Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

Quantitative comparison of wear debris from

UHMWPE that has and has not been


sterilised by gamma irradiation
A. A. Besong, J. L. Tipper, E. Ingham, M. H. Stone,
B. M. Wroblewski, J. Fisher
From the University of Leeds, England

ltra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene tion between the amount of resorption of the proximal part
U (UHMWPE) components for total joint
replacement generate wear particles which cause
2-4
of the femur and wear, and tests in vitro have demon-
strated that the macrophage response to particulate wear
adverse biological tissue reactions leading to osteolysis debris is dependent on the number and size of particles.
and loosening. Sterilisation of UHMWPE components These studies have shown that cells are more reactive to
by gamma irradiation in air causes chain scissions small phagocytosible particles and irregularly shaped par-
3,4
which initiate a long-term oxidative process that ticles than to larger and more regularly shaped particles.
degrades the chemical and mechanical properties of It is therefore important to reduce the wear volume of ultra-
the polyethylene. Using a tri-pin-on-disc tribometer we high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and the
studied the effect of ageing for ten years after gamma number of wear particles to improve the long-term clinical
irradiation in air on the volumetric wear, particle size performance.
distribution and the number of particles produced by The volume, size, morphology and concentration of the
UHMWPE when sliding against a stainless-steel wear particles produced are likely to depend on tribological
counterface. factors such as the properties of the material and the loads
The aged and irradiated material produced six and movements experienced at the contact surfaces. The
times more volumetric wear and 34 times more wear smooth hard counterface (typically Ra = 0.01 to 0.05 m)
particles per unit load per unit sliding distance than slides against a concave surface producing UHMWPE wear
non-sterilised UHMWPE. Our findings indicate that particles by adhesive and fatigue wear. Many particles of
oxidative degradation of polyethylene after gamma various sizes are produced in each cycle. The wear rates
irradiation in air with ageing produces more wear. and volumes increase dramatically as the femoral counter-
J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:340-4. face becomes roughened due to third-body damage; the
Received 8 January 1997; Accepted after revision 22 December 1997 counterface asperities remove particles by abrasive actions
5
or by low cycle fatigue. A second wear process that may
5
produce larger polyethylene particles is called ‘macro-
Osteolysis and subsequent loosening as a result of the scopic polymer asperity wear’ and is associated with cyclic
generation of wear particles are now recognised as a major deformation and strain accumulation of much larger asper-
cause of long-term failure in total joint arthroplasty. Liver- ities (up to 10 m high) on the polymer surfaces. Evidence
1 6-8
more, Duane and Murray have shown a positive correla- from explanted acetabular cups has shown that fatigue
failure of the polymer surface just below the asperity
(=5 m deep) can produce long fibres or cigar-shaped
particles of up to 100 m in length. Most polyethylene
9,10
A. A. Besong, B Eng, Research Student wear particles are submicron in size.
J. Fisher, D Eng, Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering Until recently, sterilisation of UHMWPE was by gamma
J. L. Tipper, PhD, Research Fellow irradiation in the presence of air causing the generation of
E. Ingham, PhD, Senior Lecturer
Department of Microbiology free radicals which then initiated a series of long-term
University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. oxidation reactions. The degree of oxidation in polyethyl-
11
M. H. Stone, FRCS, FRCS Ed, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon ene has been shown to depend on the dose of radiation,
Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. 12
the post-irradiation age and the environmental condi-
11,13,14
B. M. Wroblewski, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Professor of tions. Studies have indicated that it causes deteriora-
Orthopaedic Biomechanics
The John Charnley Research Institute, Wrightington Hospital for Joint tion of important mechanical properties such as tensile
15 16
Disease, Hall Lane, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire WN6 9EP, UK. strength, impact strength, toughness, fatigue
16,17
Correspondence should be sent to Professor J. Fisher. strength and Young’s modulus. These time-dependent
©1998 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery changes have been shown to affect the volumetric
18,19
0301-620X/98/28234 $2.00 wear.
340 THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY
COMPARISON OF WEAR DEBRIS FROM UHMWPE IN RELATION TO STERILISATION BY GAMMA IRRADIATION 341

Our aim was to compare quantitatively the wear debris to detect the boundaries of the very small particles. The
generated from UHMWPE that had been sterilised by distribution of particle size was obtained using image anal-
gamma irradiation and aged in air, with that generated from ysis (Image pro-Plus; Media Cybernetics, Datacell Ltd,
UHMWPE which had not been irradiated. Maidenhead, UK). SEM micrographs were taken from at
least three distinct regions on each filter membrane. Partic-
Materials and Methods les in each region were analysed and a mean particle size
distribution was calculated. An average of 2000 particles
UHMWPE (grade RCH 1000 GUR1120) wear pins were was counted from each sample. The mass and frequency
machined from acetabular cups (DePuy International Ltd, distributions as a function of size were determined from the
Leeds, UK) that had been gamma irradiated at the standard SEMs by two-dimensional particle analysis. Initial analysis
2.5 Mrad and left to age in a sterile environment of air for used an estimate of the total surface area of particles on the
ten years. Wear pins were also machined from acetabular 0.1 m filter membrane and the mass of debris on the filter
cups made from the same material matched for type and membrane to estimate the mean thickness of 0.4 m of the
specification which had not been irradiated. Eight pins were wear particles. The total number of particles was deter-
machined from each type of material: six were used as wear mined using this mean thickness, the mean area of partic-
pins, and two as soak control pins to monitor changes due les, the density of polyethylene and the mass of debris on
to the hydrophilic nature of polyethylene. After initial the filter membrane as follows:
cleaning, the pins were left to soak in deionised water for M
14 days to stabilise their moisture content. They were N=
Āt̄
prepared so that the position of the wear surface at the start
of the test was 1 mm below the initial wear surface of the where N is total number of particles on the filter membrane,
acetabular cup in clinical use. Previous oxidation profiles M is the mass of debris on the filter membrane,  is the
for irradiated and aged UHMWPE, determined by FTIR density of polyethylene, Ā is the mean area of the wear
spectroscopy, have shown that the region of maximum particles and t̄ is the mean thickness of the particles.
oxidative degradation is at a depth of between 0.5 mm and Particle size and shape were defined by length, area and
17,19
2 mm into the acetabular cup. aspect ratio (length/width). We also used qualitative
18
We used a tri-pin-on-disc unidirectional tribometer. descriptions.
The cylindrical polyethylene wear pins had a conical tip
with a 3 mm diameter flat wear surface. In each test, three Results
pins of the same material were run on a slightly roughened
(Ra = 0.07 m) stainless-steel counterface. Six tests were The aged irradiated polyethylene material wore signifi-
performed for each material and the lubricating fluid was cantly (six times, p < 0.05) more than the non-irradiated
collected and stored for the isolation and quantification of polyethylene acetabular cup as shown by the mean wear
debris. The duration of each test was between 24 and 30 factors in Figure 1.
hours for the aged irradiated material and 48 hours for the The percentage mass distribution of the wear particles
non-irradiated material. The longer duration test was for between the two ranges of size (0.1 to 10 m, > 10 m)
material with a lower wear rate but had no effect on the size was similar for both materials. Particles less than 10 m in
of particles produced. Bovine serum diluted to 25% (v/v) size accounted for 78% of the mass of the aged irradiated
by adding 0.1% (w/v) sodium azide solution was used as
the lubricant for all tests. The load on each pin was 80 N,
giving a stress of 12 MPa at the contact surfaces. The
surfaces were sliding at a speed of 80 mm/s. Wear factors
3
(wear volume (mm) ) per unit load (N) per unit sliding
distance (m)) were determined by weight loss as previously
20
described.
The wear particles were isolated from the lubricant by a
multistage digestion method using potassium hydroxide,
21,22
chloroform/methanol extraction and centrifugation.
This allowed the supernatant containing the wear debris to
be filtered sequentially through preweighed polycarbonate
filters of 10 m and 0.1 m. The filters were dried and
weighed to obtain the mass of debris in each of the two size
ranges. This method was designed to collect all the wear
particles greater than 0.1 m onto the filters, the mem- Fig. 1
branes of which were then coated with gold and scanned by The mean wear factors (+ 95% confidence limit) for the aged and
SEM. Magnifications of from 3000 up to 20 000 were used irradiated (Ai) and non-irradiated (Ni) material.

VOL. 80-B, NO. 2, MARCH 1998


342 A. A. BESONG, J. L. TIPPER, E. INGHAM, ET AL

Fig. 3
Fig. 2
Mean (+ 95% confidence limit) percentage distribution of the total number
Mean percentage mass (+ 95% confidence limit) as a function of particle of particles as a function of particle length. Less than 0.1% of the particles
length. were greater than 10 m in length and have not been included.

Fig. 4 Fig. 5
Mean (+ 95% confidence limit) percentage mass as a function of particle Mean (+ 95% confidence limit) percentage distribution of the total number
area. of particles as a function of particle area.

debris and for 71% of the mass of the debris from the non- The calculated mean aspect ratios (length/width) of the
irradiated material. We compared the mass of the wear wear particles were 2.0 and 2.6 for the unsterilised and
debris recovered after filtration with that expected to be aged irradiated UHMWPE, respectively. The mass and
present in the lubricant from the calculations of the weight number distributions with respect to size of the wear
loss of the pins. The total mass loss due to polyethylene particles for both materials are shown in Figures 2 to 5. The
wear in a test station containing three wear pins was 2 mg size distributions ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 and the percentage
for the aged irradiated material and 0.5 mg for the unsteri- number in this size range was higher (85%) for the aged
lised material. For the non-irradiated material the mean irradiated material than for the non-irradiated material
proportion of debris recovered was 75% while for the aged (65%). In terms of particle size and particle area both
irradiated material it was 70% (60% to 100%). analyses showed that in the lowest size range the per-
Initial qualitative analysis of micrographs of the wear centage mass and percentage number of particles were
debris on the 0.1 m and 10 m filters suggested that partic- greater for the aged irradiated material.
les produced from both materials were similar in morphol- Figures 6 and 7 show the number of particles in the size
3
ogy. The smaller particles were regularly shaped granules, ranges per unit volume (mm ) of wear debris as a function
while the larger particles (>10 m) appeared to be a cohesion of the length and area distributions, respectively. For the
of many small particles and very irregular in shape. aged irradiated material the number of particles per unit
THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY
COMPARISON OF WEAR DEBRIS FROM UHMWPE IN RELATION TO STERILISATION BY GAMMA IRRADIATION 343

Fig. 6 Fig. 7
3 3
Mean distribution of the total number of particles per unit volume (mm ) Mean distribution of the total number of particles per unit volume (mm )
of wear debris as a function of particle length. of wear debris as a function of particle area.

Fig. 8 Fig. 9

Mean3 (+ 95% confidence limit) number of particles per unit volume Mean (+ 95% confidence limit) number of particles generated per load per
(mm ) of wear debris for aged and irradiated (Ai) and non-irradiated (Ni) unit sliding distance for aged and irradiated (Ai) and non-irradiated (Ni)
polyethylene. polyethylene.

9
volume of wear was estimated to be (24 ± 6) 10 per The increase in the number of particles produced was
3
mm which was significantly higher (5.5 times, p < 0.05) attributed to both the increase in wear rate and the different
9 3
than that ((4.4 ± 0.7)  10 per mm ) for the non-irradiated particle size distribution which led to a significantly greater
material (Fig. 8). number of wear particles per unit wear volume. Analysis of
Combining the increased wear rate and the number of the percentage frequency distribution of the particle size, as
particles per unit wear volume allowed the total number of has been common practice in the literature, did not show a
particles produced per unit load per unit sliding distance to substantial difference in the particles. It was necessary to
be calculated. This was defined as the wear particle factor; determine the mass distribution and total number of partic-
3
for the aged irradiated material it was 30  10 particles/ les produced per unit wear volume in order to establish this
Nm which was 34 times higher (p = 0.07) than the value for difference. We also defined a wear particle number factor
non-irradiated material (884 particles/Nm; Fig. 9). (number/Nm) to allow comparison of the number of wear
particles produced per unit load per unit sliding distance
Discussion from different wear tests.
Larger particles accounted for a reasonable proportion
Our study has compared the wear debris released in vitro (26%) of the mass of the debris. Although they contributed
from polyethylene materials which have had different ster- little to the percentage frequency distribution, they did
ilisation treatments. We have shown that gamma-irradiated influence the total number of particles produced per unit
and aged UHMWPE generated many times more wear volume of wear debris. This method of analysis shows that
particles than UHMWPE which had not been sterilised. the total number of particles produced is sensitive to both
VOL. 80-B, NO. 2, MARCH 1998
344 A. A. BESONG, J. L. TIPPER, E. INGHAM, ET AL

the mass and size distribution of the debris. 8. Rose RM, Radin EL. Wear of polyethylene in the total hip prosthesis.
Clin Orthop 1982;170:107-15.
A simple configuration wear tester cannot fully replicate
9. Campbell P, Ma S, Yeom B, et al. Isolation of predominantly
the time-dependent loading and multidirectional friction submicron-sized UHMWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissues.
force found in hip prostheses in vivo. In our study we J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:127-31.
performed the simple configuration wear tests in a format 10. McKellop HA, Campbell P, Park SH, et al. The origin of submicron
polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1995;
to reproduce realistic wear rates. We used slightly rough- 311:3-20.
ened counterfaces which produced wear factors of the order 11. Trieu HH, Avent RT, Paxson RD. Effects of sterilisation on shelf-
-6 3 aged UHMWPE tibial inserts. 21st Annual meeting, Society for Bio-
of 10 mm /Nm, which are representative of clinical wear materials 1995:109.
rates. The slightly roughened counterface (Ra = 0.07 m) 12. Furman B, Li S. The effects of long term shelf life aging of ultra-high
represented femoral heads that had been damaged in vivo. molecular weight polyethylene. 21st Annual Meeting, Society for
Biomaterials 1995: 114.
The particle size distributions produced in our tests had
13. Rimnac CM, Klein RW, Betts F, Wright TM. Post-irradiation aging
modes in the range 0.1 to 0.5 m which were similar to of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]
distributions found for particles from retrieved tissues of 1994;76-A:1052-6.
21 14. Sun DC, Schmidig G, Stark C, Dumbleton JH. On the origins of a
failed prostheses. subsurface oxidation maximum and its relationship to the performance
Conclusion. We have shown that for the same sliding of UHMWPE implants. 21st Annual Meeting, Society for Biomaterials
distance and load, UHMWPE that had been sterilised by 1995;362.
gamma irradiation and aged for ten years produced greater 15. Pascaud RS, Evans WT, McCullagh PJJ. An investigation into the
tensile/compressive properties of UHMW-PE as used in total joint
wear volume (six times) and more wear particles (34 times) replacements. 21st Annual Meeting, Society for Biomaterials 1995:
than non-irradiated UHMWPE. 108.
16. Ries MD, Rose RM, Greer J, Weaver JD, Saver WI. Sterilization-
A. A. Besong was supported by an Overseas Research Studentship (ORS) induced effects on UHMWPE performance properties. 62nd Annual
and Leeds University Tetley/Lupton Scholarships. This work was sup- Meeting. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1995.
ported in part by Brite Euram Project BE7928, the Arthritis and Rheuma- 17. Goldman M, Ranganathan R, Pruitt L, Gronsky R. Character-
tism Council UK, and the UK Department of Trade and Industry. ization of structure and fatigue resistance of aged and irradiated
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a UHMWPE. 21st Annual Meeting, Society for Biomaterials 1995:111.
commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this
article. 18. Besong AA, Hailey JL, Ingham E, et al. A study of the combined
effects of shelf ageing following irradiation in air and counterface
References roughness on the wear of UHMWPE. J Biomed Mat Eng 1997;7:
59-65.
1. Livermore J, Duane L, Murray B. Effect of femoral head size on the 19. Fisher J, Reeves EA, Isaac GH, Saum KA, Sanford WM. Compar-
wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg ison of the wear of aged and non-aged ultra-high molecular weight
[Am] 1990;72-A:518-28. polyethylene sterilized by gamma irradiation and by gas plasma. J Mat
2. Glant TT, Jacobs JJ, Molnar G, et al. Bone resorption activity of Sci: Mat in Med 1997;8:375-8.
particulate-stimulated macrophages. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8: 20. Fisher J, Dowson D, Hamdzah H, Lee HL. The effect of sliding
1071-9. velocity on friction and wear of UHMWPE for use in total artificial
3. Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT. Macro- joints. Wear 1994;175:219-25.
phage/particle interactions: effect of size, composition and surface 21. Tipper JL, Ingham E, Hailey JL, et al. Quantitative comparison of
area. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:81-9. polyethylene wear debris, wear rate and head damage in retrieved hip
4. Green T, Fisher J, Ingham E. Polyethylene particles of a ‘critical prostheses. Trans 43rd Annual Meeting, ORS 1997; 22:355.
size’ are necessary for the induction of IL-6 by macrophages in vitro. 22. Fisher J, Barbour PSM, King M, et al. Wear of ultrahigh molecular
Trans 43rd Annual Meeting, ORS Vol. 22. 1997:733. weight polyethylene in artificial joints: a new approach to quantifica-
5. Cooper JR, Dowson D, Fisher J. Macroscopic and microscopic wear tion of wear debris. Proc Mat 1997;2:543-4.
mechanisms in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Wear 23. Trieu HH, Buchanan DJ, Needham DA, et al. Accelerated fatigue
1993;162:378-84. wear of gamma-sterilized UHMWPE tibial components. EORS trans
6. Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Glant TT, et al. Composition and morphol- 1997;7:106.
ogy of wear debris in failed uncemented total hip replacement. J Bone 24. Brach Del Prever E, Costa L, Gallinaro P. Ethylene oxide sterilisa-
Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76-B:60-7. tion of polyethylene cups versus gamma radiation: different behaviour
7. Lee J-M, Salvati EA, Betts F, et al. Size of metallic and polyethylene in vivo. EFORT trans 1997:585.
debris particles in failed cemented total hip replacements. J Bone Joint 25. Kurtz SM, Rimnac CM, Bartel DL. Degradation rate of ultra-high
Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:380-4. molecular weight polyethylene. J Orth Res 1997;15:57-61.

THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY

Вам также может понравиться