Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 11

Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...


Department of History
University of California, Irvine
Instructor: Dr. Barbara J. Becker

Lecture 17. Discovering the Milky Way.

Today's city-dwellers are surrounded by lights bright enough to drown out the hazy celestial film known as
the Milky Way. It is hard for them to appreciate what a perplexing problem observers in the past were
faced with when they tried to understand the source of the faint glow that arched like a giant luminous
spine across the sky. What is the Milky Way? What can it tell us about the structure of the universe and
our place in it?

Map of the Milky Way in galactic coordinates created in 1955 by Martin and Tatjana Kesküla under the direction of
Swedish astronomer, Knut Lundmark (1889-1958). Using photographs as a reference, the Keskülas carefully plotted the
images of 7,000 stars by hand. They then painted in the nebulous regions to produce an almost photographic effect. I
have added the superposed annotations to help identify a few familiar sky objects.

The Milky Way

described by Galileo in Starry Messenger (1610)

What was observed by us in the third place is the nature or matter of the Milky Way itself,
which, with the aid of the spyglass, may be observed so well that all the disputes that for so

1 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

many generations have vexed philosophers are destroyed by visible crertainty, and we are
liberated from wordy arguments.

For the Galaxy is nothing else than a congeries of innumerable stars distributed in clusters.

To whatever region of it you direct your spyglass, an immense number of stars immediately
offer themselves to view, of which very many appear rather large and very conspicuous but
the multitude of small ones is truly unfathomable.

And since that milky luster, like whitish clouds, is seen not only in the Milky Way, but
dispersed through the ether, many similarly colored patches shine weakly; if you direct a
glass to any of them, you will meet with a dense crowd of stars.

Moreover -- and what is even more remarkable -- the stars that have been called "nebulous"
by every single astronomer up to this day are swarms of small stars placed exceedingly
close together. While each individual one escapes our sight because of its smallness or its
very great distance from us, from the commingling of their rays arises that brightness
ascribed up to now to a denser part of the heavens capable of reflecting the rays of the stars
or Sun.
The Milky Way
described by William Herschel in "On the Construction of the Heavens" (1785)
I shall now proceed to shew that the stupendous sidereal system we inhabit, this extensive
stratum and its secondary branch, consisting of many millions of stars, is, in all probability, a
detached Nebula....

[I]t is ... to be hoped that in some future time this branch of astronomy will become more
cultivated, so that we may have gages for every quarter of a degree of the heavens at least,
and these often repeated in the most favourable circumstances.... I look upon what is here
given partly as only an example to illustrate the spirit of the method.

"A very extensive, branching, compound Congeries of many millions of stars..."

From this figure however, which I hope is not a very inaccurate one, we may see that our
nebula, as we observed before, is of the third form; that is: A very extensive, branching,
compound Congeries of many millions of stars; which most probably owes its origin to
many remarkably large as well as pretty closely scattered small stars, that may have drawn
together the rest....
Spiral Nebulae: Vast Stellar Systems, or Massive Swirls of Planet-forming
In November 1888 -- a century after Herschel situated the Sun and its system of planets in
the midst of a "compound Congeries of many millions of stars" -- Isaac Roberts
(1829-1904) sent a copy of a photograph he had taken of a nebula to William Huggins.

2 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

Huggins described the photo in a letter (November 27, 1888) to the Secretary of the Royal
Society, George Gabriel Stokes:

[Mr. Roberts' photograph] reveals for the first time to the eye of man its true
nature. A solar system in the course of evolution from a nebulous mass! It
might be a diagram to illustrate the Nebular hypothesis! I never expected to
see such a thing.

There are some 6 or 7 rings of nebulous matter already thrown off, & in some
of them we see the beginning of planetary condensation & one exterior planet
fully condensed.

The central mass is still larger, to compare it with the solar system, say as large
as the orbit of Mercury. The rings are all in one plane & the position is such
that we see it obliquely.

A week later, William's wife, Margaret made the following entry in their observatory

4 Dec [1888] The night was fine early in the evening. I was out in the
afternoon and was rather late in getting home: but we were not long over tea
and by 6.45 were ready to begin and did begin. Unfortunately after about half
an hour (or a little more) the sky clouded over and it was useless to continue.
Most disappointing!

We ... work[ed] ... on the beautiful and interesting neb. in Andromeda, (31M).
We had decided on this neb. for several reasons. It is in such good position for
one. For another, Mr. Roberts of Liverpool has just sent us a photograph of it
which shows clearly & unmistakeably a solar system in progress of making.
Mr. Roberts' photograph of this object is certainly the most interesting
photograph of a celestial object as an object, ever taken. How Laplace would
rejoice over it!

3 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

Isaac Roberts' photograph of M31

It would be of special interest we think to supplement this remarkable

photograph with some photographs of the spectrum of this neb. Mr. Roberts'
work gives the body: if we can get good spectra we should have the soul.

The Hugginses were not the only ones captivated by the engimatic spiral nebulae.
In 1900, Cornelius Easton (1864-1929) suggested that the spirals might serve as a model for
our own Milky Way star system. He envisioned the Milky Way as a spiral with the Sun a bit
displaced from the center.

The Milky Way star system, by Cornelius Easton (1900)

For some astronomers, the spirals and other fuzzy little objects were new planetary systems
in formation. For others, they exemplifed what a complex star system like our own Milky
Way might look like if we could see it from a great distance.

It wasn't easy to decide which view was correct because solid observational evidence
seemed to lend support to both models.
In 1915, Harlow Shapley (1885-1972) used cepheid variables contained in globular
clusters to estimate the distance to each cluster.

There are an estimated 150 globular clusters that swarm around our galaxy. Each of them
contains 100,000 to 1,000,000 stars in a spherical region only a few hundred light-years in

4 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

M13 is a globular cluster in the constellation Hercules. Astronomers today estimate it to be located about
7200 pc away from us.

M13, pictured above, looks larger to us than most other globular clusters. In fact, individual
stars in the cluster can be observed, including some cepheid variables. It's not surprising,
then, that Shapley picked it as one of his first targets of study.

After observing several cepheids in the cluster, he concluded that M13 is about 30,000 pc
away from us -- an enormous distance, far greater than anything astronomers had ever
measured. Could these distant star systems be comparable in size to our own Milky Way?

Similar observations of cepheids in other globular clusters convinced Shapley that they are
all located at tremendous distances from us. But plotting their distribution in space revealed
another curious puzzle -- globular clusters are distributed asymmetrically around us.

Earth's position is noted by the "x" on Shapley's plot of the distribution of globular clusters.

5 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

The yellow star in the illustration above symbolizes our position; the light blue region surrounding the star
symbolizes the array of stars we can see; the small blue dots symbolize the swarm of globular clusters in
our system.

Shapley concluded that we Earthlings are limited in the stars we can see. This has tricked
us into assuming (mistakenly) that we are at the center of everything. But the distribution
of globular clusters demonstrates that our star system is much bigger than we had imagined,
and we are located, not at its center, but near its edge.

Discovering the Galaxy

Meanwhile, in 1916, Adriaan van Maanen (1884-1946) announced he had obtained
incontrovertible photographic proof of rotation in face-on spiral nebulae. Van Maanen's
claim encouraged those who believed the spirals were small, nearby planetary systems,
including Harlow Shapley, who wrote to van Maanen:

Congratulations on the nebulous results! Between us we have put a crimp in

the island universes, it seems, -- you by bringing the spirals in and I by pushing
the Galaxy out. We are indeed clever, we are.

6 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

Adriaan van Maanen's measures showing rotation in the spiral nebula, M33.

But, in 1917, George Ritchey (1864-1945) photographed a nova in another face-on spiral
nebula, NGC 6946. A nova signals the presence of at least one star. Clearly NGC 6946 is
more than just a glowing cloud of gas and dust. In fact, Ritchey's observation lent solid
support behind the view that spirals are likely quite large and distant objects.

By 1918, there were two principal models for the structure of the universe:

the Milky Way, like distant spirals and many other nebulae, is a large collection of
stars, like an island floating in the vast ocean of the universe; and

the Milky Way is so large, it IS the universe; spirals and other nebulae are relatively
nearby aggregates of matter each collapsing into its own "solar" system.

Island Universe Model

chief proponent: Jacobus Kapteyn

7 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

In the illustration, the yellow star symbolizes our position; the light blue area symbolizes the Milky Way
composed of all the individual stars we can see; the blue ovals symbolize other large collections of stars,
each one having a size similar to our own Milky Way.

Milky Way = Universe Model

chief proponent: Harlow Shapley

The yellow star symbolizes our position; the light blue area symbolizes all the individual stars in the Milky
Way/universe, some which we can see from our vantage point (those in the shaded area around the yellow
star) while the rest are obscured from our view; the blue dots symbolize the globular clusters that swarm
around the Milky Way; the blue ovals symbolize other solar systems in formation.

8 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

The Great Debate

In 1920, Harlow Shapley presented the case for his model at a meeting of the National
Academy of Sciences.

Astronomer Heber Curtis argued for Kapteyn's "Island Universe" model.

Curtis Shapley
Distance to cepheids in globular clusters may have all cepheids are the same
globular different physical characteristics from
clusters? those that are nearby
What are the novae observed in spirals prove they measurable rotation observed
spirals? contain mature individual stars in spirals proves they are close
spirals must be large collections of spirals must be true nebulae
stars like our own Milky Way

In 1923 Edwin Hubble (1899-1953) used the new 100-inch telescope at the Mt. Wilson
observatory to photograph M31. For the first time ever, individual stars could be
distinguished on the photographic plate! Hubble continued to photograph M31 and
searched among its many stars for signs of novae.

Hubble's observatory notebook observations showing the changes in brightness of a star in M31 which he
believed to be a nova.

9 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

On October 6, 1923, Hubble scratched out the "N" (for nova) next to the cepheid on the photographic
plate and wrote "VAR!" (for variable).

Hubble's discovery of a cepheid variable in M31 made it possible to apply Henrietta

Leavitt's period-luminosity method and determine that M31 is located at the remarkable
distance of 1 million light-years (300,000 parsecs)!

In 1924, Knut Lundmark announced he had failed to confirm Van Maanen's observations
showing rotation in the spiral galaxy M33.

Lundmark's examination of 400 luminous points in M33 produced no evidence the spiral nebula is rotating.

For most astronomers, Hubble's research on M31 resolved the mystery of the spirals. Of
course, it raised a whole new set of questions:

why are globular clusters so different from other stars in a galaxy?

10 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23
Lecture 17 http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/ExploringtheCosmos/lecture17...

what is the significance of the different shapes and structures of these distant star
do galaxies evolve?
why do distant galaxies appear to be moving away from us?

Edwin Hubble and Copernicus (the cat)

History 135C Home Page

"The Age of the Sun's Heat," Macmillan's Magazine (March 5, 1862), pp. 288-293,
by William Thomson, Lord Kelvin (1824-1907)

"On the Secular Cooling of the Earth," Transactions of the Royal Society of
Edinburgh (1864) Vol. XXIII, pp. 167-169, by William Thomson, Lord Kelvin

From the Earth to the Moon (1865), by Jules Verne (1828-1905)

Round the Moon (1870), by Jules Verne

Weekly Readings 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Lecture Notes
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

11 od 11 20.4.2015 10:23