Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic
Kasus*kontrol 38 1 2 1,50 ,082 ,507
Pencahayaan 38 1 2 1,45 ,082 ,504
Kelembaban 38 1 2 1,39 ,080 ,495
Luas Ventilasi 38 1 2 1,92 ,044 ,273
Kepadatan Penduduk 38 2 2 2,00 ,000 ,000
Jenis Lantai 38 2 2 2,00 ,000 ,000
Jenis Dinding 38 1 2 1,92 ,044 ,273
Valid N (listwise) 38
Descriptive Statistics
Skewness Kurtosis
Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error
Kasus*kontrol ,000 ,383 -2,114 ,750
Pencahayaan ,221 ,383 -2,063 ,750
Kelembaban ,449 ,383 -1,902 ,750
Luas Ventilasi -3,253 ,383 9,055 ,750
Kepadatan Penduduk . . . .
Jenis Lantai . . . .
Jenis Dinding -3,253 ,383 9,055 ,750
Valid N (listwise)
Frequencies
Frequency Table
Kasus*kontrol
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 19 50,0 50,0 50,0
2 19 50,0 50,0 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0
pencahayaan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid < 60 lux 21 55,3 55,3 55,3
>= 60 lux 17 44,7 44,7 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0
Kelembaban
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid < 40 dan l> 70 23 60,5 60,5 60,5
40 - 70 15 39,5 39,5 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0
Luas Ventilasi
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid < 10m2 3 7,9 7,9 7,9
> 10m2 35 92,1 92,1 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0
Kepadatan Penduduk
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid >= 10m2 38 100,0 100,0 100,0
Jenis Lantai
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid standart 38 100,0 100,0 100,0
Jenis Dinding
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid tidak standart 3 7,9 7,9 7,9
standart 35 92,1 92,1 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
pencahayaan * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Kelembaban * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Luas Ventilasi * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Kepadatan Penduduk * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Jenis Lantai * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Jenis Dinding * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
pencahayaan * Kasus*kontrol
Crosstab
Kasus*kontrol
1 2 Total
pencahayaan < 60 lux Count 15 6 21
Expected Count 10,5 10,5 21,0
% within pencahayaan 71,4% 28,6% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 78,9% 31,6% 55,3%
Residual 4,5 -4,5
Std. Residual 1,4 -1,4
>= 60 lux Count 4 13 17
Expected Count 8,5 8,5 17,0
% within pencahayaan 23,5% 76,5% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 21,1% 68,4% 44,7%
Residual -4,5 4,5
Std. Residual -1,5 1,5
Total Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within pencahayaan 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 8,622 1 ,003
b
Continuity Correction 6,812 1 ,009
Likelihood Ratio 9,002 1 ,003
Fisher's Exact Test ,008 ,004
Linear-by-Linear Association 8,395 1 ,004
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
a b
Value Error Approx. T
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,430
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,476 ,142 3,250
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,476 ,142 3,250
N of Valid Cases 38
Symmetric Measures
Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,003
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,003
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,003
N of Valid Cases
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for pencahayaan
8,125 1,874 35,233
(< 60 lux / >= 60 lux)
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 1 3,036 1,236 7,457
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 2 ,374 ,181 ,772
N of Valid Cases 38
Kelembaban * Kasus*kontrol
Crosstab
Kasus*kontrol
1 2 Total
Kelembaban < 40 dan l> 70 Count 13 10 23
Expected Count 11,5 11,5 23,0
% within Kelembaban 56,5% 43,5% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 68,4% 52,6% 60,5%
Residual 1,5 -1,5
Std. Residual ,4 -,4
40 - 70 Count 6 9 15
Expected Count 7,5 7,5 15,0
% within Kelembaban 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 31,6% 47,4% 39,5%
Residual -1,5 1,5
Std. Residual -,5 ,5
Total Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within Kelembaban 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square ,991 1 ,319
b
Continuity Correction ,441 1 ,507
Likelihood Ratio ,996 1 ,318
Fisher's Exact Test ,508 ,254
Linear-by-Linear Association ,965 1 ,326
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
a b
Value Error Approx. T
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,159
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,162 ,160 ,982
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,162 ,160 ,982
N of Valid Cases 38
Symmetric Measures
Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,319
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,333
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,333
N of Valid Cases
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kelembaban
1,950 ,520 7,312
(< 40 dan l> 70 / 40 - 70)
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 1 1,413 ,691 2,891
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 2 ,725 ,389 1,351
N of Valid Cases 38
Luas Ventilasi * Kasus*kontrol
Crosstab
Kasus*kontrol
1 2 Total
Luas Ventilasi < 10m2 Count 0 3 3
Expected Count 1,5 1,5 3,0
% within Luas Ventilasi 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 0,0% 15,8% 7,9%
Residual -1,5 1,5
Std. Residual -1,2 1,2
> 10m2 Count 19 16 35
Expected Count 17,5 17,5 35,0
% within Luas Ventilasi 54,3% 45,7% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 84,2% 92,1%
Residual 1,5 -1,5
Std. Residual ,4 -,4
Total Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within Luas Ventilasi 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3,257 1 ,071
b
Continuity Correction 1,448 1 ,229
Likelihood Ratio 4,416 1 ,036
Fisher's Exact Test ,230 ,115
Linear-by-Linear Association 3,171 1 ,075
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
a b
Value Error Approx. T
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,281
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,293 ,087 -1,837
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,293 ,087 -1,837
N of Valid Cases 38
7
Symmetric Measures
Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,071
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,074
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,074
N of Valid Cases
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 2 2,188 1,525 3,139
N of Valid Cases 38
Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .
N of Valid Cases 38
Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Kepadatan Penduduk (>= 10m2 / .) .
Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .
N of Valid Cases 38
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .a
N of Valid Cases 38
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3,257 1 ,071
b
Continuity Correction 1,448 1 ,229
Likelihood Ratio 4,416 1 ,036
Fisher's Exact Test ,230 ,115
Linear-by-Linear Association 3,171 1 ,075
N of Valid Cases 38
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
a b
Value Error Approx. T
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,281
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,293 ,087 1,837
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,293 ,087 1,837
N of Valid Cases 38
Symmetric Measures
Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,071
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,074
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,074
N of Valid Cases
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 1 2,188 1,525 3,139
N of Valid Cases 38
Dokumentasi