Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Operations Services
CORROSION
MANAGEMENT
CORROSION
MANAGEMENT
KEY METRICS KEY INDUSTRY CHALLENGES
Estimated annual USD 12 -13 3.4% Global Nearly 50% of the Corrosion failure Move Develop Develop Structured Cost of Stringent Gather
cost of USD $2.5 billion across GDP (2013) reports studied occurs towards adequate effective & and inspections regulatory adequate
trillion globally chemicals described corrosion predominantly in proactive/ RBI tools efficient integrated compliances asset data
across all industries incidents as high / very pipe works, predictive and inspection data system and norms
industries* high consequences causing 71% of approach capabilities management that supports
the accidents practice thickness
studied monitoring
Increased Asset Reduced Cost of Reduced Cost of Reduced Reduced • Poor asset integrity performance
Integrity Inspection Turnarounds Production Loss Safety and
Environmental • Asset downtime
Risk
• HSE incidents
Currently inspection is often reactive. Cut and remove plugs in the insulation. Visually inspect the surface for
immediate signs of corrosion. Ultrasonically test the rest of the pipe, or take equipment offline for internal
UNCERTAINTY OF
inspections. This approach is often based on a priority list of perceived risks based on known equipment
ZONES/LINES AT RISK design parameters and observable equipment condition only. As a result sites of corrosion can easily be
missed or equipment over inspected.
If there is sufficient doubt regarding the condition of the surface away from the plugs, large areas of
UNNECESSARY LARGE insulation may be removed and equipment taken offline. The issue with this approach is that these larger
SCOPE & FREQUENCY areas are often targeted unnecessarily, just because of lack of supporting data enabling effective
OF INSPECTION decision-making. For example, CUI is often very localized so unless the plug is positioned in the right spot the
sites of corrosion will be missed.
TIME CONSUMING AND Removing plugs and taking equipment offline is time consuming and costly, particularly if scaffolding is
COSTLY TRADITIONAL required, and requires significant downtime and/or equipment isolation. Additionally, cutting plugs
TECHNIQUES introduces a fresh source of potential moisture penetration and hence further corrosion.
SAFETY CONCERNS Personnel need to access hazardous areas and/or work from heights. Additionally some non-destructive
DUE TO HUMAN techniques require the use of radiation which introduces additional risks and costs for the organization, and
INSPECTION undermines reputation.
According to this study published in May 2016 the most advanced non-destructive techniques for Corrosion Under
Insulation (CUI) and Vessels Inspection have several limitations, such as:
• Limited range of detection due to penetrating • Need for high level of expertise to interpret results
power
• Presence of water negatively impacting analysis
• Pipeline configurations or insulation types
• Difficulties identifying small pitting
• Safety concerns due to radiations
INDUSTRY CHALLENGES
INTO VALUE DRIVERS
CERTAINTY OF Advanced analytics are used to predict with high level of accuracy the zones and lines that are most at risk of
ZONES/LINES AT RISK corrosion. This enables operators to carry out targeted inspections at the right time on the right areas.
REDUCED SCOPE Thanks to data-driven decision making, scope and frequency of inspections can be reduced while enhancing asset
integrity. Using a richer data set, including multiple data sources it is possible to accurately determine where and
AND FREQUENCY OF when inspection is needed. This allows companies to significantly increase the value to effort ratio, while running
INSPECTIONS down the risk factor more quickly.
Innovative technologies enable identification of potential corrosion without removal of insulation and excessive
REDUCED COSTS,
scaffolding , reducing downtime and costs. For example Image Analytics is used to identify corrosion on a pipe from
TIME AND DOWNTIME inspection report pictures, reducing the need for highly skilled personnel.
ENHANCED SAFETY Beside limiting the number of inspections, additional techniques can be used to enhance worker safety, for example
Video Analytics. Using drones or fixed cameras, personnel is no longer required to access hazardous areas or work
BY LIMITING HUMAN from heights. This leads to a reduction in the organization’s risk exposure and related costs, helping to enhance their
INSPECTION reputation.
Go beyond silos maintenance & inspection activities to Reduced costs of inspection between
achieve optimum asset value. Achieve the right balance 10% and 20%
between competing objectives, including:
• Cost reduction • Risk management
• Asset integrity and predictability Increased uptime and productivity by
• Productivity • Safety
• Skills shortage
more than 10%
Risk Based Asset Pipeline ADAPT - Image & Video Advanced Image & Video Pipeline Nanotechnology,
Inspection Integrity Integrity Asset Data Analytics Analytics & Deep Analytics Inspection Ultrasound,
Methodology Division Management Analysis & Learning Combining 3D Using Laser
Readiness Systems Processing Model with Robotic Spectrometry,
(PIMS) Tool Accenture Crawlers & Optical Non
Active Drones Destructive
Network Testing
• Equipment risk scoring – The • 3D models can be used to plan • Risk assessment – Output from • 3D model help identify repair • Repair data are fed back into the
additional data help generate and locate inspection points and the analytical model can enrich scope and determine efficient models to provide better insights
statistically significant and lines the corrosion database to enable future repair plans for improved prioritization of
accurate risk scores for each • Work pack can be checked on engineering to carry out more inspection and repair:
piece of equipment thus field real time using tables to accurate equipment risk – Update diagrams and 3D
enhancing the risk scoring overall verify inspection priority and assessment models in SmartPlant
scope and to verify inspection • Faster review of defect-record – Update the material data record
• Equipment prioritization – location thanks to real-time upload of (MDR) in real time
– Inspection scope and • Specialized inspection inspection findings, which – All the data are handed over to
prioritization can be done in 3D methodologies derived from the enables prompt and more operations in an efficient way,
– Can be driven by identified likelihood of defects (e.g. general accurate decision making ensuring comprehensive and
geospatially clustered defects inspection validated with image • Notifications of mitigation actions consistent insights
– Improves risk scoring by helping analytics for low risk zones) automatically include all the
descope areas with very low • Inspector can feed inspection and information needed to perform
risk of corrosion defect findings into the database the actions efficiently
in real time from the field, and
receive real-time
recommendations on whether to
continue to inspect the current
zone or not
• Identify the presence of corrosion
using image analytics thus
reducing expensive scaffolding,
inspector manhours, safety risk
Fixed cameras and Inspection Plans are Inspector inputs The maintenance Repair planner Inspection results
drones are utilized engineer creates approved, result and receives engineer’s work order coordinates are captured and
for data collection. scope of work. optimized, and a recommendation will be optimized and between work order recorded in data
Information is fed Integration allocated. for next best action. scheduled. and integrated lake. Defect data is
into the image between planning Inspectors will be Results are Information about planning. Visibility consolidated
analytics model and work-order supported by captured and defects and repair of data and repairs before repair
and translated into creation across all mobile technology drone’s routes are required will be allows repair notifications are
3D visualization for activities within and utilize wearable programmed with available on the planner greater generated.
inspection engineer the plant. cameras to support next best action tablets. The engineer visibility of Consolidation of
to prioritize, e.g. the data capture for model will be able to directly requirements. repair scope allows
model displays risk image analytics. locate the defect and for optimization of
based upon Utilization of repair required through repairs required
internal and advanced the use of 3D models and benefits
external corrosion. technological tools, within the tablets. planning.
e.g. voice and Engineer will utilize
robotic arms to wearables to support
perform activities. data capture for image
analytics.
Inspection Planning Inspection & Repair Planning Inspection & Repair Inhibitor Strategy Overall Plant Optimization
WHAT Gain Confidence:
Optimization: Automation: Execution Digitization: Optimization: Strategy:
• Use advanced analytics to • Use a richer data set • Robotic inspection to improve • Fixed cameras to perform • Analytics to predict the • Analytics considers the plant
demonstrate it is possible to including multiple detection & measurement of regular inspections on the optimum inhibitor dose to as a connected active
predict the likelihood of environmental factors and external/internal conditions plant extend asset life and network, accounting for:
corrosion under insulation geospatial data streamline supply chain similar equipment behaviors,
for every 1 meter pipeline • Next Best Action (NBA) Model – • Use of tablets for direct operations parameters of
segment • Image/video analytics (e.g. Automated and iterative inspection data capture and equipment upstream /
using drones) to increase inspection & repair process access WO real-time downstream of the equipment
accuracy under analysis, vicinity
HOW • Automatic workpack creation • Technology connecting
modelling, etc.
• Field intelligence, data and integration with P6 inspection engineers on field
mining on section report to with remote SMEs to help
capture engineers knowledge guide and instruct engineers
to take measurements /
perform testing
Change Management
Likelihood of defect
OUTPUTS
Magnitude of defect: expansion and corrosion rate. Near real-time automatic recommendations on Inspection Strategy
Risk of equipment failure/ loss of containment (likelihood * consequence)
Optimum operations parameters to reduce corrosion rate and
inspection costs while increasing asset life
• Model trained on specific assets • Increased prediction accuracy • Run down risk factor quicker through efficient prioritisation • Increased asset integrity and • Holistic solution for M&I
• Confidence on model accuracy • Informed decision making on • Optimisation of inspection planning, improved visibility of progress enhanced operations process • Increased asset life and
and reliability whether scaffolding or expensive • Reduced cost and improved consistency of inspection • Optimized chemicals costs, nomination
VALUE
removal of insulation is needed • Automation of M&I and repair process streamlined supply chain
• Reduced frequency & scope of • Reduced skill set required
inspection, hence costs
• Offshore data mining capabilities, leveraging lower cost offshore resources with extensive industry experience (inspections,
Data
Data Collection
corrosion, etc.)
Collection • Dedicated teams with industry relevant expertise, readily available
• Data processing tool with automated QA/QC controls and web based access
• Experienced teams with capabilities related to API-580, API-581 and understanding of the data requirements and
Data
Data Processing
supporting technologies for each
Processing • Partnerships with risk-based inspection specialists and industry leading corrosions Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
• Ability to assist with IDMS selection and implementation to enable end-state vision
• Repeatable and adaptable processes for data analysis, corrosion loop definition, and degradation
mechanism assignment
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment • Ability to lead client stakeholders through degradation mechanism reviews, risk review workshops, and
inspection strategy validation
PROCUREMENT OPERATIONS
• Supply / demand requirements captured and planned for (for both equipment parts • Maintenance strategies in place, regularly reviewed, optimised and updated
and chemicals) • Critical equipment, spares, and chemicals clearly identified and visible to
• Equipment failure and part use history visible and analysed Maintenance, Materials Management, and Procurement
• Part requirement management with vendors • Daily monitoring enables defect and corrosion rate change early identification
• Asset life-cycle costing and planning • Accurate, complete and maintained data
• Vendor managed part requirements & lead times • Coordination through integrated activity planning
• Visibility and activities planned through IAP
PO
Michael Poland
Asset Performance Management Lead
NA (North America)
Michael.E.Poland@Accenture.com