Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321902149
CITATION READS
1 124
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Increasing Capacity of Wireless Networks using Aerial Base Stations View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Sudheesh P G on 22 December 2017.
Abstract—High altitude platform (HAP) drones can provide [6]. However, in HAP drone systems, acquiring precise CSIT
broadband wireless connectivity to ground users in rural areas is challenging due to the high altitudes and the movement of
by establishing line-of-sight (LoS) links and exploiting effective the drones. Consequently, in HAPs-to-ground stations (GSs)
beamforming techniques. However, at high altitudes, acquiring
the channel state information (CSI) for HAPs, which is a key communications1 exploiting spatial multiplexing, which can
component to perform beamforming, is challenging. In this yield a maximum possible sum-rate, is also challenging.
arXiv:1712.06583v1 [cs.IT] 18 Dec 2017
paper, by exploiting an interference alignment (IA) technique, One practical approach to achieve a maximum possible sum-
a novel method for achieving the maximum sum-rate in HAP- rate for HAP drones-to-GSs communications is via the use of
based communications without CSI is proposed. In particular, interference alignment (IA) schemes [6]–[8]. In particular, at
to realize IA, a multiple-antenna tethered balloon is used as a
relay between multiple HAP drones and ground stations (GSs). a high SNR regime, which is a typical case in HAP commu-
Here, a multiple-input multiple-output X network system is nications, IA can achieve a maximum sum-rate by restricting
considered. The capacity of the considered M ×N X network with interference beams to a smaller subspace that does not overlap
a tethered balloon relay is derived in closed-form. Simulation with the desired signal space [6]. Unlike terrestrial wireless
results corroborate the theoretical findings and show that the systems in which the BSs’ positions are fixed, acquiring CSIT
proposed approach yields the maximum sum-rate in multiple
HAPs-GSs communications in absence of CSI. The results also to implement IA in HAPs-GSs communication systems is chal-
show the existence of an optimal balloon’s altitude for which the lenging due to imperfect HAP drone stabilization. As a result,
sum-rate is maximized. the lack of exact CSI at HAP drones can yield a significant
degradation of the sum-rate performance. Nevertheless, with
I. I NTRODUCTION the use of relays, it is possible to achieve maximum sum-rate
Satellite and terrestrial cellular communications are the two when CSIT is not available [9].
most widely used communication systems for providing global Unlike the time domain realization of IA, the performance
connectivity to mobile ground users. While satellites can of IA in the spatial domain is limited due to the restrictions
deliver wireless service to users in remote areas, their spectral in designing precoding matrices [6]. Therefore, the maximum
efficiency is limited by their large footprints [1]. Meanwhile, possible sum-rate can be achieved by implementing relay-
terrestrial communication systems cannot guarantee a reliable assisted IA in the time domain. In this case, one can use
service for users in remote, rural areas, due to the lack of popular relaying mechanisms such as amplify and forward
infrastructure nodes, such as base stations (BSs). High altitude (AF) or decode and forward (DF) [9]. An AF relaying scheme
platform (HAP) drones can substantially extend the coverage with multiple relays achieves an upper bound for the DoF of a
of terrestrial networks by establishing line-of-sight (LoS) links generalized X network [9]. Hence, by adopting an AF relaying
and adjusting their altitude [2], [3]. scheme such as the one in [9], multiple relays can be used to
To exploit the spatial dimension and enhance spectral effi- achieve maximum possible sum-rate of the system where HAP
ciency, HAPs will typically rely on highly directive antennas to drones have knowledge of CSI. Similar results can be achieved
communicate with ground stations [4]. In a single HAP system with a DF-based relaying scheme with single relay in a two-
with multiple antennas at the transmitter, a spatial multiplexing user X channel [10]. However, the previous works in [9] and
gain cannot be typically achieved due to a high correlation [10] did not investigate the use of a DF relaying mechanism
between parallel paths [5]. However, the deployment of mul- for IA in an HAP drones system.
tiple spatially separated HAPs can be a promising solution The main contribution of this paper is a novel framework
to exploit spatial multiplexing and boost spectral efficiency. for maximizing the sum-rate of a relay-aided HAP drones
In particular, by using a large number of antennas at the wireless system when the CSI is not available. In particular,
HAPs, one can provide a precise beamforming which is a key to achieve the maximum sum-rate, we propose a DF scheme
requirement for spatial multiplexing. To this end, channel state involving M HAP drones, N ground receivers, and one relay
information (CSI) at the transmitter (CSIT) is required [5], with (M − 1) × (N − 1) antennas. In this scenario, we show
that it is possible to achieve the maximum possible sum-rate
Sudheesh P. G and P. Muthuchidambaranathan are with Department of Elec- by exploiting the IA scheme. Moreover, we derive a closed-
tronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology,
Tiruchirappalli, India (e-mail: pgsudheesh@gmail.com; muthuc@nitt.edu).
Mohammad Mozaffari and Walid Saad are with Wireless@VT, Electrical 1 An HAP drones-GSs wireless system in which each HAP drone carries
and Computer Engineering Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, a dedicated symbol for each GS can be modeled as an X network. The X
24061, USA, (e-mail: mmozaff@vt.edu; walids@vt.edu). network houses all possible channel models such as the interference channel,
Maurizio Magarini is with Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e the Y channel, and the Z channel. Beyond offering a generalized structure, an
Bioingegneria Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy (e-mail: maur- X network offers a maximum capacity as compared to other channel models
izio.magarini@polimi.it). such as the interference channel [6].
2
Es
GS after precoding. Therefore, the GS receives signals from σ 2 NT
γ1 = , (9)
the relay and the first transmitter. (H H H)−1 1,1
Es
B. Capacity of Rician X network where N T
is the transmitted energy per symbol, and σ 2 is the
noise power. From [15], we know that [W −1 ]1,1 can be found
The asymptotic sum-rate of a network as a function of the from the elements of H. That is,
signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) can be expressed as [6], [8]: H H
(H H)−1 1,1 = hH −1
H
1 [I − H̃(H̃ H̃) H̃ ]h1 , (10)
C = β · log(γ) + O(log(γ)), (4)
where γ is the SNR value at a given receiver. where, H = [h1 H̃]. Now, substituting (10) in (9) leads to:
Es H H H
The DoF for an X network with M transmitters and N γ1 = 2 h [I − H̃(H̃ H̃)−1 H̃ ]h1 . (11)
receivers each with A antennas, is equal to β = MM+N NA σ NT 1
−1 .
However, we consider a relay-aided system that uses a DF By substituting H i for H in (11), we get φi :
EHAP H H H
relaying mechanism. We denote the channel matrices between φi = 2 hi1 [I − H̃ i (H̃ i H̃ i )−1 H̃ i ]hi1 , (12)
the relay and HAP i by H i , and between GS j and the relay σ NT
by Gj . Since the Rician factor of the HAP-to-relay link is where EHAP is the transmitted power of each HAP. Similarly,
greater than that of the relay-to-GS link, we model H i and the SNR in GS j is:
Gj with different κ values. In this case, the small-scale fading EBL H H H
ϕj = 2 g j1 [I − G̃j (G̃j G̃j )−1 G̃j ]g j1 , (13)
matrices H̄ i and Ḡj are obtained by replacing κ in (1) by κui σ NT
and κlj , respectively. After adding the path loss components where EBL is the transmitted power of tethered balloon, as-
ψj sociated with Gj . The overall system capacity can be defined
to H̄ i and Ḡj , we get H i = (dα i
Ri )
2 H̄ i and Gj = (d
jR )
2 Ḡj ,
as in [16]:
where αi and ψj represent, respectively, the channel gains in
H i and Gj at a 1 m reference distance. Also, dRi and djR CDF (γ) = β · min(C1 (γ), C2 (γ)), (14)
PM
are the link distances in HAP i-tethered balloon and tethered where C1 = i=1 log(1 + φi ) is the sum-rate between the
PN
balloon-GS j communications. In order to find capacity of the HAPs-tethered balloon link and C2 = j=1 log(1 + ϕj ) is
considered relay aided HAPs-GSs system, we first calculate the sum-rate between the tethered balloon-GSs link. Finally,
the SNR of each stream. Here, we have two phases: HAPs- by substituting (12) and (13) in (14) this theorem is proved.
tethered balloon communications, and tethered balloon-GSs
communications. We begin with the first phase, and the same
Using Theorem 1, it is possible to analyze the impact of κui ,
steps can be used to find the sum-rate of the second phase. The
κlj ,
dRi , and M on the capacity of the Rician X-channel in
zero-forcing detection (ZF) SNR of the k th parallel channel,
the HAP drones wireless system.
γk , is given by [13]:
Γ Remark 1. At high SNR, the system fails to achieve a higher
γk = −1 , (5)
[W ]k,k sum-rate. This is because, at larger κui and κlj , the columns of
where Γ is the transmit power per symbol, and W = H H H. H will be correlated. Hence, IA will fail to achieve a maximum
Now, given the knowledge of ZF SNR, we derive the explicit capacity for higher κui and κlj values.
expression for ZF-capacity as follows. Remark 2. When M = N and κui =κlj , the capacity of the
2
E ×(d )2
Theorem 1. The capacity of a relay aided multiple HAPs-GSs system is maximum when EHAP ×(d αi
Ri )
= BL ψj jR . Also,
communication is given by: when the transmitted power EHAP = EBL , the maximum
M capacity is obtained when the tethered balloon is at the center
MN X
log2 1 + Γs hH of the HAPs-GSs link.
C= min i1 Qi hi1 ,
M +N −1 i=1
N
X IV. N UMERICAL R ESULTS
log2 1 + Γs g H
j1 W j g j1 , (6)
j=1 Here, we evaluate the sum-rate performance of the relay
where Qi and W j are given by: aided multiple HAPs-to-GSs communications. HAPs are lo-
H H cated at an altitude of 18 km above earth and each GS receives
Qi = [I − H̃ i (H̃ i H̃ i )−1 H̃ i ], (7)
signals from all HAPs. We consider an X channel, consisting
H H
W j = [I − G̃j (G̃j G̃j )−1 G̃j ], (8) of M = 2 and 3 HAPs, a tethered balloon, and 3 ground
with H̃ i , hi1 and G̃j , g j1 obtained from channel matrices H i stations. Fig. 2 shows the sum-rate of the Rician channel as
a function SNR for different Rician factors and number of
and Gj based on H i = [hi1 H̃ i ] and Gj = [g j1 G̃j ].
HAPs. As we can see from this figure, the sum-rate obtained
Proof. In the proposed model, we have two phases: HAPs- using simulations (the curves shown without a circle marker)
tethered balloon and tethered balloon-GSs communications. is in agreement with the analytical derivation. Without the use
We first find the SNR of HAP i-to-relay link, γi , and relay- of a tethered balloon, the sum-rate of the considered system
to-GS j, γj . Then, we proceed to calculate the sum-rate. In decreases as the maximum DoF cannot be achieved. While
general, the SNR of the first stream at the receiver is given exploiting IA, however, the system is equivalent to a system
by: in which CSI is known at the transmitters and, hence, a higher
4
3 HAP (Simulation) , κ l = 15 dB
3 HAP (Theory), κ l = 15 dB V. C ONCLUSION
3
3 HAP (Simulation), κ l = 20 dB In this paper, we have proposed an effective interference
3 HAP (Theory), κ l = 20 dB alignment scheme for maximizing the sum-rate of HAPs-
2 2 HAP (non IA), κ l = 20 dB ground stations communications assisted by a tethered bal-
loon relay. In particular, we have considered the half-duplex
1 relaying scheme using a tethered balloon relay to achieve
maximum DoF in HAPs-ground stations communications,
0 when the HAPs lack the knowledge of CSI. Our results have
0 10 20 30 shown that, using a tethered balloon relay for exploiting IA
SNR (dB) provides a significant sum-rate gain in the HAP-based wireless
system that uses multiple interfering drones.
Fig. 2: Sum-rate vs. SNR.
R EFERENCES
Pt = 9.5 dB, κu = 30 dB, κl = 15 dB
5 Pt = 9.5 dB, κu = 30 dB, κl = 20 dB
[1] A. Mohammed, A. Mehmood, F. N. Pavlidou, and M. Mohorcic,
“The role of high-altitude platforms (HAPs) in the global wireless
Pt = 14.5 dB, κu = 30 dB, κl = 15 dB connectivity,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 1939–1953,
4 Pt = 14.5 dB, κu = 30 dB, κl = 20 dB Nov. 2011.
Sum−rate (bps/HZ)