Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 14

LAMPIRAN

Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Statistic Statistic Statistic Statistic Std. Error Statistic
Kasus*kontrol 38 1 2 1,50 ,082 ,507
Pencahayaan 38 1 2 1,45 ,082 ,504
Kelembaban 38 1 2 1,39 ,080 ,495
Luas Ventilasi 38 1 2 1,92 ,044 ,273
Kepadatan Penduduk 38 2 2 2,00 ,000 ,000
Jenis Lantai 38 2 2 2,00 ,000 ,000
Jenis Dinding 38 1 2 1,92 ,044 ,273
Valid N (listwise) 38

Descriptive Statistics
Skewness Kurtosis
Statistic Std. Error Statistic Std. Error
Kasus*kontrol ,000 ,383 -2,114 ,750
Pencahayaan ,221 ,383 -2,063 ,750
Kelembaban ,449 ,383 -1,902 ,750
Luas Ventilasi -3,253 ,383 9,055 ,750
Kepadatan Penduduk . . . .
Jenis Lantai . . . .
Jenis Dinding -3,253 ,383 9,055 ,750
Valid N (listwise)

Frequencies

Kasus*kontrol pencahayaan Kelembaban Luas Ventilasi


N Valid 38 38 38 38
Missing 0 0 0 0
Mean 1,50 1,45 1,39 1,92
Std. Error of Mean ,082 ,082 ,080 ,044
Median 1,50 1,00 1,00 2,00
a
Mode 1 1 1 2
Std. Deviation ,507 ,504 ,495 ,273
Skewness ,000 ,221 ,449 -3,253
Std. Error of Skewness ,383 ,383 ,383 ,383
Kurtosis -2,114 -2,063 -1,902 9,055
Std. Error of Kurtosis ,750 ,750 ,750 ,750
Minimum 1 1 1 1
Maximum 2 2 2 2
Percentiles 25 1,00 1,00 1,00 2,00
50 1,50 1,00 1,00 2,00
75 2,00 2,00 2,00 2,00
Statistics
Kepadatan Penduduk Jenis Lantai Jenis Dinding
N Valid 38 38 38
Missing 0 0 0
Mean 2,00 2,00 1,92
Std. Error of Mean ,000 ,000 ,044
Median 2,00 2,00 2,00
Mode 2 2 2
Std. Deviation ,000 ,000 ,273
Skewness -3,253
Std. Error of Skewness ,383 ,383 ,383
Kurtosis 9,055
Std. Error of Kurtosis ,750 ,750 ,750
Minimum 2 2 1
Maximum 2 2 2
Percentiles 25 2,00 2,00 2,00
50 2,00 2,00 2,00
75 2,00 2,00 2,00

a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown

Frequency Table
Kasus*kontrol
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 19 50,0 50,0 50,0
2 19 50,0 50,0 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0

pencahayaan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid < 60 lux 21 55,3 55,3 55,3
>= 60 lux 17 44,7 44,7 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0
Kelembaban
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid < 40 dan l> 70 23 60,5 60,5 60,5
40 - 70 15 39,5 39,5 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0
Luas Ventilasi
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid < 10m2 3 7,9 7,9 7,9
> 10m2 35 92,1 92,1 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0
Kepadatan Penduduk
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid >= 10m2 38 100,0 100,0 100,0

Jenis Lantai
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid standart 38 100,0 100,0 100,0

Jenis Dinding
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid tidak standart 3 7,9 7,9 7,9
standart 35 92,1 92,1 100,0
Total 38 100,0 100,0

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
pencahayaan * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Kelembaban * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Luas Ventilasi * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Kepadatan Penduduk * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Jenis Lantai * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
Jenis Dinding * Kasus*kontrol 38 100,0% 0 0,0% 38 100,0%
pencahayaan * Kasus*kontrol
Crosstab
Kasus*kontrol
1 2 Total
pencahayaan < 60 lux Count 15 6 21
Expected Count 10,5 10,5 21,0
% within pencahayaan 71,4% 28,6% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 78,9% 31,6% 55,3%
Residual 4,5 -4,5
Std. Residual 1,4 -1,4
>= 60 lux Count 4 13 17
Expected Count 8,5 8,5 17,0
% within pencahayaan 23,5% 76,5% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 21,1% 68,4% 44,7%
Residual -4,5 4,5
Std. Residual -1,5 1,5
Total Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within pencahayaan 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 8,622 1 ,003
b
Continuity Correction 6,812 1 ,009
Likelihood Ratio 9,002 1 ,003
Fisher's Exact Test ,008 ,004
Linear-by-Linear Association 8,395 1 ,004
N of Valid Cases 38

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
a b
Value Error Approx. T
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,430
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,476 ,142 3,250
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,476 ,142 3,250
N of Valid Cases 38
Symmetric Measures
Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,003
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,003
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,003
N of Valid Cases

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for pencahayaan
8,125 1,874 35,233
(< 60 lux / >= 60 lux)
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 1 3,036 1,236 7,457
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 2 ,374 ,181 ,772
N of Valid Cases 38

Kelembaban * Kasus*kontrol
Crosstab
Kasus*kontrol
1 2 Total
Kelembaban < 40 dan l> 70 Count 13 10 23
Expected Count 11,5 11,5 23,0
% within Kelembaban 56,5% 43,5% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 68,4% 52,6% 60,5%
Residual 1,5 -1,5
Std. Residual ,4 -,4
40 - 70 Count 6 9 15
Expected Count 7,5 7,5 15,0
% within Kelembaban 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 31,6% 47,4% 39,5%
Residual -1,5 1,5
Std. Residual -,5 ,5
Total Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within Kelembaban 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square ,991 1 ,319
b
Continuity Correction ,441 1 ,507
Likelihood Ratio ,996 1 ,318
Fisher's Exact Test ,508 ,254
Linear-by-Linear Association ,965 1 ,326
N of Valid Cases 38

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
a b
Value Error Approx. T
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,159
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,162 ,160 ,982
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,162 ,160 ,982
N of Valid Cases 38

Symmetric Measures
Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,319
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,333
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,333
N of Valid Cases

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kelembaban
1,950 ,520 7,312
(< 40 dan l> 70 / 40 - 70)
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 1 1,413 ,691 2,891
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 2 ,725 ,389 1,351
N of Valid Cases 38
Luas Ventilasi * Kasus*kontrol
Crosstab
Kasus*kontrol
1 2 Total
Luas Ventilasi < 10m2 Count 0 3 3
Expected Count 1,5 1,5 3,0
% within Luas Ventilasi 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 0,0% 15,8% 7,9%
Residual -1,5 1,5
Std. Residual -1,2 1,2
> 10m2 Count 19 16 35
Expected Count 17,5 17,5 35,0
% within Luas Ventilasi 54,3% 45,7% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 84,2% 92,1%
Residual 1,5 -1,5
Std. Residual ,4 -,4
Total Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within Luas Ventilasi 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3,257 1 ,071
b
Continuity Correction 1,448 1 ,229
Likelihood Ratio 4,416 1 ,036
Fisher's Exact Test ,230 ,115
Linear-by-Linear Association 3,171 1 ,075
N of Valid Cases 38

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
a b
Value Error Approx. T
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,281
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,293 ,087 -1,837
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,293 ,087 -1,837
N of Valid Cases 38

7
Symmetric Measures
Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,071
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,074
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,074
N of Valid Cases

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 2 2,188 1,525 3,139
N of Valid Cases 38

Kepadatan Penduduk * Kasus*kontrol


Crosstab
Kasus*kontrol
1 2 Total
Kepadatan Penduduk >= 10m2 Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within Kepadatan
50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Penduduk
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Residual ,0 ,0
Std. Residual ,0 ,0
Total Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within Kepadatan
50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Penduduk
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .
N of Valid Cases 38

a. No statistics are computed because Kepadatan Penduduk is a constant.


Symmetric Measures
Value
a
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .
N of Valid Cases 38

a. No statistics are computed because Kepadatan Penduduk is a constant.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Kepadatan Penduduk (>= 10m2 / .) .

a. No statistics are computed because Kepadatan Penduduk is a constant.

Jenis Lantai * Kasus*kontrol


Crosstab
Kasus*kontrol
1 2 Total
Jenis Lantai standart Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within Jenis Lantai 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Residual ,0 ,0
Std. Residual ,0 ,0
Total Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within Jenis Lantai 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .
N of Valid Cases 38

a. No statistics are computed because Jenis Lantai is a constant.

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .a
N of Valid Cases 38

a. No statistics are computed because Jenis Lantai is a constant.


Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio for Jenis Lantai
a
(standart / .) .

a. No statistics are computed because Jenis Lantai is a constant.

Jenis Dinding * Kasus*kontrol


Crosstab
Kasus*kontrol
1 2 Total
Jenis Dinding tidak standart Count 3 0 3
Expected Count 1,5 1,5 3,0
% within Jenis Dinding 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 15,8% 0,0% 7,9%
Residual 1,5 -1,5
Std. Residual 1,2 -1,2
standart Count 16 19 35
Expected Count 17,5 17,5 35,0
% within Jenis Dinding 45,7% 54,3% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 84,2% 100,0% 92,1%
Residual -1,5 1,5
Std. Residual -,4 ,4
Total Count 19 19 38
Expected Count 19,0 19,0 38,0
% within Jenis Dinding 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within Kasus*kontrol 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3,257 1 ,071
b
Continuity Correction 1,448 1 ,229
Likelihood Ratio 4,416 1 ,036
Fisher's Exact Test ,230 ,115
Linear-by-Linear Association 3,171 1 ,075
N of Valid Cases 38

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
a b
Value Error Approx. T
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,281
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,293 ,087 1,837
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,293 ,087 1,837
N of Valid Cases 38

Symmetric Measures
Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,071
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,074
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,074
N of Valid Cases

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
For cohort Kasus*kontrol = 1 2,188 1,525 3,139
N of Valid Cases 38
Dokumentasi

Kondisi rumah pada kelompok kasus

Kondisi rumah pada kelompok kontrol


Penggunaan Genting Kaca di rumah kontrol
Halaman depan ruangan TB Paru Puskesmas Wani

Ruang pencatatan pasien TB Paru Puskesmas Wani

Вам также может понравиться