I personally give more credence to the documentary, Give Up

Tomorrow as it sheds more light to the truth. The general rule is

that the Supreme Court is not a trier of facts. It is not the function
of the Supreme Court to examine, review or evaluate the
evidence all over again because the trial court is in a better position
to examine real evidence, as well as to observe the demeanor of the
witnesses while testifying in the case. Therefore, the Supreme Court,
in most cases, merely relies on the records of the trial courts in their
rulings. There being no exceptions stated or cogent reasons to disturb
the findings of the trial court, the SC, in the case of People vs.
Larranaga, used as its basis the factual findings of the trial court. How
then can I find such decision honest and truthful when it was based
upon one-sided and biased facts?