Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Survey
a. Quote & introduce your passage. Tell why you chose it.
b. Indicate how elements of one's distanciation from the text might affect one's
reading of the text.
c. Indicate how your distanciation from the text might bias your research, and
indicate what you will do to try and mitigate such bias.
d. Tell the reader what you are going to say, and how you are going to say it. (Write
this section, "d.", last, since you don't know where your research may lead you.)
2. Socio-Historical Context
a. Discuss multiple elements of the socio-historical context as they are relevant to
the cultural environment in which your Biblical book was composed.
b. Discuss multiple element of the socio-historical context as they are relevant to
your specific pericope.
3. Literary Context
a. Describe the beginning and end of the pericope, and give reasons for why you
would draw the lines for the beginning & ending where you do.
b. Describe how your pericope contributes to the larger unit of thought, (paragraph,
chapter, etc.), to which it belongs. (i.e., Near Context)
i. Include both what comes before your pericope, and what follows your
pericope.
c. Describe how that larger unit of thought contributes to the book as a whole. (i.e.,
Far Context)
4. Formal Analysis
a. Describe the genre of the book to which your pericope belongs.
i. Include a discussion of what usually constitutes that genre, and how your
book conforms & how the book resists the conventions of the genre.
b. Describe the genre of the pericope itself.
i. Include a discussion of what usually constitutes that genre, and how your
book conforms & how the book resists the conventions of the genre.
5. Detailed Analysis
a. Discuss any rhetorical elements that contribute to one's understanding of the
pericope.
b. Discuss how a clause analysis contributes to one's understanding of the pericope.
(Main Clause vs. Subordinate Clause, Simple vs. Compound vs. Complex Clause)
c. Discuss key vocabulary words and how they contribute to one's understanding of
the pericope.
i. Make sure you keep in mind the differences between the Diachronic vs.
Synchronic meaning of the word/s.
Page 1 of 4
Hermeneutical Outlines
ii. Also keep in mind that authors & usage, not dictionaries, determine what
words mean.
8. Conclusion
a. In one or two paragraphs, summarize the entire essay. In your summary, include
both what it meant and what it means. Yes, this will feel redundant. But it is a
necessary component to the exercise.
1
Gorman, Michael, Elements of Biblical Exegesis: A Basic Guide for Students and Ministers. Peabody, Mass.:
Hendrickson, 2001
Page 2 of 4
Hermeneutical Outlines
ii. Far Context: Summarize what came before your passage, what comes after
the passage, and how your passage contributes to the book as a whole
iii. Near Context: Discuss the specific section of the book in which your
passage occurs, and how your passage contributes specifically to this
section.
iv. This whole section focuses more on what the text says.
v. You can read the passage yourself and do this step on your own.
2
Fee, Gordon D. New Testament Exegesis: A Handbook for Students and Pastors. Revised Edition. Louisville, KY:
Westminster/John Knox Press, 1983, 1993.
Page 3 of 4
Hermeneutical Outlines
Page 4 of 4