Department of Education

Region V
Division of Masbate
MOBO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Mobo, Masbate

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: JEYRO A. CERVANTES Name of Rater: ANNIE GRACE D. RECANA

Position: Teacher I Position: HT-I
Review Period: April 2017-March 2018 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd- Mobo NHS/Mobo/Masbate
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCO
per KRA RE
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
1. Lesson plan 1. Teaching- 1.1 Prepared June 2017 10% 5 – Outstanding – performance Q E T
in Science 7 75% functional daily – March represent an extraordinary level of
2.
Learning learning plan/daily 2018 achievement and commitment in terms
Instructional Process lesson plan in of quality and time, technical skills and
materials (30%) Science with knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
appropriate initiative.
instructional 4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
materials. exceeded expectations. All goals,
objectives and targets were achieved
above the established standards.
3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
expectations in terms of quality of work,
efficiency and timeliness. The most
critical annual goals were met.
2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
 consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.

1. Sample 1.2 Facilitated 75% June 2017 15%

students of learning in Grade – March 5 – Outstanding – performance
products 7 Science through 2018 represent an extraordinary level of
effective teaching achievement and commitment in terms
strategies of quality and time, technical skills and
knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
initiative.
4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
exceeded expectations. All goals,
objectives and targets were achieved
above the established standards.
3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
expectations in terms of quality of work,
efficiency and timeliness. The most
critical annual goals were met.
2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.

1. Daily 1.3 Submitted the June 2017 5%

Lesson Log required 75% total – March 5 – Outstanding – performance
(with number of DLL 2018 represents an extraordinary level of
signatures of within the school achievement and commitment in terms
HT/principal) year of quality and time, technical skills and
knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
initiative.
 4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
exceeded expectations. All goals,
objectives and targets were achieved
above the established standards.
3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
expectations in terms of quality of work,
efficiency and timeliness. The most
critical annual goals were met.
2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCO
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RE
1. Pictorials 2. Pupils’/ 2.1 75% of Students Every end 10% Q E T
of students accomplishments of quarter 5 – Outstanding – performance
activities and Students’ were contained in up to the represent an extraordinary level of
performances Outcomes his/her portfolio. end of achievement and commitment in terms
(30%) the next of quality and time, technical skills and
quarter knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
initiative.
4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
exceeded expectations. All goals,
objectives and targets were achieved
above the established standards.
3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
expectations in terms of quality of work,
efficiency and timeliness. The most
critical annual goals were met.
2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
 not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.

1. Grade 2.2 Maintained and June 2017 10%

Sheets updated 75% – March 5 – Outstanding – performance
(copies of students’ school 2018 represent an extraordinary level of
class record) records achievement and commitment in terms
of quality and time, technical skills and
knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
initiative.
4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
exceeded expectations. All goals,
objectives and targets were achieved
above the established standards.
3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
expectations in terms of quality of work,
efficiency and timeliness. The most
critical annual goals were met.
2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.

1. Summary 2.3 Monitored and June 2017 10%

Sheets attained a – March 5 – Outstanding – performance
satisfactory grade 2018 represent an extraordinary level of
for 75% of the achievement and commitment in terms
students in the of quality and time, technical skills and
 learning area in my knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
undertaking at the initiative.
end of the current 4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
school year. exceeded expectations. All goals,
objectives and targets were achieved
above the established standards.
3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
expectations in terms of quality of work,
efficiency and timeliness. The most
critical annual goals were met.
2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCO
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RE
Q E T
1. Certificate 3. Community 3.1 Participated As 20% 5 – Outstanding – performance
of actively at least 2 needed represent an extraordinary level of
Participation
Involvement achievement and commitment in terms
programs/activities/ and/or
2. Pictorials (20%) community-based scheduled of quality and time, technical skills and
3. Attendance projects / knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
spearheaded by the requested initiative.
school/division/bara by the 4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
exceeded expectations. All goals,
ngay and/or school/di
objectives and targets were achieved
municipality vision/
above the established standards.
barangay/ 3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
communit expectations in terms of quality of work,
y efficiency and timeliness. The most
critical annual goals were met.
 2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCO
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) RE
1. Copies of 4. 4.1 Fully complied June 5% 5 – Outstanding – performance Q E T
DTR with the necessary 2017- represent an extraordinary level of
Professional achievement and commitment in terms
2. Office log requirements for March
book Growth and punctuality and 2018 of quality and time, technical skills and
Development attendance knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
(20%) initiative.
4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
exceeded expectations. All goals,
objectives and targets were achieved
above the established standards.
3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
expectations in terms of quality of work,
efficiency and timeliness. The most
critical annual goals were met.
2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.
1. Pictorial 4.2 June 5% 5 – Outstanding – performance
Reports for Initiated/Participate 2017- represent an extraordinary level of
Trainings and d in co- March achievement and commitment in terms
School curricular/school 2018 of quality and time, technical skills and
Activities activities within the knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
attended school year initiative.
2. Certificates 4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
exceeded expectations. All goals,
of
objectives and targets were achieved
Participation
above the established standards.
for Trainings 3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
Attended expectations in terms of quality of work,
and/or School efficiency and timeliness. The most
activities critical annual goals were met.
attended 2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.

1. 4.3 Attained 9 units June 10% 5 – Outstanding – performance

Certification in graduate 2017- represent an extraordinary level of
of earned studies. March achievement and commitment in terms
units. 2018 of quality and time, technical skills and
knowledge, ingenuity, creativity and
initiative.
4 – Very Satisfactory – Performance
exceeded expectations. All goals,
objectives and targets were achieved
above the established standards.
3 – Satisfactory – Performance met
expectations in terms of quality of work,
efficiency and timeliness. The most
critical annual goals were met.
2 – Unsatisfactory – Performance
 failed to meet expectations, and/or one
or more of the most critical goals were
not met.
1 – Poor – Performance was
consistently below expectations, and/or
reasonable progress toward critical
goals was not made. Significant
improvement is needed in one or more
important areas.

Over-all Rating for

Accomplishments

ANNIE GRACE D. RECANA JEYRO A. CERVANTES MARIA CYNTHIA A. REVIL

HT-I Rater Teacher III/Ratee Principal II/ Approving Authority