Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
~ecd. m R &
ol, !<J
o Dt.-··-~/..~_
.....
--·_ ~.._ __
-
5..9
f ,r•
No. 2014/Proj./DBR/BNC/2/10 7/~1/).-- New Delhi, date 28.08.2015
/2 .:1o P r>---
Sub: Approval of Design Basis Report (Version-S), Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project
Phase-1.
Ref: MEGA's letter No. M EGA/MD/Design/DBR/Structure/June-15 dated 22.07.2015
The Design Basis Report (DBR) for viaduct, Version -5 of Metro Link Express for
Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad (MEGA) Co. Ltd. has been examined in consultation with
RDSO and approval of Railway Board is hereby conveyed.
DA/As above.
' \S
(Rut C g an)
Director/Works( Pig.)
' . Railway Board
~ -~ l:~"' ~ '"' Ph. 011-23097061
~- i>·J;;It.
-,J
..':> ,·...'
METRO - LINK EXPRESS FOR
GANDHINAGAR AND
AHMEDABAD
STRUCTURAL DESIGN BASIS REPORT FOR VIADUCT
Version- 5
f f-"'
Sector - 10 A, Gand h•na..,ar 3820' 0 •
GuJ rat, ;i\d , ,{ENFR.~L r.' t.N AG i:: R
c;LANNING & OESIN!:f)
MEGA CO. I.TI~·
r
METRO·UNK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD
. \
7 .1. 2 Sup er Imposed Dead Load (SIDL) .......................................................................$ . . ,~
. ~\\
£X...-~ ,. '
:
7. 2 PRE-STRESS FORCE (PR) .................. .......... ............................................................$
7.3 LIVE LOAD (LL) ..................................................................................................................5
7.3 . 1 Railway Vehicula r Load................................................................... ......................5
7 .3.2 Dynamic Augmentation ..............................................................................................7
7 .3 .3 Braking and Traction (BR I TR) ......................................................................7
7.3.4 Centrifugal Forces Due to Curvature of Superstructure ................................ s
7 .3.5 Racking Force ............................... . . ...... . . ........ . ..................................8
7.4 TEMPERATURE EFFECTS (TL) ....................................................................................8
7.4 .1 Gen eral : ............................................ .............. .......................... .................... 8
111
tl
II
ME"TRQ-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD
{) L i '• t
~\YI'" ':-/
. I
t /---'
~t:"'f'FII.l t/C,~GI: ~
OFSIGN R\SIS R' 'l'O'lT Vl Ull('r. \'~ Ill luly 21) 1r,
vLANNII>tG !1. O£Sif'iy.l)
MEGA CO. LTD.
METRO·UNK EXPRESS FOR GANOHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Des1gn Basis Report perta ins to Viaduct Portion of Ahmedabad Metro Project from
Matera stadium to APMC and Vastral Gam to Thaltej prov1ding North - South and East·
West connectivity respeCtively.
The Viaduct for Ahmedabad Metro project compnses of Precast PSC segmental smgle box
girder or cast· 1n-situ box girder w1th inclined webs support1ng two tracks with RCC
substructure and Bored cast in sit" pile foundat1on. The standard gauge of 1435mm shall
be followed. The centre to centre distance between the two tracks shall be as per SOD of
MEGA.
This Design Bas's Report provides Design Criteria for Viaduct of Ahmedabad Metro
2.0 UNITS
The m ain units used for d esign shall be: [m]. [mm], [t], [kN), [KN/m 2 ] , [MPa] , [ 0 C) ,
[rad]
Track Geometry, Track Structure & Rolling Stock should be as per the approved SOD of
MEGA.
The v1aduct runs along and crosses several ex 1sting roadways and existing railways. The
followmg sections outline the general clearance requ~rements for these cross1ngs.
Clearance for road traffic shall be as per Road Authonty of IRC reqUi rement.
Clearances for Rolling Stock should be as per the approved Schedule of Ormensrons of
MEGA.
The lrfe of marn Structural systems should be as per cla use 15.1.3 of IRS: CBC. The
design life of PSC structure shall be as per clause 16.1.3 of IRS: CBC.
6.1 CONCRETE
B. Modular Rat io
Modular Ratio including long term effects such as creep shall be taken as
follows(§ 5.2.6 o~ IRS: CBC).
I
For tensile reinforcement, m, = 280/ f""
'
For compressive rernforcement, m< = 420/ f"'
I
II. Minimum Grade of Concrete & Cover
Mrnimum grade of concrete should be as per clause no 5.4.4 of IRS CBC for
exposure condrtion defined rn Clause 5.4 1 of IRS: esc.
III. Cement
The type of cement shall be as per clause 4.1 o' IRS: CBC.
•
The m rnrmum cementrtious material content shall be ~s per clause 5.4.5 &
table 4·(c) of I RS : CBC
:< '; (
...... 'lf-4G.t,. '··''~~"'*""''
!:JESIG'I/ fl:\SIS REPORT-VlADUcr- ,_.~ 12 ; I A~~I'Jft... G \. ~t.~IN · .. Jt..'Y. l
I~EG.A ~Q~ ~J
METRO-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANOHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD
•
The maximum water-cement ratio shall be as per clause 5.4.3 & table 4(a) of
IRS: esc.
The total chlonde content by weight of cement shall be as per clause 5.4.6 of
IRS: CBC.
IV. Density
Densoty of concrete shall be as per Table 1 of IS· 875 (part-I).
V Poisson's Ratio
Poisson's ratio for all concrete : 0.15 .
Young's Modulus
Young's Modulus of Prestressong steel shall be as per dause 4.6.2 of IRS: CBC.
Prestressing Units
Other Parameters
Sheathing: Corrugated HOPE Duct shall be used as per clause 7.2.6.4.2 of IRS:
CBC.
Followings are the vanous loads to be taken into consideration for analys1s and
design of structures as prescnbed in IRS: Bridge Rules up to latest up-to-date
corr ection slip.
,.,.t rt
DF.SIG'< B.'\SIS RF.PORT-V!AOUCT· VS July. ll'!;
METRO-liNK EXPRESS FOR GANOHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD
I. Rails+ pads
IL Cable trough cell
Ill. Cable trays
IV. Hand Rail ,
\
V. Third Rail
VI. MISCellaneous (OCS, signaling)
VII. Cables
VIII. Para pet
IX. Plinths
Note: The SIDL can be of two types: Fixed or non variable, and variable. In case
Melro certifies that a porti on of SIDL 1s of fixed or non variable type and it is not
likely to vary significantly during the life of the structure and a special clause for
ensuring the same IS incorporated in the Metro's mamtenance manual, the load
factors applicable for dead load may be considerea for this component of S!DL.
The pre- stressing force calculation will be as per § 16.8 of IRS: CBC. The loss of
pre stress due to frict1on will be calculated as per § 16.8.3 of IRS: CBC. The loss
of pre-stress, other than friction losses will be calculated as per§ 16.8.2 of IRS:
CBC.
Each component of the structure shall be designed I checked for all poss1ble
combmations of these loads and forces. They shal resist the effect of the worst
comb1nation of following coach dimension:
.. - - - - ----------------·
D
Max, mu m Axle load 16 t
Where,
D 22600 mm (Length of a car over coupler)
a = (ba lance)
b = 2200mm to 2400mm (Length of rigid wheel base for single bog1e)
b + c- 14800 +/- 250 mm (Distance between bog1e centres)
Mov.ng load analysis IS done for all four combinations of axle spacing as
ment•oned above and envelope of forces viz., Bending moment and shear forces
are found out. From thiS envelop, equivalent UOL for bendmg moment and shear
forces IS found out and tabulated below.
w here,
Loaded Length: For Bending Moment, l is equal to the effect1ve span in meters.
For Shear, l is the loaded length in meters to give the max1mum Shear 10 the
Member under consideration.
EUDL (BM): The equ1valent uniformly d1stnbuted toad for bend1ng moment for
spans above l Orn such that the bending moment due to EUDL at 1/6 of the span
is equal to bendmg moment developed at the same section due to load tram as
defined above
EUDL (SF): The equ1vatent un1formly distributed load for shear force for spans
such that the shear force due to EUDL at the support •s equal to shear force
developed at the same sect1on due co load tram defined above
t
11.5 7f>.337 71.28 12.8 11.52
13 83.522 73.818 12.8 11.52
J
14 5 89 719 81978 12.8 11.52
~
Loads other than standard trains like track machmes, cranes, any new rolling
stock etc. which may come on this strvctu~ should be within the loading
envelope initially decided by the metro as above.
For spedal structures like continuous structure, cable stayed bridges, etc. the
actuaf train loads may be used for design.
--
7 .3.2 Dynamic Augmentation
CDA for 1ong•tud1nal and transverse ana·ysis shalf be as per IRS: Bridge Rules.
. (
'lFSIG'i I! \S'S REPOHT Vl.\')1 'I r 1;.-; 17
I { •.•, t N
, ,,... ., .t.. r.""· (. ,,!uly.
• LANNii•;,.:; .>; ~I. $1NGt
20,1 S
..,. 1, ,t . ._
The horizon tal centrffugal force due to moving load in curved su perstructu re is to
be considered as per§ 2.5 of lRS: Bridge Rules.
C=Wv2 1127R
Where W is axle load in kN, v is maximum design speed in km/h and R is radius
of curvature in m . This force is assumed to act at a height o f 1.80 m above rail
t op level.
The horizont al transverse loading due to racking specified in IRS: Bridge Rules §
2.9 is applicable to design of latera l bracing .
7 .4 . 1 General:
A rail structure mteract10n [RSIJ analysis is required because the contin uously
welded runn1ng rails are cont•nuous over the deck expansion JOints. The
in teraction occurs because the rails are directly connected to rhe decks by
fasten•ng system.
The wond load shall be calculated as per§ 2.11 of IRS: Bridge Rules and I S: 875
(Part 3).
Erectoon forces and effects shall be consodered as per coause 2.13 of IRS: Bridge
Rules. The we1ght of all permanent and tempOr<Ory material together with all other
forces and effects which can operate on any par. of during erection shall be taken
onto account
-me c~ra lrnent oad shall be i!S per Append x XXV of IRS: Bridge Rules wotl'!
standard gauge In place of broad gauge. For ULS and stabihty check, loi!ding sha ll
be proportioned as p.:Jr maximum axle load .
Sacramento derailment criteria may be used for U-g•rders. This cnterion
corresponds to the application of 40% of one coach weight applied horizontally as
a 3M long umform Impact load on the U Girder top flange. This derailMent load
corresponcs to an ULS load. For SLS combmatJOn-5 of IRS: CBC a 1 /1.75 co-
efficient shall be applied to the dera•lment load.
The parapets shall be designed to res•st lateral hor izontal force & a vertical force
of 1.50kN/m applied simultaneously at the top of the parapet as per § 2.10 of
IRS: Bridge Rules. Add•tional n01se barrier In addition to above aerodynam•c
actions from passmg of tram shall be taken into account based on the design
speed of the train, aerodynamic shape of the train, the shape of parapet structure
and the pos1tion of parapet structure.
The vehicle coll•s•on load shall be cons•dered as per clause 222 of IRC. 6 2014.
Elementary load
Dead Load OL
Super l1'11posed Loads SIOL
Shrinkage&. Creep sc
Presues:, PS
I i'e load u I rain Weight
-
TW
D) namic Impact I
I orce due to cun'3turc or T r~n!'over.se eccentricit}' CF
l.ongiwdinal lo= 1 tracth¢. Braking) I.F
Live Load on Fool Path* LFP
\\'hen Lhe load on loot path" con;idcred then 'o CD\
~hall be dpplicd on I rain Live load 10 accounl for
O.,.(ation:u~ il'3in u11dcr emCJ1',!ency condition.
Ill
f
METRO-LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHMEDABAD
Buoynncy
i Venical direction EQ I
!l
Differential :....:ttlcrnent f)S
Oertlilment Load DR
l rictionnl Re:str3int FR
The analysis and design will be carried out for all possoble cases of rolhng traon
loads. All the supportong structures, such as superstructure, beanngs,
substructure and foundations shall be checked for the most onerous cases.
1.1.1 : Used fo r Deck Torsion. U<1>ring (\>mpression, Uplift c hock, Shall check,
l'oundmion cbccl.
0 0
1.1.2: Lsed for Shaft check. Found.l.toon check
LW: Used for Deck check. Bearing Compression check, Shaft ch.,cl.. fo11ndation check
LL-1: L'sed for •haft c~eck foundotion check. Shear K") ched,
The ULS and SLS load col"lbonat•ons and partoal safety factors for loads should be
fol lowed as per clause ~ 1.2, clause 11.3 and Table 1.2 of IRS: CBC.
In l1eu of combinations 2 of clatJSC 11.0 and Table !.2 of IRS:CBC, All strucwral
elements shall be checked for Ult1mate lim1t state and Serviceability limit state
load Combinations as defined in clause 6.7 of "RDSO Guidelines on Seismic
Des1gn of Railway Bridges-Jan 201 5".
The superstructure/bearing, sub-structure and foundatiOn will be checked for one
rrack loaded condition as well as both track loaded condition , for sing le spa n and
both spans loaaed conditions, as the case may be.
Design of viaduct shall be in accordance w1th the construction
methodology/construction sequence to be adopted during execut ion.
The stresses at transfer, construction stage and dur;ng service for pres'"uessed
casr in situ and SC9mental construction shall be as per clause 16.4.2.2 (Concrete
Com pressive stress Limitations), 16.4.2.3 (Steel stress Lim itations),
16.4.2.4(Cracking), l7.3.3(0ther types of Connect1ons) and 17.4 (Composite
Concrete Constructions) of IRS: CBC. However for precast segmental
construction, no tensile stress shall be permitted at transfer and dunng
construction .
Clause 10. 2(Serv1ceability Lim1t States) of IRS: esc shall be used for RCC
construction (Beams, columns and slabs).
10.1 DURABILITY
For SLS Combination GJ, crack w1dth in reinforced concrete members shall be
calculated as per clause 15.9.8.2.1 of IRS: CBC.
The allowable crack w1dth should be as per clause 10.2.1(a) based on the
exposure condition defined in clause 5.4.1 of IRS: CBC and table-10 of IRS: esc.
For crack control in columns, Clause 15.6.7 of IRS: CBC will be mod1fied to the
extent that actual ax1al load will be considered to act simultaneously. Clause no.
10.4.1, 11.3.4, and 13.3 of IRS: esc shall be kept in view while calculating
vertical deflection at m1d span.
11.0 FATIGUE
11. 1 GENERAL
Fatigue phenomenon shall be analyzed only for those structural elements that are
subjected to repetit•on of sigmficant stress variation (under traffic load). Thus
generally the fatigue shall be regarded only for deck structura part supportmg the
tracks.
..... :......
11.2 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
Clause 3.6 of [RS: Steel Bndge Code I clause 13.2 of IRS: welded Bndge Code
shall govem. If J\ values are reQUired to be used, the tra•n closest to the actual
train format1on proposed to be run on the metro system shall be used Other.v1se,
detailed counting of cycles shall be done.
12.0 FOUNDATIONS
(1) IRS: Bndge substr\JCtures and foundation code shall be followed for dcs1qn ot
Foundat1ons.
For designing the p1er cap as corbel the provisions of clause 17.2.3 of IRS: esc
shall be followed. In case of shear span to effective depth ratio be1ng more than
0.6, pier cap will be designed as nexural members.
The effective length of a cant•lever pier for the purpose of slenderness ratio
calculations shall be done as per IRS: CSC.
Cons•dering the span configuration and safety aspects of the structural system (In
nonma and seism•c condition), •t is proposed to adopt laminated elastomeric
beanngs placed underneath the Box-girder/ PSC-girders for transfer of vertical
forces and a react1on block (protruding above the pier head) for transfer of In-
plane forces. The elastomeric beanng shall be designed as per EN 1337 Part 1
and Part-3 along w1th !RC: 83 Part-II. Wherever EN code is not clear UIC 772 -
2R and along w1th IRC: 83 Part·II shall be followed.
POT cum PTFE or Spherical beanngs may be provided 1f elastomeric beanngs are
not poss•ble to des•gn for spec•al spans. POT -PTFE and spherica bearing shall be
des•gned as per IRC: 83 Part-Ill 2002 and IRC: 83 Pdrt·IV 2014 respectively.
· - - - ,.._ T'r'\
I 16. 2 REPLACEABILITY OF BEARINGS
METRO·LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR AND AHM EDABAD
While finalizmg the. proposed bearing system, it shall be kept in m1nd that
accessibil ity and replacement of each part of bearing are of paramount
importance as the design hfe of bearings is shorter than that of the stnucture.
Keeping in vtew the above coted cnteria, all the bearings and pier caps w1l be
detailed for replacement of beanngs in the future.
16.3
UPLIFT . - ~\{
If required, a holding -down device connecting the deck and the pier head shalf be ·
placed in order to prevent the deck from overturning. Tile holding-down devoce
may be integrated in the pot·beanng system or be a separate system constotuted
of bars embedded in pier cap and viaduct woth appropriate details, permottong
transla tion/rotation. Other systems can also be foreseen.
Due to the lack of appropriate guidelines in Indian codes, the design cnteria for
holding down device (upward •orce limit requonng holding down device, desogn
formulas) will be taken from the latest intematoonal practoce (AASHTO, MOTC
codes) .
The superstructure shal be simply supported songle cell Box gorder constnucted by
precast segmental constnuction technique woth internal pre-stressing and w1th
epoxy gluing and temporary prestressing of segments. At a few locations
nonstandard/specia l spans are envisaged .e.g. precast post-tensioned I gorders
woth cast on sotu deck slab. In general, super stnucture (Box Girder) woll be
accommodatong two tracks as per approved SOD of"' EGA.
18.0 DRAINAGE
The drainage of ded. shall be des,gned to cater the maximum envisaged rainfall
Intensity and suitable longitudinal and transverse slope should be provided.
Moreover the p rovisions of Clauses 10.4.1.1 & 15.2.2 of IRS: CBC shall be
followed.
Solid Pier
The drain p1pe of double wall HOPE corrugated p1pes w1th water collection box at
lop which w1ll be located within the sohd p1er to avo1d unpleasant aesthet1cs.
Deck
The top of soffit slab w111 be profiled so as to collect the r un -off water at multiple
points by providing a cross slope of 2.5%. Drainage pipes will be prov1ded to
collect the runoff.
The IRS Codes shall be followed in principle. Although main clauses have been
mentioned 1n the DBR, the other relevant clauses as available in t he IRS codes
shall also be followed, wherever, applicable. If provis1ons are not available 1n IRS,
the order of preference shall be as follows, unless specified otherwise:
January 2015
IRC: 5 Standard Spec•ficat•on & Code of Practice for Road Bridges - General
Features of Des1gns
IRC: 6 Standard Spec1f•cat1on & Code of Practice for Road Bridges - Loads and
Stresses
IRC: 18 Design Criteria for Pre-stressed Concrete Road Bridges (Post Tensioned
Concrete)
IRC: 21Standard Spec1ficat10n & Code Of Practice For Road Bridges ·Cement
Concrete (Plain &Remforcement.)
IRC: 22 Standard Spec•f•cat•on & Code of Practice for Road Bndges, Section VI -
Composite Construction for Road Bridges --Cement Concrete (Plain
&Reinforcement.)
IRC: 83(I)Standard Spcc•fication & Code of Practice for Road Bridges, Part I
Metallic Bearings
IRC: 83{11) Standacd Specification & Code of Practice for Road Bndges, Part·ll
Elastomeric Beanngs
IRC: 83(1Il) Standard Spec•l•cat•on & Code of Practice for Road Bndges, Part-III
POT, POT-cum-PTFE, Pin and MetalliC Guide Bearings
IRC 83{1V) Standard SpeC1f1cat10n and Code for practice of road bridges, Pa rt IV:
Sphencal and Cyhndncal Bearings.
IRC· Sp-71 Guidelines for Design and Construction of Pre -cast Pre-Tensioned
Girders for bridges
(Part 1/Sec2) Concrete Poles Sectoon 2 Bored Cast-in-situ Poles (with amendments)
Code of Practice for Design & Constr. of Pile Foundations Part 4 Load
IS:29U
test on
Piles
1S:2950 Designs and Construction of Raft Foundatoons
IS :-<:268 Uncoated S~ress Relocved Low •l~xatoon S<>vcn-ply Strands for pre
stressed
Concrete
Design and Construction of Bored cast-in-Situ Plies Founded on
15:14593
Rocks
85: 5400 Code of Practice for Design of Con crete Bridges Part 4 -1990.
BS: 8006 Code of Practice for strengthened reinforced soils and other
fills - 1995.
, /
OFSH;N BASIS REI'ORT-''1 \f>UCT- \"'i 120
~ /../
J 1~ Ju~· 2J 1-
GENFR.t.L fVt,NAGER
. ' l>t ANNf1o.C · "ESII'IG·
¥£ r.ll cr. , ·" •