Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Footings
UPDATE FOR THE ‘08 CODE
The new Section 15.10.4 requires a minimum amount of reinforcement in a nonprestressed mat foundation for
each principal direction and the required distribution of that reinforcement.
Section 11.6.5 is revised to increase the upper limit on the shear friction strength for concrete placed monolithi-
cally or placed against a hardened concrete surface intentionally roughened as specified in 11.6.9. The increased
limit becomes applicable when using higher-strength concrete.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Provisions of Chapter 15 apply primarily for design of footings supporting a single column (isolated footings)
and do not provide specific design provisions for footings supporting more than one column (combined foot-
ings). The code states that combined footings shall be proportioned to resist the factored loads and induced
reactions in accordance with the appropriate design requirements of the code. Detailed discussion of combined
footing design is beyond the scope of Part 22. However, as a general design approach, combined footings may
be designed as beams in the longitudinal direction and as an isolated footing in the transverse direction over a
defined width on each side of the supported columns. Code Refs. 15.1 and 15.2 are suggested for detailed design
recommendations for combined footings.
Footings must be designed to safely resist the effects of the applied factored axial loads, shears and moments.
The size (base area) of a footing or the arrangement and number of piles is determined based on the allowable
soil pressure or allowable pile capacity, respectively. The allowable soil or pile capacity is determined by prin-
ciples of soil mechanics in accordance with general building codes. The following procedure is specified for
footing design:
1. The footing size (plan dimensions) or the number and arrangement of piles is to be determined on the basis of
unfactored (service) loads (dead, live, wind, earthquake, etc.) and the allowable soil pressure or pile capacity
(15.2.2).
2. After having established the plan dimensions, the depth of the footing and the required amount of reinforce-
ment are determined based on the appropriate design requirements of the code (15.2.1). The service pressures
and the resulting shear and moments are multiplied by the appropriate load factors specified in 9.2 and are
used to proportion the footing.
For purposes of analysis, an isolated footing may be assumed to be rigid, resulting in a uniform soil pressure for
concentric loading, and a triangular or trapezoidal soil pressure distribution for eccentric loading (combined axial
and bending effect). Only the computed bending moment that exists at the base of the column or pedestal is to
be transferred to the footing. The minimum moment requirement for slenderness considerations in 10.10.6.5
need not be transferred to the footing (R15.2).
15.4 MOMENT IN FOOTINGS
At any section of a footing, the external moment due to the base pressure shall be determined by passing a vertical
plane through the footing and computing the moment of the forces acting over the entire area of the footing on one
side of the vertical plane. The maximum factored moment in an isolated footing is determined by passing a vertical
plane through the footing at the critical sections shown in Fig. 22-1 (15.4.2). This moment is subsequently used
to determine the required area of flexural reinforcement in that direction. The reinforcement provided must also
meet the minimum area of reinforcing steel required for a mat foundation. Section 15.10.4 requires the reinforce-
ment in each principal direction satisfy Section 7.12.2. For Grade 60, this required reinforcement ratio is 0.0018.
In one-way square or rectangular footings and two-way square footings, flexural reinforcement shall be distributed
uniformly across the entire width of the footing (15.4.3). For two-way rectangular footings, the reinforcement
must be distributed as shown in Table 22-1 (15.4.4).
b b
2 2
critical section
critical section
b s
4 2
(a) Concrete Column, (b) Masonry Wall (c) Column with Steel Base
Pedestal or Wall Plate
Figure 22-1 Critical Location for Maximum Factored Moment in an Isolated Footing (15.4.2)
s (typ.) s (typ.)
One-way L B
L
L (15.4.3) (15.4.3)
AsL
s = γ s A sL
A s1
As2 As1 As2
(1− γ s )A sL
s (typ.) A s2 =
@s2 @s1 @s2 2
L
β =
B
Two-way ⎛ 2 ⎞
AsB
@s3
L B γs = ⎜ ⎟
⎝ β+ 1⎠
B B
L 2 2
L
(15.4.3) (15.4.4)
22-2
15.5 SHEAR IN FOOTINGS
Shear strength of a footing supported on soil or rock in the vicinity of the supported member (column or wall) must
be determined for the more severe of the two conditions stated in 11.11. Both wide-beam action (11.11.1.1) and
two-way action (11.11.1.2) must be checked to determine the required footing depth. Beam action assumes that the
footing acts as a wide beam with a critical section across its entire width. If this condition is the more severe, design
for shear proceeds in accordance with 11.1 through 11.4. Even though wide-beam action rarely controls the shear
strength of footings, the designer must ensure that shear strength for beam action is not exceeded. Two-way action
for the footing checks “punching” shear strength. The critical section for punching shear is a perimeter bo around the
supported member with the shear strength computed in accordance with 11.11.2.1. Tributary areas and corresponding
critical sections for wide-beam action and two-way action for an isolated footing are illustrated in Fig. 22-2. Note that
it is permissible to use a critical section with four straight sides for square or rectangular columns (11.11.1.3).
c1 + d
Critical section bo
for two-way action
shear
bo = 2 (c1 + c2) + 4d
bw
c +d c2
2
Critical section
for beam action
shear
d c1
In the design of a footing for two-way action, Vc is the smallest value obtained from Eqs. (11-31), (11-32),
and (11-33). Eq. (11-33) established the upper limit of Vc at 4λ fc′ bo d . Eq. (11-31) accounts for the effect of
β, which is the ratio of the long side to the short side of the column, concentrated load, or reaction area. As β
increases the concrete shear strength decreases (see Fig. 22-3). Eq. (11-32) was developed to account for the
effect of bo/d, and is based on tests that indicated shear strength decreases as bo/d increases.
If the factored shear force Vu at the critical section exceeds the governing shear strength given by φVc the minimum
of Eqs. (11-31), (11-32), or (11-33), shear reinforcement must be provided. For shear reinforcement consisting
of bars or wires and single- or multiple-leg stirrups, the shear strength may be increased to a maximum value of
6 fc′ b o d (11.11.3.2), provided the footing has an effective depth d greater than or equal to 6 in., but not less
than 16 times the shear reinforcement bar diameter (11.11.3). However, shear reinforcement must be designed
to carry the shear in excess of 2λ fc′ bo d (11.11.3.1).
For footing design (without shear reinforcement), the shear strength equations may be summarized as follows:
22-3
β
Two-way action
4
Vc ⎛ 4⎞
Vc = ⎜ 2 + ⎟ λ fc′ bod
λ fc′ bod ⎝ β⎠
2
c1
Wide-beam action c2
1
β = c1 / c2
1/β
(
≤ φ 2λ fc′ bw d ) Eq. (11-3)
where bw and Vu are computed for the critical section defined in 11.11.1.1 (see Fig. 22-2).
• Two-way action
⎧ ⎛ 4⎞
⎪
⎪ ⎜⎝ 2 + β ⎟⎠ λ fc′ bo d Eq. (11-31)
⎪
⎪ ⎛ αsd ⎞
Vu ≤ minimum of ⎨
⎪ ⎜⎝ b + 2⎟⎠ λ fc′ bo d Eq. (11-32)
o
⎪
⎪ 4λ fc′ bo d Eq. (11-33)
⎪⎩
where
β = ratio of long side to short side of the column, concentrated load or reaction area
αs = 40 for interior columns
= 30 for edge columns
= 20 for corner columns
bo = perimeter of critical section shown in Fig. 22-2
22-4
15.8 TRANSFER OF FORCE AT BASE OF COLUMN, WALL, OR REINFORCED
PEDESTAL
With the publication of ACI 318-83, 15.8 addressing transfer of force between a footing and supported member
(column, wall, or pedestal) was revised to address both cast-in-place and precast construction. Section 15.8.1
gives general requirements applicable to both cast-in-place and precast construction. Sections 15.8.2 and 15.8.3
give additional rules for cast-in-place and precast construction, respectively. For force transfer between a foot-
ing and a precast column or wall, anchor bolts or mechanical connectors are specifically permitted by 15.8.3,
with anchor bolts to be designed in accordance with Appendix D. (Prior to the ’83 code, connection between
a precast member and footing required either longitudinal bars or dowels crossing the interface, contrary to
common practice.) Also note that walls are specifically addressed in 15.8 for force transfer to footings.
Section 15.8.3 contains requirements for the connection between precast columns and walls to supporting
members. This section refers to 16.5.1.3 for minimum connection strength. Additionally, for precast columns
with larger cross-sectional areas than required for loading, it is permitted to use a reduced effective area based
on the cross-section required, but not less than one-half the total area when determining the nominal strength
in tension.
The minimum tensile strength of a connection between a precast wall panel and its supporting member is
required to have a minimum of two ties per panel with a minimum nominal tensile capacity of 10 kips per tie
(16.5.1.3(b)).
All forces applied at the base of a column or wall (supported member) must be transferred to the footing (sup-
porting member) by bearing on concrete and/or by reinforcement. Tensile forces must be resisted entirely by
reinforcement. Bearing on concrete for both supported and supporting member must not exceed the concrete
bearing strength permitted by 10.14 (see discussion on 10.14 in Part 6).
φPnb = φ ( 0.85fc′ A1 )
10.14.1
where
fc′ = compressive strength of the column concrete
φ = 0.65 9.3.2.4
A2 = area of the lower base of the largest frustrum of a pyramid, cone, or tapered wedge con-
tained wholly within the footing and having for its upper base the loaded area, and having
side slopes of 1 vertical to 2 horizontal (see Fig. R10.14).
Example 22.4 illustrates the design for force transfer at the base of a column.
When bearing strength is exceeded, reinforcement must be provided to transfer the excess load. A minimum
area of reinforcement must be provided across the interface of column or wall and footing, even where concrete
bearing strength is not exceeded. With the force transfer provisions addressing both cast-in-place and precast
22-5
construction, including force transfer between a wall and footing, the minimum reinforcement requirements
are based on the type of supported member, as shown in Table 22-2.
Table 22-2 Minimum Reinforcement for Force Transfer Between Footing and Supported Member
Cast-in-Place Precast
200A g
Columns 0.005Ag fy
For cast-in-place construction, reinforcement may consist of extended reinforcing bars or dowels. For precast
construction, reinforcement may consist of anchor bolts or mechanical connectors. Reference 22.1 devotes an
entire chapter on connection design for precast construction.
The shear-friction design method of 11.6.4 should be used for horizontal force transfer between columns and
footings (15.8.1.4; see Example 22.6). Consideration of some of the lateral force being transferred by shear
through a formed shear key is questionable. Considerable slip is required to develop a shear key. Shear keys,
if provided, should be considered as an added mechanical factor of safety only, with no design shear force as-
signed to the shear key.
Plain concrete pedestals and footings are designed in accordance with Chapter 22. See Part 30 for an in-depth
discussion and examples.
REFERENCE
22.1 PCI Design Handbook—Precast and Prestressed Concrete, MNL-120-04, 6th Edition, Precast/Pre-
stressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 2004, 750 pp.
22-6
Example 22.1—Design for Base Area of Footing
Code
Calculations and Discussion Reference
The base area of the footing is determined using service (unfactored) loads with the net
permissible soil pressure.
350 + 275
Af = = 167 ft 2
3.75
To proportion the footing for strength (depth and required reinforcement) factored 15.2.1
loads are used.
Pu 860
qs = = = 5.10 ksf
Af 169
22-7
Example 22.2—Design for Depth of Footing
For the design conditions of Example 22.1, determine the overall thickness of footing required.
13'-0"
fc′ = 3000 psi
Pu = 860 kips
30" + d bo for
qs = 5.10 ksf d
two-way
action
2
bw for
beam action
Code
Calculations and Discussion Reference
Determine depth based on shear strength without shear reinforcement. Depth required for shear 11.11
usually controls the footing thickness. Both wide-beam action and two-way action for strength
computation need to be investigated to determine the controlling shear criteria for depth.
Assume overall footing thickness = 33 in. and average effective thickness d = 28 in. = 2.33 ft
1. Wide-beam action:
Vu = qs ⫻ tributary area
bw = 13 ft = 156 in.
(
φVn = φ 2λ fc′ bw d ) Eq. (11-3)
(
= 0.75 2 × 1.0 × )
3000 × 156 × 28 / 1000 9.3.2.3
2. Two-way action:
Vu = qs ⫻ tributary area
⎡ ( 30 + 28 ) (12 + 28) ⎤
Tributary area = ⎢(13 × 13) - ⎥ = 152.9 ft
2
⎣ 144 ⎦
22-8
Code
Example 22.2 (cont’d) Calculations and Discussion Reference
⎧
⎪ 4
⎪ 2+ Eq. (11-31)
⎪⎪ β
Vc
= minimum of ⎨ α s d Eq. (11-32)
λ fc′ bo d ⎪ +2
⎪ bo Eq. (11-33)
⎪ 4
⎪⎩
30
β = = 2.5
12
bo 196
= = 7
d 28
⎧ 4
⎪ 2 + 2.5 = 3.6 (governs)
⎪
Vc ⎪ 40
=⎨ + 2 = 7.7
λ fc′ bo d ⎪ 7
⎪ 4
⎪
⎩
22-9
Example 22.3—Design for Footing Reinforcement
For the design conditions of Example 22.1, determine required footing reinforcement.
13'-0"
fc′ = 3000 psi
1' 6'-0"
fy = 60,000 psi
A Critical section for moment
Pu = 860 kips (long projection)
qs = 5.10 ksf
A
Code
Calculations and Discussion Reference
Mu 1193 × 12 × 1000
Required Rn = = = 130 psi
φbd 2 0.9 × 156 × 28 2
0.85fc′ ⎛ 2R n ⎞
ρ = 1- 1-
fy ⎜
⎝ 0.85fc′ ⎟⎠
0.85 × 3 ⎛ 2 × 130 ⎞
= ⎜ 1- 1- = 0.0022
60 ⎝ 0.85 × 3000 ⎟⎠
d 28
ρ (gross area) = × 0.0022 = × 0.0022 = 0.0019
h 33
Check minimum As required for footings of uniform thickness; for Grade 60 15.10.4
reinforcement:
Required As = ρbd
13 × 12 − 2 ( 3) − 1
= 12.42 < 18 in. O.K.
12
Note that a lesser amount of reinforcement is required in the perpendicular direction due to lesser
Mu , but for ease of placement, the same uniformly distributed reinforcement will be used each
way (see Table 22-1). Also note that dt = 27 in. for perpendicular direction.
22-10
Code
Example 22.3 (cont’d) Calculations and Discussion Reference
0.003 0.85f'c
c a =β1c C
d=dt=28"
T
t
As fy
a=
0.85 fc′ b
10.27 × 60
= = 1.55
0.85 × 3 × 156
a 1.55
c= = = 1.82
β1 0.85
ε t + 0.003 0.003
=
dt c
⎛ 0.003 ⎞
εt = ⎜ d − 0.003
⎝ c ⎟⎠ t
0.003
= × 28 − 0.003 = 0.043 > 0.004
1.82 10.3.5
Critical section for development is the same as that for moment (at face 15.6.3
of column).
⎡ ⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 3 fy ψ tψeψs ⎥
ld = d
⎢ 40 λ fc′ ⎛ c + K ⎞ ⎥ b
b tr
⎢ ⎜⎝ d ⎟⎠ ⎥
⎢⎣ b ⎥⎦
Eq. (12-1)
22-11
Code
Example 22.3 (cont’d) Calculations and Discussion Reference
c b + K tr 3.5 + 0 12.2.3
= = 3.5 > 2.5, use 2.5
db 1.0
Since ld = 32.9 in. is less than the available embedment length in the short direction
⎛ 156 30 ⎞
⎜⎝ - - 3 = 60 in.⎟ , the No. 8 bars can be fully developed.
2 2 ⎠
Use 13-No. 8 each way.
22-12
Example 22.4—Design for Transfer of Force at Base of Column
For the design conditions of Example 22.1, check force transfer at interface of column and footing.
column bars
fc′ (column) = 5000 psi, normalweight concrete
footing dowels
fc′ (footing) = 3000 psi, normalweight concrete
fy = 60,000 psi
3" cover
Code
Calculations and Discussion Reference
φPnb = φ(0.85fc′ A1 )
10.14.1
= 0.65 (0.85 ⫻ 5 ⫻ 12 ⫻ 30) = 995 kips > Pu = 860 kips O.K. 9.3.2.4
The bearing strength of the footing is increased by a factor A2 / A1 ≤ 2 due to the 10.14.1
to the large footing area permitting a greater distribution of the column load.
33"
66"
72"
2
63"
30"
156"
12"
12"
12"
63"
66"
72"
156"
2
1
33"
22-13
Code
Example 22.4 (cont’d) Calculations and Discussion Reference
A1 is the column (loaded) area and A2 is the plan area of the lower base of the largest frustum
of a pyramid, cone, or tapered wedge contained wholly within the support and having for
its upper base the loaded area, and having side slopes of 1 vertical to 2 horizontal. For the
30 ⫻ 12 in. column supported on the 13 ⫻ 13 ft square footing,
A2 = (66 + 12 + 66) ⫻ (63 + 30 + 63).
A2 144 × 156
= = 7.9 > 2, use 2
A1 30 × 12
Note that bearing on the column concrete will always govern until the strength of the
column concrete exceeds twice that of the footing concrete.
φPnb = 2 [ φ(0.85fc′ A1 )]
Even though bearing strength on the column and footing concrete is adequate to transfer 15.8.2.1
the factored loads, a minimum area of reinforcement is required across the interface.
In column:
⎛ 0.02fy ⎞
l dc = ⎜
⎝ λ fc′ ⎠
⎟ db ≥ ( 0.0003fy ) d b
For No. 7 bars:
⎛ 0.02 × 60,000 ⎞
l dc = ⎜ 0.875 = 14.9 in.
⎝ 1.0 5000 ⎟⎠
In footing:
⎛ 0.02 × 60,000 ⎞
l dc = ⎜ 0.875 = 19.2 in. (governs)
⎝ 1.0 3000 ⎟⎠
22-14
Example 22.5—Design for Transfer of Force by Reinforcement
For the design conditions given below, provide for transfer of force between the column and footing.
PD = 200 kips
dowel bars
PL = 100 kips 1'-6"
9'-0" square
Code
Calculations and Discussion Reference
1. Factored load Pu = (1.2 ⫻ 200) + (1.6 ⫻ 100) = 400 kips Eq. (9-2)
The column load cannot be transferred by bearing on concrete alone. The excess load 15.8.1.2
(400 - 318.2 = 81.8 kips) must be transferred by reinforcement.
A2
φPnb =
A1
[φ(0.85fc′ A1 )] 10.14.1
45°
9'-0"
A2 7 × 7 A2
= = 7 > 2, use 2 45°
A1 1 × 1 A1
( Pu - φPnb )
φfy
As (required) =
81.8
= = 2.10 in.2
0.65 × 60
22-15
Code
Example 22.5 (cont’d) Calculations and Discussion Reference
a. For development into the column, the No. 14 column bars may be lap spliced with the 15.8.2.3
No. 8 footing dowels. The dowels must extend into the column a distance not less than
the development length of the No. 14 column bars or the lap splice length of the No. 8
footing dowels, whichever is greater.
The No. 8 dowel bars must extend not less than 33 in. into the column.
b. For development into the footing, the No. 8 dowels must extend a full 15.8.2.3
development length.
As (required) 2.10
= = 0.66
As (provided) 3.16
Available length for dowels development ≈ 18 - 5 = 13 in. > 12.5 in. required, O.K.
,
Note: In case the available development length is less than the required development length, either
increase footing depth or use larger number of smaller size dowels. Also note that if the foot-
ing dowels are bent for placement on top of the footing reinforcement (as shown in the figure), the bent portion
cannot be considered effective for developing the bars in compression (12.5.5).
22-16
Example 22.6—Design for Transfer of Horizontal Force at Base of Column
For the column and footing of Example 22.5, design for transfer of a horizontal factored force of 85 kips acting
at the base of the column. The footing surface is not intentionally roughened.
Design data:
Footing: size = 9 ⫻ 9 ft
thickness = 1ft-6 in.
fy = 60,000 psi
Code
Calculations and Discussion Reference
Vu 85
Required Avf = = = 3.15 in.2 Eq. (11-25)
φfy μ 0.75 × 60 × 0.6
22-17
Code
Example 22.6 (cont’d) Calculations and Discussion Reference
If the 4-No. 8 dowels were not adequate for transfer of horizontal shear, the footing concrete
in contact with the column concrete could be roughened to an amplitude of approximately
1/4 in. to take advantage of the higher coefficient of friction of 1.0 and a potentially higher
Vn limit in 11.6.5:
85
Re quired Avf = = 1.89 in.2
0.75 × 60 × 1.0
⎡ ⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 3 fy ψ tψeψs ⎥
ld = d
⎢ 40 λ fc′ ⎛ c + K ⎞ ⎥ b
b tr
⎢ ⎜⎝ d ⎟⎠ ⎥
⎢⎣ b ⎥⎦
Eq. (12-1)
Clear cover to No. 8 bar ≈ 3.25 in.
c b + K tr 2.25 + 0
= = 2.25 < 2.5, use 2.25
db 1.0
ψt = 1.0
ψe = 1.0
ψs = 1.0
λ = 1.0
22-18
Code
Example 22.6 (cont’d) Calculations and Discussion Reference
( )
l dh = 0.02ψ c fy / λ fc′ d b
12.5.2
⎛ 60,000 ⎞
= ⎜ 0.02 × 1.0 × 1.0 × ⎟ × 1.0 = 19.0 in.
⎝ 1.0 4000 ⎠
Modifications: 12.5.3
Use 15 in. hook embedment into footing to secure dowels at the footing reinforcement.
Total length of No. 8 dowel = 32 + 15 = 47 in. Use 4 ft-0 in. long dowels.
Note: The top of the footing at the interface between column and footing must 11.6.9
be clean and free of laitance before placement of the column concrete.
s ≈ 3.5"
4-No. 14
6db = 6" diameter
4'-0"
No. 8 dowel
12"
No. 4 tie
1'-4"
90° Standard hook
1.5" cover
= 12db + 3db + db
12"
= 16db = 16" = 1' - 4"
22-19
Example 22.7—Design for Depth of Pile Cap
For the pile cap shown, determine the required thickness of the footing (pile cap).
critical section
Cap size = 8.5 ⫻ 8.5 ft for two-way
action
PD = 20 kips
1'-3"
PL = 10 kips
1'-3" 3'-0" 3'-0" 1'-3"
Code
Calculations and Discussion Reference
1. Depth required for shear usually controls pile cap thickness. Both wide-beam action 11.11
and two-way action for the footing must be investigated.
Assume an overall cap thickness of 1 ft-9 in. with an average d ≈ 14 in. 15.7
Vu ≤ φVn
Eq. (11-1)
(
φVn = φ 2λ fc′ bw d )
Eq. (11-3)
( )
φVn = 0.75 2 4000 × 102 × 14 /1000 = 135.4 kips > Vu = 120 kips O.K.
22-20
Code
Example 22.7 (cont’d) Calculations and Discussion Reference
Vu = 8 ⫻ 40 = 320 kips
⎧ 4
⎪ 2+ β Eq. (11-31)
⎪
Vc ⎪ α d Eq. (11-32)
= smallest value of ⎨ s + 2
λ fc′ bo d ⎪ bo Eq. (11-33)
⎪ 4
⎪
⎩
16
β = = 1.0
16
bo = 4 (16 + 14) = 120 in.
bo 120
= = 8.6
d 14
⎧ 4
⎪ 2+ = 6
1 Eq. (11-31)
⎪
Vc ⎪ 40
⎨ + 2 = 6.7 Eq. (11-32)
λ fc′ bo d ⎪ 8.6
⎪ 4 (governs) Eq. (11-33)
⎪
⎩
15 in.
bo = π (12 + 2 × 7 ) = 81.7 in.
punching shear
22-21
Code
Example 22.7 (cont’d) Calculations and Discussion Reference
⎧ 4
⎪ 2+ β Eq. (11-31)
⎪
Vc ⎪ α d
= minimum of ⎨ s + 2 Eq. (11-32)
λ fc′ bo d ⎪ bo
⎪ 4 Eq. (11-33)
⎪
⎩
π
bo = (12 + 2 × 7 ) + 2 × 15 = 50.4 in.
4
bo 50.4
= = 3.6
d 14
4
⎧ 2 + 1 = 6
Vc ⎪
⎪ 20 + 2 = 7.6
λ fc′ bo d = ⎪ 3.6
⎨
⎪ 4 (governs)
⎪
⎪
⎩
φVc = 0.75 × 4 4000 × 50.4 × 14/1000 = 134 kips > Vu = 40 kips O.K.
22-22