::
g'''
l:;.'
lntroduction
In this chapter, the general FEA procedure for using three-dimensional solid elements is
illustrated. A finite element model using three-dimensional solid elements may look the
most realistic as compared to the other types of FE eiements. However, this type of
analysis also requires more elements, which implies more mathematical equations and
therefore more computational resources and time.
The main objective of finite element analysis is to calculate the stresses and
displacements for specified loading conditions. Another important objective is to
determine if failure will occur under the effect ofthe applied loading. It should be
pointed out that the wordfailure as used for failure criteria is somewhat misleading. In
the elastic region of the material, the system's deformation is recoverable. Once the
system is stressed beyond the elastic limit, even in a small region of the system,
deformation is no longer recoverable. This does not necessarily imply that the system has
failed and cannot carry any further load.
STRAIN
Elastic Plastic
Several theories propose different failure criteria. In general, all these theories provide
fairly similar results. The most widely used failure criteria are the Von Mises yield
criterion and the Tresca yield criterion. Both the Von Mises and. Tresca stresses are
scalar quantities, and when compared with the yield stress ofthe material they indicate
whether a portion of the system has exceeded the elastic state.
Von Mises Criterion: (Note that o1, 02, 03 are the three principal stresses.)
.)
2 6rr' - (ot oz)' + (o2 - o3)' + (o.] - ot)',2
Tresca Yield Criterion:
1
2"
.r,": I2 (or - or)
Three-Dimensional Solid Elements I 1-3
This chapter illustrates the general FEA procedure ofusing three-dimensional solid
elements. The creation ofa solid model is first illustrated and solid elements are
generated using the Solidllorks Simulation mesh commands. In theory, all designs could
be modeled with three-dimensional solid elements. The three-dimensional solid element
is the most versatile type of element compared to the more restrictive one-dimensional or
two-dimensional elements. The procedure involved in performing a three-dimensional
solid FEA analysis is very similar to that of a two-dimensional solid FEA analysis, as
was demonsffated in Chapter 10. As one might expect, the number ofnode-points
involved in a typical three-dimensional solid FEA analysis is usually much greater than
that ofa two-dimensional solid FEA analysis.
Problem Statement
Determine the maximum normal stress in the AL6061 member shown; the c-link design
is assembled to the frame at the upper hole (A 0.25) and a vertical load of200 lbs. is
applied at the top ofthe notch on the lower arm as shown.
I l-4 Introduction to Finite Element Analysis
Preliminary Analysis
The analysis ofstresses due to bending moment has been restricted to straight members
as illustrated in Chapter 7 through Chapter 9. Note that a good approximation may be
obtained if the curvature of the member is relatively small in comparison to the cross
section ofthe member. However, when the curvature is large, the stress distribution is no
longer linear, it becomes hyperbolic. This is due to the fact that, in a curved member, the
neukal axis ofa transverse section does not pass through the centroid of that section.
The distance R from the center of curvature C to the neutral axis is then defined by the
equation:
A
P= (A is the cross sectional area.)
ldA
Jr.
For some of the more commonly used shapes, the R values are as shown:
no.dius
-h .5 h2(bi+bo)
t: s 1ryf; 1",6u"+ 1
lr, 'il't
R:
(bir; -bor'1) hf - h tlrt - b")
Three-Dimensional Solid Elements 1 1-5
The bending stress in a curved beam, at location r measued from the center of curvature
C, can be expressed as:
M(R-r)
'
6P:
Aer
-
P:200 lbs.
M:350 in-lb.
The normal stress at the cross section is a combination ofthe stresses from the normal
force P and the bendiflg moment M. The stress distributions axe as shown in the figure
be1ow.
The maximum normal stress occurs on the inside edge, the edge that is closer to the
center of the curvature C.
Onormal force
P : -ltT
200 rb
: 800 psi
A
11-6 Introduction to Finite Element Analvsis
To calculate the bending stress, we will first calculate the R and e values:
ll
R= l."
=.5/ (tn(1.25t.7s))=0.9788
,NT
,
e:1-0.9788= 0.0212
The maximum bending stress, which is at the inside edge (r: 0.75), can now be
calculated:
O bending moment = 350 (0.9788 - .75) I (0.25 x .0212 x.75) = 20146 psi
Therefore
l{o.xim um Stness
Therefore
Starting SolidWorks
sorid+rark!
Sotidworks main window will appear on the screen.
I |
1 ., 'oI'* I
T:. r--l
ll -:=--
l--
oor,[ 4.
rf I
Click on the OK button to accept the settings.
5. Select the Options icon from the Menu toolbar to open the Options dialogbox.
\-@-r'J- e+
trI-.S.4-A *'fl,
o'o iTl-l* : 6. Click the Fillet icon in the Sketch toolbar
shown.
as
Ery
Sketch Fitlet
The solidworks simtlation product line features two areas of Finite Element Analysis:
Structure and Thermal. Stntcture focuses on the structural integrity of the design, and
I he r ma I ev aluates heat-transfer characteristics-
* Note that the solidworks Simulation module is integrated as part of solidwort<s. A1l
of the Solidworks simulation commands are accessible tkough the icon panel in the
( -u n t t tnncl Ma nogcr area.
rll{r
It- | -..
iauque
:'
lQl] FressureVesselDesign
* Note the default list of materials, which are available in the pre-defined SolidWorks
Simulation material library, is displayed.
4. Click Apply to assign the material propefty ihen click Close to exit
the material assignment command.
11-18 Infioduction to Finite Element
&
GERec0lir
HUl]
.r.
Aduts,:r l:-, (omFnrE 1. Choose Create Mesh by clicking the icon in the
:r , i F.esuits
toolbar as shown.
: t&
ft,q Run
Run Design Srenarior
Studj 1 [-DefEult-] ,
.
Automalic lrBnsition. loff
Loops
lnclude MeshAr.:to off
JaEobiaa Foints d porlr * The current coarse mesh consists of
Element size i 0.1174!l in I 1 747 nodes and,7215 solid elements.
8. Click on the [X] icon to close the Mesh Details dialog box.
Inftoduction to Finite Element
* Note the FEA calculated Max. Stress is very similar to the result from the
preliminary analysis on page 1 1-6.
* The FEA Sa/uer calculated the Max. Von Mises Stress with the refinement to be
21140 psi.
i
Gi&
Run , Resu,tE ltE
',qddi5or irefar|*E,, ConFEre
qE5'-i;: aesults
1R,n
6. Choose Create Mesh by clicking the icon in the
@ toolbar as shown.
Run Design Scenarios
C reate
r Run All{tudier
PErcentnqe ol elEmenti
wilhAspect Bati! { l
Percenlaqe ol elemenh
* The FEA so/ver calculated the Max. von Mises Stress with the refinement to be
21 150.8 psi. The refinement only changes the stress value by 1 .6%,which implies
the FEA mesh is quite adequate.
H.?1'1508
Sg rs.3sE E
'.
- 1t F26.A
. 15,864.11
,14,102I
.I2,340!
. 10,578.9
. . 5,292 S
::.lr-:,531.0
*tit
r,,,-'
Three- Dimensional Solid Elements I t-29
* The FEA solver calcrlated the Max. von Mises stress with the refinement to be
2'1118.7 psi. The refinement only changes the stress value by 1.0%, which implies
the previous FEA mesh is quite adequate.
H
4g rs,r59.2
:{'.
1 _ 17,59!.7
15,640 2
_ i4,0807
10,561.7
..
. a,an22
JlItt - I842.7
Hiit
I.,
--+ Y eld strenqihr 3S,885.4
Three-Dimensional Solid Elernents I 1-31
Comparison of Results
In FEA, the process of mesh refinement is called convergence analysis. The
convergence
study is necessary for both surface and solid elements. Fir our analysis,
the refinem-ent of
the mesh does show the FEA results converging near the analytical
result. The refinement
to the size of0.10 inches is quite adequate for our anarysis. Note the use
of the Mesh
control and the Automstic Transition options allow the more efficient and effective
refinements of the mesh in the high stress areas.
(o
o)-
In examining the FEA results, one should first examine the deformed shape to check for
proper placement ofboundary conditions and to determine if the caiculated deformation
of the model is reasonable. It is always important to perform a convergence study to
obtain more accurate results. Besides using hand caiculations to check the results ofthe
FEA analyses, it is also quite feasible to check the results by using other element types.
For example, the curved-beam problem, illustrated in this chapter, can also be analyzed
using the lD beam elements andlor 2D surface eiements. We do need to r ealize that
different elements have different limitations; for example, the stress concentration effects
are not present with the beam elements. But the purpose ofperforming a second and/or a
third analysis is to assure the results of the first analysis; so it is not necessary to expect
all element types to produce exactly the same results. This concept is fuither illustrited in
the next chapter.
It should be emphasized that, when performing FEA analysis, besides confirming that the
systems remain in the elastic regions for the applied loading, other considerations are also
impoftant; for example, large displacements and buckling of beams, which can also
invalidate the linear statics analysis results. In performing finite element analysis, it is
also necessary to acquire some knowledge of the theory behind the method and
understand the restrictions and limitations ofthe software. There is no substitution for
experience.
Finite element analysis has rapidly become a vital tool for design engineers. However,
use of this tool does not guarantee correct results. The design engineer is still responsible
for doing approximate calculations, using good design practice, and applying good
engineering judgment to the problem. It is hoped that FEA will supplement these skills to
ensure that the best design is obtained.
t
Questions:
l. What are the most widely used failure criteria?
3. What will happen to the system if it is stressed beyond the elastic limit?
6. Under what condition is the bending stress developed in a curved beam no longer
linear?
7. Can a curved beam problem be analyzed with the 1D beam element? What is the
main limitation of performing such an analysis?
8. What are the advantages ofusing 3D elements over using the lD or 2D elements?
11-34 Introduction io Finite Element
Exercises:
1. For the steel U-shape design (diameter: Ve"), determine the maximum stress
developed under a loading ofP:200 lb.
///+
'ffi--
,*r# ]_]
T,
For the above problem, perform additional FEA analyses using the two cross-sections
shown below and compare the results.
--r_
I
E-
,JJ
Introduction to Finite Element
Chapter 12
3D Thin Shell Analysis
w.5,.6.060
&".,.,."."
r,,,.,",""
,YEdjleiqlh6,D42zo00o
,,t,
Ewmu@@Weffiree
Understand the procedures to create
Solid and Shell FEA models.
Create a surface Model and perform an
FEA Analysis, using Shell elements.
Apply proper constraints to the different
types of elements.
Understand the Basic differences of the
different 3D FEA elements.
12-2 Intoduction to Finite Element Analvsis
lntroduction
In the previous chapter, we have examined the use ofthe three-dimensional solid element
to perform FEA analyses. Although, the three-dimensional (3-D) solid element is perhaps
the most versatile rype of element compared to the other types of elements; certain
situations do exist where the 3-D solid elements might not be the most effective option in
performing FEA analyses. For example, designs that are made of thin materials, such as
pressure containers, tanks and drums. Also, designs with long and narrow features, such
as pipes and frames. For these types ofdesigns, if analyzed with the 3-D solid elements,
wili typically result in a very large number of elements and therefore require much more
computing power and time to perform the FEA analyses.
The three-dimensional thin shell element is another type of 3-D element that is
particularly designed to aid the FEA analyses ofthin shell designs. In theory, all designs
could be modeled with three-dimensional solid elements. A thin shell design can also be
analyzed, using 3D solid elements. Two of the main considerations in selecting the
element type to use are (1) the amount of time it takes to perform the analysis, and (2) the
accuracy of the results.
With the advancements in computer technology in the last few decades, it is now quite
feasible to perform multiple FEA analyses using different types of elements. In many
instances, performing FEA analyses may be faster than hand calculations; and one should
also realizing that hand calculations might not be possible in many situations. In this
chapter, the procedures to perform FEA analyses using the above two types of elements
are illustrated. To assure the accuracy ofFEA results, performing a second and/or a third
analysis can be very practical and effective.
3D Thin Shell
In FEA analysis, the 3D solid element is the most versatile type of element, as all designs
are three dimensional objects.
3D Solid
analysis
In FEA analysis, if a part is relatively thin compared to its length and width, using shell
elements would be more efficient than using 3D solid elements. ln SotidWorks
simulation, we can also create a surface model, which is an idealization ofthe design.
Thin Shell
analysis
Resides selecting the proper type of elements to be used in the FEA analyses, options to
simplifz the FEA analyses, such as symmetry, should also be considered. Symmetry is an
important characteristic that is often seen in designs. Symmetrical designs ire generally
more pleasing to the eye and also provide the desirable functionalities in designs. As ii
was illustrated in chapter 11, symmetry can greatly reduce the computing time in FEA
analyses.
l2-4 lntroduction to Finite Element Analysis
Problem Statement
Determine the tangential and longitudinal stresses of the thin-wall cylindrical pressure
vessel shown in the figure below. The pressure vessel is made ofsteel and is subject to an
internal pressure of 15MPa. The dimensions of the vessel are: End radius 300mm,
cylindrical length 500mm and wall thickness 25mm.
Preliminary Analysis
On the cylindrical section of the pressure vessel, the two principle stresses are (1) the
tangential and (2) longitudinal stresses. The principle stresses on the hemispherical
ends are tangential stress. These primary stresses are identified as shown in the hgure
below.
From strength of Materials, the principle stresses on the cylindrical section ofthe
pressure vessel walls, which are the tangential and longitudinal stresses, can be
determined by
6tur€ential
Pdi
otangentiar : n :15.0 x 106 x (2 x0.275)l(2x0.025)
= 165 MPa
Starting SolidWorks
I. Select the SolidWorks option on the Start menu or select the
SolidWorks icon on the desktop to start SolidWorks.The
SolidWorks main window will appear on the screen.
5. select the options icon from the Menu toolbar to open the options diarogbox.
'l' To perform the 3D solids FEA analysis, we will first create a solid model using the
Revolve command. The Revolve operation is defined as creating a solid by iaking
a planar section rotating about an axis ofrotation.
The solidworks simttlation product line features two areas of Finite Element Analysis:
Structure and rhermal. structure foctses on the structural integrity ofthe design, and
therm al evaluates heat-transfer characteristics.
;G rs
L':. 2. In the Solidllrorks Office list, choose SolidWorks
Salidftor|..5 Solidit'jsrks
E'ruting Simulation as shown.
LJ.
'i' Note that the solidworks simulation module is integrated as pafi of solidworks . All
of the solidllrorks simukttion commands are accessible through the icon panel in the
CommandManager area.
'l' Note the default list of materials, which are available in the pre-define d solidworlc
Simulation material library, is displayed.
4. Click Apply to assign the material property then click Close to exit
the Material Assignment command.
Applying Boundary Gonditions - Constraints
'!' For our solid analysis, the model we created is a % solid model of the pressure
container which is symmetrical about the horizontal mid-plane and two vertical
planes. we will need to apply roller constraints to the three symmetry pranes,
'
not allowed in the perpendicular directions of the syrnmetry planes. ^
motions
EA
tlEt
Run '-_: -- - aafipare 1 . Choose Create Mesh by clicking the icon in the
Reirits
toolbar as shown.
9 Stdndard mesh
Curlatlre bdsed
:'. In general, a good rule of thumb to follow in creating
mesh
the first mesh is to have about 3 to 4 elements on the
m edges of the model. Since our model has fairly small
cross section, we will use the wall thickness as the
element size.
* Note the FEI solver calculated Max. Stress is very similar to the result from the
preliminary analysis on page 12-5.
313E
Refinement of the FEA Mesh - Global Element Size 0.0125
.i. To confirm the FEA results are valid, we will adjust the mesh by tsing a Global
Element size of 0.0125.
* The FEA So/ver calculated the Max. Von Mises Stress with the refinement to be
164.6MPa, which varied just a bit from the previous mesh. This confirms the
FEA is adequate.
Inhoduction to Finite Element
T,-:1.
L g h,--, 1 :. Cti.f on the OK burlon ro accept Lhe serrings.
I--:-E-{:.
-!'T:+'
4. Select the Options icon frorr the Menu toolbar to open the Options dialogbox.
Lhit syEtem
Q. l4l$ {meter. kilogram, second)
.
,.CGS
. {Eefitimeter, gram, second)
kIMGS {millimeter, gram, second}
IPS dnch, pound, semnd)
' austom
6. In the pull-down menu, select:
lnset) Surface ) Revolve
* Note the default list of materials, which are available in the pre-define d, solidll'orks
Simulation material library, is displayed.
fi;Ed;:;t;:--'I;
i!.y,e:e!i.:--
-],j
,'...o.,r=r:.., ,l
.. .1:. .. ...ttt. :t. . tu....
4. Click Apply to assign the material propefty then click Close to exit
the Material Assignment command.
Introduction to Finite Element
19. Set the Along Plane Dir I and Atong plane Dir 2
angles to 0 as shown.
3D Thin Shell Analysis 12-2'7
28. Set the Along Plane Dir I and Along Plane Dir 2
angles to 0 as shown.
* Note the FEA calculated Max. Stress is about 4Yo lower than the result from the
preliminary analysis on page I2-5.
FI m
A o.o toom
u4riJ-u;.il4rd4{E
. 0.000sn - :
l44jJ*tti",iJ,itdd{iti,
Lj AubmatiE bEnsition
* The FEA,solver calculated the Max. von Mises Stress with the refinement
to be
160.3MPa, which is about 3% ditTerEnce to the preliminary results. Note the
refinement generated 5280 elements, which is about 6.6 times nrore elements
than
the previous mesh.
12-32 Introduction to Finite Element Analvsis
Questions:
1. For designs that are thin and symmetrical about an axis, what are the different FEA
analyses available in SolidWorkg Simulation?
2. What are the advantages and disadvantages ofperforming a shell analysis over a 3D
solid analysis?
3. In SolidWorks Simulation, how do you sefup the FEA model to be a surface model?
6. What are the differences in applying constraints on thin shell models vs. solid
models?
Exercises:
1. Determine the maximum Von Mises stress of the thin-wall round-bottom cylindrical
pressure vessel shown in the figure below; dimensions are in mm. The pressure vessel
is made of steel and is subject to an internal pressure of 10MPa. For the FEA
analyses, set all degrees of freedom to fixed at the top edge of the opening. (The
Radius 225 and Radius 200 arcs share the center point, which is measured 200 mm
along the vertical axis. The Radius 265 and Radius 235 arcs also share the same
center point at the origin.)
2. Determine the maximum von Mises stress of the thin-wall flat-bottom cylindrical
pressure vessel shown in the figure below; dimensions are in inches. The pressure
vessel is made ofsteel and is subject to an internal pressure of45psi. For the FEA
analyses, set all degrees of freedom to f ixed at the top edge ofthe opening.
Shell thickness:
0.3