Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
Social voting is a promising new feature in online updates, in forms of text, image, and video, with
social networks. It has distinctive challenges and his/her direct friends, but also, can hastily disseminate
opportunities for suggestion. In this paper, we those updates to a much larger arger viewer of indirect
increase a set of matrix factorization (MF) aand friends, leveraging on the rich connectivity and global
nearest-neighbor (NN)-based
based recommended systems reach of popular online social networks. Many online
(RSs) that explore user social network and group social networks now offer the social voting function,
association information for social voting through which a user can share with friends his/her
recommendation. During experiments with actual opinions, e.g., like/dislike, on different subjects,
social voting traces, we express that social network ranging from customer statuses, display pictures, to
and group association
ciation information can drastically games played, products purchased, websites visit, etc.
progress the popularity-based
based voting advice, and Taking like/dislike
dislike type of votings one step further,
social network in order dominates group association some online social networks,
networks e.g., Sina Weibo,
sequence in NN-basedbased approaches. We as well empower users ers to initiate their own voting campaigns,
observe that social and group information is much on any topic of their interests, with user customized
more precious to cold users rs than to heavy users. In voting options. The friends of a voting initiator can
our experiments, simple meta path based nearest
nearest- participate in the campaign or retweet the campaign to
neighbor models outperform computation
computation- their friends. Other than stimulating social
concentrated on matrix factorization models in hothot- interactions,
ractions, social voting also has many potential
voting recommendation, while user's preferences for commercial values. Advertisers can initiate votings to
non-hot
hot votings can be better mined bby matrix advertise certain brands. Product managers can
factorization models. We further put forward a hybrid initiate votings to conduct market research. E- E
RS, bagging distinct single approaches to get the best commerce owners can strategically launch votings to
top-k hit rate. attract more online customers.
@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 3 | Mar-Apr 2018 Page: 1426
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470
2456
III. PROPOSED WORK IV.. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
We consider top-kk voting recommendation in online In this paper, we present a set of matrix factorization-
social networks. For each user, the recommender based and nearest neighbor-based and
system has suggested a small number, say k, of recommendation organization for online social voting.
votings from all existing votings. Matrix
atrix factorization During researches with actual data, we found that
approaches were found to be very competent in social network and group association information can
general top-k recommendation. Moreover, social significantly improve the precision of approval-based
network evidence can be demoralized to improve the voting recommendation, especially for cold users, and
accuracy of top-k recommendation. For this reason, social network information directly to group
we start with matrix factorization approaches using affiliation information in nearest neighbor-based
neighbor
both social network evidence and grougroup association approaches. In this
his paper demonstrated that social and
information. We propose a multi-channelchannel matrix group information is much more valuable to progress
factorization model, which factorizes user user-voting recommendation precision for cold users than for
relations, use to user and user to group interactions heavy users. This is since cold users tend to contribute
concurrently, gearing to improve top-kk hit rate. We in popular voting’s.
s. In our experiments, simple Meta
first develop neighborhoods by navigati
navigating different path-based nearest neighbor models outperform
types of metapaths in the Weibo heterogeneous computation intensive Matrix
atrix factorization models
mo in
information network. We then explore user hot-voting commendation,, while users’ interests for
neighborhoods in the hidden feature space derived non-hot voting’ss can be better mined by Matrix
from matrix factorization models. factorization models. This paper is only for step
toward thorough study of social voting
Nearest-Neighbor Method recommendation. As an instantaneous imminent work
item, we would like to refer how voting contented
Other than matrix factorization approaches, nearest- information can be mined for recommendation,
neighbor -based recommendations have also been especially for cold voting’s.
s. We are also attentive in
considered. nearest-neighborr methods are generally developing voting recommendation organization
used in recommended system. Thus, it is very customized for individual users, given the
captivating to study the presentation of nearest- convenience of multi-channel
channel evidence about their
neighborr copies on social voting recommendation social neighborhood activities..
delinquent. In nearest-neighbor -based
based methods, the
neighborhood of a operator can be calculated using REFERENCES
collaborative filtering, or it can be a set of directly or
1) R. M. Bond et al.,, “A 61-million-person
61
indirectly associated friends in a social network, or
experiment in social influence and political
just a set of users with analogous interests in a similar
mobilization,” Nature,, vol. 489, pp. 295–298,
295 Sep.
group. This makes it suitable to combine social trust
2012.
and user-group relationship into nearest
nearest-neighbor -
founded top-k recommendation. 2) G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin, “Toward
“ the
next generation of recommender systems: A
Screenshot survey of the state-of of-the-art and possible
extensions,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.,
Eng. vol.
17, no. 6,pp. 734–749,
749, Jun. 2005.
3) X. Su and T. M. Khoshgoftaar, “A survey of
collaborative filtering techniques,” Adv. Artif.
Intell.,, vol. 2009, Aug. 2009, Art. no. 421425,doi:
10.1155/2009/421425.
4) Y. Koren, “Factorization meets the neighborhood:
A multifaceted collaborative filtering model,” in
Proc. ACM KDD,, 2008, pp. 426–434.
426
@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 3 | Mar-Apr 2018 Page: 1428