Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
White Paper On Spectrum
White Paper On Spectrum
Spectrum
February 2013
Contents
Introduction����������������������������������������������������������������������� 1
Executive summary������������������������������������������������������������� 2
List of abbreviations����������������������������������������������������������� 3
1. Background�������������������������������������������������������������������� 5
1.1 Economic benefits of IMT����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5
1.2 Importance of coordinating framework��������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5
2.3.2 Operators������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 9
2.4 Conclusion�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11
3. Spectrum map�������������������������������������������������������������� 12
3.1 Existing spectrum������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12
3.2 Future outlook������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������14
3.2.1 Analysis on additional frequency bands��������������������������������������������������������������� 14
6. Annex��������������������������������������������������������������������������� 36
6.1 Coordinating framework���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 36
7. References�������������������������������������������������������������������� 40
Introduction
This Whitepaper contains the considerations of Huawei on the spectrum for mobile
communication. Capacity demands on mobile wireless networks are increasing at an
explosive rate, which has led to the demand for spectrum increasing rapidly as well. A
prediction of the necessary spectrum in 2020 based on these requirements, as well as
the suggested spectrum for WRC-15, is provided in the first part of this paper.
In the following part, the existing operating bands being studied by 3GPP, and
spectrum for IMT that could possibly be allocated in the future, are summarized
and analyzed to give a full picture of the spectrum available, or that could be made
available, for the mobile wireless industry. Specific spectrum suggested for WRC-
15 includes parts of 470-694 MHz, 694-790 MHz, parts of L band, the band around
2GHz, parts of 3600-4200MHz and 4400-4990MHz.
Besides acquiring new spectrum for IMT, the efficient use of existing spectrum
is another way to promote the development of the wireless industry. Small cell
deployments and the allocation of appropriate high-frequency spectrum for hotspot
applications, supplementary downlink spectrum, carrier aggregation and LTE roaming
bands as methods to utilize spectrum better are analysed in Section 3.
The final subject we emphasize in the Whitepaper is TDD spectrum. Flexible utilization
of fragmented spectrum is one advantage of using TDD. Synchronization among
different operators is a key issue for TDD systems that is also analysed in the paper.
1
Executive Summary
Possible candidate band for IMT under WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.1
Incumbent
Description Spectrum WRC-15 target
user
Parts of 500-600MHz
TV WRC-15 regional identification for IMT usage
[470-around
PMSE Need cooperation with Broadcasting industry
Low candidate 694MHz]
bands (<1GHz)
700MHz TV WRC-15 Regional IMT identification: Region 1 (AI
[694-790MHz] PMSE 1.2)
Parts of 4.4-4.99 GHz Sat. WRC-15 global identification for IMT usage
2
List of abbreviations
3
Abbreviations Full spelling
MCS Mobile Communication Service
MFCN Mobile/Fixed Communications Networks
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of
MIIT
China
MSS Mobile-Satellite Service
PCS Personal Communications Service
PMSE Programme Making and Special Events
RCC Regional Commonwealth in the field of Communications
RSGB Radio Society of Great Britain
SDL Supplemental DownLink
TDD Time Division Duplexing
UMTS Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
WCS Wireless Communications Service
WLAN Wireless Local Area Networks
WRC World Radiocommunication Conference
WP5D Working Party 5D
4
1 Background
This economic success is built on IMT-2000, but future economic welfare will
depend upon the growth of new technologies, such as IMT-Advanced and so on.
Any regulatory changes or uncertainty that jeopardizes those needs should be
considered very carefully. As the European Commission Communication on radio
spectrum policy2 notes, “The EU’s timely provision of harmonized frequencies
“triggered” the development of new pan-European digital cellular system (GSM)”.
1
From "Optimising spectrum for future mobile service needs"(GSMA, 2006) and "Studies on frequency-related matters on International Mobile Telecommunications and other terrestrial mobile
broadband applications" (RESOLUTION 233-WRC-12, 2012)
2
Brussels, 6.2005 COM(2005) 411 final
5
There is a fairly long lead time between the identification of frequency bands by
world radiocommunication conferences and the deployment of systems in those
bands, and timely availability of spectrum is therefore important to support the
development of IMT systems. The coordinating framework will continue to assure
the timely availability of spectrum for IMT in the world.
Estimated spectrum
requirement by year in MHz Current available spectrum by region in MHz
1300 1172
840
630
590
510
478
370 360
20
15
10
A)
A)
PT
U
T
ifie
M
AP
AT
L(N
L(L
CE
20
20
20
AS
nt
TE
TE
ide
CI
CI
Figure 1 Comparison of the amount of the estimated required, global identified and regional
available spectrum (source: ITU-R M.2078 & UMTS Jan. 2012)
6
Because of difficulties experienced by each nation in allocating spectrum, only
around half of the already identified spectrum is available. As user demand
outpaces advances in technology and deployment, the operators will have to
control the traffic increase by their pricing plans.
Figure 2 from the CJK WhitePaper6 summarized the major driving forces for the
traffic explosion.
3
http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/index.asp?category=study-groups&rlink=rwp5d&lang=en
4
“Draft Liaison statement to Joint Task Group 4 5-6-7 - Initial information on spectrum requirements studies for WRC-15 Agenda item 1.1”, http://www.itu.int/md/R12-JTG4567-C-0047/en
5
ITU-R M.2243(00/2011), http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-M.2243-2011-PDF-E.pdf
6
“CJK WhitePaper on Forecast of mobile broadband development in the Asia-Pacific Region”, http://www.tta.or.kr/English/new/external_relations/meetingDocumentView.
jsp?boardIdx=IMT&num=109
7
The explosively increasing mobile traffic is not distributed evenly over the whole
network and more than 80% of the traffic comes from hotspots or indoor areas,
based on the analysis from Informa Telecoms & Media7. It is also forecasted that
mobile video will be the dominant service in the near future and it is shown that
about 70% of mobile services will be video in 2016 based on the prediction of
mobile traffic share from Cisco8.
To meet the explosive traffic demands and higher performance expectation, the
heterogeneous network or HetNet is becoming the network topology of the
future, as shown in Figure 3. The service of the small cells is compatible with a
good fixed network (fiber …). If the data speed of the fixed network is too slow,
or if there is not fixed network, the traffic will be captured by large cells. Public
fixed networks provide, more and more, the TV services (Broadcast TV, TV on
demand…). The future evolutions of the mobile network will be probably similar,
and, the impact of this evolution will be to create the traffic asymmetry (more
downlink traffic than the uplink traffic).
One way to map the spectrum frequency to the deployment scenario is as below:
111 Wideband for the capacity. It is easier to find wideband in high spectrum
(above 1GHz or 3GHz).
222 The propagation and the coverage is better at low frequency (below 3GHz
and especially below 1GHz)
333 Below 400MHz, there are some technical difficulties to design the mobile
terminal
As mobile traffic increases and mobile connection speeds increase for anything,
anytime from anywhere, more spectrum in the low and low-to-mid bands is
needed to provide the coverage and capacity. The mid-to-high band is much more
important than ever before, to provide high performance, and also to provide
capacity boosting for the urban environment, especially hotspot and indoor areas.
7
Mobile broadband access at home: Informa Telecoms & Media
8
Cisco, Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2011-2016, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_
paper_c11-520862.html
8
2.3 Spectrum prediction and gap
2.3.1 Administrators
All administrators are facing the prospect of a spectrum shortage, some examples
are shown in Table 1.
Baseline Additional
Information Traffic increase
Administrator bandwidth for Spectrum
Source forecast
IMT Requirement
EuropeanUnion
Radio Spectrum
Europe Y2015:1200MHz
Policy Programme
(RSPP)
Y2015:300-
Global Mobile
Y2014 allocated: 500MHz
Canada Broadband
553MHz Y2022:400-
Forum 2012
600MHz
ACMA paper
Towards 2020 –
30 times increase Y2012 allocated
Future spectrum Y2015: 150MHz
Australia in traffic from 2007 and planned:
requirements Y2020: 300MHz
to 2014 840MHz
for mobile
broadband
As we can see, the amount of global identified spectrum is twice the amount
of regionally available spectrum, because each nation has its own limitations
on spectrum arrangements and the difficulty of establishing global harmonized
spectrum.
2.3.2 Operators
From the business perspective, there is never sufficient spectrum, and operators
will have to ease the traffic increase by pricing. In the case of AT&T, iPhone users
were to be provided unlimited traffic contracts, but the traffic explosion quickly
congested the network and AT&T had to gradually move unlimited data plans to
9
tiered mobile data packages to ease the traffic increase and to keep the network
balanced. In this sense, we could say that even facing today’s traffic explosion,
the spectrum is not enough, let alone for the year 2020.
AT&T, for example, has stated9 that growth rate and data demand outpaces
the capabilities of these advanced radio interface technologies and network
topographies. Future new spectrum allocation to IMT is required as user demand
outpaces the technology and deployment advances. What AT&T has faced is not
unique among operators in the United States or elsewhere in the world.
The licensed spectrums the Japan’s operators hold are shown in Table 2.
Considering the low band and low-to-mid band, it seems the main operators hold
sufficient amount of resource, although the amount of efficient spectrum held
is far less than the total amount held by operators as shown in Table3. Japan’s
3.5G work is ongoing, which is supposed to provide large capacity and high
performance. Wi-Fi has been used for offloading traffic to alleviate the operators’
pressure on network capacity; while IMT small cell technology in higher band is
targeted to carry and control the traffic on licensed spectrum when the spectrum
becomes available, which DOCOMO is also actively research and promoting.
30MHz 40MHz
DoCoMo 20MHz 30MHz - [Partially [Only in some 40MHz - 160MHz
limited] areas]
UQ - - - - 30MHz 30MHz
Wireless
City - - - - - - 30MHz 30MHz
Planning
31.2MHz
[Partially
WILLCOM - - - - - share with - 31.2MHz
codeless
phone]
9
“Addressing spectrum efficiency, information on current and planned use, and technical and operational characteristics in frequency bands for IMT under WRC-15 Agenda item 1.1”, AT&T,
http://www.itu.int/md/R12-WP5D-C-0179/en
10
“Frequency Management Policy on Mobile Communications in Japan”, Japan, http://www.apt.int/sites/default/files/2012/09/AWG-13-INP-136_Japan_MIC_presentation_in_AWG_Workshop.pdf
10
Table 3 bands from global harmonization perspective held by Japanese operators
UQ 30MHz 30MHz
2.4 Conclusion
As is being discussed in ITU-R WP5D, more than 500MHz of additional spectrum
is needed for the year 2020, distributed in three band ranges – low band (<1GHz),
mid-to-high band (1-3GHz) and high band (3-6GHz), to support the explosive
traffic increase and higher performance expectation.
11
3 Spectrum map
The following map shows the main IMT bands allocated in each ITU region.
FDD FDD
•• Band 1 (2100M) •• Band 2 (1900M)
•• Band 3 (1800M) •• Band 4 (AWS)
•• Band 7 (2.6G) •• Band 5 (850M)
•• Band 8 (900M) •• Band 10
•• Band 20 (DD800) •• Band 12 (700M L)
•• Band 22 (3.5G) •• Band 13 (700M U)
•• Band 14 (700M)
TDD •• Band 17 (700M)
•• Band 33 •• Band 23 (MSS)
•• Band 38 (2.6G) •• Band 24 (L-band)
•• Band 42 (3.5G) •• Band 25 (E1900)
•• Band 43 (3.6G) •• Band 26 (E850 U)
•• Band 27 (E850 L)
Region 3 Region 3(Japan Specific) •• Band 28 (APT700)
•• Band 29 (DL 700)
FDD TDD FDD
•• Band 1 (2100M) •• Band 34/a •• Band 1 (2100M) •• Band 18 (850M) TDD
•• Band 3 (1800M) •• Band 39/f •• Band 6 (850M) •• Band 19 (850M) •• Band 41 (2.6G)
•• Band 5 (850M) •• Band 40 (3.5G) •• Band 9 (1800M) •• Band 21 (1.5G)
•• Band 8 (900M) •• Band 28 (3.6G) •• Band 11
•• Band 28 (APT700) •• Band 44 (APT700)
12
3GPP already defined the band number for different regional allocation.
13
3.2 Future outlook
The International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R)
is responsible for coordinating the international use of the radio spectrum and
holds World Radiocommunication Conferences (WRC) every three to four years
to review and revise the Radio Regulations, the international treaty governing the
use of radio-frequency spectrum, geostationary-satellite and non-geostationary-
satellite orbits. The activities related to spectrum for IMT at WRC are as follows.
The agenda items of WRC-15 dealing with spectrum matters for IMT are:
Figure 7 Agenda items of WRC-15 dealing with spectrum matters for IMT
14
Firstly, where cost considerations require the installation of fewer base stations,
not only in rural and/or sparsely populated areas but also in urban and/or
suburban areas, bands with good coverage to facilitate such deployment are
generally suitable for implementing mobile systems, including IMT. Especially
in many developing countries and countries with large areas of low population
density, there is a need for cost-effective implementation of IMT. In fact, lower
frequency bands(< 1 GHz) are most suitable for providing coverage with low cost
based on the propagation characteristics.
Secondly, Report ITU-R M.2074 identifies the preferred frequency ranges for
the future development of IMT-2000 and IMT-Advanced, including both the
“new mobile access” and “new nomadic/local area wireless access” as they are
presented in Recommendation ITU-R M.1645. It suggests that new spectrum that
can fulfill the full range of requirements of the ITU for IMT-Advanced, should be
found below 6 GHz for a number of technical reasons, such as allowing sufficient
mobility, an acceptable trade-off between cost and full area coverage, availability
of the required RF hardware components and mobile terminal complexity and
power consumption. Concretely, the frequency bands from 1GHz to 6GHz,
including Low-to-mid bands (1-3GHz) and Mid-to-high bands (3-6GHz), are most
suitable to provide capacity and performance.
Thirdly, further studies are needed to resolve the availability issues for IMT in
high bands (>6GHz) because of the different characteristics of spectrum above
and below 6GHz. These studies should focus on technical, propagation and
implementation aspects of high bands (>6GHz) for IMT. Therefore, it would be
better that the frequency bands above 6GHz are considered at WRC-19 rather
than WRC-15).
Fourthly, as higher and higher bitrates will be demanded for the future
development of IMT systems, larger channel bandwidths (continuous or
composite by carrier aggregation) will be needed. Report ITU-R M.2074 includes
detailed analysis of some of the technical issues surrounding the spectrum
range preferences for the future development of IMT-2000 and IMT-Advanced.
The Report states that a new radio access system, covering the full range of
capabilities of IMT-Advanced is envisaged to support a wide range of data rates
according to economic and service demands in multi-user environments. There
will be target peak data rates of up to approximately 100 Mbit/s for high mobility
and up to approximately 1 Gbit/s for low mobility. It may be possible to reach
considerably higher overall spectrum efficiency than today's technologies, but
even under the most optimistic assumptions discussed today and in favorable
radio reception conditions, the 1 Gbit/s transmission rate may require bandwidth
in the order of 100 MHz or more.
15
3.2.2 Views on additional frequency bands
We support the identification of additional frequency bands for IMT to facilitate
the development of terrestrial mobile broadband applications at WRC-15. At
WRC-15, we support making at least 500 MHz of spectrum newly available for
IMT by 2020, with up to 1GHz being provided if possible.
Based on the above analysis, it is our view that it is not only the amount of
spectrum that is important but also the aspects affecting frequency range
preferences. These are primarily based on the requirements and target
characteristics for the envisioned system of IMT These will have to be considered
for frequency ranges to study in relation to WRC-15 Agenda items 1.1 and 1.2.
With respect to the preferred frequency ranges for the future development of
IMT-2000 and IMT-Advanced, we propose that the new spectrum for IMT should
be identified mainly below 6 GHz at WRC-15 due to technical reasons identified
in Report ITU-R M.2074.
•• Low bands (< 1GHz) – mainly used for macro network to provide coverage
•• Low-to-mid bands (1-3GHz) – mainly used for macro and micro network to
provide coverage/capacity
•• Mid-to-high bands (3-6GHz) – mainly use for micro/pico/hotspots network and
Wireless Sensor Networks to provide high capacity and performance.
Larger bandwidths for the future development of IMT will be needed, such as
100 MHz or more (preferred continuous bands).
16
Finally our band-by-band analysis and position of some possible candidate bands
for IMT are as follows.
Table 5 Possible candidate band for IMT under WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.1
Incumbent
Description Spectrum WRC-15 target
user
Parts of 500-600MHz
TV WRC-15 regional identification for IMT usage
[470-around
PMSE Need cooperation with Broadcasting industry
Low candidate 694MHz]
bands (<1GHz)
700MHz TV WRC-15 Regional IMT identification: Region 1 (AI
[694-790MHz] PMSE 1.2)
Parts of 4.4-4.99 GHz Sat. WRC-15 global identification for IMT usage
17
follow the decisions that have been previously taken in such bands, where
exclusive individual usage rights are being assigned. Global harmonization should
be addressed from the very beginning. Synergies with the adjacent bands shall
be exploited: base station and user device RF components (e.g. amplifiers and
antennas may be reused to a large extent). .
CONCLUSIONS
It’s proposed to identify 470-694/698MHz or part of this band for IMT at WRC-15
to provide cellular coverage network.
In Region 2, the band is identified for IMT, spectrum has been assigned as FDD as
shown in the diagram below.
MHz 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810
A4 MS Tx un-paired BS Tx BS Tx MS Tx
698 716 728 746 763 776 793
M.1036-03-A4
11
Figure 8 P694-790 MHz frequency arrangement of Region 2
11
From ITU-R M.1036-4
18
In region 3, at the meeting of the APT Wireless Forum (AWF-9) at Sep.,2010,
agreement was reached on two harmonized frequency arrangements for IMT in
698-806MHz frequency band. It was decided that spectrum should be allocated
as follows:
For FDD:
•• a lower guard-band of 5 MHz should be allocated between 698-703 MHz;
•• an upper guard-band of 3 MHz should be allocated between 803-806 MHz.
For TDD:
•• Whole Bands from 698MHz to 806MHz for TDD
The band plan is not compatible with FDD band Plan. Actually, South America is
gradually following the APT band plan (FDD).
45 MHz 45 MHz
DTTV PPDR/LMR
DTTV PPDR/LMR
694 6 9 8 806
MHz MHz MHz
CONCLUSIONS
Band 700MHz brings a significant amount of “high quality” spectrum for mobile
broadband. Commercial networks have already been launched in US, in Region
3 the band had been identified as IMT utilization, in Region 1 the issue will be
decided at WRC-15.
12
From ITU-R M.1036-4
19
[3] L-band (1350-1525 MHz)
1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 [MHz]
Softbank Softbank
3G 3G
Stage 1 RA MCA MCA MCA MCA MSS
Softbank Softbank
1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 [MHz]
1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1480 1490 1500 1510 1520 1530 [MHz]
Stage 3 RA 3G MCA
3G MCA MSS
13
L-Band terminology refers to the 1 to 2 GHz frequency range, as defined by the Radio Society of Great Britain (RSGB),
14
From Japanese MIC
20
Table 6 1427-1525 & 1525-1660 MHz defined in 3GPP15
1447.9 1495.9
21 – 1462.9 MHz – 1510.9 MHz FDD
MHz MHz
1626.5
24 – 1660.5 MHz 1525 MHz – 1559 MHz FDD
MHz
Although the bands (1350-1525 MHz) are considered as key candidate band for
IMT, many efforts are necessary because the band is also the important band for
other services and supplications, including GPS and DAB applications. That will be
the high priority item in WRC-15.
CONCLUSIONS
We propose the global harmonized allocation for IMT in parts of this band
at WRC-15. The future use for IMT in this band will contribute to the need of
coverage and capacity for the future development of IMT.
15
From 3GPP
21
At the same time, we have also taken note that TDD Bands 33/34 are still important
TDD band in some other countries who tend to leave the bands as they are.
1900MHz 1920MHz 1980MHz 2010 2025MHz 2090MHz 2110MHz 2170MHz 2200 2215MHz
CONCLUSIONS
We propose the global harmonized allocation for IMT terrestrial components in
the band 1980-2010 MHz and 2170-2200MHz at WRC-15.
Furthermore there may be two separate side-by-side ways to deal with existing
IMT TDD bands (3GPP TDD Band 33/34) in the world.
•• The first way is that the allocation of the bands 1900-1920(3GPP TDD Band
33) and 2090-2110MHz, 2010-2025(3GPP TDD Band 34) and 2200-2215
MHz as paired bands for IMT create new FDD bands in one Region or some
countries for effective utilization of the band because the bands have been
allocated for IMT TDD in those counties, but never used for a long time.
•• The second one is still to keep TDD Bands 33/34 as it is now in some other
countries because the bands have been allocated and used for IMT TDD in
those counties.
22
SPECTRUM DEVELOPMENT PATH
In EU, CEPT administrations already designated the frequency bands 3400-3800
MHz on a non-exclusive basis to mobile/fixed communications networks (MFCN),
without prejudice to the protection and continued operation of other existing
users in this band, according to the TDD band plan arrangement.
However the band is currently heavily used for the FSS service, in larger countries
especially where satellite communications offer a cost effective communication
mean. Thus, although the band is potentially global harmonized, it is difficult to
clear the band in order for IMT utilization in many countries in the next few years.
CONCLUSIONS
It’s proposed to identify 3600-3800MHz for IMT to provide cellular network with
capacity to fulfill increasing traffic requirement, especially for small coverage with denser
cellular. Regarding the bands 3800-4200MHz, the spectrum sharing between IMT and
FSS should be advocated with low power IMT network (E.g. LTE-Hi).
However they have an analogy with the situation on the band 3600-4200MHz.
The traditional utilizaion is FSS/ VSATs. The band is currently heavily used for the FSS
service, in larger countries especially where satellite communications offer a cost
23
effective communication mean. Thus, it is difficult to clear the band in order for IMT
utilization in many countries in the next few years.
CONCLUSIONS
It’s proposed to identify 4400-4500MHz and 4800-4990MHz for IMT to provide
cellular network with capacity to fulfill increasing traffic requirement, especially
for small coverage with denser cellular. Regarding the bands 4500-4800MHz, the
spectrum sharing between IMT and FSS should be advocated with low power IMT
network (E.g. LTE-Hi: LTE Hotspot & Indoor Enhancement).
Since WRC-92, there are many bands allocated to IMT. How to better use the
band is the point of the chapter.
3.5GHz is one of the most important bands of global spectrum for small cell.
■■ 3.5GHz
With current traffic requirement trend, operators are increasingly looking at
solutions from three aspects including band expansion, denser network, air-
interface efficiency. Thus, heterogeneous networks where the wide area coverage
layers are integrated with additional layers of “small cells” are necessary to provide
additional capacity, with wider spectrum bandwidth deployed and enhancing
spectrum efficiency. Huawei LTE-Hi (LTE Hotspot & Indoor Enhancement) solution
is being developed targeting three aspects:
24
To meet the capacity requirement in hotspot, to seek the wider spectrum for IMT
is needed. The 3400-3600 MHz band is ideal for providing such kind of focused
coverage with its large amount of contiguous spectrum available.
This band also helps in the interference management associated with denser
cellular because of its reduced coverage capability which helps. This band has
great potential to become a globally harmonized band with at least 50MHz
allocated.
3.5GHz has many band characteristics adapt to the dense ”small cells” for
offloading traffic.
•• High bandwidth: to fulfill the requirement of increasing capacity
•• High propagation loss: more fit for small coverage
•• Reduced coverage capability: to help in interference management associated
with denser cellular
LTE-Hi is the promising “small cell” technology being developed in R12. Its
working frequency includes 3.5GHz.
Among the developments are new technical and operational aspects of IMT
systems and arrangements, which may include other characterizations of the use
of spectrum, such as:
•• Asymmetric FDD uplink (traditionally in lower bands) and downlink blocks (with one
or more separate downlinks which could also be in different bands).
•• FDD or TDD uplink and downlink for very high peak data rates in confined and
densely populated indoor areas as well as in confined areas of moving vehicles.
•• FDD and TDD backhauling from, e.g. trains, buses and other vehicles or from
body area networks to the host IMT network
•• In-band or out-of-band backhauling of small cells.”
For the unpaired spectrum used as SDL, it should be noted that the spectrum in
some regions can also be used for TDD under demands of regulatory bodies.
16
Revision 2 to Document 5D/TEMP/55-E, ITU-R WP5D meeting, 11 October 2012
25
The 716~728 MHz was initially planned to be used for mobile TV services in the
USA, later is proposed to be only used for DL for LTE, and defined as Band 29
with duplex mode with FDD in 3GPP.
700MHz Spectrum in US
698 704 710 716 722 728 734 740 746 758 763 776 788 793 806
A B C D E A B C C D C D
Public Public
Safety Safety
SDL concept was also discussed in CEPT in the context of the L-Band and in ITU.
Intra-band CA
3GPP RAN4 studies intra-band carrier aggregation for following bands according
to operators’ actual requirement, including intra-band continuous CA and non-
continuous CA.
For those continuous scenarios still being studied, the key focus is on UE back-off power.
Non-continuous CA may have big impact on UE, so we should keep an eye on it.
17
3GPP Band number see table 4 in section 3.1 of this WhitePaper.
26
Inter-band CA
The topic studies RF requirement at scenario of inter-band CA. The requirement
comes from operators owning the band. In Rel-11 the scenarios are independently
studied in different WI.
LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 5, 2UL Korea Class A1
18
3GPP Band number see table 4 in section 3.1 of this WhitePaper.
27
All inter-band CA combinations only finish the scenario of one-carrier UL in Rel-
11. The work on two UL carriers simultaneously transmitting is postponed to Rel-
12. In Rel-12, 5 WIs on CA are created according to the type of CA combination.
In different regions, FDD bands and TDD/unpaired spectrum are different, thus
the possible combinations are different.
Region 1
Many FDD operators hold TDD spectrum of 1.8/1.9/2.0GHz,
Possible combinations:
•• DD800 FDD + 1.9/2.0GHz TDD
•• 1.8GHz FDD + 1.9/2.0GHz TDD
•• DD800 FDD + 2.6GHz TDD
•• 1.8GHz FDD + 2.6GHz TDD
•• 2.6GHz FDD + 2.6GHz TDD
•• FDD band + 3.7GHz/3.5GHz
28
Region 2
In US, TDD or unpaired spectrum for IMT is mainly located at 2.6GHz, future
possible 3.5GHz.
2.6GHz TDD spectrum is held by the TDD only operators who have no FDD
spectrum. So it is impossible to have FDD+TDD CA combination.
Possible combination:
•• 700MHz FDD + 3.5GHz
Region 3
There are different situations in each country.
FDD bands: currently 2.1GHz, 1.5GHz, 1.7GHz and 850MHz; future possible band
900MHz, 800MHz.
Possible combinations:
•• FDD: 2.1GHz, 1.5GHz, 1.7GHz, 900MHz, 800MHz + TDD: 3.5GHz
•• FDD: 1.5GHz, 900MHz + TDD: 2.6GHz
29
4.4 LTE roaming
Compared to GSM and UMTS, the main issue for LTE spectrum is the fragmented
availability: many bands but none of them suitable for global roaming band.
Currently, FDD frequency bands for commercial or trial LTE networks include:
•• Europe: 800M (Band 20), 1800M (Band 3 GSM refarming), 2600M (Band7),
•• US & Canada: 700M (Band 13, Band 17), AWS (Band 4, Band10)
•• Japan: 850M (Band 18), 1500M (Band 21), 2100M (Band 1),
•• Korea: 850M (Band 5)
•• Latin America: 700M, AWS (Band 4, Band10), 1800M (Band 3 GSM
refarming), 2100M (Band 1), 2600M (Band 7)
From the bands to be available for LTE application recently, we can group the
bands with the consideration on covered ITU regions.
FDD:
•• APT 700M (Asia, Europe (if compatibility with APT band plan is adopted),
Latin America), 3500MHz
TDD:
•• 2300MHz, 2600MHz, 3500MHz
Regarding the complicated bands situation for LTE, it is not possible to find a single
global roaming band. More reasonable way is to use several frequency bands which can
cover at least two ITU regions to comprise the roaming spectrum.
For FDD application, candidate bands for roaming band combination include:
•• 1800MHz, E850MHz, APT 700MHz, US 700MHz
For TDD application, candidate bands for roaming band combination include:
•• 2.3GHz, 2.6GHz, 3.5GHz
Note that except for the candidate bands, roaming via FDD is also a possible
30
700MHz Bands:
B12
698 716 728 746
B17
704 716 734 746
Region 2
B13
746 756 777 787
B14
758 768 788 798
Band 44
703 803
Region 3 Band 28
703 748 758 803
Region 1 CEPT
698 791
850MHz Bands:
Lower E850
Region 2 806 824 851 869
Upper E850
814 849 859 894
Band 5
Band 18
2600MHz Bands:
B B
R A A A B B B C C C D D D J A B C D G F E K R E E E F F F H H H G G G
Region 2 The US S 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 S 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
1 2
16 5.5*12 4 6*7 4 6 5.5*12
31
5 TDD spectrum application
Currently core bands for TDD are 1.9GHz, 2.0GHz, 2.3GHz and 2.6GHz. There is
totally about 440MHz bandwidth spectrum. In future, new candidate bands e.g.
3.5GHz and 3.7GHz may bring additional 400MHz bandwidth spectrum for TDD.
Analysis
Different TDD band has different band characteristics adapted to the different
application and scenario.
•• Band 1.9GHz/2.0GHz: region 1 and region 3; small bandwidth
(15MHz~20MHz), low propagation loss and penetration loss
•• Band 2.3GHz: ongoing discussion in region 1, WCS (FDD application)
in region 2, IMT in region 3; large bandwidth (100MHz), relatively low
propagation loss and penetration loss
•• Band 2.6GHz: small bandwidth(50MHz) in EU large bandwidth (190MHz) in
US and China, relatively high propagation loss and penetration loss
•• Band 3.5GHz/3.7GHz: ongoing in different regions; very large bandwidth
(200MHz), high propagation loss and penetration loss
If there are several operators in same band, need a guard band (around 10MHz)
between each adjacent operator or to synchronize the TDD networks.
Dedicated band
1.9GHz/2.0GHz
In region 1, 1900-1920MHz (Band 33) and 2010-2025MHz (Band 34) are
currently allocated to UMTS networks but remain unused throughout the EU. The
32
European Commission has already issued a Mandate to CEPT to study suitable
alternative applications and develop appropriate technical conditions and sharing
arrangements.
2.3GHz
For 2.3GHz, non-mobile service is operated at the band in most countries and
only in small number of countries, mobile service is operated.
In EU, current usage is complex. LSA (licensed shared access) is hot issue in the
discussion in possible usage ways, but and maybe, could be static (without
consequence on the 3GPP standard). According to ECC WG FM questionnaire,
there are 12 countries which have no plan in addition to current non MBB use
and 5 countries that might support an EC/ECC harmonization.
In US, the band was assigned to WCS service in 1997. Now part of the band is
planned to be used as FDD systems.
In China, because of earlier military application, the band is only used in indoor
scenario before. MIIT in China formally announced that 2.3GHz can be used for
outdoor scenario after permission in Sep. 2012.
2.6GHz
Earlier allocation for this band is WiMAX. Many operators hold the spectrum more
than 20MHz. In recent years, the band already is allocated to LTE application in
Europe, US, China, etc. Although the band is intended for global harmonization,
actually there are two streams for allocation.
•• Option1: sandwich allocation, mainly in EU (Region1)
33
In case of coexistence between TDD BS and FDD BS with the same class, guard band
is necessary to avoid interference. Guard band is from 5MHz to 10MHz depending on
the scenarios.
•• Option2: all band for TDD, or there is no FDD allocation in the band, mainly in
US, China.
Currently, CMCC holds the band 2570-2520MHz for LTE-TDD trial network. It can be
estimated that existing status will be maintain in future and another operator may
also come in and hold some of the band. At least two operators may share this band
including CMCC and China telecommunications with high possibility.
Summary
With more and more spectrum available for TDD and the development of Hetnet,
complicated network with multiple operators and multiple layers becomes a trend.
It will bring co-existence problem especially for TDD because of the challenge for
synchronization between BSs. Synchronization becomes an imperative issue to be
solved for TDD.
Operator A D S U U D D S U U D
Operator B D S U U D D S U U D
Figure 15 Interferences between uncoordinated TDD systems in the same band and areas
34
There are several possible techniques for improving coexistence between TDD
networks like:
•• Synchronization
•• Sub-band filtering
•• Site coordination
•• Restricted blocks
The use of sub-band filtering and restricted blocks methods are obviously methods
which lead to spectrum wastage. Sub-band filtering method also increases
the number of base station types even within the same band and destroy the
economies of scale. Site coordination method will bring very complicate site plan
and site construction.
There are several methods for synchronization of the start of frame: GNSS
(like GPS), synchronization over backhaul network (like IEEE 1588 v2), and
synchronization through the radio-interface (like network listening). For outdoor
base stations like macro/micro cells, it is easy to get synchronization by GPS. But
with the development of heterogeneous network, more and more base stations
are planning to deployed indoor to improved the hotspot throughput. GPS and
IEEE 1588 are not always available or suitable for small cells. In this case, over-
the-air synchronization approach can be used. This approach can be used for the
BSs not only within a single operator but also between different operators with
multiple layers sharing the same band. The following figure shows a feasible way
to implement synchronization across different operators.
Declaring Initial
Channel Synchronization
Introduce "Declaring
Channel" to make it Synchronization Synchronization
possible to save GB Recalibration Tracking
N
BS A BS B BS C
35
The procedure includes:
•• Declaring Channel: Each operator broadcasts/monitor the spectrum usage
information.
•• Initial Synchronization: keep synchronization with the deployed BS (target BS)
•• Synchronization Tracking: keep synchronization periodically.
•• Synchronization recalibration.
3GPP will still further enhance the current synchronization mechanisms for the
scenario of multi-carriers and multi-layers in the later releases.
6 Annex
Administrations
External Org.
36
111 ITU-R
The ITU Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R) specializes in facilitating international
collaboration to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of
the radio-frequency spectrum and satellite orbits, by:
ITU-R is responsible for coordinating the international use of the radio spectrum.
The conferences and important outcome of ITU-R are as follows19.
Rec WRC RR
Radiocommunication Bureau
SGs & SC RofP
RAG
19
From ITU-R website
37
The World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) is the most important
conference in ITU-R, normally held one month long every four to five years.
•• The WRC is the forum where countries decide on the shared use of the
frequency spectrum to allow the deployment or growth of all types of
radiocommunication services that have global implications
•• WRC decisions are contained in Final Acts which include amendments to the
Radio Regulations (RR, treaty status)
•• The Radio Regulations also provide the technical provisions for sharing
radio frequency spectrum among radio services and the regulatory
provisions for bringing into use new radio based systems.
20
From Radio Regulations published by ITU-R
38
There are six main regional organizations in the world.
•• Inter-American Telecommunications Commission (CITEL)
•• The regional organization will adopt common proposals before the WRC in
accordance with their own procedures.
•• The regional proposals are submitted to the WRC on behalf of all of their Members.
39
7 References
40
Copyright © Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 2013. All rights reserved.
No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Trademark Notice
, HUAWEI, and are trademarks or registered trademarks of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Other trademarks, product, service and company names mentioned are the property of their respective owners.
is provided for reference purpose only and constitutes neither an offer nor an
www.huawei.com
acceptance. Huawei may change the information at any time without notice.