Aramex PJSC (ARMX:DFM)
Price Fair Value Estimate
February 5th, 2018
by Shabbar H. Kothari, Aamir H. Kothari
Aramex likely to keep growing, but fully
priced for now to offer any upside
Recommendation
At AED 4.13, ARMX is fairly priced and we
recommend a NO-BUY.
Even upon assuming a 9% y-o-y growth in
revenues for the next five years, this is an
unremarkable albeit well-run business and
we would not recommend buying unless a
significant mispricing occurs.
Industry overview
Aramex falls into the $250bn Global Courier
& Delivery Services (GCDS) industry.** To put
this into perspective, Aramex FY 2016 sales
were equivalent to $1.2bn. Operators
provide express courier delivery services of
parcels, documents, and packages for
business and individual customers.
The market is fragmented and is made up of
big and small players who compete on price,
delivery speed, reliability and supply chain
capacity.
The industry has experienced moderate
growth over the last 5 years due to slow
economic growth in developed nations,
especially Europe. Thus a large portion of the
growth has come from emerging markets.
(See Appendix A for details)
Business overview
Aramex PJSC (ARMX) is an international
express, mail delivery and logistics services
company based in Dubai, UAE. The company
has operations in 200 cities worldwide with
key hubs in Amman, Dubai, Hong Kong,
London, New York and Singapore.
Since inception, it has developed a solid
foothold in the MENA region and has some
presence in Europe and East-Asia. Aside from (See Appendix C for details)
express shipping, it has a relatively small
market-share in the MENA region’s freight,
logistics and supply chain business.
**Source: IBISWorld industry report
Uncertainty Enterprise Value
AED 4.13 AED 4.1 to 4.5 High AED 6.7bn
Consider Buy Economic Moat Stewardship Rating
 Market Cap
AED 3 to 3.4 None Standard AED 5.9bn
’06-‘16 Financial performance
Segment details (in order of percentage of
revenue) overview
Aramex revenues have grown by a factor of
International express (39%) - overseas door-
three over a ten-year period (AED 1.8bn to
to-door delivery of small packages.
AED 4.3bn).
Freight forwarding (26%) - transportation of
Cost of revenues in this industry consist
heavier and special-handling shipments
largely of gasoline costs incurred while
through air, land and sea.
moving goods. A close look at Aramex shows
Domestic express (23%) - door-to-door
that a fattening EBIT margin (8% to 11% from
delivery of urgent packages within countries.
Logistics (6%) - end-to-end logistics solutions 2006-2016) is not a result of cost efficiencies
but to a declining oil price. In other words,
for the transfer, storage and distribution of
ARMX does not possess scaling advantages
products and information.
as it grows. More than half of its operating
Others (6%) - catalogue shipping services,
expenses are staff-related that scale at the
document storage, airline ticketing/travel,
same rate as revenues.
visa services and publication & distribution.
Over the past five years, ARMX’s expanding
Geographical segments (in order of
spread between ROIC and WACC is
percentage of revenue):
attributable to savvy capital re-structuring
1. Middle East and Africa (64%)
involving increased amounts of low-cost debt
2. Asia and others (20%)
that has lowered WACC. During the same
3. Europe (13%)
period, an increase in ROIC (15% to 18%) is
4. North America (3%)
likely a result of lower transportation costs
and an improved capital velocity (revenues/
(See Appendix B for details)
invested capital).
Has it created Economic- As a counter-point, we believe only the
Value-per-share?* ‘Aramex’ flagship brand in the Middle East
has some pricing power. The same cannot be
A resounding yes. Our model shows that AED said for Aramex’s fresh subsidiaries in price-
1 of equity invested into ARMX in 2006 sensitive emerging markets - namely North
would now be worth AED 2.8, at a CAGR of Africa and the Indian subcontinent. A sharp
11%. upturn in fuel costs may squeeze margins
*Per-share economic value is derived by adding the and returns alike.
growth in BV/sh and the total per-share dividends
issued from 2006 to 2016. (See the Berk-Cow-model
(See Appendix D for details)
addendum for details)


During this period ARMX’s BV/sh grew from Does it stand out?
AED 0.8 to AED 1.6, and a cumulative of AED
0.6 was returned as preferred dividends. No
Given its unique blend of services, ARMX’s
cash was returned to owners in the form of
performance has matched the average of its
buybacks.
respective sub-industries.
We searched for an enduring economic
advantage in ARMX and found none. The
express courier services sub-industry does
not feature high returns on capital. The
logistics segment, on the contrary, yields to
customer switch costs - but only makes up
6% of ARMX’s revenues today.
Aramex has established itself with
operational excellence through services that
are fast, reliable, tech-savvy and customer-
centric. On the acquisition front, ARMX has
scooped up several small express-service
businesses to ease penetration into new
geographies. All this in combination with a
capital light business has produced a mildly
impressive performance over the past
decade.
 Base-Case: 3,3% CAGR, Best-Case: 5.9%
Even so, ARMX has failed to establish a
concrete ‘moat’ around its castle. It’s growing
size has not translated into scale or cost
advantages. We foresee these industry and
business realities to remain unchanged in the
near future.
ARMX’s multi-segment and multi-geography
nature yields a variety of competitors. The
most formidable regional competitors
include large and small logistics and freight-
forwarding companies.
Overseas competition in the express services
space is a different ballgame. ARMX
competes with three colossal shipping
companies: UPS, FedEx and DHL. As
mentioned earlier, ARMX’s key growth
strategy is to expand into new geographies
via mini acquisitions. It would likely face an
incumbent presence of the three giants
practically everywhere.
(See Appendix E for details)
A note on management
Management appears standard. It is
disappointing that neither Fadi Ghandour
nor Hussein Hachem discuss Capital
Allocation (ROIC & WACC spreads or value-
creating propositions) in the CEO letters
since 2011. The observations in the letters
are trite and self-congratulatory. There are
glib remarks made about how the firm tries
to be tech-savvy and ‘innovative’. But there is
no clear discussion of strategic plans to grow
nor is there any discussion of widening the
competitive edge. There is repeated mention
of how the firm stays competitive by being
asset-light - but in our books this is no edge.
In a business largely about a middleman
service between goods-suppliers and goods-
seekers, a competitor is not deterred from
replicating the asset-light model of ARMX.
**Source: IBISWorld industry report
Industry forecast cash-flow model to ‘read’ what the market
implies about a company's future
performance. In ARMX’s case, the implied
Revenue for the GCDS industry will grow at
expectations appear to have priced-in a sales
an annualized rate of 3% to $288b over the
growth of 8% at an EBIT margin of 10%. This
next five years to 2022**. A significant
portion of that growth will come from happens to be in line with our valuation,
hence our verdict is that this stock is currently
emerging markets, specifically the Asia-
fairly valued.
Pacific region. Demand for time-sensitive
goods is expected to grow globally due to
increased consumer spending. Global e- Total Shareholder Return
commerce and manufacturing trends that will
require just-in-time delivery will boost growth
(TSR)
for delivery service companies.
Additionally, better infrastructure, rising CAGR.
education quality and more consumers
(See Appendix G for details on assumptions)
online in emerging nations - all driving
globalization will escalate online shopping
and business transactions - ultimately
strengthening demand for courier delivery Projected
service businesses. CAGR
Time Key
return at
horizon assumptions
today’s
On the flip side, intensifying regulation on
price
greenhouse gas emissions will put pressure
on industry profit margins in the future. Many 8% sales
governments agree that greenhouse gas growth, 10%
EBIT margin,
emissions need to be controlled. GCDS
Base 4.4%
businesses will have to integrate the growing 5 years 3.3%
dividend
case
expenses of staying “green” into their yield,
operations. This tied with inevitable Reinvestment
AED1bn
fluctuations in fuel prices are threats Aramex
cannot offset with higher prices. 11% sales
growth, 10%
DCF Valuation EBIT margin,
4.4%
Best
5 years 5.9%
case dividend
With a 5-year time horizon, we project each yield,
segment’s sales-growth rate separately, Reinvestment
AED1.5bn
resulting in a weighted-average for the entire
business between 8% and 11%. We forecast
ARMX will keep a tight control on EBIT
margin at 10%. Reinvestments are expected
to follow past trends of Growth CapEx and
new Acquisitions. Finally, given ARMX’s heavy
presence in the Middle East and expanding
international portfolio, we assume a 5-year
WACC range of 11% and a steady-state
WACC of 9%.
The resulting Intrinsic-Value-per-share range
is AED 4.1 to AED 4.5.
Given ARMX’s risk profile, we recommend a
25% margin of safety on price - with a target
buying range of AED 3 to AED 3.4.
(See Appendix F for details)
Price Implied Expectations
(PIE)
The idea behind PIE is to start with the
current stock price and use the discounted
 Appendix A - Industry overview

The Global Courier and Delivery Services (GCDS) is a $250 billion industry
and consists over 600,000 enterprises worldwide. Operators primarily
provide air, surface or combined express courier delivery services of parcels,
documents and packages for businesses and individuals. Soon after the
global economic meltdown of ’08/’09, the industry experienced rapid
expansion as the global economy improved and developed markets
stabilized. However, the industry has experienced moderate growth over the
last 5 years due to low economic activity in developed nations, especially
Europe. A large portion of the growth has come from emerging markets
where rising economies increasingly demand courier services.
often rely on a large fleet of cargo aircraft and as a result depend on large
multinational operators such as UPS and FedEx that have the resources and
hub networks.
Surface couriers and messengers (land-based transportation) make up the
largest segment of the industry accounting for ~56% of total revenue.
Packages in this segment are delivered over a longer time period. Most
enterprises in this segment operate in single urban markets, providing local
delivery services. This is also the most labour intensive section of the
industry.

The industry is in the mature stage of its life cycle as businesses depend on
underlying economic growth while focusing on improving operating
efficiencies. Mergers and acquisitions, along with joint ventures, have
become more prominent as companies try to expand their services and gain
access to growing markets.
All other services consist of small operators transporting small purchased or
serviced items including groceries, medicine and prepared food among
other things. This segment represents a mere 1% of industry revenue.

Products and Services



International trade is heavily dependent on the GCDS industry making it an
integral part of the global economy. Apart from pick-up and delivery
services, couriers also assist their clients in administrative processes by
providing services like track and trace.

Air Transit courier services including express refers to services conducted in a

short time period and account for ~43% of industry revenue. These services
Major Markets




Business services including retailers and wholesalers

Banking, government and legal professionals are the largest users of courier
and delivery services in this section, followed by retail and wholesale
businesses. These include businesses in fashion, electronics, consumer
goods and antiques industries. The increasing use of e-commerce has led to
a growth of this segment in the past 5 years.

Households

This subdivision includes self-employed or work-from-home individuals

using courier services to deliver documents and small parcels. This segment
is anticipated to grow in the future as increasing number of people use the
internet as a trading platform. Household activities such as grocery and
restaurant delivery are also included in this segment, in addition to packages
being delivered between family members and friends.

Other

This segment consists of service companies such as logistics and supply

chain management, which includes financial services.
Business Locations


The GCDS industry is centred across three areas of the world - North
America, Europe and North Asia.
North America
Home to two of the largest players in the industry, UPS and FedEx, North
America is the largest revenue producer, specifically the USA. The market is
predominantly made up by the express sector. The US domestic market
alone accounts for 90% of the total courier industry in the North America
region. Canada accounts for the most of the remaining market.
Lastly, China’s low-cost labour force has attracted investors into the country
making China the manufacturing giant that it is today. This has proved to
be excellent news for domestic and international courier express
companies. However, some major players are withdrawing from China due
to strong competition, lack of cost advantages and new government
regulation.
Other regions
Growing economic development in all other regions has been driving
demand for industry services. Poor infrastructures however result in most
services carried out by domestic players.

Europe
The European market is a close second to North America in terms of
revenue generation. Similarly, majority of the enterprises in Europe operate
in the express delivery segment. A key driver of growth in Europe has been
the removal of customs barriers in an expanded European community,
together with growing economies in the Eastern Bloc.

North Asia
It is estimated that Japan represents more than half of industry revenue in
the North Asia region, largely due to its industrialized and developed
economy. The courier industry in Japan is one of the most advanced in the
world, enabling customers to choose a preferred delivery time for a parcel.

South Korea is another major market in North Asia. The high internet
penetration in the country has made online shopping the norm, stimulating
demand for courier service companies. In addition, strong South Korean
manufacturing brands such LG and Samsung have increased exports from
the country that has boosted demand for GCDS operators.
Operating Conditions
Capital Intensity
Capital Intensity for a business in the GCDS industry very much depends
on the size of their operations. Smaller entities spend much more on labour
than on capital investments. Labour expenses include wages and salaries
paid to driver, pilots, loading crews and administrative staff.
For larger operators capital intensity is slightly higher, as they tend
to have a large number of vehicles and aircraft that are required to make
express domestic and international deliveries. In addition, investment
needed to enter emerging markets has also risen the capital intensity in the
last 5 years.
Technological Change
Technology is a critical part of the operations in the GCDS industry, and a
growing number of operators have been implementing state-of-art
technology to streamline their delivery process, improve data flow and
information access. An example of this is the ability to track a parcel.
That said, the pace at which technology changes is not as rapid as
other tech-heavy industries.
The market is fragmented and is made up of
big and small players who compete on price,
delivery speed, reliability and supply chain
capacity.
Industry operators cater to a diverse range of
clients leading to relatively stable demand
over time.
Regulation & Policy
The GCDS industry is lightly regulated with standards and regulations set
by both national government authorities and industry associations.
Regulation is stricter in developed countries than emerging economies.
Global express carriers who own aircraft fleets have to deal with
airspace and aircraft regulations, such as various safety standards and
emissions rules.
Note: all industry data and information is sourced from IBISWorld.
 Appendix B - Business overview

Aramex PJSC (ARMX) is an international express, mail delivery and logistics Second, the incumbent competition is too fierce to warrant ARMX’s
services company based in Dubai, UAE. The company was founded by Fadi comparably limited resources.

Ghandour and Bill Kingson in 1982.* The company currently employs
18,000 people, and has 567 offices in 69 countries. (Source: Q3 2017 Aramex
Presentation) The MENA region’s key export continues to be Oil & Gas
commodities. In exchange, the region imports food, other commodities
and finished products from China, the Indian subcontinent and the
Western Hemisphere. ARMX has played a small role as ‘transporter’ and
‘facilitater’ to serve the region’s imports.

The breakdown of Aramex’s business is best observed in two ways:

Industry segments and Geographies.

Industry segments: ARMX TTM sales were AED 4,556m, of which 62% are
from Express (Courier) Services (domestic and international). ARMX is the
largest shipping company in the MENA region. Additionally, it operates in
the Freight Forwarding (26% of sales) and Logistics (6% of sales) sub-
industries - where it faces formidable competition.

Geographies: 64% of ARMX’s 2016 sales are from the MENA region -
identifying it as a largely ‘Arab’ business. 20% of sales were generated in
Asia - including East, Southeast and South Asia - all regions where ARMX
projects a significant portion of future growth. Another 13% from Europe,
and only a sliver of 3% from North America.
Refraining from expansion in North America is prudent for two reasons. *Aramex. (2018, January 12). In Wikipedia, Retrieved 10:23, February 6, 2018, from
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aramex&oldid=819983975
First, N. America’s Transportation and Logistics industries are mature.
 Appendix C - Has it created Economic-Value-per-share?

The Berkshire Cow - Measuring Economic-Value Creation Y10 - 2016 About this model

Ticker: ARMX:DFM The Berkshire Cow is our proprietary model
` BV = 2,275
Date: Feb 5th 2018
that attempts to approximate Economic Value
BV/sh = 1.6
Y1 - 2006 1,107 that a business has created (or destroyed)
△BV =
over the past 10 years. This is done by
BV = 1,168 = 0.8
△BV/sh assuming that the economic value created for
BV/sh = 0.8 owners often tracks the change in BV/sh plus
the total cash returned to owners as
buybacks or dividends. We do not aim for
precision here, only an indication of the
quality of a business from the owner’s
Rev/sh = 0.9 Rev/sh = 3.0
perspective.

ROIC = 8% WACC = 11% ROIC = 14%


ΣRe-Investments = 1,870

Milk boxes
IC/sh = 0.88 IC/sh = 1.97
represent NPV of How did ARMX do?

future cash flows
Aramex doubled its BV/sh and returned a
ΣMaint. Capex = ΣD&A = 655
cumulative of AED0.64 purely as dividends to
its owners. Put simply, a AED1 invested in
ΣNOPAT = 2,620
Σ in Non-Cash WC = 180
ΣChanges in Debt, Net = 524 Aramex in 2006 would have grown to
+
ΣGrowth Capex = 897
ΣAfter-Tax Debt Service = (21.4) AED2.8. This is the key take-away.

ΣAcquisitions = 793 ΣFCFE = 1,120 

Over ten years, ARMX produced AED 2.6bn
in NOPAT, of which AED 1.9bn was expended
ΣCash Returned = 939 on reinvestments, and a net of AED 0.52bn
ΣDividends ΣBuybacks
= = was raised from debt. AED 1.1bn of Free
939 0 Cash to Equity was produced and AED 939m
was returned to as cash as Dividends to
Economic-Value Creation
owners - and none as buybacks.
Total (in $mm) = BV + ΣCash Returned 

Total (in $mm) = 1,107 + 939 = 2,046 Other important assumptions are that
AED1 in BV per share grows to AED2.8 in maintanence capex is equal to depreciation
All figures in AED millions, except per share $Per share = BV/sh + ΣDividend/sh
Per share b= 0.80 + 0.64 = 1.44
Economic-Value per share. and that reinvestments consist of changes-in-
working-capital, growth capex and total
acquisitions. 

 Appendix D - Financial performance overview

Table 1 - Financial performance trends

AED millions 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 TTM CAGR Commentary
It would be insightful to know how much of Sales growth
was driven by increase in Volume of services, in contrast

Sales 2,576.2 3,071.6 3,324.8 3,649.5 3,754.7 4,343.2 4,555.7 8% with increase in average prices of services.
YoY change (%) 19.2% 8.2% 9.8% 2.9% 15.7% 4.9%
Observe how COGS as a % of sales remains more or less
unchanged as Sales multiply. This an indication that ARMX
COGS Margin %
is unable to ‘scale’ its costs as it grows. The same can be
seen with SG&A costs.
47.4% 46.1% 45.8% 45.1% 43.3% 44.0%
Notice that EBIT CAGR is 12%, notably higher than Sales
CAGR of 8%. The acceleration in EBIT is as a result of
Operating Income
(EBIT) 254.9 295.9 348.6 382.5 375.8 457.2 510.4 12% lower fuel costs - not better cost management.
YoY change (%) 16.1% 17.8% 9.7% (1.8)% 21.7% 11.6%
EBIT margin 9.9% 9.6% 10.5% 10.5% 10.0% 10.5% 11.2%
ARMX’s average Tax rate has risen over the years, leading

NOPAT 237.4 269.3 316.3 345.9 338.9 402.1 435.4 10% to slower NOPAT CAGR.
NOPAT Margin 9.2% 8.8% 9.5% 9.5% 9.0% 9.3% 9.6%
Net Income 211.5 244.1 278.0 318.4 311.3 426.6 411.0 11%
Net Margin 8.2% 7.9% 8.4% 8.7% 8.3% 9.8% 9.0%
ROIC 11.3% 11.9% 14.6% 15.3% 13.8% 14% ROIC has been in the range of 12-15%.

(1-Tax Rate) 93.1% 91.0% 90.8% 90.4% 90.2% 88.0%

EBIT Margin 9.9% 9.6% 10.5% 10.5% 10.0% 10.5%
ARMX has done well to slightly improve its Capital
Velocity (Sales/IC). The nature of the shipping business is
such that rate of sales growth tracks the rate of
Saless/Invested Capital
(with Op leases) 1.23 1.36 1.53 1.61 1.53 1.51 reinvestments.

Invested Capital (in mm) 1623.2 1751.8 1647.3 1733.7 1843.1 2204.3
Operating Leases 471.6 503.7 524.4 530.1 605.0 677.1
 Table 2 - Geographic segment analysis
Sales FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
by Geography (AED
Commentary
millions) 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016

Total Sales 3,071.6 3,324.8 3,649.5 3,754.7 4,343.2

YOY change 8% 10% 3% 16%

Middle East and

North Africa
2,229.0 2,480.7 2,625.8 2,764.8 2,798.0
% of total Sales 73% 75% 72% 74% 64%

2016 has brought about a material change in ARMX’s geographic

breakdown. Sales affiliated with Asia have more than doubled! We
Asia think this will become a general trend for the business in the
upcoming years. The MENA region likely has far less potential for
275.7 266.6 368.4 334.1 863.3 growth as compared to Far east, Southeast and South Asia.
% of total Sales 9% 8% 10% 9% 20%

Europe has shown small potential for growth as ARMX has made no
Europe acquisitions here, likely as a result of DP-DHL’s dominating presence
500.6 526.4 588.3 544.8 563.9 in this region.
% of total Sales 16% 16% 16% 15% 13%

North America makes up a tiny piece of the puzzle. UPS and FedEx in
North America the shipping space, and Expeditors and CH Robinson’s Logistics
66.3 51.1 67.0 110.9 118.0 market shares are best not challenged.
% of total Sales 2% 2% 2% 3% 3%
 Appendix E - Does it stand out?


ARMX’s multi-segment and multi-geography nature yields a variety of competitors. The most formidable regional competitors include large and small logistics and
freight-forwarding companies. International competitors include huge multinationals operating in shipping and logistics. Table 3 below details the nature of key
competitors.

Commentary on Table 3: Although difficult to draw conclusions from Gross Margins, one can see that the shipping business demands notably more man-hours
compared to the Freight and Logistics. Businesses that are exclusively in the Freight & Logistics (namely ARMX’s MENA comps) business have lower SGA
expenses and consequently higher EBIT margins. The three giant International players are heavily involved in shipping and their expense ratios and profit
margins reflect this. ARMX falls somewhere in the middle, with its heavy tilt on express shipping, but noteworthy emphasis on Freight.

ROIC is another matter altogether. Since Invested Capital says much about Capital Allocation and Capital Structuring decisions made my management, it is by no
means assured that high margins lead to high return on invested capital. It is worth noting that in this crucial metric, ARMX performs better than all its competitors
as of 2016.
Table 3 - Comparisons with key competitors

2016 figures
 Gross Investe No. of Sales per Headquar

SGA% EBIT NOPAT
(all figures converted margin of Sales margin d Cap ROIC % employ employee Commentary
to USD) $mm tered
% $mm ees

ARAMEX 55% 26% 10.5% 109 785 14% 18,000 $65,062 UAE

KGL 55% 11% 17.5% 24 373 6% Unknow Unknown Kuwait Warehousing, freight, logistics is 65% of this business. The rest is leasing, food
n supply and stevedoring. No express shipping business here.

GWC 36% 11% 27% 64 817 8% 2,200 $104,261 Qatar Logistics and Freight forwarding only.

DP-World 52% 15% 40% 1,585 24,592 6% 36,500 $114,055 UAE Logistics and Freight forwarding only. This business is 30 times larger than
ARMX.

Agility 35% 27% 6.7% 246 3,425 7% 22,700 $181,567 Kuwait 75% Logistics, 25% Infrastructure Services

UPS 76% 56% 8.8% 3,813 44,873 8% 434,000 $117,512 USA 85% of sales are its Express shipping. Only 11% is SupplyChainLogistics, and 4%
freight.


FED EX 63% 36% 8% 3,286 47,613 7% 400,000 $150,750 USA Close to 80% of sales are from domestic & international Express and Ground
shipping. Freight, Supply Chain Logistics amount to 20%.



TNT Express is wholly owned by FedEx - which has notable presence in the GCC.

DHL 47% 34% 5.2% 3140 27,268 12% 500,000 $143,161 Germany

Commentary on Table 5: There is evidence that ARMX
will continue its growth trajectory outside of its home-
base MENA region - with a special emphasis on North
and South Asian economies. This is in line with the
expected growth of the global industry.
 albeit grow at slower rates given increasing competition
Table 5 is a sub-industry breakdown showing that most
of ARMX’s growth has been driven by its Express
Services business, combining international and
domestic. Although Logistics has a high CAGR of 19%,
Appendix F - DCF Valuation
ARMX contributes to a tiny share of the industry in By 2022, we expect ARMX sales to be approx. AED
absolute terms.
 7.7bn - with International & Domestic Express

 amounting to two-thirds of sales, Freight playing a
We project that segment sales will track past trends, lesser role at 16%, and Logistics at 8%.



and ARMX’s increasing expense ratio as it becomes a Note: Projections exclude exchange rate impact.
larger business. (see Projected CAGR column for
details)




Table 5 - Sub-Industry-specific sales and future projections

Projected Target Segment

Sub-Industry CAGR Segment
CAGR for segmental % of total
sales in AED 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 TTM Growth
 % of total
next 5 sales in rev (in
millions 2011-2016 rev (TTM)
years 2022 2022)

International
837 969 1,057 1,228 1,387 1,687 1,897 15% 42% 14.5% 3,320 43%
Express

Freight
1,073 1,169 1,235 1,244 1,203 1,131 1,126 1% 25% 1.0% 1,189 16%
Forwarding

Domestic
373 593 645 755 729 981 997 21% 22% 16.0% 2,060 27%
express

Logistics 111 138 170 198 206 265 259 19% 6% 18.0% 606 8%

Publications
28 26 20 10 10 10 9 -19% 0% 0.0% 10 0%
and distribution

Others 154 177 198 209 219 269 268 12% 6% 12.0% 474 6%

ARMX TOTAL 2,576 3,072 3,325 3,644 3,754 4,343 4,556 11.0% 7,659

ARMX
Projected 11%
CAGR
 Table 4 - ARMX Sub-Industry Segment Gross margins from 2011-2016

2011 gross 2012 gross 2013 gross 2014 gross 2015 gross 2016 gross Table 4 sheds some more light on segment-specific
margins margins margins margins margins margins
profitability within ARMX. Note that Logistics and
Int. Express 65% 66% 67% 66% 68% 69% ‘Other’ segments are far more profitable compared
Freight 27% 26% 27% 27% 27% 28% to Shipping and Freight. Could it be wise for ARMX
Forwarding to emphasize its Logistics business in the future?
Domestic 76% 71% 69% 68% 68% 53%
express

Logistics 81% 82% 80% 79% 79% 75%

Others 88% 89% 88% 87% 88% 86%

Publications & 25% 26% 33% 36% 39% 42%

Distribution









 Aramex - Numbers & Narrative
Assumptions (Base- Assumptions (Best- Link to Narrative
case) case)

From 2011 to 2016, ARMX sales grew from AED 2.5bn to 4.5bn, a difference of AED 2bn, or 11% CAGR.



8%
 11%
 We see one of two scenarios unfolding for ARMX. The range in these drivers is what constitutes to the
range in Intrinsic Value.


 

Sales growth CAGR 2017-2022 

Absolute sales grow to Absolute sales grow to
Our base-case scenario is that gIven the industry growth discussed earlier and the management’s plan of
~AED 6.5bn in 2022 ~AED 7.5bn in 2022
growth in Asian emerging economies - sales grow by AED 2bn over the next 5 years - or a CAGR of 8%.



Scenario B is best-case, where ARMX surpasses expectations, acquires new businesses in fast-growing
North Asian markets such as Japan & SouthKorea, and grows by AED 3bn - or a CAGR of 11%.

Terminal Sales growth CAGR Beyond 2022, the model assumes that the business grows at the same rate as
2.4% 2.4%
risk-free rate.

EBIT margin 2017-2022 ARMX has kept EBIT margin tightly held at around 10%; we assume it will continue to do so in the near
10% 10%
future.

Reinvestments 2017-2022 From 2011-2016, ARMX poured a total of ~AED1bn as reinvestments.




AED 1bn AED 1.5bn
Scenario A assumes an equivalent AED 1bn reinvestment. Scenario B’s higher growth rate warrants a higher
reinvestment rate, and as such we assume AED1.5bn.

Tax rate
TTM tax rate is assumed in the model. Though we believe this is a problem area given that ARMX’s
14% 14% historically keeps rising year-on-year. We are unsure how to project this with more accuracy. This is one of
the reasons the KIP process demand a MarginOfSafety on the IV/sh range.

WACC 2017-2022 The geographic distrubution of revenues and Debt-to-Equity ratio yields a current WACC of 11%. We
11% 11%
assume this for the high-growth period of 2018-2022.

WACC Steady State 9% 9% As for steady-state (terminal), the model assumes 9%.

Risk-free Rate 2.4% 2.4% Current Risk-free rate as provided by ARMX

The resulting range of IV/sh is 4.1 to 4.5. At today’s price of AED 4.1, the stock is either fairly
valued, or undervalued by 9%.

Intrinsic Value AED4.10 AED4.50 

Given the uncertainty profile of ARMX, we recommend a 25% margin-of-safety on the stock
price. As such, the recommended buy-target range is AED 3 to AED 3.4.
 Appendix G - Total Shareholder Return (TSR)

Base-Case Best-Case Link to Narrative

Last trading AED4.10 AED4.10 -

Target year (2022) Intrinsic Value AED4.10 AED4.50 Explained in appendix F

Projected EV/NOPAT in 2022 11 11

5-year EV/NOPAT median was 11. We assume the same in
2022.

Cumulative Dividend Gain in 2022 AED1.01 AED1.01 ARMX has only returned cash to shareholders via
dividends, and the dividend growth rate for the last 5 years
has been 4%.
We assume the same growth rate up to 2022.

Base-case: with NOPAT projections from Appendix F

valuation, a projected EV/NOPAT multiple of 11, plus a
cumulative dividend of AED1.00 - the resulting CAGR
TSR CAGR% 3.3% 5.9% would be a paltry 3.3% at today’s price of AED4.1.

Best-case: NOPAT projections for best case, and the same

assumptions as above would yield a CAGR of 5.9% at
today’s price of AED4.1.



 Appendix H - Investor Express by evaDimensions




The following pages present data analytics of the Investor

express tool (http://www.evadimensions.com) for Aramex PJSC.



(Updated as of Jul 12th 2018)

ARAMEX PJSC - ARMX DB evaDimensions Value & Capital Components
View Data in US Dollars Currency in: Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
United Arab Emirates, Middle East and Africa TransportaIon | Mkt Cap: 6.3 ‫إ‬.‫د‬B | Share Price: 4.30 ‫إ‬.‫د‬ 13-Jul-18

Capital and Market Value Reconciliation Capital Components

12 5

Working Capital
Surplus
10 4
Cash
Other

8 PV Rents 3
Debt & FVA
PV Rent
billion (AED)

billion (AED)
MVA

6 2
Net PP&E
Market
CVA
Value Intangible Capital
4 1
Common
Market Goodwill (Adj.)
Cap

2 Capital 0
Other

0 -1
 Go ARMX DB hkothari_1
Add Company to Binder

My EVA Research Company Compare Aggregates Screening Screening (New) Portfolio Analyzer Settings Contact Us Help

Summary PRVit EVA Estimates Value Metrics Value & Capital Components EVA Income Statement Projection Model Cost of Capital Data Snapshot Company Description
ARAMEX PJSC - ARMX DB evaDimensions Value Metrics
View Data in US Dollars Currency in: Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)

United Arab Emirates, Middle East and Africa TransportaHon | Mkt Cap: 6.3 ‫إ‬.‫د‬B | Share Price: 4.30 ‫إ‬.‫د‬ 13-Jul-18

Enterprise Value Components Future Growth Reliance

12,500 80.0% 25.0%

10,000 70.0% 20.0%

Future Growth Reliance

7,500 60.0% 15.0%
Million (AED)

EVA Margin
5,000 50.0% 10.0%

2,500 40.0% 5.0%

0 30.0% 0.0%

-2,500 20.0% -5.0%

12/2003 12/2005 12/2007 12/2009 12/2011 12/2013 12/2015 12/2017 12/2003 12/2005 12/2007 12/2009 12/2011 12/2013 12/2015 12/2017

FVA Future Value Added MVA-CVA Current Value Added CVA (EVA/COC) Capital Future Growth Reliance = FVA / Market Value (left) EVA Margin (right)
Market Value

Absolute Stock Performance

Market Implied Momentum vs. Share Price Market Implied Momentum vs. EVA Momentum
6.0% 6.0 10.0%
Market Implied Momentum

Absolute Stock Performance

EVA Momentum
12-31-2004: 1.6%
4.0% 4.0 0.0%

2.0% 2.0 -10.0%

0.0% 0.0 -20.0%

12/2003 12/2005 12/2007 12/2009 12/2011 12/2013 12/2015 12/2017 12/2003 12/2005 12/2007 12/2009 12/2011 12/2013 12/2015 12/2017

Absolute Stock Performance (right) Market Implied Momentum (left) Market Implied Momentum EVA Momentum

MVA Spread MVA vs. EVA

600.0% 8,000 150

400.0% 6,000 100

MVA Spread

EVA Spread

MVA (AED)

200.0%

EVA (AED)
4,000 50

0.0% 2,000 0

-200.0% 0 -50
12/2003 12/2005 12/2007 12/2009 12/2011 12/2013 12/2015 12/2017

MVA Spread
-2,000 -100
12/2003 12/2005 12/2007 12/2009 12/2011 12/2013 12/2015 12/2017

MVA (left) EVA (right)

ARAMEX PJSC - ARMX DB evaDimensions Data Snapshot
Currency in: Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
United Arab Emirates, Middle East and Africa TransportaGon Mkt Cap: $ 1.7B Share Price: $ 1.17 12-Jul-18

ARMX DB's strong return on capital and its impressive EVA profit trend combine for a strong, 70th percenBle P score against
Performance all global companies.
2013TFQ1 2014TFQ1 2015TFQ1 2016TFQ1 2017TFQ1 2018TFQ1 12-Jul-18 Average Trend
1 Sales 863.00 919.00 1,015 1,077 1,203 1,308 1,308 1,064
2 EBITDAR (EBITDA+Rent+R&D+Ad+Etc) 127.00 142.00 163.00 162.00 201.00 243.00 243.00 173.00
3 NOPAT (Net OperaBng Profit AVer Tax) 49.00 57.00 72.00 76.00 90.00 104.00 104.00 75.00
4 Capital (Net OperaBng Assets) 702.00 693.00 692.00 924.00 969.00 1,146 1,146 854.00
5 Return on Capital (ROC) (NOPAT/Capital) 7.4% 8.4% 10.2% 9.8% 9.6% 9.9% 9.9% 9.2%
6 Cost of Capital (COC) 7.5% 8.2% 9.5% 9.6% 8.9% 7.8% 7.8% 8.6%
7 EVA (ROC-COC) x Capital) -1.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 22.00 22.00 6.00
9 EVA Spread (EVA/Capital = ROC-COC) -0.1% 0.2% 0.6% 0.2% 0.7% 2.1% 2.1% 0.6%
10 EVA Margin (EVA/Sales) -0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.5% 1.7% 1.7% 0.5%
11 EBITDAR Margin (EBITDAR/Sales) 14.7% 15.5% 16.0% 15.1% 16.7% 18.6% 18.6% 16.1%
12 Sales Growth 16.3% 6.4% 10.5% 6.1% 11.8% 8.7% 8.7% 10.0%
13 EVA Momentum (ΔEVA/Sales) -0.1% 0.2% 0.4% -0.3% 0.5% 1.3% 1.3% 0.3%
14 EVA Momentum (ΔEVA/Capital) -0.1% 0.3% 0.5% -0.4% 0.6% 1.6% 1.6% 0.4%
15 3 Year Trend (ΔEVA/Capital) 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.7% 0.7% 0.3%
16 Last Quarter (ΔEVA/Capital) 0.1% 0.9% 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3%
P Performance Score 40.00 57.00 72.00 51.00 62.00 69.00 70.00 59.00
P1 Profitability Score 48.00 52.00 62.00 58.00 58.00 64.00 66.00 57.00
P2 Trend Score 35.00 57.00 72.00 40.00 60.00 62.00 63.00 54.00
ARMX DB's highly stable returns are betrayed by its weak financial condiBon, resulBng in a low, 36th percenBle R score
Risk against all global companies.
2013TFQ1 2014TFQ1 2015TFQ1 2016TFQ1 2017TFQ1 2018TFQ1 12-Jul-18 Average
1 Free Cash Flow (FCF) -32.00 67.00 72.00 -156.00 46.00 -74.00 -74.00 -13.00
2 Op Cash GeneraBon (OCG) 74.00 99.00 105.00 128.00 157.00 139.00 139.00 117.00
3 Excess Cash Per Share 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10
4 Equity Risk Index 0.98 1.04 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.16 1.16 1.08
5 Stock Price VolaBlity 20.0% 25.0% 27.0% 27.0% 28.0% 21.0% 24.0% 25.0%
6 EVA Margin Variability 0.5% 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.8%
7 FCF GeneraBon (FCF/Capital) -5.0% 10.0% 10.0% -20.0% 5.0% -7.0% -7.0% -1.0%
8 OCG Return (OCG/Gross LT Capital) 19.0% 23.0% 24.0% 25.0% 24.0% 18.0% 18.0% 22.0%
9 Total Debt/Total Capital 31.0% 30.0% 26.0% 43.0% 49.0% 44.0% 44.0% 37.0%
R Risk Score 12.00 3.00 23.00 23.00 41.00 38.00 36.00 23.00
R1 Variability 1.00 3.00 10.00 4.00 16.00 7.00 9.00 7.00
R2 Vulnerability 48.00 23.00 55.00 61.00 73.00 79.00 74.00 57.00

Value ARMX DB's high valuaBon compared to book value, earnings and cash flow combine for a high, 79th percenBle V score against
all global companies.
2013TFQ1 2014TFQ1 2015TFQ1 2016TFQ1 2017TFQ1 2018TFQ1 12-Jul-18 Average
1 Share Price 0.61 0.90 0.94 0.92 1.35 1.20 1.17 0.99
2 Total Shareholder Return 25.8% 51.8% 8.4% 2.0% 55.1% -11.1% -16.4% 22.0%
3 Equity Value 893.00 1,315 1,379 1,351 1,973 1,754 1,714 1,444
4 Market Value (MV) 1,279 1,705 1,801 2,046 2,805 2,682 2,642 2,053
5 Capital 702.00 693.00 692.00 924.00 969.00 1,146 1,146 854.00
6 Market Value Added (MVA) (MV - Capital) 577.00 1,012 1,109 1,122 1,836 1,536 1,496 1,198
7 Current Value Added (CVA) (EVA/COC) 13.00 43.00 81.00 59.00 118.00 343.00 343.00 110.00
8 Future Value Added (FVA) (MVA - CVA) 564.00 970.00 1,028 1,062 1,717 1,193 1,153 1,089
9 MVA Spread (MVA/Capital) 82.0% 146.0% 160.0% 121.0% 190.0% 134.0% 130.0% 139.0%
10 MVA Margin (MVA/Sales) 67.0% 110.0% 109.0% 104.0% 153.0% 117.0% 114.0% 110.0%
11 EBITDAR MulBple (Ent Value/EBITDAR) 10.10 12.00 11.10 12.70 14.00 11.10 10.90 11.80
12 NOPAT MulBple (MV/NOPAT) 25.90 29.80 25.20 26.90 31.10 25.70 25.40 27.40
13 Future Growth Reliance (FVA/MV) 44.0% 57.0% 57.0% 52.0% 61.0% 44.0% 44.0% 53.0%
14 Market-Implied Momentum (ΔEVA/Sales) 0.6% 1.2% 1.3% 1.2% 1.7% 0.9% 0.8% 1.1%
V ValuaGon Score 60.00 70.00 69.00 67.00 77.00 80.00 79.00 71.00
V1 Wealth RaBos 55.00 66.00 65.00 64.00 74.00 78.00 77.00 67.00
V2 Wealth MulBples 58.00 68.00 66.00 62.00 75.00 73.00 71.00 67.00
PRVit
2013TFQ1 2014TFQ1 2015TFQ1 2016TFQ1 2017TFQ1 2018TFQ1 12-Jul-18 Average
1 Intrinsic Value Score (P-R) 57.00 78.00 82.00 62.00 64.00 72.00 74.00 69.00
2 PRVit Global Score 47.00 58.00 66.00 44.00 35.00 41.00 45.00 48.00
3 Industry Average Adjustment -11.00 -12.00 -12.00 -6.00 -7.00 -8.00 -6.00 -9.00
4 Country Average Adjustment 7.00 -11.00 -12.00 -5.00 -3.00 -9.00 -3.00 -6.00
5 PRVit Prime Score 50.00 91.00 94.00 72.00 50.00 69.00 63.00 71.00
6 PRVit PRime Score vs Sub-Sector 50.00 92.00 95.00 70.00 50.00 68.00 63.00 71.00
7 PRVit Prime Score vs Country 50.00 85.00 87.00 75.00 50.00 65.00 58.00 69.00
 ARAMEX PJSC - ARMX DB evaDimensions EVA Income Statement

ARMX DB - EVA Income Statement Transporta=on Mkt Cap: 6.3 ‫إ‬.‫د‬B Share Price: 4.30 ‫إ‬.‫د‬ 12-Jul-18

Fiscal Period: 2009TFQ1 2010TFQ1 2011TFQ1 2012TFQ1 2013TFQ1 2014TFQ1 2015TFQ1 2016TFQ1 2017TFQ1 2018TFQ1 2019TFQ1 2020TFQ1 2021TFQ1 2022TFQ1 2023TFQ1
Period Ending: 3/31/09 3/31/10 3/31/11 3/31/12 3/31/13 3/31/14 3/31/15 3/31/16 3/31/17 3/31/18 3/31/19 3/31/20 3/31/21 3/31/22 3/31/23
Consensus Es=mate
Sales 2,049‫إ‬.‫د‬ 2,226‫إ‬.‫د‬ 2,277‫إ‬.‫د‬ 2,727‫إ‬.‫د‬ 3,172‫إ‬.‫د‬ 3,374‫إ‬.‫د‬ 3,728‫إ‬.‫د‬ 3,955‫إ‬.‫د‬ 4,420‫إ‬.‫د‬ 4,805‫إ‬.‫د‬ 5,219‫إ‬.‫د‬ 5,704‫إ‬.‫د‬ 6,118‫إ‬.‫د‬ 6,440‫إ‬.‫د‬ 6,783‫إ‬.‫د‬
Sales Growth Rate (y-o-y) 9.1% 8.7% 2.3% 19.8% 16.3% 6.4% 10.5% 6.1% 11.8% 8.7% 8.6% 9.3% 7.3% 5.3% 5.3%
COGS (Adjusted) 46.0% 38.1% 44.2% 44.9% 44.6% 43.9% 42.7% 41.8% 41.9% 43.8% 43.9% 43.7% 43.7% 43.9% 44.1%
SG&A (Adjusted) 39.4% 47.1% 40.0% 39.9% 40.7% 40.6% 41.3% 43.2% 41.4% 37.6% 37.7% 37.5% 37.5% 37.6% 37.8%
EBITDAR Margin 14.7% 14.8% 15.8% 15.3% 14.7% 15.5% 16.0% 15.1% 16.7% 18.6% 18.4% 18.9% 18.8% 18.5% 18.1%
Working Capital Charge 3.6% 2.8% 3.1% 3.0% 2.8% 3.2% 3.7% 3.9% 3.2% 2.9% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8%
PP&E Charge 11.0% 9.9% 10.3% 10.1% 10.5% 11.2% 11.3% 12.3% 13.8% 13.7% 13.1% 12.8% 12.7% 12.7% 12.6%
EVA From Opera=ons Margin 0.1% 2.1% 2.4% 2.2% 1.4% 1.1% 1.0% -1.2% -0.3% 2.1% 2.6% 3.3% 3.3% 3.0% 2.7%
Intangible Capital Charge 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.5% 0.8% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8%
EVA Before Tax Margin 0.0% 2.0% 2.3% 1.9% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% -1.6% -1.1% 1.2% 1.8% 2.5% 2.5% 2.2% 1.9%
EVA AUer Tax Margin 1.9% 2.9% 3.4% 3.1% 2.6% 2.9% 3.3% 2.6% 2.6% 3.4% 3.6% 3.8% 3.9% 3.8% 3.6%
Other EVA -0.3% -0.3% -0.4% -0.4% -0.4% -0.4% -0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%
EVA Excluding Goodwill & Special Items Margin 1.6% 2.6% 3.0% 2.7% 2.2% 2.5% 3.1% 2.8% 2.8% 3.4% 3.6% 3.9% 4.0% 3.9% 3.9%
Goodwill & Cum Unusual Items Charge 3.9% 3.4% 3.2% 2.8% 2.4% 2.4% 2.7% 2.7% 2.3% 1.8% 1.7% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8%
EVA Margin -2.3% -0.8% -0.2% -0.1% -0.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.5% 1.6% 1.9% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.1%
EVA -47 -18 -6 -2 -5 3 16 5 22 78 98 124 137 139 140
ΔEVA 23 29 12 3 -3 8 13 -11 17 56 20 27 13 2 1
EVA Momentum (ΔEVA/Trailing Sales) 1.2% 1.4% 0.5% 0.1% -0.1% 0.3% 0.4% -0.3% 0.4% 1.3% 0.4% 0.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%
Produc=vity Gains (ΔEVA Margin) 1.4% 1.5% 0.6% 0.2% -0.1% 0.3% 0.3% -0.3% 0.4% 1.1% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% -0.1% -0.1%
Profitable Growth (Sales Growth Rate x EVA Margin) -0.2% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%

Indicates a rela-vely high profit or low cost value for that line item Red indicates a rela-vely low profit or high cost value for that line item
ARAMEX PJSC ‐ ARMX DB evaDimensions Projec on Model
View Data in US Dollars           Currency in: Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)

United Arab Emirates, Middle East and Africa Freight Transporta on | Mkt Cap: 6.3 ‫إ‬.‫د‬B | Share Price: 4.30 ‫إ‬.‫د‬ 12‐Jul‐18

Sales Growth Es mates EVA Margin Es mates EVA Margin, Momentum vs. Share Price
EVA Income Statement Valua on

1.53‫إ‬.‫د‬

EVA Momentum & EVA Margin
Absolute Stock Performance
11.8 1.6 1.6
Sales Growth 11.1 1.5 1.5

EVA Margin
10.5 1.4
10.0 9.9
9.6 1.3

8.7 8.9

‐64% 6.4
6.1

versus Market Price of 4.30 ‫إ‬.‫د‬ 0.5
0.4

0.1 0.1

Cost of Capital 7.81% Shares Outstanding 1,464.1 Future Growth Reliance (FGR) 7.6% 5y EVA Mo. 0.2% EVA Margin 

Override   Override   Market‐Implied FGR 43.9% Sales CAGR 9.9% Charges 
 
Fiscal Period: TFQ1 TFQ1 TFQ1 TFQ1 TFQ1 TFQ2 TFQ3 TFQ4 TFQ1 TFQ2 TFQ3 TFQ4 TFQ1 TFQ1 TFQ1 TFQ1  
Period Ending: 3/14 3/15 3/16 3/17 3/18 6/18 9/18 12/18 3/19 6/19 9/19 12/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23  
Sales (in Millions) 3,374 3,728 3,955 4,420 4,805 4,860 4,975 5,165 5,266 5,346 5,492 5,718 5,851 6,436 7,009 7,703  
Sales Growth Rate 6.4% 10.5% 6.1% 11.8% 8.7% 8.9% 9.2% 9.4% 9.6% 10.0% 10.4% 10.7% 11.1% 10.0% 8.9% 9.9%
EVA Margin 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.5% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.4% 1.6% 1.5%
EVA Momentum (Delta EVA/Trailing Sales) 0.3% 0.4% ‐0.3% 0.4% 1.3% 0.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ‐0.0% ‐0.0% ‐0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.0%  
 
ARAMEX PJSC ‐ ARMX DB Transporta on
View Data in US Dollars EVA Margin Absolute Stock Performance Market‐Rela ve Summary 12‐Jul‐18
PRVit PRVit Prime PRVit Prime
Market Cap Share Price PRVit Prime
Global Score vs. Ind Score vs.
EVA Margin, Momentum vs. Share Price (AED) (AED) Score
Score Group Country
6.3B 4.30 45 63 58 63
Sell Underweight Hold Overweight Buy

EVA Momentum & EVA Margin

0‐19 20‐39 40‐59 60‐79 80‐100
Absolute Stock Performance

PRVit Target Return 5.3%

PRVit Score vs. Market

ARMX DB

Intrinsic Value Ranking vs. Market

FWRD

(P(70)‑R(36)=74th Percentile)
EVA Drivers

HUBG
9375 JP

Sales Growth
% of Sales

ATSG AAWW

600057 CH

Actual Valuation Ranking vs. Market

(V=79th Percentile)

Add Ticker:
 
  
ARAMEX PJSC ‐ ARMX DB evaDimensions Cost of Capital
Low‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Detail Level‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐High Annual Trailing 4‐Quarters Methodology
View Data in US Dollars Currency in: Arab Emirates Dirham (AED)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

ARMX DB ‐ Cost of Capital Transporta on | Mkt Cap: 6.3 ‫إ‬.‫د‬B | Share Price: 4.30 ‫إ‬.‫د‬ 12‐Jul‐18

Fiscal Period: 2009TFQ1 2010TFQ1 2011TFQ1 2012TFQ1 2013TFQ1 2014TFQ1 2015TFQ1 2016TFQ1 2017TFQ1 2018TFQ1
Period Ending: 3/31/09 3/31/10 3/31/11 3/31/12 3/31/13 3/31/14 3/31/15 3/31/16 3/31/17 3/31/18
                     
Cost of Capital (GLOBAL) 9.9% 8.9% 8.5% 8.2% 7.5% 8.2% 9.5% 9.6% 8.9% 7.8%
Country Risk Premium 2.8% 2.2% 1.7% 1.8% 1.6% 2.1% 3.8% 3.7% 3.4% 2.2%
Cost of Capital (US) 7.1% 6.7% 6.8% 6.4% 5.9% 6.2% 5.7% 5.9% 5.4% 5.6%
  Risk Free Rate 1 Yr Average 4.0% 4.3% 4.2% 3.5% 2.9% 3.6% 3.0% 2.9% 2.7% 2.9%
  Market Risk Premium 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
  Unlevered Beta from Opera ons Industry Median 0.843 0.866 0.896 0.926 0.945 0.954 0.972 0.982 0.977 0.975
  Debt to Capital Ra o (Book) 19.7% 22.9% 23.8% 23.3% 23.3% 25.6% 27.9% 29.7% 34.0% 39.6%
  Tax (Marginal) 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0%
Appendix I - Key GAAP metrics & KIP Economic-Value-Creation
model




The following pages present in-house data models used by

KIP’s research team.



(Updated as of Jul 12th 2018)
ARAMEX (ARMX) 52-High 52-Low as of February 5, 2018 Last Mkt Cap

5.50 3.90 4.30 6,295.2

Industry: Shipping & Logistics
Business Commentary
Aramex PJCS provides logistics and transportation solutions. It operates through the following segments: International Express, Freight Forwarding, Domestic Express, Logistics and Other
Operations. The International Express segment is the delivery of small packages across the globe to both retail and wholesale customers. The Freight Forwarding segment includes express
delivery of small parcels as well as pick up and deliver of shipments within the country. The Logistics division covers warehousing activity, its management distribution, supply chain
management, inventory management and other value added services. The Other Operations segment refers to catalogue shipping services, document storage, airline ticketing and travel, visa
services and publication and distribution. The company was founded by Fadi Ghandour and William Kingson in 1982 and is headquartered in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Big-5 OPENERS:
Yes. It’s mostly a shipping, freight, logistics business. It moves goods for businesses and individuals, and it
Can I define the business in one sentence? Is it simple to understand and to describe?
smoothens the process of moving those goods for a fee.

Are the products/services consistent and dependable? Do they change a lot? Yes. They don’t change often.

Since 1982. Yes, it follows long-term cycles of commodities like oil and economic booms/bust. Not cyclical in
How long has the business been around? Has it seen a cycle(s)?
the short term.
Likely, yes. Not a fad. The nature of shipping is hard to change. Globalization and transactions will only
Will it be around after 5 years? After 10 years? Is it a fad? Is it prone to obsolescence?
multiply. ARMX services are not prone to obsolescence.

Does this business ADD or EXTRACT value from its customers? It adds value. Shipping is probably a small portion of operating expenses for most clients.

Yes. To the extent that most businesses are. Currency impact weighs heavy on ARMX as it becomes an
Is it vulnerable to externalities like: Govt. Regulations, Unions, Currency, Macro-Economy events, War
increasingly international business. Regulations for what can and cannot be shipped apply. So does the
Earnings TRENDS (all figures in AED millions except per sh.) y5 Next Earnings Release on: 4-May-17
Report Date 31-Dec-07 31-Dec-08 31-Dec-09 31-Dec-10 31-Dec-11 31-Dec-12 31-Dec-13 31-Dec-14 31-Dec-15 31-Dec-16
Fiscal Year-End 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 5yr Med 10yr Med
Revenue 1363.8 1783.8 2080.0 1960.8 2212.0 2576.2 3071.6 3324.8 3649.5 3754.7 4343.2 4721.0 3649.5 2576.2
YoY change (%) 30.8% 16.6% (5.7)% 12.8% 16.5% 19.2% 8.2% 9.8% 2.9% 15.7% 8.7% 11.0% 12.3% CAGR%
Operating Income (EBIT) 108.2 143.0 175.2 205.9 229.7 254.9 295.9 348.6 382.5 375.8 521.4 553.0 375.8 254.9
YoY change (%) 32.2% 22.5% 17.5% 11.5% 11.0% 16.1% 17.8% 9.7% (1.8)% 38.8% 6.1%
NOPAT 104.0 134.0 164.9 195.1 215.6 237.4 269.3 316.3 345.9 338.9 458.6 469.2 338.9 237.4 14.1%
Net Income (Earnings) 95.2 121.6 147.3 184.3 204.1 211.5 244.1 278.0 318.4 311.3 426.6 435.4 311.3 211.5
Operating CashFlow(CFFO) 78.7 142.0 233.6 263.1 244.8 260.3 365.1 434.0 456.0 461.5 612.8 508.2 461.5 399.5
Free Cash to Equity (FCFE) 6.2 17.7 (9.6) 13.5 5.3 11.5 (106.2) 143.8 (15.8) 201.0 254.9 477.7 516.1
Costs %
COGS Margin % 54.6% 53.2% 50.1% 43.5% 46.2% 47.4% 46.1% 45.8% 45.1% 43.3% 44.0% 45.9% 45.1% 46.1% Median
Gross Margin % 45.4% 46.8% 49.9% 56.5% 53.8% 52.6% 53.9% 54.2% 54.9% 56.7% 56.0% 54.1% 54.9% 53.9%
SG&A % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.2% 26.3% 26.4% 25.0% 24.2% 0.0%
R&D % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Other %
Earnings %
EBIT Margin % 7.9% 8.0% 8.4% 10.5% 10.4% 9.9% 9.6% 10.5% 10.5% 10.0% 12.0% 11.7% 10.5% 10.0% Median
Net Income Margin % 7.0% 6.8% 7.1% 9.4% 9.2% 8.2% 7.9% 8.4% 8.7% 8.3% 9.8% 9.2% 8.4% 8.3%
Owners Earnings FCF %

Per-Share TRENDS y1 y5 y10 (all figures in $$ per sh.)

Fiscal Year-End 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 5yr 10yr
Basic Shares Out. (mil) 1464.1 1464.1 1464.1 1464.1 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 30.0
YoY change (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (0.0)% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (0.0)% Change%
0.0 0.0 Totals
Revenue per sh 0.93 1.22 1.42 1.34 1.51 1.76 2.10 2.27 2.49 2.56 2.97 1.7x 3.2x
YoY change (%) 30.8% 16.6% (5.7)% 12.8% 16.5% 19.2% 8.2% 9.8% 2.9% 15.7% 11.0% 12.3% CAGR%
EBIT per sh 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.20 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.36 2.0x 4.8x
YoY change (%) 32.2% 22.5% 17.5% 11.5% 11.0% 16.1% 17.8% 9.7% (1.8)% 38.8% 15.4% 17.0% CAGR%

Dividend Yield % 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 2.8% 5.0% 3.8% 4.5% 4.7% 3.9% 4.5% 3.8% Median

Quality y1 y5 y10 5yr 10yr

Fiscal Year-End 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Assets(AV) 1512.4 1674.8 1845.3 2058.2 2286.5 2492.8 2715.2 2985.8 3207.2 3445.4 3974.2 4404.1 1.6x 2.6x
Shareholder's equity (BV) 1167.5 1310.6 1436.5 1623.8 1805.6 1896.1 2046.1 2126.8 2189.6 2199.8 2274.5 2519.1 1.2x 1.9x
YoY change (%) 12.3% 9.6% 13.0% 11.2% 5.0% 7.9% 3.9% 2.9% 0.5% 3.4% 10.8% 0.7x
Intangible+Goodwill (FIGURE
THIS OUT USING NOTES)
as % of BV 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Tangible BV per sh 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
YoY change (%) (100.0)% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
BV per sh 0.80 0.90 0.98 1.11 1.23 1.30 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.50 1.55 1.72 1.2x 1.9x
YoY change (%) 12.3% 9.6% 13.0% 11.2% 5.0% 7.9% 3.9% 2.9% 0.5% 3.4% 10.8% 3.7% 6.9% CAGR%

ROE 8.7% 10.0% 10.9% 12.3% 12.1% 11.6% 12.6% 13.5% 15.0% 14.4% 19.3% 17.3% 13.5% 12.2% Median
Net Margin* 7.0% 6.8% 7.1% 9.4% 9.2% 8.2% 7.9% 8.4% 8.7% 8.3% 9.8% 9.2%
Asset Turnover 0.90 1.07 1.13 0.95 0.97 1.03 1.13 1.11 1.14 1.09 1.09 1.07
Leverage (Assets/Equity) 1.30 1.28 1.28 1.27 1.27 1.31 1.33 1.40 1.46 1.57 1.75 1.75

WACC 15.2% 9.3% 11.5% 10.1% 6.9% 11.0%

ROIC (Incl. Op Leases, from 2010) 8.0% 9.2% 11.1% 13.1% 12.6% 11.3% 11.9% 14.6% 15.3% 13.8% 15.9% 14.7% 13.8% 12.2% Median
(1-Tax Rate) 96.1% 93.7% 94.1% 94.8% 93.9% 93.1% 91.0% 90.8% 90.4% 90.2% 88.0% 84.8%
EBIT Margin 7.9% 8.0% 8.4% 10.5% 10.4% 9.9% 9.6% 10.5% 10.5% 10.0% 12.0% 11.7%
Revenues/Invested Capital
(with Op leases) 1.06 1.22 1.40 1.32 1.29 1.23 1.36 1.53 1.61 1.53 1.51 1.48
Invested Capital (in mm) 994.0 1126.0 1140.6 1144.8 1270.9 1623.2 1751.8 1647.3 1733.7 1843.1 2204.3 2402.6 6.3% 8.3% CAGR%

Operating Leases 298.2 337.8 342.2 343.4 446.9 471.6 503.7 524.4 530.1 605.0 677.1 793.5 7.5% 8.5%
2006-2009 Op Leases are derived
35% 29% 29% 32% 31% 33% 31% 33% 1.1%
ROIC (Excl. Op Leases) 10.4% 11.9% 14.4% 17.0% 16.9% 14.6% 15.4% 19.2% 19.9% 18.4% 18.0% 4.2% 5.6%
Invested Capital (IC) per sh 0.88 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.17 1.43 1.54 1.48 1.55 1.67 1.97 2.18 6.6% 8.3% CAGR%
YoY change (%) 13.3% 1.3% 0.4% 15.4% 21.9% 7.7% (3.7)% 4.2% 8.1% 17.7% 1.3x 2.2x
Median

Re-Investment Value Drivers - % for each $1 increase in Sales these need to be re-checked 5yr 10yr
Non-Cash W.Cap ReInv % 11.2% 1.5% 7.4% 15.2% 14.9% 0.6% (6.1)% 11.1% 52.6% (5.7)% 2.6% 6.1%
Growth Capex Re-Inv % 14.8% 17.8% (5.5)% 40.1% 29.3% 33.5% (3.8)% 8.5% 180.7% 33.0% 32.1% 30.1%
Acquisitions Re-Inv % 0.0% 0.0% (28.2)% 9.7% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.8% 31.9% 56.2% 29.2% (26.6)%
Total Re-Investments % 37.1% 39.8% (3.4)% 84.2% 113.5% 50.7% 7.6% 82.9% 279.1% 101.4% 63.9% 9.5% Totals

Red-Flags y1 y5 y10
Fiscal Year-End 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 5yr 10yr
Acquisition/Divestiture, Net 0.0 0.0 0.0 (33.6) (24.4) (218.6) 0.0 0.0 (152.0) (33.6) (331.0) (9.4) (516.6) (793.2) Totals
One-time Charges Average
Sale of PP&E 2.5 0.8 1.7 2.9 1.8 2.4 4.6 3.1 3.3 3.5 18.6 5.2
Total Receivables, Net 261.7 319.2 346.3 349.1 404.0 499.7 583.5 603.9 686.7 731.2 754.4 934.2
as % of Total Sales 19.2% 17.9% 16.6% 17.8% 18.3% 19.4% 19.0% 18.2% 18.8% 19.5% 17.4% 19.8%

Long-Term Debt 13.4 14.7 15.8 6.5 6.5 9.6 12.4 128.1 97.3 228.6 361.8 293.3
as % of Total Capital 1.3% 1.3% 1.4% 0.6% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 7.8% 5.6% 12.4% 16.4% 12.2%
Interest Coverage
Operating Leverage(DOL) 1.05x 1.36x (3.06x) 0.90x 0.67x 0.84x 2.16x 1.00x (0.61x) 2.47x 0.84x 0.90x Median

Change

Others y1 y5 y10
Fiscal Year-End 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 5yr 10yr

Cash Taxes on EBIT 4.4 9.5 10.6 11.4 14.9 17.8 26.7 32.1 36.8 36.7 60.9 80.1
Tax Rate (% of EBT) 3.9% 6.3% 5.9% 5.2% 6.1% 6.9% 9.0% 9.2% 9.6% 9.8% 12.0% 15.2% 9.6% 6.9% Median
Depreciation & Amort. 24.0 35.6 43.9 45.7 48.7 55.3 72.8 80.6 81.5 86.9 104.3 109.0 426.1 655.4 Totals
as % of Assets 1.6% 2.1% 2.4% 2.2% 2.1% 2.2% 2.7% 2.7% 2.5% 2.5% 2.6% 2.5%
Capital Expenditures 55.3 97.8 96.6 52.3 149.4 162.0 238.5 71.0 109.0 277.0 298.5 172.8 994.0 1552.1 Totals
as % of CFFO 70.3% 68.9% 41.4% 19.9% 61.0% 62.2% 65.3% 16.4% 23.9% 60.0% 48.7% 34.0%
Average
Totals
Totals
Cash Returned to Owners 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 109.8 73.2 146.4 168.4 205.0 219.6 234.3 812.6 938.9 Totals
Payout Ratio % 0.0% 12.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.2% 27.2% 46.3% 48.7% 60.5% 47.9% 49.9% 47.0% 35.1% Totals
Inventories 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
as % of Sales 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Cash Conv. Cycle (days) (3) 9 19 14 16 15 24 26 25 29 18 average??
Days Sales Out (DSO) 55 59 59 65 62 64 65 65 65 69 63
Days Inventory Out (DIO) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Days Payable Out (DPO) 58 51 40 51 46 49 40 39 40 40 44
∆ Non-Cash Working Capital (66.8) (46.8) (4.4) 8.8 (38.1) (54.3) (3.0) 15.3 (35.9) (55.3) 33.4 (45.4) (180.3) Totals

Price on Report Date AED1.80 AED2.28 AED0.72 AED1.43 AED2.08 AED1.80 AED2.00 AED3.04 AED3.10 AED3.16 AED4.07 AED4.26 17.7% 8.5% CAGR%
Enterprise Value AED2,462 AED3,153 AED757 AED1,610 AED2,510 AED2,362 AED2,634 AED3,971 AED4,083 AED4,270 AED5,888 AED6,120
EV/NOPAT 24 24 5 8 12 10 10 13 12 13 13 13
ƩNet Increases in Debt 1.0 6.1 (0.3) (13.5) (0.9) 8.4 6.5 149.3 (27.4) 163.8 231.8 (60.1) 524.0 523.7 Totals
Debt Service (5.3) (3.9) (1.9) (12.4) (15.1) (5.6) (1.5) 2.2 (0.6) 1.7 15.7 16.8 35.8 (21.4) Totals
ARAMEX (ARMX) 52-High 52-Low as of March 29, 2018 Last Mkt Cap

5.50 3.90 4.30 6,295.2

Capital Structure AED mm AED per sh Ownership & Liquidity

Basic Shares Out. (mil) 1,464.0 Insider Ownership
Diluted Shares Out. (mil) Compare with ValueLine Number Insider Transactions
Price AED 4.3 Institutional Ownership
Market Cap AED 6,295.2 as of 03/29/18
Ʃ LTD+STD+Notes Payable AED 628.0 % STD:LTD 1.8% High STD:LTD is not good Shares Out. (mil) # of Shares Out.
Current Portion of LTD AED 0.0
Net Pension Obligations AED 0.0 User Input frrom PIE Shares Float (mil) Sh.Out available for trading
Operating Leases, Uncapitalized AED 793.5 Short Interest (mil) # of Shares Shorted
Minority Int. + Pref Equity AED 9.1 if >15% find out why? Short-Interest % Short Interest/Sh.Out
Outstanding ESO Liability AED 0.0
+ Total Debt AED 1,430.6 AED 1.0 Float Short % Short Interest/Sh.Float
- Cash,Cash Equiv&Short-term Inv. AED 557.4 AED 0.4 User Input frrom PIE Daily Trading Vol. (mil)
Enterprise Value (EV) AED 7,168.4 AED 4.9 Short-Interest Ratio (days) days Short Interest(mil)/Avg. Volume(mil)

The Berkshire Cow - An Economic-Value-Creation Model

ƩPast 10-yrs ƩLast 5-yrs
NOPAT 2,676.2 ƩD&A 655.4 NOPAT 1,729.1 ƩD&A 426.1
ƩCFFO (mil) 3473.1 ƩTotal Adjustments -> CFFO 343.0 ƩCFFO (mil) 2,329.3 ƩTotal Adjustments -> CFFO 297.0

ƩAfter-Tax Debt Service (21.4) ƩAfter-Tax Debt Service 35.8

ƩMaint.Capex (assume=ƩD&A) (655.4) ƩMaint.Capex (=ƩD&A) (426.1)
Ʃ R&D 0.0 Ʃ R&D 0.0

Re-Investments: as % of NOPAT Re-Investments: % of NOPAT

ƩChg. in Non-Cash W.Cap (180.3) 6.7% this+other Adjustments acccounted for in CFFO ƩChg. in Non-Cash W.Cap (45.4) 2.6%
ƩGrowth Capex (896.7) 33.5% ƩGrowth Capex (567.9) 32.8%
ƩAcquisitions, Net (793.2) 29.6% ƩAcquisitions, Net (516.6) 29.9%
ƩRe-Investments (1,870.2) 69.9% ƩRe-Investments (1,129.9) 65.3%

ƩFCFF (using NOPAT) 673.9 ƩFCFF using NOPAT 515.5 ƩNOPAT + ƩAdjustments - ƩMaint. Capex - ƩGrowth Capex - ƩAcquisitions
ƩFCFF (using CFFO) 1,149.2 ƩFCFF using CFFO 783.0 ƩCFFO + ƩDebt Service - ƩMaint. Capex - ƩGrowth Capex - ƩAcquisitions

ƩNet Increases in Debt 523.7 ƩNet Increases in Debt 524.0

ƩFCFE (potential Cash-Returned) 1,176.2 ƩFCFF + ƩNet Increases in Debt - ƩAT-Debt Service ƩFCFE 1,075.2

y1 y10 y5 y10
2006 2016 ∆ Change times y1 2011 2016 ∆ Change times y5
BV (mil) 1,167.5 2,274.5 1,107.0 1.9x 1,896.1 2,274.5 378.4 1.2x
BV per sh AED0.8 AED1.6 AED0.8 1.9x AED1.3 AED1.6 AED0.3 1.2x
% Cash Ret. % FCFF % Cash Ret. % FCFF
Ʃ Dividends Paid 938.9 0.8x AED 0.6 100% 81.7% 812.6 0.4x AED 0.6 100% 104%
Ʃ Net Share Buybacks/Issued 0.0 0.0x AED0.0 0% 0.0% 0.0 0.0x AED0.0 0% 0%
ƩCash Returned to Sh. holders 938.9 81.7% 812.6 104%
∆ % ownership 0.0% ∆ % ownership 0.0%
ƩEconomic-Value Created($$mm) = ∆BV
+ ƩCash Returned 2,045.9 (additional Economic-Value created) 1,191.0

$1 in BV grows to AED 2.8 of Economic-Value 10.7% CAGR% AED 1.6 of Economic-Value 10.2%
ƩEconomic Value Creation ($$/sh) = AED1.4 per sh AED0.8 per sh
∆BV per sh + Ʃdividends/sh

$1 in BV per sh. grows to AED2.8 of Economic-Value per sh. 2.8x 10.7% AED1.6 of Economic-Value per sh. 1.6x 10.2%

Total Shareholder Return (TSR)

2006 2016 ∆ times y1 2011 2016 ∆ times y5

Price per sh AED 3.0 AED 3.1 AED 0.1 1.0x 0.2% AED 1.8 AED 3.1 AED 1.3 1.7x 11.4%

ƩDividends per sh AED 0.6 per sh AED 0.6 per sh

TSR=∆Price per sh + ƩDividends per sh AED 0.7 per sh 1.2x 2.1% AED 1.8 per sh 2.0x 15.2%

Selected Sources and Uses of Cash

Selected Sources of Cash % of Sources Ʃ10-yrs Ʃ5-yrs % of Sources
ƩOperating Cash Flows (CFFO) 87% 3,473.1 2,329.3 82%
ƩNet Increases in Debt 13% 523.7 524.0 18%
Ʃ Share Issuances 0% 0.0 0.0 0% includes cash raised associated with Employee Stock-Option (ESO) Plans
ƩSources of Cash AED 3,996.8 AED 2,853.3

Selected Uses of Cash: Capital Allocation % of Uses Ʃ10-yrs Ʃ5-yrs % of Uses

Re-Investments & Operations
ƩMaint. Capex 20% 655.4 426.1 18% assume=D&A
ƩGrowth Capex 27% 896.7 567.9 24% -ve indicates it generates instead of uses
Ʃ Mergers/Acquisitions, Net 24% 793.2 516.6 22% -ve indicates divestitures
Ʃ R&D 0% 0.0 0.0 0% R&D not part of ƩUses
Cash Returned to Shareholders
Ʃ Dividends Paid 29% 938.9 812.6 35%
Ʃ Share Buybacks 0% 0.0 0.0 0%
ƩUses of Cash AED 3,284.2 AED 2,323.2

Sources less Uses of Cash AED 712.6 AED 530.1

Relative Valuation: Ratios & Trends y5 y10

Fiscal Year-End 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Basic Shares Outstanding 1464.1 1464.1 1464.1 1464.1 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0 1464.0
Diluted Shares Outst.(mil) - - - - - - - - - - -
Price AED 3.0 AED 1.5 AED 2.2 AED 0.8 AED 1.5 AED 1.8 AED 1.8 AED 2.0 AED 3.1 AED 3.3 AED 3.1
Earnings per sh AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.2 AED 0.2 AED 0.2 AED 0.2 AED 0.3
EV per sh AED 2.9 AED 1.4 AED 2.0 AED 0.5 AED 1.2 AED 1.6 AED 1.6 AED 1.7 AED 2.8 AED 3.0 AED 3.0
BV per sh AED 0.8 AED 0.9 AED 1.0 AED 1.1 AED 1.2 AED 1.3 AED 1.4 AED 1.5 AED 1.5 AED 1.5 AED 1.6
Sales per sh AED 0.9 AED 1.2 AED 1.4 AED 1.3 AED 1.5 AED 1.8 AED 2.1 AED 2.3 AED 2.5 AED 2.6 AED 3.0
NOPAT per sh AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.2 AED 0.2 AED 0.2 AED 0.2 AED 0.2 AED 0.3

Cash Conversion Cycle (days) (3) 9 19 14 16 15 24 26 25 29 18

ROE 8.7% 10.0% 10.9% 12.3% 12.1% 11.6% 12.6% 13.5% 15.0% 14.4% 19.3%
ROIC 8.0% 9.2% 11.1% 13.1% 12.6% 11.3% 11.9% 14.6% 15.3% 13.8% 15.9%
Gross Margin % 45.4% 46.8% 49.9% 56.5% 53.8% 52.6% 53.9% 54.2% 54.9% 56.7% 56.0%
FCF Margin % 1.7% 2.5% 6.6% 10.7% 4.9% 3.9% 5.4% 11.0% 9.6% 4.9% 9.8%

Dividends Paid per sh AED 0.00 AED 0.01 AED 0.00 AED 0.00 AED 0.00 AED 0.08 AED 0.05 AED 0.10 AED 0.12 AED 0.14 AED 0.15
Net Issuance of Stock per sh AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0
Total ƩCash Returned per sh AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.0 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.1 AED 0.2
Cash Returned Yield 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.2% 2.8% 5.0% 3.7% 4.3% 4.9%
Earnings Yield (%) = ROE/PBV 2.5% 4.2% 5.2% 9.8% 7.6% 7.7% 8.7% 7.6% 6.8% 6.4% 8.1%
Dividend Yield(%) 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% 2.7% 4.1% 3.6% 4.3% 4.3% 4.1%
Dividend Growth Rate % 0.0% -100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -33.3% 100.0% 15.0% 21.7% 7.1% 15.0%

EV/NOPAT 41.0x 15.3x 17.7x 3.8x 8.0x 9.9x 8.7x 7.7x 11.8x 13.2x 9.7x 9.7x
P/E 46.6x 18.4x 21.9x 6.6x 11.0x 12.5x 10.8x 10.5x 14.3x 15.5x 10.6x 10.8x
EV/Invested Capital (EV/IC) 3.3x 1.4x 2.0x 0.5x 1.0x 1.1x 1.0x 1.1x 1.8x 1.8x 1.5x 1.5x
P/BV 3.5x 2.4x 2.1x 1.3x 1.6x 1.5x 1.5x 1.8x 2.2x 2.2x 2.4x 2.2x

P/S 3.3x 1.3x 1.5x 0.6x 1.0x 1.0x 0.9x 0.9x 1.2x 1.3x 1.0x
P/FCF 189.7x 50.8x 23.5x 5.8x 20.9x 26.3x 16.0x 8.0x 13.0x 26.0x 10.7x
EV/EBIT 39.4x 14.4x 16.7x 3.6x 7.5x 9.3x 7.9x 7.0x 10.7x 11.9x 8.5x
P/E (cash adjusted) 25.6x 13.1x (27.3x) 18.2x 26.7x 26.8x 51.8x 29.2x 17.2x 20.7x 17.5x
P/Tang BV 8.7x 7.9x 5.6x 2.9x 3.4x 3.0x 3.3x -- 4.3x 4.6x 4.8x

@ today price, Earnings Yield (%) = ROE/PBV = 1/PE = 8.1% ROIC/EIC = NOPAT/EV 10.3%