CIVN4002 Test memo-2012

Q1: 1)

Dynamic coefficient:

1 1 1
    95.92
1 r 2
 57 .1
1  ( )2 1  ( )2
 57.4

P0
[ y (t )]max  yst  
k
 𝐺+𝛽𝑃0 3 (35+95.92×10)×1000×43
𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑙 =
48𝐸𝐼 48×2.1×105 ×106 ×7480×104 ×10−12

=84.39×10−3 m=84.39mm

It is clear that the running frequency of the machine is very close to

the natural frequency of the system. The serious vibration is resulted
from resonance.

2)

Solve this one degree static indeterminacy

 Find out the deflection at the mid-span (where the machine is):

1 1 𝐿 5𝐿 2 5𝐿 1 6𝐿 6𝐿 2 6𝐿 1 5𝐿 5𝐿 2
δ= ( × × × × + × × × × + × × × ×
𝐸𝐼 2 2 32 3 32 2 22 32 3 32 2 32 22 3
5𝐿 7𝐿3
)=
32 768𝐸𝐼

Therefore, the natural frequency of the new system is:

7GL3
 st 
k 1 g g 768EI
   
m m W  st

768EIg 768  2.1  10 5 N / mm 2  7480  10 4 mm 4  9.8  1000mm / s

   86.83S 1
7GL3
7  35  1000 N  (4  1000mm) 3

1 1 1
 new     1.762
1 r 2
 57. 1
1  ( )2 1  ( )2
 86.83

𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝐺+𝛽𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝑃0 3 (35+1.762×10)×1000×43

𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑙 = =4.47×
48𝐸𝐼 48×2.1×105 ×106 ×7480×104 ×10−12
10−3 𝑚=4.5mm

It can be seen that the improvement is significant.

3)
a) Further increase the stiffness of the beam, for example, fixed-fixed
supports,….

b) Dynamic vibration absorber

Q2:

 2m 0   7k  2k 
M   K
 0 m   2k 2k 

Characteristic Equation:
  2 2m 0   7k  2k  
det    0 m   2k 2k   0
    

2 4 m 2  11km 2  10k 2  0

11  41 k 11  41 k
12  , 22 
4 m 4 m

k k
1  1.1492 2  4.3508
m m
Mode shape corresponding to the first natural frequency

 x1   1 
   A1 sin 1t
 x2  2.35

2.35
Mode shape corresponding to the second natural frequency
 x1   1 
   A2 sin 2t
 x2   0.85

-0.85

1
Q3:

2𝑚 0 0
M=[ 0 2𝑚 0]
0 0 𝑚

12𝐸𝐼
𝑘=
ℎ3
K1=3k; k2=3k, k3=2k
6𝑘 −3𝑘 0
K[−3𝑘 5𝑘 −2𝑘]
0 −2𝑘 2𝑘
 1
Assume X1={1.5}
2

4.25𝑘 𝑘
=10.5𝑚 = 0.405 𝑚

𝑘
(𝜔12 =0.3927𝑚, theoretical,error:+3.1%)