Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 16

There are horror movies that will give you nightmares, and cause you to fear showers

and shallow waters for decades. There are some that get deep under your skin – often
times because they’ve literally flayed or burrowed under their characters’ skins – and
others that will make you see everyday items (a bowl of pea soup, a hockey mask, a
videotape) in a horrifying new light. And then there are the ones that push so many
social-taboo envelopes, strike so many collective raw nerves and tweak so many
communal gag reflexes that they are a cut, if you will, above the rest. We’ve all seen good
scary movies and bad scary movies – it’s the really ugly ones, however, that tend to
generate the most memorable and notable notoriety.
So we’ve singled out 14 horror films that have caused various degrees of public outcry
upon their release – or in a few cases, weren’t released in certain countries for decades.
Several films nearly got folks arrested; a couple merely inspired repulsion and disgust
from critics and audiences alike, along with some passionate jeers. But all of the movies
here fall under the category of controversial, all of them took the genre to some fairly
extreme places, and all of them get a 1-10 according to how much respective outrage
each work generated. Remember, it’s only a movie…it’s only a movie…it’s only a movie…
.
Cannibal Holocaust (1980)
Synopsis: Square one of horror’s found-footage subgenre, this alleged “lost tape” from
an American film crew trekking into the Amazon crossed every line it could reach. An
anthropologist leads an expedition to recover the documentarians who went looking for
the indigenous tribes of maneaters rumored to be hiding around the jungle; they then
find savagery beyond their wildest imagining, including an infamous sequence of a
young woman impaled on a wooden stake and numerous examples of why the movie is
named Cannibal Holocaust.
Controversy: After 10 glorious days of release (during which the film generated a
staggering $200 million0, the film was pulled from theaters and Italian director
Ruggero Deodato was slapped with obscenity charges. When the film ran in
France, Photo magazine alleged that the extensive ritual-sacrifice sequences were the
real deal, and the courts threw a murder charge on Deodato for good measure. The
filmmaker had to track down his actors and bring them before the jury so they could
explain that they had not, in fact, been slaughtered during the production. His name was
cleared, and his space in the fake-snuff-film hall of fame was cemented. CB
RELATED
What Do ‘The Purge’ Movies Say About Us?

‘Woman Walks Ahead’ Review: Biopic on Feminist Painter Is One Big Falsehood

Rating: 8
The Exorcist (1973)
Synopsis: A young girl in Washington D.C. begins exhibiting some incredibly odd
behavior. It turns out that, well, she’s possessed by a demon. Holy men are called to rid
her of the unholy spirit. Heads do not roll so much as rotate around, 360-degrees.
Controversy: The self-mutilating crucifix masturbation, the film-long buffet of
sacrilege, “your mother sucks cocks in hell” – even audiences who had become
accustomed to the loosening of restrictions on sex and violence were shocked by William
Friedkin’s the-devil-made-her-do-it horror movie. Paramedics were supposedly called to
numerous screenings, and rumors that people died of heart attacks watching some of
the movie’s intense scenes persist to this day. The U.K. banned it from home release for
a decade, and scholars have obsessed over the controversial presence of subliminal
messaging in the film in order to disturb viewers – something Friedkin has confirmed
over the years. CB
Rating: 7
Faces of Death (1978)
Synopsis: Never mind Mondo Cane; this psuedo-verite movie about various weird and
creepy phenomena around the globe, including scenes depicting a graphic autopsy, a
decapitation, a suicide, a cannibal orgy, and a bear mauling, is considered one of the
most horrifying and nauseating “documentaries”ever made.
Controversy: Conservative politicians and self-appointed social watchdogs linked
John Alan Schwartz’s film to the more heinous crimes of the day, and bans followed in a
handful of countries. Even the FBI, fooled by a cruddy print, looked into whether the
scene showing a death cult in San Francisco might merit some further investigation. CB
Rating: 6
Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1986)
Synopsis: John McNaughton’s take-no-prisoners indie lets viewers tag along with its
titular killer (played memorably by Michael Rooker) and his sleazy, degenerate pal as
they randomly rack up one murder after the next. The introduction of his friend’s sister,
Becky, into his life suggests that Henry may have a chance for a normal life. That notion
is short-lived.
Controversy: The film’s production company didn’t even want to give the movie a
theatrical release, leaving McNaughton to personally send screener copies to prominent
critics in the hope of drumming up buzz and snagging a distributor. But nobody was
biting after the MPAA slapped Henry with an “X” rating, then mostly reserved for porno
flicks. The violence-heavy film helped precipitate the creation of the NC-17 rating, a
distinction for movies with with extreme content that didn’t cross the line into nudie-pic
territory. Nearly three years after his festival premiere, McNaughton landed a limited
release that earned just over $600,000, but made him into a folk hero on the cult-film
circuit. CB
Rating: 7
The Human Centipede (First Sequence) (2009)
Synopsis: A German surgeon kidnaps three tourists and forces them to participate in
an experiment. Putting his “100% medically accurate” theory to the test, he creates a
conjoined organism by sewing them together, mouth to anus.
Controversy: Like a modern-day William Castle, Dutch director Tom Six used his
“100% medically accurate” gimmick to troll for controversy, adding extra offense by
evoking the specter of Nazi experiments. (The name of Dieter Laser’s mad scientist, Dr.
Josef Heitler, none-too-subtly fuses Adolf Hitler with Josef Mengele.) When he claimed
that the movie had been called “the most horrifying film ever made,” a British journalist
tried to track down the source of the quote; it was never found. He also mentioned that,
when the film showed at festivals, there were copious incidents involving people
vomiting in the aisles – which probably was true. The film’s 2011 sequel caused even
more controversy, with several newspaper asking if the movie should be
bannedindefinitely. ST
Rating: 5
I Spit on Your Grave (1978)
Synopsis: Woman retreats alone to isolated Connecticut college. Woman gets
terrorized and raped by four locals. Woman goes to church. Woman lures them back for
the kill.
Controversy: Banned in several countries, including a spot on the U.K.’s “video
nasties” list, I Spit on Your Grave remains notorious for drawing the ire of Roger Ebert,
who gave it zero stars and considered it the worst film ever made. Among the countries
to have banned the film were Iceland, Ireland, Germany and Norway; some countries
showed a shortened version of it over the years, usually trimming what is indeed a
prolonged gang rape sequence. Various activist groups still consider this one of the most
anti-women films ever made, despite the fact that its director, Meir Zarchi, originally
wanted to call it Day of the Woman. ST
Controversy: 7
I Stand Alone (1998)
Synopsis: Situated between the French arthouse’s extreme edges and exploitation
cinema’s lunatic fringe, Gaspar Noe’s notorious feature debut often feels like an
existential slasher film as told from the perspective of the killer. Abused at a young age
by a priest, an unnamed French butcher ends up killing the man he thought raped his
daughter, getting raped himself, and indulging in more hard-to-watch incidents than
can be counted on one bloodied hand. It does not end well, to say the least.
Controversy: Noe has never shied away from the graphic (see his rape-revenge
drama Irreversible) but his debut feature took many folks completely off-guard with its
penchant for perversion, taboo-breaking, and overall brutality. Festival audiences
reacted violently at several screenings, though to be fair, he did add a warning title card
giving sensitive viewers 30 seconds to vacate the auditorium before his stomach-
churning climax. Still, the most sickening and violent scene – in which the butcher
performs a DIY abortion on his own wife through a shockingly direct method – raised
the majority of public hackles and got the enfant terrible accused of being the cinematic
equivalent of a terrorist. Speaking to IndieWire, the filmmaker cited the 1983 Austrian
“masterpiece” Angst as one the movie’s indirect inspirations, and talked glowingly of
how the movie was banned for being too out-there. Though Noe’s film did not meet the
same fate, it was not for lack of trying. CB
Rating: 6

The Last House on the Left (1972)


Synopsis: En route to a concert, two teenage girls are sexually assaulted, tortured, and
killed by a sadistic gang in the woods. When the thugs inadvertently hole up in one of
the victim’s houses, her parents have their revenge.
Controversy: Loosely inspired by Ingmar Bergman’s The Virgin Spring and blessed
with a home-movie crudeness, Wes Craven’s rape-revenge thriller pushed the limits of
good taste, from its horrifically violent scenes of comeuppance to a notorious scene in
which a character is forced to urinate on herself. (We can be thankful that the director
abandoned the idea of including hardcore pornography like he’d originally
planned.) New York Times critic Howard Thompson admitted to walking out after 50
minutes of this “sickening tripe,” and despite a few prominent critics rising to its
defense at various times, Last House stayed on the U.K.’s notorious “video nasties” list
for decades, losing appeal after appeal until finally getting an uncut video release in
2008. Even its lead actor, Fred Lincoln, once said that “I wish it had been banned in
the United States.” ST
Rating: 8
Night of the Living Dead (1968)
Synopsis: After a space probe explodes in Earth’s atmosphere (the most likely reason,
given that it’s a theory voiced by the film’s resident scientist), the dead began to rise
from their graves and shamble after the living, attacking them for their delicious,
delicious flesh. A group of survivors hole up in a house while outside, dozens of “ghouls”
– though these creatures would soon be known throughout the world as “zombies”
– try to get at them. And with one $114,000 independent horror movie, director George
A. Romero gives birth to a cottage industry.
Controversy: From the very beginning – when the movie premiered in a Pittsburgh
theater during a Saturday matinee screening filled with kids – the Rosetta stone of
zombie films attracted its fair share of notoriety. Audiences weren’t accustomed to such
in-your-face violence and gore, which completely violated the regulations of what you
could show onscreen at the time (according to Glenn Kay’s Zombie Movies, the film’s
distributor didn’t even submit it to the MPAA for a rating); Variety did everything but
call for Romero’s head on a platter, saying the movie compromised “the moral health of
film goers” and essentially established the “guidelines for the pornography of violence.”
Controversial or not, the movie went on to break records at midnight screenings and
drive-ins. It’s now rightfully considered an American classic. DF
Rating: 7

Psycho (1960)
Synopsis: A secretary from Phoenix steals $40,000 from the office and goes on the
lam. Exhausted from the drive and facing a heavy rainstorm, she finds a vacancy at the
Bates Motel. The proprietor seems friendly. What could go wrong?
Controversy: Audiences had never seen anything as shocking as Alfred Hitchcock’s
movie, particularly the famed shower sequence. The movie is considered to have helped
kill the old production code that regulated sex and violence onscreen; Hitch played an
elaborate bait-and-switch game to get around censors, promising cuts he never made,
and he forced exhibitors to stick to a “no late admissions” policy. (In Singapore, the
shower scene played en toto, while another murder scene and a shot of a corpse were cut
entirely.) Faintings in the audience were allegedly a common occurrence; critic C.A.
Lejeune abruptly resigned her post at The Observer after 32 years of service for having
to sit through it. It’s still the quintessential slasher flick. ST
Controversy: 10
A Serbian Film (2010)
Synopsis: A retired porn star with dwindling finances agrees to return to the screen in
an “art film.” Sounds like easy money, right until the shoot opens with jackbooted thugs
leading him to an orphanage set.
Controversy: Rape, snuff, incest, pedophilia, necrophilia, “newborn porn” (do not
ask): this genuinely vile movie, regrettably, has it all. Censor boards around the world
have done everything they can to prevent people from seeing it. Two different cuts were
released in the U.S. – one NC-17, one five minutes longer and unrated – but Netflix
dropped the DVD from its rolls without explanation, and countries like Spain, Norway,
Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand have banned it entirely. Those who do sit through it
will be comforted to learn that the filmmakers see it as a blanket metaphor for the
atrocities of the Balkan War. Right. ST
Rating: 9
Silent Night, Deadly Night (1984)
Synopsis: As a five-year-old, Billy Chapman witnesses a man dressed as Santa Claus
murder his parents. Three years later, he has another traumatic Santa-related
experience at an orphanage. Naturally, he grows up to become a serial murderer in a
Santa suit.
Controversy: It was the Yuletide hook of this Eighties slasher flick that presented
some promotional hiccups, with the parents of America were concerned about their kids
seeing posters and TV commercials depicting Jolly Old St. Nicholas as a mass murderer.
Critic Gene Siskel called out the names of the distributor, the writer, the director, and
the producer for public shaming; Leonard Maltin, in his zero-star TV review, famously
quipped, “What’s next? The Easter Bunny as child molester?” Protests greeted the film
in the Midwest. In Britain, a conference of Catholic authorities put the movie at the
top of its “morally offensive” list, and it was pulled from theaters both here and
abroad. ST
Rating: 8

Snuff (1976)
Synopsis: A group of murderous, Manson Family-esque hippies, led by a charismatic
cult leader, wanders the countryside in search of thrills. After following the gang as they
terrorizing numerous folks and nubile females, the film then switches gears and
becomes a “documentary” of a young women being “killed” by the film’s crew – an
alleged actual snuff film.
Controversy: Exploitation-cinema legends Roberta and Michael Findlay had gone
down to Argentina to film a quick-and-dirty movie that would cash in on the Helter
Skelter craze, titled Slaughter. The result was essentially deemed unreleasable – then
distributor Allen Shackleton had the “bright” idea of filming a fake killing, tacking it on
the end of the movie and starting rumors that this was the real deal. Doubling down on
the urban-legend ballyhoo and renaming the result Snuff (“Shot in South
America, where life is cheap!”), he then hired fake protestors to picket in front of
theaters and faux-FBI agents to question patrons. Soon, genuine Women’s Rights
Groups joined in to denounce the film as misogynistic, real-life cops begin investigating
the authenticity of the “murder on camera” claims and New York’s district
attorney considered prosecuting a theater owner who was showing
it. Variety eventually exposed it as a hoax. DF
Rating: 6

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)


Synopsis: Five travelers in search of gas come across a seemingly abandoned house in
the rural outskirts of the Lone Star State. What they find is a family of homicidal
maniacs – and one of the most iconic characters in all of horror history.
Controversy: For its veritable smorgasbord of horrors, Hooper’s film was banned in
Brazil, Chile, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, and what
was then West Germany. He had somewhat better luck in the states, though disgusted
walkouts were reported in San Francisco, and just north in Ottawa, local police forced
two theaters to stop running the film or face morality charges. The film was not merely
banned in Britain; the Board of Film Censors blackballed it so hard that even including
the words “chainsaw” in a movie title was strictly verboten. Despite ruffling feathers
around the globe, Hooper was able to annually re-release prints of his film for eight
years after it premiered, becoming a word-of-mouth sensation in the process. CB
Rating: 8
Watch the greatest horror movies of the 21st century.
In This Article: Horror, Zombies
Want more Rolling Stone? Sign up for our newsletter.

SHOWCOMMENTS17

Trending
1.
Banned and Brutal: 14 Beyond-Controversial Horror Movies

2.
D.B. Cooper: Investigators Claim They’ve Discovered Skyjacker’s Identity

3.
If Michael Cohen Flips, Trump Officially Loses Control of the Narrative

4.
Ex-Republican Operative Steve Schmidt: ‘The Party of Trump Must Be Obliterated. Annihilated.
Destroyed’

5.
The Trouble With Johnny Depp
EDITORS' PICKS

Cardi B and Offset: A Hip-Hop Love Story


POSTED IN:MUSIC FEATURES


The Trouble With Johnny Depp
POSTED IN:MOVIE FEATURES


The 100 Greatest Songs of the Century – So Far
POSTED IN:MUSIC LISTS
Newswire

Film Review: ‘The First Purge’

Posted on:Variety
Posted4 hours ago

Amber Tamblyn Says David Cross Was ‘Rightfully Accused of


Doing Something Racist’ and Couple Received ‘Death Threats’

Posted on:Indiewire
Posted3 hours ago

‘It: Chapter Two’, ‘The Nun’ & More Part Of New Line’s 2nd Annual
‘ScareDiego’ At Comic-Con

Posted on:Deadline
Posted4 hours ago

Hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our Solar System were born


from a few now-dead planets

Posted on:BGR
Posted4 hours ago

 Rolling Stone
 Music
 TV
 Movies
 Politics
 Culture
 RS Pro
 Advertise
 Contact
 Legal
 Privacy Policy
 Terms of Use
 Your Privacy Rights
 Ad Choices
 Privacy Preferences
 Connect With Us
 Facebook
 Twitter
 YouTube
 Get The Magazine
 SUBSCRIBE NOW
 GIVE A GIFT
Newsletter Signup
SUBMIT
Have a Tip?
We want to hear from you! Send us a tip using our anonymous form.
SEND US A TIP

© Copyright 2018 Rolling Stone, LLC, a subsidiary of Penske Business Media, LLC.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP
OUR BRANDS
Close comments

Add a comment

o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

o
o
o
o
o
o
o

o
o
o
o
o
o

o
o
o
o
o

o
o
o
o
o

o
o







ad