Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Cardiometabolic Diseases
Abstract The adenosine monophosphate-activated protein termed as metabolic syndrome (MetS) (1), characterized
kinase (AMPK) is a metabolic sensor of energy metabolism by a clustering of major risk factors for developing cardio-
at the cellular as well as whole-body level. It is activated by vascular disease. Obesity, representing derangement in
low energy status that triggers a switch from ATP-consuming energy balances, is tightly linked with the development of
anabolic pathways to ATP-producing catabolic pathways.
type-2 diabetes through its ability to engender insulin re-
AMPK is involved in a wide range of biological activities that
normalizes lipid, glucose, and energy imbalances. These sistance, leading to glucose intolerance and development
pathways are dysregulated in patients with metabolic syn- of type-2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Thus, insulin resistance
drome (MetS), which represents a clustering of major cardio-
vascular risk factors including diabetes, lipid abnormalities,
and energy imbalances. Clearly, there is an unmet medical
need to find a molecule to treat alarming number of pa- Abbreviations: ACC, acetyl CoA carboxylase; ACE, angiotensin-
tients with MetS. AMPK, with multifaceted activities in vari- converting enzyme; AICAR, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside;
ous tissues, has emerged as an attractive drug target to AIS, autoinhibitory sequence; AMPK, 5′adenosine monophosphate-
manage lipid and glucose abnormalities and maintain en- activated protein kinase; ATGL, adipocyte-triglyceride lipase; CaMKK,
ergy homeostasis. A number of AMPK activators have been Ca2+ /calmodulin-dependent kinase ; CBS, cystathionone--synthase;
CDC42, cell division control protein 42 homolog; ChREBP, carbohy-
tested in preclinical models, but many of them have yet to drate response element binding protein 1; CNS, central nervous sys-
reach to the clinic. This review focuses on the structure- tem; CPT1, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1; CRTC2, CREB-regulated
function and role of AMPK in lipid, carbohydrate, and en- transcription coactivator-2; CTRP9, C1q/TNF-related protein 9;
ergy metabolism. The mode of action of AMPK activators, CXCR4, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; DDI, drug-drug interaction;
mechanism of anti-inflammatory activities, and preclinical DGAT2, diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2; DIO, diet-induced obese;
and clinical findings as well as future prospects of AMPK EGCG, epigallocathechin-3-gallate; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide syn-
thase; FOXO, forkhead box; GBD, glycogen-binding domain; GPAT,
as a drug target in treating cardio-metabolic disease are glycerol phosphate acyl transferase; GS, glycogen synthase; HDAC,
discussed.—Srivastava, R. A. K., S. L. Pinkosky, S. Filippov, J. class IIA histone deacetylases; HF, heart failure; HKII, hexokinase II;
C. Hanselman, C. T. Cramer, and R. S. Newton. AMP-acti- HMGR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; HNF-4␣, hepatic
vated protein kinase: an emerging drug target to regulate nuclear factor-4␣; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HSL, hor-
imbalances in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism to treat mone-sensitive lipase; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell;
cardio-metabolic diseases. J. Lipid Res. 2012. 53: 2490–2514. ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; IL, interleukin; LCFA, long
chain fatty acid; LKB1, liver kinase B1; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MetS,
metabolic syndrome; MGAT, monoacylglycerol acyltransferase; MIF,
Supplementary key words atherosclerosis • cholesterol • diabetes • macrophage inhibitory factor; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamy-
drug therapy • dyslipidemias • fatty acid • inflammation • obesity • cin; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NF-kB, nuclear factor
hepatic steatosis kappa B; OCT1, Organic cation transporter 1; PEPCK, phospho-
enolpyruvate carboxylase; PGC1-␣, PPAR-␥ coactivator-1␣; SCD1, steroyl
CoA desaturase 1; SDF1␣, stromal cell-derived factor 1 ␣; SERCA, sar-
coplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase; SIRT1, sirtuin (silent
The pathophysiology of diabetes and obesity is a very mating type information regulation 2 homolog) 1; SREBP1, sterol reg-
complex process involving many pathways. Deregulation ulatory element binding protein 1; STRAD, ste20 related adapter;
TBC1D4, TBC1 domain family member 4; TGF-, transforming growth
of these pathways gives rise to metabolic abnormalities factor-; TNF-␣, tumor necrosis factor-␣; TORC1, target-of-rapamycin
complex-1; TSC2, tuberous sclerosis complex 2; UCP1, uncoupling
protein 1; UPR, unfolded protein response; VCAM-1, vascular cell ad-
hesion molecule-1; WAT, white adipose tissue.
Manuscript received 28 February 2012 and in revised form 11 July 2012. 1
To whom correspondence should be sent.
Published, JLR Papers in Press, July 13, 2012 e-mail: ajitsriva@gmail.com (R.A.K.S.); rnewton@esperion.com
DOI 10.1194/jlr.R025882 (R.S.N.)
Copyright © 2012 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
2490 Journal of Lipid Research Volume 53, 2012 This article is available online at http://www.jlr.org
is associated with a wide array of the pathophysiological within the AMPK subfamily of kinases. Studies performed
sequelae, including hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and using AIS deletion constructs show a greater than 10-fold
atherosclerosis (1, 2). Because the number of patients with increase in kinase activity as compared with constructs
MetS is growing at an alarming rate worldwide and 25% of containing the AIS (19, 20).
the developed world’s population have pathological con- The AMPK-subunits do not display catalytic activity,
ditions of MetS, there is global unmet medical need to but they appear to be critical for AMPK ␣␥ complex as-
find a molecule for monotherapy. Currently, patients with sembly and glycogen sensing in the cell (21–24). Domains
MetS are on 3–5 concomitant medications to treat condi- located near the C terminus of the -subunit have been
tions of hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and shown to interact with regions on the ␣- and ␥-subunits,
elevated levels of pro-inflammatory proteins. This require- which suggests that the -subunit, in part, may function as
ment for concomitant treatment is associated with poor a scaffold to support AMPK heterotrimeric complex as-
compliance and risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) (3), sembly. The -subunits also contain glycogen-binding
leading to discontinuing therapy. domains (GBD) that mediate AMPK’s association with gly-
5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase cogen, which could facilitate colocalization of AMPK with
(AMPK) is an enzyme that controls key players of meta- its substrate glycogen synthase (GS). This might allow the
bolic pathways, thus emerging as a major regulator of glu- cell to coordinate the control of glycogen synthesis with
cose and lipid metabolism through multiple beneficial glycogen levels and energy availability (21–24). Addition-
roles in the target tissues, liver, adipose, and muscle (4). ally, a potential role for -subunit myristoylation has been
AMPK is a phylogenetically conserved serine/threonine suggested to be important for appropriate AMPK cell
kinase that mediates cellular energy homeostasis (5, 6) membrane localization and activation (25).
through the enzymatic activity stimulated by phosphoryla- The AMPK␥-subunits regulate enzyme activity through
tion of threonine-172 (7, 8). AMPK was discovered as an sensing relative intracellular ATP, ADP, and AMP concen-
enzyme whose activity catalyzes the phosphorylation and trations. This is accomplished through complex interactions
subsequent inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) of adenine nucleotide with four repeated cystathionone--
and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMG-CoA synthase (CBS) motifs occurring in pairs called Bateman
reductase, HMGR) (9, 10). These activities attributable to domains (6, 26, 27). It is now thought that the CBS motifs
AMPK together with regulation of insulin signaling make arrange in a manner that results in the formation of four
it an attractive target for the management of hepatic meta- adenine binding sites. Site 4 has a very high affinity for
bolic disorders and insulin resistance (11, 12). The hypo- AMP and does not readily exchange for ATP or ADP,
thalamic functions involved in the regulation of satiety whereas sites 1 and 3 bind AMP, ADP, and ATP competi-
may impact obesity and diabetes (13). AMPK activation is tively (28). Site 2 seems to be largely unoccupied, and its
associated with the stimulation of hepatic fatty acid oxida- role in regulating AMPK activity has not been fully eluci-
tion; inhibition of cholesterol synthesis, lipogenesis, and dated (29, 30). Initially, AMPK activation was thought to
triglyceride synthesis (14); inhibition of adipocyte lipolysis be mediated solely by AMP binding; however, recent work
and lipogenesis (15); stimulation of skeletal muscle fatty has shown that both AMP and ADP binding result in con-
acid oxidation and muscle glucose uptake (16); and mod- formational changes which activate AMPK in two ways: i)
ulation of insulin secretion by pancreatic -cells (17). All promoting Thr-172 phosphorylation by upstream kinases,
these attributes of AMPK show promise and offer opportu- and ii) antagonizing its dephosphorylation by protein
nity to develop a selective AMPK activator to treat lipid phosphatase(s) (31, 32). Conversely, only AMP has been
and glucose abnormalities. This review highlights the mul- shown to directly increase phosphorylated AMPK (Thr-
tifaceted actions of AMPK and its role in the liver and 172) activity through an allosteric mechanism. Kinetic en-
other tissues, with special emphasis on lipid metabolism, zyme assays have shown that allosteric activation by AMP
inflammation, and mode of action. results in a greater than 10-fold increase in activity, while
the activation resulting from Thr-172 phosphorylation of
AMPK STRUCTURE AND REGULATION the ␣-subunit is greater than 100-fold. In combination,
these two activation mechanisms yield a greater than 1000-
Mammalian AMPK exists as a heterotrimeric complex fold increase in activity (33). In cells, intracellular adenine
consisting of three subunits that occur as multiple iso- nucleotide ratios are very tightly regulated, and AMPK ac-
forms. The catalytic ␣-subunits (␣1/␣2) and the regula- tivation appears to be sensitive to small changes in these
tory - (1/2) and ␥-subunits (␥1/␥2/␥3) are encoded ratios. Although many ATP consuming processes produce
by seven different genes. The catalytic ␣ subunit contains ADP, adenylate kinase maintains AMP and ADP concen-
a highly conserved Ser/Thr kinase domain near the N- trations close to equilibrium in most cell types. Therefore,
terminus in the activation loop (18). Phosphorylation of an increase in the ADP:ATP ratio is associated with a con-
Thr-172 within this loop is critical for enzyme activity (18). comitant increase in AMP concentration, and the intracel-
In addition to regulation through phosphorylation, AMPK␣- lular AMP:ATP ratio also increases. Given that both AMP
subunit activity has been shown to be self-regulated by and ADP activate AMPK through increasing phosphoryla-
a region identified C-terminal to the kinase domain (19, 20). tion and that ADP concentrations usually significantly ex-
This autoinhibitory sequence (AIS) is similar to ubiquitin- ceed AMP concentrations (34–37), it is possible ADP
associated domains, which are highly conserved sequences may be the physiologically relevant adenine nucleotide
complications (2). The pathophysiological conditions genes, both at the enzyme phosphorylation level as well as
leading to the abnormal metabolic pathways and eventu- transcriptional level (51, 52, 57, 58). For instance, phos-
ally diabetes and obesity are often caused by the hepatic phorylation of ChREBP by AMPK mediates inhibition of
elevation of the enzymes synthesizing lipid and glucose glucose-induced gene transcription (59). Over-function of
(72). Hyperlipidemia in MetS appears to occur as a result SREBP1, a lipogenic transcription factor, is associated with
of overproduction of VLDL and glucose by the liver the increased prevalence of dyslipidemia in type-2 diabe-
through lipogenic and gluconeogenic pathways (2, 73). tes (77). A key contributing factor in type-2 diabetes is
The role of liver in insulin resistance and lipoprotein the failure of insulin to suppress gluconeogenesis and he-
overproduction has been demonstrated in animal disease patic glucose production. AMPK prevents overproduction
models of excess energy intake (74, 75) and in genetic ani- through downregulation of the SREBP1 and inhibition of
mal models of diabetes, obesity, and hyperlipidemia (76), lipogenic and gluconeogenic enzymes as evidenced by
in which the production of lipids and glucose by liver is the liver-specific AMPK␣2 knockout mice that develop hy-
elevated and clearance is impaired (2, 4). Therefore, liver perglycemia and glucose intolerance as a result of in-
not only plays an important role in dyslipidemia but also creased hepatic glucose production (78). Conversely, the
in the development of insulin resistance (11) through im- stimulation of AMPK in wild-type mice dramatically re-
balances in energy status. AMPK plays an important role in duces hepatic glucose output (79).
balancing this liver-centric dysregulation by functioning as Results from animal models confirm the physiological
an energy sensor and augmenting fatty acid oxidation and importance of hepatic AMPK for whole-body glucose ho-
inhibiting the biosynthesis of cholesterol, triglycerides, meostasis. For instance, systemic infusion of an AMPK activa-
and glucose. tor, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside (AICAR),
in normal and insulin-resistant obese rats decreased he-
Hepatic AMPK in glucose metabolism patic glucose production (80), further corroborated by blood
While AMPK-mediated effects are observed in multiple glucose lowering in mouse models of diabetes following
tissues, liver appears to be the major organ responsible for liver-specific short-term activation of AMPK using adeno-
lipids and glucose production. AMPK-mediated balancing virus-mediated expression of a constitutively active form
of lipid and glucose production in the liver is a key step in of AMPK␣2 (79). Additionally, liver-specific deletion of
maintaining hepatic metabolism. This function of AMPK AMPK␣2 caused mild hyperglycemia and glucose intoler-
in the liver is brought about by modulating a number of ance as a result of enhanced gluconeogensis (78). These
(OCT1), which is highly expressed in the liver and facili- tion of complex I of the respiratory chain (82) and subse-
tates the selective uptake of metformin into hepatocytes quent alterations in cellular adenine nucleotide levels.
(238). In mice lacking OCT1, the effect of metformin on However, TZDs have also been shown to be high affinity
AMPK activation and gluconeogenesis is dampened, and ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-␥
the hypoglycemic effect of the biguanide is abolished (239), (PPAR-␥) (244). Indeed, many pharmacological effects of
suggesting that metformin’s primary action is the inhibi- rosiglitazone have been attributed to its PPAR-␥ activating
tion of hepatic gluconeogenesis and to some extent glu- properties (245, 246). TZDs acutely activate AMPK by a
cose uptake in skeletal muscles (81). Among the mechanisms mechanism independent of PPAR-␥-regulated gene tran-
of action of metformin suggested, the direct inhibition of scription, which appears to be associated with change in
the respiratory chain complex 1 constitutes the more con- cellular energy state (82, 247). TZDs downregulate lipoly-
vincing molecular mechanism, leading to reduced cellular sis through the reduction of TNF-␣ and reduce fatty acids
ATP and increased AMP (82, 240, 241). The main antidia- in circulation by accelerated uptake by adipocytes (248).
betic effect of metformin is attributed to hepatic activation In addition to TNF-␣, these drugs also inhibit the release
of AMPK followed by the inhibition of gluconeogenesis. In of several adipokines from adipose cells, such as interleu-
contrast to skeletal muscle, the effect of metformin in the kin-6 and resistin, which induce muscle insulin resistance.
liver is mediated by LKB1, as the liver-specific knockout of Concomitantly, TZDs augment the secretion of the insu-
LKB1 in diabetic mice did not respond to metformin (242). lin-sensitizing factor adiponectin from adipose tissue in
Thus, the AMPK-mediated hypoglycemic effects of met- man and rodents (249). Adiponectin stimulates glucose
formin in mice appear to require the upstream kinase uptake and fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscles and in-
LKB1. Available experimental evidence suggests that met- hibits gluconeogenesis in the liver by activating AMPK
formin activates AMPK via modulating the AMP:ATP ratio (103, 250). Thus, TZDs might exert their therapeutic ben-
as well as LKB1 mediated pathway (242), although an efit by activating AMPK via two independent mechanisms.
AMPK-independent effect has also been suggested (243). In the skeletal muscle of diabetic patients treated with
In human subjects, metformin reduces blood glucose levels TZDs, an increase in PGC-1␣ was noticed over six months
mainly via inhibition of hepatic gluconeogenesis (239). (251). Importantly, TZD effects were observed in adipo-
cytes in which PPAR-␥ expression was blocked (233),
Thiazolidinediones. Thiazolidinediones (TZD) are an- which was further corroborated using a TZD derivative,
other class of antidiabetic drugs that have been shown to BLX-1002, that does not bind to PPAR-␥, but stimulates
stimulate AMPK activity. Members of this group, such as AMPK activity and induces insulin secretion in -cells
rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, cause rapid increase in (252). PPAR-␥ sparing activity of another TZD, MSDC-
AMPK activity. Similar to the biguanides, the acute effects 0602, was recently shown to have attributes consistent with
of TZDs on AMPK activity is mediated indirectly via inhibi- AMPK activation (253).
REFERENCES
CHALLENGES OF DEVELOPING AMPK ACTIVATORS 1. Grundy, S. M. 2000. Metabolic complications of obesity. Endocrine.
13: 155–165.
Despite significant efforts toward finding efficacious 2. Han, S., C. P. Liang, M. Westerterp, T. Senokuchi, C. L. Welch,
AMPK activators for therapeutic use in patients with Q. Wang, M. Matsumoto, D. Accili, and A. R. Tall. 2009. Hepatic
MetS, most of the identified compounds prepared ei- insulin signaling regulates VLDL secretion and atherogenesis in
mice. J. Clin. Invest. 119: 1029–1041.
ther from synthetic route or extracted from plant sources 3. Boyd, S. T., D. M. Scott, and A. M. Pick. 2009. Pill burden in low-
suffer from one or more drawbacks. Initially, lack of a income patients with metabolic syndrome and diabetes. J. Pharm.
robust assay to screen AMPK activators impeded discov- Technol. 25: 297–302.
4. Srivastava, R. A., and N. Srivastava. 2004. Search for obesity drugs:
ery efforts. Due to the lack of an assay system predictive targeting central and peripheral pathways. Curr. Med. Chem.
of its usefulness in the in vivo models, even today re- Immunol. Endocr. Metab. Agents. 4: 75–90.
searchers are relying on the partially purified AMPK 5. Hardie, D. G. 2004. The AMP-activated protein kinase path-
way—new players upstream and downstream. J. Cell Sci. 117:
from rat liver, which is not a high-throughput assay 5479–5487.
method but is expected to provide meaningful data to 6. Cheung, P. C., I. P. Salt, S. P. Davies, D. G. Hardie, and D. Carling.
justify follow-up in vivo efficacy studies. Unfortunately, 2000. Characterization of AMP-activated protein kinase gamma-
subunit isoforms and their role in AMP binding. Biochem. J. 346:
small molecules with specificity and selectivity have not 659–669.
shown good pharmacokinetic properties. The other 7. Birnbaum, M. J. 2005. Activating AMP-activated protein kinase
challenge in the discovery of AMPK activators is the without AMP. Mol. Cell. 19: 289–290.
multiple mechanisms of AMPK activators in multiple tis- 8. Hardie, D. G. 2003. Minireview: the AMP-activated protein kinase
cascade: the key sensor of cellular energy status. Endocrinology.
sues and their differential effects on biochemical path- 144: 5179–5183.
ways in those tissues (i.e., liver, muscle, and adipose). 9. Beg, Z. H., D. W. Allmann, and D. M. Gibson. 1973. Modulation
Thus, in the development of a screening paradigm for of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity with
cAMP and wth protein fractions of rat liver cytosol. Biochem.
new compounds, it is challenging to decide which tissue Biophys. Res. Commun. 54: 1362–1369.
to target and what endpoint to measure in an in vivo 10. Carlson, C. A., and K. H. Kim. 1973. Regulation of hepatic acetyl
setting. As an example, the main target of A769662 is coenzyme A carboxylase by phosphorylation and dephosphoryla-
tion. J. Biol. Chem. 248: 378–380.
most likely the liver, in which an activation of 1- 11. Viollet, B., M. Foretz, B. Guigas, S. Horman, R. Dentin, L. Bertrand,
containing AMPK complex reduces the expression of L. Hue, and F. Andreelli. 2006. Activation of AMP-activated pro-
gluconeogenic enzymes. The question then remains tein kinase in the liver: a new strategy for the management of
metabolic hepatic disorders. J. Physiol. 574: 41–53.
about other tissues, like muscle, which is a key meta-
12. Towler, M. C., and D. G. Hardie. 2007. AMP-activated protein
bolic target organ for glucose metabolism. To date, ex- kinase in metabolic control and insulin signaling. Circ. Res. 100:
cept ETC-1002, small molecules that selectively activate 328–341.
AMPK have yet to show efficacy in the clinic. Future 13. Kola, B. 2008. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the control
of appetite. J. Neuroendocrinol. 20: 942–951.
studies are likely to explain whether the limited success 14. Hardie, D. G. 2004. AMP-activated protein kinase: a master switch
in targeting AMPK is related to the identified molecule’s in glucose and lipid metabolism. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 5:
safety or the complex biology of this novel target in spe- 119–125.
15. Daval, M., F. Foufelle, and P. Ferre. 2006. Functions of AMP-
cific tissues that results in the regulation of energy im- activated protein kinase in adipose tissue. J. Physiol. 574:
balances in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. 55–62.