FDP Guidelines May 2018

REVISED FIELD DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDELINES
PETROLEUM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS
Prepared by FDP Committee Members:
 Mohamed Zamrud Bin Zainal (Lead)  Juhairi Aris Bin Muhamad Shuhili
 Assoc. Prof. Lee Jang Hyun  Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tarek Arbi Omar Ganat
 Ahmad Radzi Bin Shahari  Muhammad Luqman Bin Hasan
 Ir. Dr. Chew Kew Hong  Dr. Berihun Mamo Negash
 Dr. Titus Ntow Ofei  Azlinda Abdul Malik
 Haizatul Hafizah Binti Hussain
Reviewed & Approved by
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Khaled Abdalla Elraies

Department Chair
© 2018 INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PETRONAS SDN BHD
All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any
means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owner.
Page | 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATIC MODELLING ............................................................................................................. 4

Objective 1: To describe and understand the field background. ............................................ 4
Objective 2: Static Modelling ................................................................................................ 5
Objective 3: Petrophysical analysis of offset well ................................................................. 7
RESERVOIR ENGINEERING ................................................................................................. 8
Objective 1: Basic Rock Properties ....................................................................................... 8
Objective 2: Special Core Analysis Laboratory (SCAL) Study ............................................ 9
Objective 3: PVT Analysis .................................................................................................. 10
Objective 4: Gridding / Upscaling ....................................................................................... 11
Objective 5: Initialization .................................................................................................... 12
Objective 6: Model Set Up / Well Placement ...................................................................... 13
Objective 7: Forecast - Primary recovery & optimization ................................................... 14
Objective 8: Forecast - Primary recovery with artificial lift & optimization ...................... 15
Objective 9: Forecast - Secondary recovery ........................................................................ 16
Objective 10: Forecast - Secondary recovery with artificial lift .......................................... 18
Objective 11: Reservoir Management Plan (RMP) ............................................................. 20
DRILLING ENGINEERING................................................................................................... 21
Objective 1: Perform Offset Well Analysis ......................................................................... 21
Objective 2: Pore Pressure and Fracture Gradient Profile & Casing Seat Selection .......... 22
Objective 3: Location and Number of Platform ................................................................. 23
Objective 4: Well Trajectory Design .................................................................................. 24
Objective 5: Hole/Casing Size & Kick Tolerance Determination ...................................... 25
Objective 6: Drilling Fluid and Cementing Design ............................................................ 26
Objective 7: Casing Design ................................................................................................ 27
Objective 8: Bit Selection, Preliminary BHA & Drillstring Design, Torque and Drag and
Hydraulics Analysis ............................................................................................................. 28
Objective 9: Rig Sizing and Rig Type Selection ................................................................ 30
Objective 10: Advanced Technologies & Drilling Strategy ............................................... 31
Objective 11: Time & Cost Estimation ............................................................................... 32
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING ............................................................................................ 33
Objective 1: To Perform Well Design ................................................................................. 33
Page | 2
Objective 2: Material Selection (Completion Equipment) .................................................. 34
Objective 3: To Perform Well Design ................................................................................. 35
Objective 4: To Perform Artificial Lift Selection and Design ............................................. 36
Objective 5: To Design Downhole Sand Control System ................................................... 37
Objective 6: To Design Injector Well .................................................................................. 38
Objective 7: To Prepare Well Completion Schematic ......................................................... 39
Objective 8: To Prepare Well Completion Cost .................................................................. 40
FACILITIES ENGINEERING AND HSE .............................................................................. 41
Objective 1: Analyse PVT Report ....................................................................................... 41
Objective 2: Identify Platform Location and Oil (And Gas) Export Options ...................... 41
Objective 3: Identify at Least 3 Development Options ....................................................... 41
Objective 4: Identify Process and Utilities Systems ............................................................ 41
Objective 5: Discuss Sustainability and HSE Requirements ............................................... 41
PETROLEUM ECONOMICS ................................................................................................. 41
Objective 1: Develop Economic Analysis Spreadsheet ...................................................... 41
Objective 2: Cost Estimates Using Que$Tor (Or Eqv./Merak Peep) .................................. 41
INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION ................................................................ 54
FDP ASSESSMENT BREAKDOWN ..................................................................................... 57
Page | 3
STATIC MODELLING
The general objective of static modelling part is to build static model by using Petrel TM 2015.
Objective 1: To describe and understand the field background.
Objective Description: To understand the geological information and background of the field
based on the given reports.
Steps involved:
1. Read and analyse the geological setting of the field.
Input:
1. Geological report
Output:
1. Summary of the geological information/setting.
Course mapping:
Introduction to Petroleum Geoscience / Fundamental of Petroleum Exploration Engineering
Page | 4
Objective 2: Static Modelling
Objective Description: To build a reservoir model by incorporating surface map and log data.
To estimate the hydrocarbon in place.
Steps Involved:
1. Load the horizons of the field
2. Project Setting: Change the unit to field unit from metric unit
3. Delete surface 1.1 to 6.0, left with Structure and 7.0
4. Duplicate surface: Structure and 7.0 and rename them to “Top_Actual” and “Bottom”
5. Shift the coordinate of the model to origin and open them in a new 3D window
6. Find the elevation difference between “Top_Actual” and “Bottom”
7. Delete the”Bottom”, duplicate “Top_Actual” and rename the copy, “Actual_Bottom”
8. Shift the depth by using the formula “Bottom_Actual” = “Top_Actual” – elevation
difference
9. Duplicate the wells. Shift the duplicate wells coordinate by shifting the wellhead
coordinate and creating a new survey. There are 3 wells namely SMM_1, SMM_2, and
SMM_2S1. The maximum depth must be known from trajectory
10. The newly shifted trajectory must be passed to production engineer for DST matching
11. Make Simple Grid with x and y increment of 100
12. Make Layering with number of layers, 200.
13. Under Perspective of Geology & Geophysicist, make well log upscaling
14. Create crossplots of depth, layer, porosity, permeability and water saturation and export
them.
15. Change the crossplots into .mac extension to be input in Petrel 2015. Make sure
permeability and porosity are plotted with respect to layers and water saturation is
plotted with depth. The water saturation below OWC is 1.
16. Obtain Rs and Bo from PVT Report. NTG must be analysed by exporting the crossplot
of GR first via Well Log Upscaling. The GR reading must be proven using geological
and advanced rock report.
17. Compute STOIIP using Volume icon.
Input:
1. Well logging data (interpreted)
2. Modular dynamic tester data (interpreted)
3. Poroperm relationship
4. Geological study report and advanced rock report (complementary).
Output:
1. Static Model
Page | 5
Course mapping:
1. Reservoir Engineering, I (volumetric calculation – theoretical support)
2. Introduction to Petroleum Geoscience/Fundamental of Petroleum Exploration
(mapping/horizons)
3. Well logging and formation evaluation (log interpretation)
4. Reservoir modelling and simulation (poroperm analysis in full field simulation)
5. Reservoir Engineering II / I (MDT data interpretation)
Page | 6
Objective 3: Petrophysical analysis of offset well
Objective Description: To perform petrophysical analysis on interval of offset well with DST
information to find permeability scaling.
Steps Involved:
1. The DST of an offset well must be studied to identify which depth interval the test was
run. The depth of the interval must be recorded with the right datum (whether MD or
TVD).
2. Record the permeability of the interval
3. Study the well logging data obtained from the offset well based on the identified depth
interval (Step 1 and 2) and defined the porosity over the depth interval.
4. A kind reminder: please make sure the depth and datum are the same between log and
DST. The well trajectory and rig floor elevation can be obtained from well report. Extra
cautious is needed when converting depth from a sidetrack and vertical well.
5. Perform poro-perm relationship for the offset well and compute permeability over the
interval with log data.
6. Average the permeability arithmetically and find the scale of well test permeability to
averaged poroperm permeability. The scale will be later used in your own field.
Input:
1. Well logging data (interpreted)
2. Well Test Data (No interpretation required)
3. Poroperm relationship
4. Well Report
Output:
1. Permeability scaling factor
Course mapping:
1. Well logging and formation evaluation (log interpretation)
2. Reservoir modelling and simulation (poroperm analysis in full field simulation)
3. Well test analysis (complementary knowledge)
Page | 7
RESERVOIR ENGINEERING
Objective 1: Basic Rock Properties
Objective Description: To establish a poro-perm relationship (should not be linear) and

estimate permeability using poro-perm for intervals with no core.
Steps Involved:
1. Plot all the porosity and permeability from core data.
2. Find the equation relating porosity and permeability
3. Using the equation, compute the permeability for the intervals with no core
4. The permeability created with respect to depth must be upscaled with respect to layers
and compared with upscaled log permeability. The upscaling must be done cautiously
by taking proper mid-point and conduct arithmetic averaging method. In the case of
discrepancy, the upscaled poro-perm permeability takes precedence over upscaled log
permeability since core-flooding yields direct measurement of permeability and well
logging is an interpretation method known not to yield quantitative permeability.
5. The upscaled poro-perm relationship must be scale up/down accordingly based on
output of static modelling Objective 3.
Input
1. Porosity and permeability from core data
2. Porosity from log data
3. Scale up/down from offset well logging and testing data
Output
1. Scaled poro-perm permeability
2. Permeability for all the layers
Course Mapping
Reservoir Modelling Simulation
Page | 8
Objective 2: Special Core Analysis Laboratory (SCAL) Study
Objective Description: To normalize, average and de-normalize relative permeability curves

and capillary pressures
Steps Involved:
1. Referring to Tarek Ahmad, Reservoir Engineering Handbook 3rd Edition page 311 to
313, perform the activities using core samples 3-015, 3-016 and 3-022.
2. The same procedures should be repeated for capillary pressure using all the samples.
Input
1. Relative permeability, permeability, connate water saturation, residual oil saturation
and sample height of 1 ft. (all obtained from Advanced Rock Report – Core Data).
2. Capillary pressure, permeability, connate water saturation, residual oil saturation and
sample height of 1 ft. (all obtained from Advanced Rock Report – Core Data).
Output
1. De-normalized Average Relative Permeability
2. De-normalized Average Capillary Pressure
Course Mapping
Page | 9
Objective 3: PVT Analysis
Objective Description: To digitize all the fluid properties and use correlation for missing data
interval.
Steps Involved:
1. Please digitize all the fluid properties such as formation volume factor, viscosity and
solution gas oil ratio plotted with respect to pressure.
2. Please input the curve into Petrel and choose any correlation to compute the properties
for missing interval (until initial reservoir pressure).
3. Refer to the video recorded by Prof. Jang.
Input
1. The fluid properties such as formation volume factor, viscosity and solution gas oil ratio
from fluid report
Output
1. Fluid properties such as formation volume factor, viscosity and solution gas oil ratio
plotted with respect to pressure.
2. The missing interval i.e. from the maximum pressure tested in the lab to reservoir
pressure must be defined.
Course Mapping
Reservoir Rock & Fluid Properties
Page | 10
Objective 4: Gridding / Upscaling
Objective Description: Upscale the structure (grid size) and the properties.
Steps Involved:
1. The grid numbers obtained from static models must be reduced via upscaling.
2. For all the upscaled blocks, the properties must be upscaled as well.
Input
1. Static model
Output
1. Dynamic model with less grid numbers (coarser) and upscaled properties.
Course Mapping
Page | 11
Objective 5: Initialization
Objective Description: Integrate all the dynamic data (rel. perm etc.) into the upscaled static
model and calibrate the model to minimize the differences between static and dynamic HIIP.
Steps Involved:
1. Adjust the saturation especially near the contact area and the difference of HIIP between
static and dynamic should be less than 5%.
2. Adjustment in saturation needs adjustment in capillary pressure as well.
Input
1. Dynamic model with scaled permeability
Output
1. Dynamic model with less than 5% HIIP difference with static model.
Course Mapping
Page | 12
Objective 6: Model Set Up / Well Placement
Objective Description: Determination of production targets and number of wells.
Steps Involved:
1. Determine the sweet spots in the model which are the coordinates with considerably
high porosity, permeability, low initial water saturation and highest thickness.
2. Spud production wells (not too near each other – maintain proper well spacing) over
the sweet spots (in Petrel). Well spacing refers to the distance between TD of 2
production wells.
Input
1. Dynamic model with less than 5% HIIP difference with static model.
Output
1. Number of production wells

2. Production targets (well placement)
Course Mapping
1. Reservoir Modelling Simulation
Page | 13
Objective 7: Forecast - Primary recovery & optimization
Objective Description: To evaluate the amount of monetary value (NPV) generated in

optimized primary recovery case.
Steps Involved:
1. Obtain the well trajectory (coordinates) from drilling engineer. The exact matching of
coordinates from Landmark to Petrel is quite impossible thus try your level best to have
the best same coordinates.
2. Obtain the optimum tubing size and lift curve from production engineer for each of the
well. Remember that production engineer also requires well trajectories prior to
creation of lift curve.
3. Incorporate the input from Step 1 and 2 into model and start producing.
4. Plot individual well with NPV (not cumulative rate) in descending NPV order (in MS
Excel). Determine the cut-off once there is a decline in NPV. The cut-off determines
the number of production wells required and this process is called creaming curve.
5. The production rate, perforation interval and depth of perforation, all these parameters
must be optimized and the best case (highest NPV) should be highlighted for primary
recovery.
6. Illustrate the volume of oil, gas and water produced in a bubble map form.
Input
1. Well trajectory from drilling engineer
2. Lift curve and optimum tubing size from production engineer
3. Economic figures such as oil price, costing and fiscal terms (required to compute NPV).
Output
1. NPV of all the cases
2. NPV of the most optimum case
Course Mapping
2. Production Engineering I (complementary)
3. Drilling Engineering I (complementary)
Petroleum Economics (complementary
Page | 14
Objective 8: Forecast - Primary recovery with artificial lift & optimization

optimized primary recovery case with artificial lift.
Steps Involved:
1. For all the production wells that passed creaming curve, the potential of the well to
prolong production with the aid of artificial lift for example gas lift must be studied.
2. Obtain the lift curve from production engineer for each of the well with artificial lift.
This includes optimum injection rate for gas lift and depth of injection- if gas lift is
chosen.
3. For all the production wells, the new lift curve with artificial lift must be used before
simulating the new production profile. The production profile must be translated to
NPV. Remember that installation of artificial lift will definitely incur more costs than
wells without the support. Thus, the additional recovery obtained by having artificial
lift must offset the additional cost incurred. If not, the case with no artificial lift must
be chosen for the next stage
4. Illustrate the volume of oil, gas and water produced in a bubble map form.
Input
2. Lift curve, optimum gas lift injection rate, depth of injection and optimum tubing size
from production engineer
Please allocate some extra cost for production wells due to gas lift installation.
Output
Course Mapping
4. Petroleum Economics (complementary)
Page | 15
Objective 9: Forecast - Secondary recovery

optimized secondary recovery case.
Steps Involved:
1. Based on primary recovery without artificial lift, study the production profile and well
placement of each production well. Based on the study, find the targets for injection.
There are two different schemes applicable, injection into reservoir or/and into aquifer.
Bear in mind, selecting injection targets far from platform may result in this several
consequences; repositioning of platform which means Objective 7 must be redone,
commissioning of a satellite platform for injection wells or sub-sea injection wells. The
latter two are costly.
2. Obtain the well trajectory (coordinates) for injection wells and production wells (if
repositioning of platform occurs) from drilling engineer. The exact matching of
3. Obtain the lift curve from production engineer for each of the production (if
repositioning of platform occurs) and injection wells. The injection rate and pressure
can be obtained by performing nodal analysis in the injection wells. The maximum rate
and minimum pressure will be shown. Please also obtain the optimum tubing size for
production (if repositioning of platform occurs) and injection wells as well.
4. Incorporate the lift curve and well trajectories for production (if repositioning of
platform occurs) and injection wells into the model.
5. For the production rate, perforation interval and depth of perforation, all these
parameters must be optimized. Optimization can also take place by varying injection
pressure, injection rate and depth of injection. When designing the injection pressure,
the pressure should not exceed fracture pressure at that depth (perforation depth). The
fracture pressure can be checked from mud window (pore pressure and fracture pressure
plot with depth). The best case (highest NPV) should be highlighted for secondary
recovery.
6. Illustrate the volume of oil, gas and water produced in a bubble map form. This is only
meant for production wells.
Input

2. Lift curve, optimum tubing size from production engineer.
3. Nodal analysis of injection well and tubing size from production engineer.
4. Plot of fracture pressure with depth from drilling engineer.
Page | 16
Please ensure right material is used for injection wells which will affect the cost of per
injection well.
Output

Course Mapping

Page | 17
Objective 10: Forecast - Secondary recovery with artificial lift

optimized secondary recovery case with artificial lift.
Steps Involved:
1. Based on primary recovery with artificial lift, study the production profile and well
placement of each production well. Based on the study, find the targets for injection.
There are two different schemes applicable, injection into reservoir or/and into aquifer.
Bear in mind, selecting injection targets far from platform may result in this several
consequences; repositioning of platform which means Objective 8 must be redone,
commissioning of a satellite platform for injection wells or sub-sea injection wells. The
latter two are costly.
2. Obtain the well trajectory (coordinates) for injection wells and production wells (if
repositioning of platform occurs) from drilling engineer. The exact matching of
3. Obtain the lift curve with artificial lift from production engineer for each of the
production (if repositioning of platform occurs) and injection wells. This includes
optimum injection rate for gas lift and depth of injection. The injection rate and pressure
can be obtained by performing nodal analysis in the injection wells. The maximum rate
and minimum pressure will be shown. Please also obtain the optimum tubing size for
production (if repositioning of platform occurs) and injection wells as well.
4. Incorporate the lift curve and well trajectories for production (if repositioning of
platform occurs) and injection wells into the model.
5. For the production rate, perforation interval and depth of perforation, all these
parameters must be optimized. Optimization can also take place by varying injection
pressure, injection rate and depth of injection. When designing the injection pressure,
the pressure should not exceed fracture pressure at that depth (perforation depth). The
fracture pressure can be checked from mud window (pore pressure and fracture pressure
plot with depth). The best case (highest NPV) should be highlighted for secondary
recovery.
6. Illustrate the volume of oil, gas and water produced in a bubble map form. This is only
meant for production wells.
7. Although there might be presumption that combining artificial lift with injection should
yield the highest recovery but that is not always the case. The improper planning of
injection wells will also result in less NPV compared to cases without injection wells.
Input

2. Lift curve, optimum tubing size from production engineer.
Page | 18
3. Nodal analysis of injection well and tubing size from production engineer.
4. Plot of fracture pressure with depth from drilling engineer.
Please ensure right material is used for injection wells which will affect the cost of per
injection well.
Output

Course Mapping

Page | 19
Objective 11: Reservoir Management Plan (RMP)
Objective Description: To provide general clauses on Reservoir Management Plan.
Steps Involved:
1. Please include critical parameters such as listed in the input below and write them up
in a single paragraph. Elaboration can be included on how to arrive at the figures.
Input
1. The injection pressure implemented with constraint from fracture pressure.
2. The time when injection is started. This criterion can be explained by defining the
minimum reservoir pressure to maintain (such as slightly above bubble point).
3. The voidage replacement ratio (VRR) from secondary recovery cases.
4. Maximum gas oil ratio (GOR) from production engineer.
5. The allowable amount of producible CO2.
Output
1. Reservoir Management Plan (RMP)
Course Mapping
Field Development Plan
Page | 20
DRILLING ENGINEERING
To design a cost effective & fit for purpose well.
Objective 1: Perform Offset Well Analysis
Objective Description: To identify risk and challenges encountered in the offset well and gather
all well design and drilling parameter
Steps involve:
1. Gather well design parameter and drilling parameter from available offset well data
2. Identify risk and challenges from the offset well by looking into section summary,
drilling report.
Input:
1. End of well report
2. Mud log
3. Any formation pressure information (MDT, RFT)
Output:
1. Stick chart
2. Time Vs. Depth curve for offset well
Course Mapping:
Drilling Engineering I
Page | 21
Objective 2: Pore Pressure and Fracture Gradient Profile & Casing Seat Selection
Objective Description: To develop a safe mud window (pore pressure and fracture gradient
profile)
Steps Involved:
1. Use the information from bulk density logs to construct the overburden pressure profile
2. With the mud weight (together with any well control event, MDT data or formation
evaluation log data such as neutron porosity, resistivity, sonic, etc) , use the available
pore pressure correlation and calibrate with mud weight and any actual well control
event in the offset well.
3. By using overburden pressure and pore pressure profiles, use any of the available
fracture pressure correlation and calibrate it with actual data from LOT or FIT or XLOT
and actual event in offset well such as losses.
4. Refine the model by considering any wellbore stability event such as wellbore breakout
5. Input a suitable margin for pore pressure and fracture pressure (and if available collapse
pressure, this is optional)
6. Select preliminary casing setting depth with any of the approach (except for conductor
casing)
7. Conductor casing setting depth, piled conductor usually required at least 100 ft of
penetration below seabed or deeper than platform piles or until refusal (254 blow per
foot). Take note this is field dependent.
Input:
1. Mud weight information, LOT, FIT, XLOT. (Any events such as well control, losses,
breakout)
2. Formation evaluation log, MDT
Output:
1. Pore pressure and fracture gradient profile
2. Stable mud window profile, with consideration on wellbore stability. (Optional)
3. Casing setting depth (except for conductor casing)
Course mapping:
Page | 22
Objective 3: Location and Number of Platform
Objective Description: To determine the most optimized location and number of platform.
Steps Involved:
1. Obtain well placement targets from reservoir simulation, ideally this target includes
injector as well.
2. By using landmark compass site optimizer, determine the most optimized location of
the platform and if necessary multiple platform need to be considered.
Input:
1. Subsurface targets from reservoir simulation
(X(Easting), Y(Northing), Z(TVDSS))
2. Kick off point, dog leg and inclination limitation, well profile.
Output:
1. Coordinates of the platform(s)
Course mapping:
Page | 23
Objective 4: Well Trajectory Design
Objective Description: To determine the trajectory of the well
Steps Involved:
1. Obtain the surface coordinates of the platform from the previous step
2. Construct a drilling slot template considering the amount of well to be drilled on that
platform
3. Use specific slot and perform well plan to each target, considering kick off point, dog
leg and inclination limitation
4. After all trajectory is completed. Look at the spider plot and rectify if there any well
path intersecting near the platform/slots
5. Perform a preliminary anti-collision analysis (in reality, hole size/casing size and well
sequence need to be considered)
6. Rectify any issue with the trajectory if there is any well that have OSF< 5. (OSF:
oriented separation factor). Any situation where 1.5<OSF <5 is technically acceptable.
Input:
1. Subsurface targets from reservoir simulation
(X(Easting), Y(Northing), Z(TVDSS))
2. Coordinates of platform(s)
Output:
1. Well trajectory (well deviation plan)

2. Anti-collision analysis report
3. Spider-plot
4. 3D view of well trajectory
Course mapping:
Page | 24
Objective 5: Hole/Casing Size & Kick Tolerance Determination
Objective Description: To determine hole & casing size
Steps Involved:
1. Obtain the tubing size for the wells & completion design (cased/open hole)
2. Select your casing design and hole size by using the hole/casing size chart. Consider
the completion design as well.
3. Check for kick tolerance, ensure a bare minimum of 25 bbls kick tolerance for all
section below surface casing.
4. If kick tolerance is not acceptable, modify the casing setting depth or further
modification.
Input:
1. Tubing size for each well
2. Completion design (cased hole, open hole, monobore, etc.)
3. Mud weight and expected pore pressure (for kick tolerance)
4. Simplified generic BHA
Output:
1. Casing and hole size for each section

2. Kick tolerance result
Course mapping:
Page | 25
Objective 6: Drilling Fluid and Cementing Design
Objective Description: To determine the suitable mud type and cementing design
Steps Involved:
1. Identify any issue or challenges in offset well in term of drilling fluid and cementing
(such as clay swelling, losses while drilling or cementing, hole cleaning issue)
2. Select the mud type that could prevent or mitigate any issue encountered in the offset
well in consideration of the new well design.
3. Check for top of hydrocarbon in each section and ensure top of cement is always at
least 500 ft above the top of hydrocarbon. Surface casing is usually cemented to surface
while liner need to be cemented up until the previous casing.
4. Determine the top of cement for lead and tail cement.
5. Calculate the slurry volume requirement for each tail and lead cement and determine
the amount of sacks of cements required.
Input:
1. Offset well analysis
2. Offset well cement design
Output:
1. Mud type
2. Top of cement for tail and lead
3. Cement volume and sacks of cements
4. Any special additives for cement
Course mapping:
Page | 26
Objective 7: Casing Design
Objective Description: To perform casing design considering pressure, temperature and

service life of the well.
Steps Involved:
1. Gather pore pressure, fracture pressure (and temperature if available) from previous
analysis
2. Gather data from formation fluid analysis, H2S, CO2 concentration and injection fluid
(oxygen content if water)
3. Gather well design parameter such as top of cement, casing setting depth, casing size,
injection pressure (for injection well)
4. By using Landmark stress check, input all the design parameter.
5. Create scenario such as full evacuation to gas, gas replacement, pressure test, tubing
leak, etc. for each casing string.
6. Select the most suitable connection for each string considering requirement such as gas
tightness (if required) and application (e.g: casing while drilling). Consider the tensile,
burst and collapse rating of each connection
7. Select the best casing configuration that meet the minimum design factor for burst,
collapse, tension, triaxial/VME.
8. Revise (if required) casing selection considering fluid or injection fluid (injector well)
and temperature. This can be done together with PTech for tubing material selection.
Input:
2. Drilling fluid and cementing design
3. Casing setting depth
4. Pore pressure and fracture pressure profile
5. Formation fluid analysis
Output:
1. Grade, weight, size (previously determined) of each string

2. Casing Connection
Course mapping:
Page | 27
Objective 8: Bit Selection, Preliminary BHA & Drillstring Design, Torque and Drag and
Hydraulics Analysis
Objective Description: To perform a selection on drill bit, and to perform preliminary BHA
and drill string design, torque &drag analysis and hydraulics.
Steps Involved:
1. Examine bit records from offset well, check if there any need for improvement or any
way to eliminate or reduce the amount of bit trip. Perform bit selection based on offset
well bit records and if available, data from mud log, sonic data (can be correlated with
UCS) and formation evaluation logs.
2. Gather data on trajectory, any dog leg requirement, and section which require build,
hold drop or combination of build-hold, drop- hold or all in one section.
3. Decide on the type of steering used for each section, simple rotary BHA, mud motor
or rotary steerable system.
4. Gather drilling parameter such as weight on bit, ROP, RPM, etc from offset. (decide if
any modification required)
5. By using Landmark WellPlan, input the design parameter and create a BHA with the
steering tool (PDM or RSS if required) MWD and any other LWD as per logging
requirement. Consider the Weight on bit and trajectory and include sufficient drill
collar and HWDP (if required). In reality you should include JAR and possibly
accelerator as well but that is considered out of scope.
6. Continue to create the drillstring and choose the proper size of drill pipe with the correct
class and preliminary grade and weight and connection
7. Run the torque and drag module in Landmark WellPlan and check if there is any
component that exceeds the buckling limit, tensile limit and torque limit. It is common
practice to not let tension at any point exceed the 80% tensile limit of that component
and torque to not exceed 80% of makeup torque.
8. Consider maximum torque as well and check if this amount of torque can be provided
by the top drive at this specific RPM. (Usually not a problem unless it is an ERD well)
9. Run the hydraulics module with the specific drilling fluid properties you have
designed, design the bit total flow area(TFA)within 2.5 < Horsepower per square
inch(HIS) < 5 but this is just a general guideline.
10. Check maximum pump pressure and ECD at the bit and the shoe, make sure none of
the limit is exceeded such as fracture pressure and of course check the capability of the
pump to deliver the given flow rate at the maximum pump pressure.
Input:
Page | 28
1. Drilling fluid properties
2. ROP, Weight on Bit, RPM, flow rate
3. Bit records from offset wells
Output:
1. Bit selection
2. Preliminary BHA and Drill string design
3. Torque and drag analysis
4. Hydraulics analysis
Course mapping:
1. Drilling Engineering I
2. Drilling Engineering II
3. Drilling Hydraulics
4. Offshore Drilling Engineering
Page | 29
Objective 9: Rig Sizing and Rig Type Selection
Objective Description: To perform preliminary rig sizing and rig type selection
Steps Involved:
1. Consider the type of field development (Subsea well head or platform?)

2. Consider the type of platform and number of wells planned to be drilled on the
platform, large platform is usually design in consideration of taking in a tender assisted
rig. (A large platform with a great number of slots to be covered required multiple rig
move/re-positioning if it is required to be covered by a jack-up rig)
3. If a tender assisted rig is selected, the platform must be designed in a way that it could
take in the additional weight of drilling equipment set(DES) and the drilling loads and
this should be communicated to facilities. The platform layout need to be designed in
a way to facilitate the use of tender assisted rig.
4. If a jack-up rig is selected, consider the drilling envelop of a jackup rig. Can the jack-
up rig cover the whole slots?
5. Check the drilling load capability of the jack-up rig, keep in mind that the derrick load
capability reduces the farthest the cantilever “skid out” from its original position
6. Ensure that the rig pump is capable to deliver the required flow rate at the pump
pressure required
7. Ensure that the rig capable to provide the torque at the rpm required.
8. Ensure the BOP stack and well control equipment satisfies the drilling requirement.
Input:
1. Torque and drag analysis
2. Hydraulics analysis
3. Platform slots layout
Output:
1. Rig type
2. Rig sizing
Course mapping:
1. Drilling Engineering I
2. Drilling Engineering II
3. Drilling Hydraulics
4. Offshore Drilling Engineering
Page | 30
Objective 10: Advanced Technologies & Drilling Strategy
Objective Description: To identify any opportunity to use any advanced technology to improve
drilling performance or prevent or mitigate any potential issue. Identify drilling strategy that
could optimize drilling
Steps Involved:
1. Consider the type of problem encountered in offset well, is it possible to prevent or

mitigate the potential problem using any advanced technology.
2. Consider any technology that could reduce the time spent on drilling, logging, casing
running, etc. Any technology selected need to be properly justified, at the end of the
day, it is all about the cost (if u use an additional equipment to reduce time, the time
saving should result in an overall reduction in cost)
3. Consider drilling strategy such as batch drilling, however take note that batch drilling
has its own limitation (number of wells drilled in batch mode and of course delay in
first oil, at the end of the day as long as it can be justified by cost saving). Batch drilling
could reduce the amount of idle time on waiting on cement (WOC) and also reduce
overhead cost of sending the equipment (such as RSS) to rig and sending it off back to
the contractor base (item not being send back is charged on per day basis)
Input:
Output:
1. Drilling strategy
2. Any plan to use advanced technology (if any) with justification
Course mapping:
Page | 31
Objective 11: Time & Cost Estimation
Objective Description: To estimate time and cost for each well
Steps Involved:
1. Outline each step of the drilling process, including rig mobilization and rig positioning
and demob. (e.g.: Rig move, Rig positioning, rig up, conductor driving (if not done by
facilities), install Started head (depends on which case) and diverter and F/T same,
M/U BHA, trip in, drill and cased surface hole, WOC, N/D diverter, install CHS &
N/U BOP and P/T & F/T BOP, M/U BHA for next section, trip in drill next section
and cased same, WOC, cement evaluation logging, etc.)
2. Consider if your strategy includes batch drilling, in that case Waiting on cement
(WOC) can be eliminated but need to take into account the skidding time (to another
slot) and installation of suspension cap, and N/U diverter or BOP again.
3. Obtain completion time from PTech and sum it up for a total well time.
4. Using an excel template or costing software (TBA) generate the cost for each well
based (drilling phase only) on time required.
5. Obtain completion cost from PTech but ensure they consider rig cost as well not just
the completion equipment and accessories.
6. Generate a Time versus depth curve (TVD) for each well.
7. Generate KPI such as Drilling days per 1000 ft., Drilling cost per foot and Well cost
per foot.
Input:
2. Well design
3. Drilling strategy
4. Any advanced technology used
5. Completion time
6. Completion cost
Output:
1. Total drilling time

2. Total drilling cost
3. Total time including completion
4. Total well cost
Course mapping:
Page | 32
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING
To perform a cost effective well completion design and maximizing the value of Field life
cycle.
Objective 1: To Perform Well Design
Objective Description: To select the optimum tubing size by performing sensitivity analysis
at various operating condition for new oil producer well.
Steps Involved:
1. Use forecast data for IPR input

2. Acquire deviation data from Drilling
3. Acquire surface data from Facility
4. Build well model using PROSPER
5. Perform sensitivity using several tubing size at different operating condition
6. Generate Lift curve for Reservoir simulator
Input:
1. PVT report – Compositional data, reservoir pressure and temperature.

2. Production Flow rate constraint from reservoir simulation
3. Forecast
4. Predecessor objective – P1 (Type of VLP correlation to be used in PROSPER).
Output:
1. Well model for Producer

2. Lift curve for reservoir simulator
Course mapping:
1. Petroleum Production Optimization

2. Production Engineering I
Page | 33
Objective 2: Material Selection (Completion Equipment)
Objective Description: To choose suitable material of the completion equipment.
Steps Involved:
1. Calculate the partial pressure for Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen Sulfide
2. Determine the proper material by referring to the material selection chart based on
CO2, H2S and temperature.
3. Determine the final material grade by performing tubing stress analysis
Input:

2. Material selection chart – from online Link
3. Predecessor objective – Not available.
Output:
1. Material grade to be used in the development well.
Course mapping:
Page | 34
Objective 3: To Perform Well Design
Objective Description: To select the optimum tubing size by performing sensitivity analysis
at various operating condition for new oil producer well.
Steps Involved:

Input:
2. Production Flow rate constraint from reservoir simulation
3. Forecast
4. Predecessor objective – P1 (Type of VLP correlation to be used in PROSPER).
Output:
1. Well model for Producer

Course mapping:

Page | 35
Objective 4: To Perform Artificial Lift Selection and Design
Objective Description: To choose type of artificial lift system to be used in the FDP and the
perform detail design of the artificial lift system.
Steps Involved:
1. Evaluate at least 2 type of artificial lift system

2. Choose one of the artificial lift system to be used in FDP
3. Using well model, perform detail artificial lift system design based on the worst
condition observed from production forecast.
4. Perform production optimization using the new artificial lift system.
5. Generate updated Lift curve for Reservoir simulator
Input:
1. Production Flow rate constraint from Reservoir
2. Gaslift data from Facility
3. Forecast from Reservoir
4. Predecessor objective – P4 (PROSPER model without artificial lift).
Output:
1. Well model for Producer with artificial lift system

3. The optimum artificial lifts setting i.e. Gaslift injection rate or Frequency for pumps.
Course mapping:

Page | 36
Objective 5: To Design Downhole Sand Control System
Objective Description: To evaluate the sand data, to do the screening on type of sand control
system to be used and to design the downhole sand control system.
Steps Involved:
1. Evaluate the sand data

2. To determine type of sand control equipment to be used
3. Perform sand control equipment design
Input:
1. Sonic log
2. Particle Size Distribution report
Output:
1. Type of sand control to be used in development.
Course mapping:
Page | 37
Objective 6: To Design Injector Well
Objective Description: To design injector well as secondary recovery mechanism
Steps Involved:

Input:

3. Acquire fracture pressure from End of Well Report
5. Injection Flow rate target from Reservoir
6. Forecast from Reservoir
7. Predecessor objective – R10 (PROSPER model without artificial lift).
Output:
1. Well model for Injector well

Course mapping:
Page | 38
Objective 7: To Prepare Well Completion Schematic
Objective Description: To compile the upper completion and lower completion information
and summarize it in the form of well completion schematic.
Steps Involved:
1. To identify associated downhole equipment

2. To determine type of Christmas tree to be used for the development well
3. Compile the information
4. Build well completion schematic for all wells including injector
Input:
1. Predecessor objective – P4, P5 and P6.
Output:
1. Well model for Injector well

Course mapping:
Production Engineering I
Page | 39
Objective 8: To Prepare Well Completion Cost
Objective Description: To compile the cost of completion for each well type.
Steps Involved:
1. Compile the information

2. Build well completion schematic for all wells including injector
Input:
1. Predecessor objective – P7.
Output:
1. Cost Summary
Course mapping:
Production Engineering I
Page | 40
FACILITIES ENGINEERING AND HSE
To propose facilities plan for the field development
Objective 1: Analyse PVT Report

Objective Description: To determine oil and gas processing facilities required.
Objective 2: Identify Platform Location and Oil (And Gas) Export Options
Objective Description: To identify location of surface facilities
Objective 3: Identify at Least 3 Development Options

Objective Description: To identify types of offshore structures for processing, storage/export
and pipelines
Objective 4: Identify Process and Utilities Systems

Objective Description: To identify main processing and utilities modules and their capacities
based on production profiles and reservoir development strategies and production engineering
input
Objective 5: Discuss Sustainability and HSE Requirements

Objective Description: To discuss the sustainability and HSE aspects of the field
development plan
PETROLEUM ECONOMICS
To conduct economic analysis for the field development options proposed
Objective 1: Develop Economic Analysis Spreadsheet

Objective Description: To identify location of surface facilities
Objective 2: Cost Estimates Using Que$Tor (Or Eqv./Merak Peep)

Objective Description: To generate costs for economic analysis
Page | 41
APPENDIX 1-1
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
May 2018
FORM 03a
FDP I FINAL ORAL PRESENTATION SCORE SHEET
(To be completed by Internal Examiners)

Group Name : _________________________________________________________
Please circle the appropriate grade for each category
(Marks Awarded)
A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Category (0.85- (0.84- (0.75- (0.65- (0.55- (0.5- (0.45- (0.44- (0-0.39)
Criteria for Judging
Quality 1) 0.8) 0.79) 0.74) 0.64) 0.54) 0.49) 0.40)
Geological
 Geological Setting
Background
(5)  Reservoir Geology
Petrophysics & Static  Gamma-Ray Log analysis

Modelling (30)  Static Modelling
 Basic Rock Properties

Reservoir (25)  SCAL Study
 PVT Analysis
 Upscaling
 Initialization
Non-verbal  Appearance; Facial
Communication expression; Confidence
(15)  Gesture; Eye Contact,
Pauses
 Use of aids (graphs,
diagrams, objects etc)
 Fluency and choice of
words (using language
clearly and accurately)
Pronunciation, articulation
 Continuity of Presentation
 Technical and factual
Questions and accuracy; Grasp of subject
Answers (25)  Creativity – use of
example
 Convincing Answer,
Showing creativity and
Innovativeness
TOTAL SCORE (/100)
Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________
………………………………….
Internal Examiner’s/ signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
Page | 42
APPENDIX 1-2
May 2018
FORM 03b
FDP I FINAL REPORT SCORE SHEET
(To be completed by Internal Examiner)

Group Name : _________________________________________________________
(Marks Awarded)
Category (0.85- (0.84- (0.75- (0.65- (0.55- (0.5- (0.45- (0.44- (0-0.39)
Quality 1) 0.8) 0.79) 0.74) 0.64) 0.54) 0.49) 0.40)
Geological
 Geological Setting
Background
(10)  Reservoir Geology
Petrophysics & Static  Gamma-Ray Log analysis

Modelling (30)  Static Modelling
 SCAL & Basic Rock

Reservoir (30) Property
 PVT Analysis
 Gridding / Upscaling
 Initialization
Language and  No grammatical error
formatting (15)  Language and formatting
 Range of Volume
Conclusion (15)  Uncertainty
 Assumptions
TOTAL SCORE (/100)
Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________
………………………………….
Internal Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
Page | 43
APPENDIX 1-3
May 2018
FORM 03c
FDP II FINAL ORAL PRESENTATION SCORE SHEET
(To be completed by Internal Examiner/ External Examiner)

Group Name : _________________________________________________________
(Marks Awarded)
Category (0.85- (0.84- (0.75- (0.65- (0.55- (0.5- (0.45- (0.44- (0-0.39)
Quality 1) 0.8) 0.79) 0.74) 0.64) 0.54) 0.49) 0.40)
 Model setup & well

placement
Reservoir (15)  Forecast & Optimization
 Reservoir Management
Plan
Production (15)  DST well Nodal analysis
 Well design
 Artificial lift design
 Casing design and
wellhead selection
 Well trajectories
 Torque and drag,
Hydraulics
 Time and Cost Estimates
 Offset well analysis
 Drilling fluids and
cementing
Drilling (15)  Pore pressure & fracture
pressure profile
 Drill string design & bit
selection
 Casing setting depth with
kick tolerance
consideration
 Rig sizing and selection
 Drilling Optimization &
new technology
consideration
 Development options
Facility & HSE (10) selection
 Oil (& gas) export options
 Oil & gas processing
facilities, utilities and other
systems
 Discuss sustainable
development & HSE
requirements
 Discuss abandonment
options
Consistency &  Integration between
Workflow of FDP discipline
(15)  Teamwork and integration
between discipline
Economic  Economic Assumptions
Page | 44
(15)  Development Options and
scenarios
 Results (NPV, IRR,
Payback period, PI)
 Sensitivity Analysis (oil
price, Opex, Capex,
production rates)
 Conclusion and
Recommendation
Pauses
example
Innovativeness
TOTAL SCORE (/100)
Comments: _______________________________________________
………………………………….
Internal Examiner 's/External Examiner’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
Page | 45
APPENDIX 1-4
May 2018
FORM 03d
FDP II FINAL REPORT SCORE SHEET
(To be completed by Internal Examiner)

Group Name : _________________________________________________________
(Marks Awarded)
Category (0.85- (0.84- (0.75- (0.65- (0.55- (0.5- (0.45- (0.44- (0-0.39)
Quality 1) 0.8) 0.79) 0.74) 0.64) 0.54) 0.49) 0.40)
FDP I Report (5)  Contents of FDP I

 Model setup & well
placement
Reservoir (15)  Forecast & Optimization
 Reservoir Management
Plan
Production (15)  DST well Nodal analysis
 Well design
 Artificial lift design
wellhead selection
Hydraulics
cementing
Drilling (15)  Pore pressure & fracture
pressure profile
selection
kick tolerance
consideration
new technology
consideration
Facility & HSE (10) selection
systems
development & HSE
requirements
options
Consistency &  Integration between
Workflow of FDP discipline
(15)  Teamwork and integration
between discipline
Economic  Economic Assumptions
(15)  Development Options and
scenarios
Page | 46
Payback period, PI)
 Sensitivity Analysis (oil
price, Opex, Capex,
production rates)
 Conclusion and
Recommendation
Language and  No grammatical error
formatting (10)  Language and formatting
TOTAL SCORE (/100)
Comments: _______________________________________________
………………………………….
Internal Examiner 's signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
Page | 47
APPENDIX 1-5
May 2018
FORM 03e
STATIC MODEL DECISION GATE PRESENTATION
(To be completed by Supervisor/Consultant)

Group Name : _________________________________________________________
(Marks Awarded)
Category (0.85- (0.84- (0.75- (0.65- (0.55- (0.5- (0.45- (0.44- (0-0.39)
Quality 1) 0.8) 0.79) 0.74) 0.64) 0.54) 0.49) 0.40)
Corrected Surface  Top_Actual &

(20) Bottom_Actual horizon
 Elevation difference
 Well head coordinate
Well Coordinates  New trajectory
(15)
 X and Y-increment
Gridding & Layering  Number of Layers
(10)
 Population of data from

Properties Generation well log, poro-perm and
& STOIIP Estimation well test data
(30)  Setting up contact
 Estimation of STOIIP
Pauses
example
Innovativeness
TOTAL SCORE (/100)
Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________
………………………………….
Supervisor/Consultant’s signature
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
Page | 48
APPENDIX 1-6
May 2018
FORM 03f
DYNAMIC MODEL DECISION GATE PRESENTATION

Group Name : _________________________________________________________
(Marks Awarded)
Category (0.85- (0.84- (0.75- (0.65- (0.55- (0.5- (0.45- (0.44- (0-0.39)
Quality 1) 0.8) 0.79) 0.74) 0.64) 0.54) 0.49) 0.40)
Basic Rock  Poroperm Relationship

Properties (15)
 Relative permeability
normalization
SCAL Study (20)
 Capillary pressure
normalization
 Digitization of PVT plots,
PVT Analysis (10) tables and values
 Grid Coarsening compared

Upscaling & to Static Model
Initialization (30)  Matching STOIIP volume
with Static Model
Pauses
example
Innovativeness
TOTAL SCORE (/100)
Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________
………………………………….
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
Page | 49
APPENDIX 1-7
May 2018
FORM 03g
DRILLING & PRODUCTION DECISION GATE PRESENTATION

Group Name : _________________________________________________________
Awarded)
(Marks
Category A A- B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Quality (0.85- (0.84- (0.75- (0.65- (0.55- (0.5- (0.45- (0.44- (0-0.39)
1) 0.8) 0.79) 0.74) 0.64) 0.54) 0.49) 0.40)
DST matching (5)  Perform DST matching
 Tubing Size Sensitivity

Nodal Analysis (20)  Lift Curve Generation
Well Completion  Sand Control Design

Schematic &  Size and Depth of
Artificial Design Completion Object
(10)
wellhead selection
Hydraulics
cementing
Drilling Engineering
(35)  Pore pressure & fracture
pressure profile
selection
kick tolerance
consideration
new technology
Pauses
example
Innovativeness
TOTAL SCORE (/100)
Page | 50
Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________
………………………………….
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
Page | 51
APPENDIX 1-8
May 2018
FORM 03h
FACILITIES & PETROLEUM ECONOMIC DECISION GATE PRESENTATION

Group Name : _________________________________________________________
(Marks Awarded)
Category (0.85- (0.84- (0.75- (0.65- (0.55- (0.5- (0.45- (0.44- (0-0.39)
Quality 1) 0.8) 0.79) 0.74) 0.64) 0.54) 0.49) 0.40)
selection
Facility & HSE (35)
systems
development & HSE
requirements
options
 Economic Assumptions
 Development Options and
scenarios
Petroleum Economics Payback period, PI)
(35)  Sensitivity Analysis (oil
price, Opex, Capex,
production rates)
 Conclusion and
Recommendation
Pauses
example
Innovativeness
TOTAL SCORE (/100)
Page | 52
Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________
………………………………….
Name : _____________________________________ Date : ____________
Page | 53
INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION
INDIVIDUAL QUESTION AND

NAME ID PRESENTATION ANSWER REMARKS
(5 MARKS) (5 MARKS)
Page | 54
APPENDIX 1-8
1.0 May 2018
FORM 03i
PEER EVALUATION FORM

(Mark each category that best describes performance using the scale for each of your team members. An average score will
be determined.)
Group :
:
Evaluated by :
Date :
1. Working with others - Effectiveness in relating and co-operation with others

2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Mark
Impatient listener. Does Receptive to other ideas. Initiates and cultivates
Makes and maintains
not consider people’s Sometimes fails to share Always makes a key contacts. Uses tact
workable relationships
opinions. Loses their ideas to gain support contribution and and diplomacy. Gets
with others
interest and support cooperates unpopular things done
2. Planning and organising - Establishes realistic goals and uses resources

2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Mark
Does not plan ahead.
Does not prioritise. Carefully plans so that Always on top of things
Always waits to the last Organises work to keep
Spends too much time on support is available when and in control. “Panics”
minute. Frequently productively occupied
nonessential items needed handled smoothly
misses deadlines
3. Effectiveness under stress - Ability to work under pressure of changing load & deadlines
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Mark
Keeps work flowing When a crises occurs, Raises Game. Smoothly
Easily flustered when Stays calm during hectic
smoothly in normal drops everything and produces high quality
given more than one periods and maintains
situations but loses it produces high quality work to meet each new
assignment to do steady output
when pressure mounts work and existing deadline
4. Commitment to job - Diligence, involvement and interest in work

2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Mark
Frequently tardy or Very attentive to Eagerly seeks new
Works dependably on
absent for reasons others responsibilities. assignments and
Does not devote time to regular assignments but
consider frivolous. Discourages casual challenges. Pursues
develop new job skills. does not take on extra
Outside interests more conversation when development activities in
work
important. there’s work to be done own time.
AVERAGE MARK =
………………………………….
Student's signature
Page | 55
NAME OF GROUP MEMBERS 1 2 3 4 AVG
Please fill in the marks according to the criteria listed on the previous page
Page | 56
FDP ASSESSMENT BREAKDOWN
FDP I Evaluated by Mark Week

Static Model Decision Gate Presentation (Group) Supervisor/Consultant 10 6
Static Model Decision Gate Presentation (Individual) Supervisor/Consultant 10 6
Dynamic Model Decision Gate Presentation (Group) Supervisor/Consultant 10 11
Dynamic Model Decision Gate Presentation (Individual) Supervisor/Consultant 10 11
Final Presentation (Group) Internal Examiner 15 13
Final Presentation (Individual) Internal Examiner 5 13
Final Report Internal Examiner 20 13
Peer Evaluation N/A 5 13
Test N/A 15 12
FDP II Evaluated by Mark Week
Drilling & Production Decision Gate Presentation (Group) Supervisor/Consultant 10 12
Drilling & Production Decision Gate Presentation (Individual) Supervisor/Consultant 5 12
Facilities & Petroleum Economic Decision Gate Presentation (Group) Supervisor/Consultant 10 13
Facilities & Petroleum Economic Decision Gate Presentation (Individual) Supervisor/Consultant 5 13
Final Report Internal Examiner 15 14
Final Presentation (Group) Internal Examiner 10 14
Final Presentation (Individual) Internal Examiner 5 14
Final Presentation (Group) External Examiner 15 14
Final Presentation (Individual) External Examiner 5 14
Peer Evaluation N/A 5 14
Test N/A 15 11
Page | 57

FDP Guidelines May 2018

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

FDP Guidelines May 2018

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

REVISED FIELD DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDELINES

PETROLEUM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS

Prepared by FDP Committee Members:

Reviewed & Approved by

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Khaled Abdalla Elraies

© 2018 INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PETRONAS SDN BHD

STATIC MODELLING ............................................................................................................. 4

Objective 1: To describe and understand the field background.

Objective 1: Basic Rock Properties

Objective Description: To establish a poro-perm relationship (should not be linear) and

Objective Description: To normalize, average and de-normalize relative permeability curves

Objective Description: Determination of production targets and number of wells.

1. Number of production wells

1. Reservoir Modelling Simulation

Objective Description: To evaluate the amount of monetary value (NPV) generated in

Petroleum Economics (complementary

Objective Description: To evaluate the amount of monetary value (NPV) generated in

Objective Description: To evaluate the amount of monetary value (NPV) generated in

1. Well trajectory from drilling engineer

1. NPV of all the cases

1. Reservoir Modelling Simulation

Objective Description: To evaluate the amount of monetary value (NPV) generated in

1. Well trajectory from drilling engineer

1. NPV of all the cases

1. Reservoir Modelling Simulation

Objective Description: To provide general clauses on Reservoir Management Plan.

To design a cost effective & fit for purpose well.

Objective 1: Perform Offset Well Analysis

Objective Description: To determine the trajectory of the well

1. Well trajectory (well deviation plan)

Objective Description: To determine hole & casing size

1. Casing and hole size for each section

Objective Description: To perform casing design considering pressure, temperature and

1. Grade, weight, size (previously determined) of each string

1. Consider the type of field development (Subsea well head or platform?)

1. Consider the type of problem encountered in offset well, is it possible to prevent or

Objective Description: To estimate time and cost for each well

1. Total drilling time

Objective 1: To Perform Well Design

1. Use forecast data for IPR input

1. PVT report – Compositional data, reservoir pressure and temperature.

1. Well model for Producer

1. Petroleum Production Optimization

Objective Description: To choose suitable material of the completion equipment.

1. PVT report – Compositional data, reservoir pressure and temperature.

1. Material grade to be used in the development well.

1. Petroleum Production Optimization

1. Use forecast data for IPR input

1. Well model for Producer

1. Petroleum Production Optimization

1. Evaluate at least 2 type of artificial lift system

1. Well model for Producer with artificial lift system

1. Petroleum Production Optimization

1. Evaluate the sand data

1. Type of sand control to be used in development.

Objective Description: To design injector well as secondary recovery mechanism

1. Build well model using PROSPER

1. Use forecast data for IPR input

1. Well model for Injector well

1. Petroleum Production Optimization

1. To identify associated downhole equipment

1. Well model for Injector well

1. Compile the information