Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
125
The
British
Psychological
British Journal of Developmental Psychology (2006), 24, 125–149
q 2006 The British Psychological Society
Society
www.bpsjournals.co.uk
* Correspondence should be addressed to Professor Lynne Murray, School of Psychology, The University of Reading, 3 Earley
Gate, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AL, UK (e-mail: lynne.murray@reading.ac.uk).
DOI:10.1348/026151005X83568
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
homework (Epstein, 1986; Keys, Harris, & Fernandes, 1995; MacBeath & Turner, 1990;
Cowan & Hallam, 1999). Nevertheless, parents may not always feel well-equipped to
help their children and interactions with the child during attempts to help with
homework can be challenging and, at times, conflictual (Cowan & Traill, 1998; Levin
et al., 1997). This may be particularly likely in relation to mathematics, where the
strategies taught in school may differ from those used by the parents (Shumow, 1998).
The degree to which depression may influence the parents’ ability to provide scholastic
support has been little researched to date. However, a study by Goldsmith and Rogoff
(1995) comparing the behaviour of dysphoric and non-dysphoric women in interactions
with 5- to 6-year-old children showed that those with dysphoric symptoms had
particular difficulties with structured teaching tasks, being less sensitive to both the
child’s emotional cues and the child’s understanding of the problem.
communalities in the communicative strategies of mothers and fathers, there are key
differences (Jain, Belsky, & Crnic, 1996; Laasko, 1995). In the context of maternal
depression, the role of fathers may become particularly important. For example, studies
of infants of depressed mothers have shown that infants who become distressed and
withdrawn in the context of interactions with their mothers can be alert and well-
regulated when interacting with their healthy fathers (Hossain, Field, Gonzalez,
Malphurs, & Del Valle, 1994). In the current study, therefore, we included fathers as well
as mothers and examined the nature of their homework interactions with the child, as
well as the extent of their overall involvement with the child’s schoolwork.
school achievement tests and high IQ. We also expected that the provision of general
emotional support and the absence of coercive control would be associated with high
self-esteem and good behavioural adjustment. Finally, in line with previous research, we
predicted that the contribution of maternal behaviour to child outcome would be
greater than that of paternal behaviour and that this would be reflected in differences in
the extent of mothers’ and fathers’ general involvement in their children’s schoolwork
and activities.
Method
Participants
Participants were originally recruited from a representative community sample of 702
primiparous women and their healthy, full-term infants. Mothers were screened at six
weeks with the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS; Cox, Holden, & Sagovsky,
1987); those with scores indicating probable depression were interviewed. Sixty-one
women had experienced an episode of depression meeting research diagnostic criteria
(Spitzer, Endicott, & Robins, 1978) since delivery. After every alternate case was
identified (for the last six months of recruitment, after every case was identified),
potentially psychiatrically well controls were randomly selected from those with low
EPDS scores (i.e. 9 or less) and these women were interviewed to confirm that no
depression had occurred either prior to or since delivery. Forty-two women were
selected as controls. All but three of the 103 women identified for recruitment
(each from the depressed group) agreed to participate in the study. Mothers and their
children were assessed at 18 months and again at 5 years. The current assessment took
place when the children were aged 8 years. At this point, 55 of the mothers and children
in the index group and 41 in the control group (94.8% and 97.6%, respectively, of those
originally recruited) were seen again. We also attempted to assess as many of the
children’s fathers as possible: this was achieved for 46 (83.6%) of the index group and
35 (85.4%) of the controls. Sample characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Procedure
The study children and their mothers initially visited the university research unit where
a range of assessments were conducted, including measurement of the child’s IQ, self-
esteem and their performance on a set of mathematics problems. The mother’s mental
state and IQ were also assessed and she was asked about her relationship with her
partner and her involvement with the child’s schoolwork and activities. Her permission
was sought to obtain teacher reports of the child’s behaviour and their performance on
school achievement tests. Two visits were subsequently made to the family home; on
one occasion the child was observed with their mother and on the other with their
father, each time completing a different set of mathematics problems. The order of both
the observation of mother and father and the allocation of the two sets of mathematics
problems was randomized. The parents were each asked to give the kind of back-up
support to the child that they might ordinarily do at home. The researcher set a video-
camera to record a view of both child and parent and left the room for a 20 minute
period while the homework task was completed. In the case of fathers, who had not
previously attended the research unit assessment, the researcher then conducted
mental state and IQ assessments and interviewed the father to ascertain his involvement
in the child’s schoolwork and activities.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Measures
Parent measures
Mental state. Maternal mental state when child was aged 8 years was assessed using the
affective disorders section of the structured clinical interview for DSM diagnoses (SCID;
First, Spitzer, & Williams, 1996) to determine whether or not the mother was currently
depressed. Mothers were also questioned using the same schedule about their mood
since the previous assessment at 5 years and the timing of any episodes of depression
was recorded. Mothers had similarly been interviewed at 5 years and 18 months;
together, the information from these three interviews, along with that identifying the
presence or absence of depression in the first three months post-partum, was used to
derive the following mental state variables: (i) post-partum depression, (ii) current or
recent depression (defined as occurring within the previous 12 months) (iii) depression
occurring during the child’s school years (i.e. between 5 and 8 years) and the overall
duration of the child’s exposure to depression (calculated in months). Fathers were also
interviewed, using the full SCID. This was used, as for the mothers, to ascertain their
current and recent mental state as well as whether they had experienced an episode of
disorder in the child’s school years. However, since the fathers had not previously been
interviewed, it was not considered possible to obtain valid information concerning the
occurrence of any episodes prior to this time. Since the number of fathers who
experienced any one diagnosis in the time period concerned was small (depression:
N ¼ 18; alcohol abuse: N ¼ 3; an anxiety disorder: N ¼ 10), fathers were categorized
for each time period as having either experienced or not experienced any diagnosis.
Maternal and Paternal IQ. The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson &
Willison, 1991) was administered to provide a measure of overall IQ. In normal
populations, scores on the NART correlate highly with those on standard IQ tests. The
measure is widely used in research and clinical practice to estimate IQ in populations
with neurological or psychiatric disorders, as it overcomes the difficulty that symptoms
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
(e.g. retardation) may interfere with performance in standard IQ assessments and make
the estimation of IQ invalid.
Parental conflict. In order to assess the quality of parental relationship, the Dyadic
adjustment scale (DAS; Spanier, 1976) questionnaire was completed, with additional
items to assess perceived and felt criticism (Hooley & Teasdale, 1989).
Parental involvement. Parents were asked a series of structured questions about
their participation in the child’s school (e.g. running clubs, serving as parent governor,
assisting in class) and their involvement in the child’s school-related work and activities
(e.g. accompanying child to museums/sites relevant to school projects, helping child
find source materials from libraries/Internet sites). Parents were also asked about their
involvement in the child’s other non-school based activities (e.g. sports interests,
hobbies). Involvement in each area was rated on a 5-point scale.
Homework materials
Three sets of mathematics problems were compiled from the Primary Maths Bank
(Pollitt & Munro, 1989). This is a Rasch-calibrated set of items of varying difficulty
covering the range of mathematics taught to children in school between the ages of 7
and 13 years, from which questions may be selected and mixed to construct extended
tests. Each of the three sets in the current study comprised 25 items, including
computation, concepts and problem-solving, money, measures, time, fractions and
shape. The three sets were comparable in terms of their level of difficulty: Set A:
M ¼ 48:52 (SD ¼ 6:4), range 35.3–59.6; Set B: M ¼ 48:19 (SD ¼ 6:78), range 35.9–60.4;
Set C: M ¼ 48:90 (SD ¼ 6:46), range 37.9–61.9.
Set A was used when the children visited the research unit to establish each child’s
level of ability; Sets B and C were used at home, one with each parent. To ensure that the
children were all posed with a similar, moderate degree of challenge, they were asked to
start the sets at home at the point just before they started failing items on Set A.
Parental homework support dimensions. Videotapes of parent-child discourse
during the homework sessions were transcribed1. Separate utterances were identified
on the basis of timing and intonational cues, as well as their content. Utterances were
examined in conjunction with the video and, for each one, the presence or absence of
each of the four dimensions of parental behaviour was recorded by a researcher who
had no other information concerning the children and their families. A random sample
of homework interactions for 10 of the children was scored by a second researcher.
(1) Promotion of mastery motivation: the parent shows positive enthusiasm for the
task, their willingness to help and encourages the child. For example: ‘Oh, let’s
have a go at that one, you can do it with the scales – OK?’; ‘Shall I just show you
that one to get you started?’
(2) Promotion of representational understanding: the parent may give information
about the principles involved in the problem. For example: ‘It’s like saying, for
example, that if there were two bowls and you have one of them, you have the
same proportion of bowls as if there were four and you had two; you have half in
each case.’ Alternatively, the parent may offer suggestions involving the principles
of the problem. For example: ‘There might be a number you can multiply the top
1
Poor audio quality prevented scoring in a few cases.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
one by. Then multiply the bottom one by the same number and it will equal one of
these’; ‘Perhaps you could use what you did for the question about the cost of
pencils’.
(3) Provision of general low-level emotional support: the parent demonstrates their
psychological availability and supportive awareness of the child by means of back-
up, affirmative comments (it is important to note that such comments were not
confined to times when the child was completing the problem successfully, but
could just as well be made as the child struggled with the task). For example: ‘yes,
that’s it’; ‘OK, you’re starting there, then’; ‘mm, mm, right’; ‘I see what you’re
doing’.
(4) Coercive control: The parent speaks forcibly and gives a strong directive for the
child to do something. For example: ‘Write that down there: : :put the 1 in the
right hand column’; ‘Now add 7 plus 8’.
parental mental state and wider family circumstances were related to parental behaviour
with the child and the child’s development and, second, to examine the relations
between each parent’s behaviour with the child during homework and the child’s
functioning. Finally, a series of regression analyses with blocked entry procedures was
performed to examine the influence of parental homework support on child outcome,
having taken relevant parental and family characteristics, as well as the child’s previous
performance in each domain of functioning, into account.
Results
Characteristics of homework communication in mothers and fathers
The total scores for the dimensions of homework support were expressed as
percentages of the total number of utterances. Inspection of the distributions of scores
on each of the parental homework support dimensions showed only those for coercive
control to be normally distributed.
Normality of distribution for the other variables was achieved by means of log
transformations. All dimensions showed good inter-rater reliability; kappas were as
follows: promotion of mastery motivation: .73; promotion of representational
understanding: .78; provision of emotional support: .94; coercive control: .88.
The characteristics of maternal and paternal homework communication (untrans-
formed scores) are shown in Fig. 1. There was considerable variability among the
parents; some interactions showed high levels of coercive control and low levels of
emotional support or promotion of the child’s motivation and understanding about the
task, whereas other parents were highly supportive and facilitated their children’s
endeavours. Overall, as can be seen from Fig. 1, mothers and fathers differed little from
each other on most dimensions of homework support (coercive control: z ¼ 0:67;
promotion of independent representational understanding: z ¼ 1:76; emotional
support: z ¼ 1:54). If anything, fathers tended to show a more optimal pattern and
this was significant in the promotion of mastery motivation dimension (z ¼ 2:07,
p , :05). While mothers’ and fathers’ styles of homework communication of were
broadly similar, the degree of general involvement in both the child’s school and their
school-related activities showed striking differences between the two parents, with
mothers being more involved than fathers (z ¼ 4.23, p , :001 and z ¼ 5:36, p , :001,
for school and school-related activities, respectively). By contrast, the two parents’
involvement in other aspects of the children’s lives did not differ (z ¼ 0:88; see Fig. 2).
Parental mental state, family characteristics, child gender and homework support
and their relation to child functioning
Table 2 shows the univariate correlations (Pearson, point-biserial etc., as appropriate)
between parental and family variables, child gender and parental homework support
behaviours. It also shows the associations between these variables and the measures of
child functioning. Postnatal depression showed no association with any dimension of
maternal communication with the child, nor was it associated with child outcome. The
same was true for the overall duration of the child’s exposure to maternal depression.
By contrast, current and more recent maternal depression was associated with poorer
support for the child in each dimension of homework discourse (i.e. more coercive
control, less emotional support and less promotion of mastery motivation and
representational understanding) and, with the exception of child IQ, generally poorer
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
50 80
40
60
30
40
20
20
10
0
0
50 40
40
30
20 10
10
0
Representational understanding Mastery motivation
Mother Father
child functioning. Paternal mental disorder showed only one significant association
with the nature of homework communication, with more coercive control occurring
in the context of current disorder. Current paternal disorder was also linked to a
greater likelihood of child behaviour problems in school. In general, middle-class
parents and those with higher IQs showed better patterns of homework support than
other parents; in turn, their children had better outcomes. These patterns of
association were similar for mothers and fathers, although links were generally
stronger for maternal variables.
The quality of parental homework communication (particularly mothers’ homework
communication) was associated with a number of child outcomes. With regard to child
IQ, mothers who promoted mastery motivation and representational understanding,
provided more emotional support and expressed less coercive control during the
interaction had children with higher scores, as did fathers who gave more emotional
support. Associations with child academic achievement, as assessed by the SATS,
broadly paralleled those for IQ; in the main, these were somewhat weaker than those
concerning child IQ, although some additional associations emerged. Thus, in addition
to the positive influence of maternal emotional support and low rates of coercive
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Maternal (N= 78) and paternal (N=78) involvement in school and home
3.5
3
Mother
Father
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
Involvement Involvement Involvement
at home at school in school work
Figure 2. Maternal (N ¼ 78) and paternal (N ¼ 78) involvement in school and home.
control, paternal promotion of mastery motivation and low levels of coercive control
were associated with better results on the SATS.
Children’s self-esteem was related to most dimensions of maternal homework
communication, but not with paternal interactions. Finally, children whose mothers
exhibited more emotional support and whose fathers promoted more mastery
motivation and expressed less coercive control were amongst the better adjusted at
school.
Multivariate analyses
Given the associations between different aspects of homework support, and between
mental state and other family characteristics, and the parents’ behaviour with the child,
the question arises of whether particular aspects of homework communication were
important and whether these influenced child functioning over and above the effects of
parental and family variables. This central question was addressed by means of
multivariate regressions. In addition, since child characteristics could themselves have
influenced parental behaviour, regression analyses also took into account the child’s
previous functioning in each domain of development. In the initial analysis (shown as
model 1 in Tables 3 to 6) we determined the relative contribution of the different
homework communication variables; in order to avoid prematurely deleting variables,
we retained those where p , :15 for subsequent analysis. In the subsequent, main
model (shown as model 2 in Tables 3 to 6), variables were entered in two blocks. The
first block consists of two types of variables: the developmentally equivalent variable to
that predicted at 8 years, as previously assessed at age 5 (i.e. for child IQ and academic
achievement, we controlled for previous child IQ [GCI]; for child self-esteem, we
controlled for earlier expressions of low self-worth; and for child behavioural
136
Table 2. Associations among parental homework dimensions, child gender, wider family characteristics and child outcome
Table 3. Regression models for child IQ based on maternal, paternal and parental predictors
b t b t b t
Model 1
M promotion of 0.14 1.23 0.12 0.96
mastery motivation
M promotion of repres. 0.21 1.70þ 0.30 2.10*
understanding
M emotional support 0.35 2.95** 0.20 1.47þ þ
M coercive control 0.05 0.33 0.06 0.35
P promotion of mastery 0.04 0.28 2 0.03 20.22
motivation
P promotion of repres. 2 0.17 2 1.31 2 0.18 21.44
understanding
P emotional support 0.20 1.45 0.13 0.91
P coercive control 2 0.19 2 1.15 2 0.08 20.51
Model F Fð4; 83Þ ¼ 5:33, Fð4; 73Þ ¼ 2:37, Fð8; 69Þ ¼ 2:73,
p , :001 p , :10 p , :05
Model 2
Step 1
GCI (5 years) 0.49 5.33*** 0.43 4.18*** 0.43 4.20***
Child gender 0.15 1.78þ 0.17 1.78þ 0.18 1.86þ
Social class 20.19 2 2.04* 2 0.09 2 0.73 2 0.11 20.88
Maternal depression 0.17 1.89þ 0.15 1.50
(5–8 years)
Maternal IQ 0.21 2.26* 0.17 1.64
Paternal disorder 0.11 1.09 0.10 1.06
(5–8 years)
Paternal IQ 0.17 1.44 0.12 1.01
Model F Fð5; 80Þ ¼ 12:03, Fð5; 70Þ ¼ 7:88, Fð7; 68Þ ¼ 6:52,
p , :001, R 2 ¼ :43 p , :001, R 2 ¼ :36 p , :001, R 2 ¼ :40
Step 2
GCI (5 years) 0.46 4.98*** – – 0.40 3.89***
Child gender 0.19 2.23* – – 0.20 2.20*
Social class 20.13 2 1.31 – – 2 0.06 20.50
Maternal depression 0.17 1.93þ 0.17 1.73þ
(5–8 years)
Maternal IQ 0.15 1.62 0.09 0.86
Paternal disorder – – 0.09 0.92
(5–8 years)
Paternal IQ – – 0.11 0.95
M promotion of mastery – – – –
motivation
M promotion of repres. 0.19 2.13* 0.23 2.31*
understanding
M emotional support 0.12 1.26 0.12 1.12
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Table 3. (Continued)
b t b t b t
M coercive control – – – –
P promotion of mastery – – – –
motivation
P promotion of repres. – – – –
understanding
P emotional support – – – –
P coercive control – – – –
Model F Fð7; 78Þ ¼ 9:92, Fð9; 66Þ ¼ 6:14,
p , :001, DR 2 ¼ :04, p , :001, DR 2 ¼ :05,
Fð2; 78Þ ¼ 3:07, Fð2; 66Þ ¼ 3:29,
p , :05 p , :05
þþ
p , :15;þp , :10; *p , :05; **p , :01; ***p , :001:
Repres. understanding ¼ representational understanding.
adjustment in school at age 8, we controlled for the child’s score at 5 years on the PBCL),
and predictors comprising parental and family characteristics as well as child gender.
With regard to parental mental health, only the occurrence of disorder in the period 5 to
8 years was considered. This was, first, because neither postnatal depression nor
chronicity of child exposure showed any relation in univariate analyses with either
maternal homework dimensions or children’s outcome and, second, only small numbers
of parents experienced current disorder. In the second block, as well as previous child
functioning and parental and family characteristics, we included those homework
communication variables retained in the initial step. For each child outcome, analyses
were first carried out for mothers2 and fathers separately and then for combined mother
and father variables.
2
The analysis for combined mother and father variables includes only those mothers for whom father data were available (i.e.
78 rather than the 88 mothers who were observed with their children and whose results are shown in the left hand columns of
Tables 3 to 6). Each analysis in these tables was repeated for the 78 mothers for whom father data were available and, as
these were found to give identical results to those for the whole sample, they are not shown.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Table 4. Regression models for child academic achievement based on maternal, paternal and parental
predictors
b t b t b t
Model 1
M promotion of mastery 0.22 1.65þ þ 0.27 1.95þ
motivation
M promotion of repres. 20.11 2 0.84 20.05 2 0.35
understanding
M emotional support 0.10 0.72 20.04 2 0.26
M coercive control 20.23 2 1.45 20.07 2 0.40
P promotion of mastery 0.19 1.22 0.17 1.07
motivation
P promotion of repres. 2 0.07 20.54 20.13 2 1.00
understanding
P emotional support 0.05 0.34 0.04 0.25
P coercive control 2 0.32 21.74þ 20.30 2 1.64þ þ
Model F Fð4; 65Þ ¼ 2:50, Fð4; 58Þ ¼ 3:45, Fð8; 54Þ ¼ 2:45,
p , :06 p , :05 p , :05
Model 2
Step 1
GCI (5 years) 0.45 4.17*** 0.32 2.58* 0.32 2.62*
Child gender 0.003 0.03 2 0.05 20.43 20.04 2 0.33
Social class 0.08 0.66 0.07 0.45 0.14 0.95
Maternal depression 20.22 2 1.99þ 20.20 2 1.65
(5–8 years)
Maternal IQ 0.20 1.87þ 0.03 0.24
Paternal disorder 2 0.09 20.74 20.06 2 0.52
(5–8 years)
Paternal IQ 0.37 2.66** 0.37 2.61*
Model F Fð5; 63Þ ¼ 6:35, Fð5; 56Þ ¼ 3:86, Fð7; 54Þ ¼ 3:20,
p , :001, p , :01, p , :01,
R 2 ¼ :34 R 2 ¼ :26 R 2 ¼ :29
Step 2
GCI (5 years) 0.46 4.28*** 0.29 2.36* 0.30 2.54*
Child gender .001 0.003 2 0.02 20.13 20.02 2 0.18
Social class 0.06 0.51 0.09 0.65 0.15 1.06
Maternal depression 20.19 2 1.81þ 20.16 2 1.40
(5–8 years)
Maternal IQ 0.18 1.69þ 20.02 2 0.18
Paternal disorder 2 0.05 20.43 20.02 2 0.20
(5–8 years)
Paternal IQ 0.29 2.06* 0.34 2.48*
M promotion of mastery 0.20 1.96þ 0.29 2.57*
motivation
M promotion of repres. – – – –
understanding
M emotional support – – – –
M coercive control – – – –
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Table 4. (Continued)
b t b t b t
P promotion of mastery – – – –
motivation
P promotion of repres. – – – –
understanding
P emotional support – – – –
P coercive control 20.25 2 1.99þ 20.16 2 1.31
Model F Fð6; 62Þ ¼ 6:18, Fð6; 55Þ ¼ 4:05, Fð9; 52Þ ¼ 4:00,
p , :001, p , :01, p , :001,
DR 2 ¼ :04, DR 2 ¼ :05, DR 2 ¼ :12,
Fð1; 62Þ ¼ 3:85, Fð1; 55Þ ¼ 3:99, Fð2; 52Þ ¼ 5:12,
p , :06 p , :06 p , :01
þþ
p , :15;þp , :10; *p , :05; **p , :01; ***p , :001:
Repres. understanding ¼ representational understanding.
(Model 2, Step 2). By contrast, when father variables were analysed, only the effect of
child IQ at 5 years predicted 8 year functioning. When maternal and paternal variables
were considered together, it was still the case that the mother’s promotion of
representational understanding was influential, while no other variables, apart from the
child’s gender and earlier performance, were significantly associated with child IQ
scores.
Table 5. Regression models for child self-esteem based on maternal, paternal and parental predictors
b t b t b t
Model 1
M promotion of mastery 0.18 1.56þ þ 0.19þ þ 1.46
motivation
M promotion of repres. 20.14 2 1.18 20.13 2 0.92
understanding
M emotional support 0.18 1.50þ þ 0.17 1.20
M coercive control 20.29 2 2.01* 20.32 2 1.84þ
P promotion of mastery 2 0.01 2 0.08 20.09 2 0.69
motivation
P promotion of repres. 2 0.19 2 1.42 20.22 2 1.74þ
understanding
P emotional support 0.12 0.80 20.01 2 0.09
P coercive control 2 0.20 2 1.14 20.10 2 0.62
Model F Fð4; 82Þ ¼ 5:11, p , Fð4; 72Þ ¼ 1:48, Fð8; 68Þ ¼ 2:68,
:001 ns p , :05
Model 2
Step 1
Child self-esteem 20.11 2 1.04 2 0.15 2 1.24 20.07 2 0.62
(5 years)
Child gender 20.02 2 0.14 0.02 0.13 0.04 0.34
Social class 0.21 1.80þ 0.06 0.44 0.22 1.53
Maternal depression 20.27 2 2.36* 20.32 2 2.68**
(5–8 years)
Maternal IQ 0.08 0.69 0.20 1.65
Paternal disorder 2 0.09 2 0.76 20.05 2 0.46
(5–8 years)
Paternal IQ 2 0.03 2 0.23 20.06 2 0.44
Model F Fð5; 81Þ ¼ 2:05, Fð5; 71Þ ¼ 0:63, Fð7; 69Þ ¼ 1:94,
p , :10, R 2 ¼ :11 ns, R 2 ¼ :04 p , :10, R 2 ¼ :17
Step 2
Child self-esteem 0.04 0.36 – – 0.02 0.15
(5 years)
Child gender 0.05 0.49 – – 0.04 0.35
Social class 0.34 3.19** – – 0.26 1.85þ
Maternal depression 20.26 2 2.52* 20.30 2 2.66**
(5–8 years)
Maternal IQ 20.08 2 0.79 0.05 0.45
Paternal disorder – – 20.06 2 0.58
(5–8 years)
Paternal IQ – – 20.09 2 0.68
M promotion of mastery 0.10 0.93 0.04 0.29
motivation
M promotion of repres. – – – –
understanding
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Table 5. (Continued)
b t b t b t
maternal depression occurring in the child’s school years and the mother’s use of
coercive control during the homework task were associated with low self-esteem. In
the analysis including paternal variables, none were found to predict this child
outcome and when both maternal and paternal behaviours were considered
together, the effects of maternal depression and the mother’s use of coercive
control remained significant.
Table 6. Regression models for child school maladjustment based on maternal, paternal and parental
predictors
Model 1
M promotion of mastery 21.37 .11 2 5.04 .60
motivation
M promotion of repres. 20.82 .05 0.86 .02
understanding
M emotional support 212.89 6.73** 2 19.12 5.28*
M coercive control 20.004 .02 2 0.06 1.57
P promotion of mastery 222.06 7.32** 2 25.19 6.22*
motivation
P promotion of repres. 22.44 .46 2 6.39 1.48
Understanding
P emotional support 27.49 2.21þ þ 2 10.17 1.68
P coercive control 20.02 .19 2 0.04 .68
Model F x2 ¼ 13:38, x2 ¼ 16:53, x2 ¼ 26:31,
df ¼ 4, p , :01 df ¼ 4, p , :01 df ¼ 8, p , :001
Model 2
Step 1
PBCL (years) 0.19 4.10* 0.19 2.35 0.18 1.59
Child gender 3.12 5.36* 10.83 .03 11.59 .04
Social class 1.10 1.49 0.99 .48 0.80 .22
Maternal depression 1.47 2.62 1.98 2.25
(5–8 years)
Maternal IQ 20.10 3.93* 2 0.07 .79
Paternal disorder 2.96 5.28* 3.01 4.24*
(5–8 years)
Paternal IQ 20.11 1.05 2 0.06 .22
2 2 2
Model F x ¼ 28:30, x ¼ 31:78, x ¼ 35:45,
df ¼ 5, p , :001 df ¼ 5, p , :001 df ¼ 7, p , :001
Step 2
PBCL (5 years) .22 4.51* 0.02 .01 – –
Child gender 3.36 4.80* 16.57 .04 – –
Social class .98 .93 1.45 .70 – –
Maternal depression 1.52 2.23 – –
(5–8 years)
Maternal IQ 2 .08 2.01 – –
Paternal disorder 7.45 2.39 – –
(5–8 years)
Paternal IQ 20.06 .06 – –
M promotion of mastery – – – –
motivation
M promotion of repres. – – – –
understanding
M emotional support 216.48 4.04* – –
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Table 6. (Continued)
M coercive control – – – –
P promotion of mastery 244.08 2.50 – –
motivation
P promotion of repres. – – – –
understanding
P emotional support 24.51 .07 – –
P coercive control – – – –
Model F x2 ¼ 33:91, df ¼ 6, x2 ¼ 41:92, df ¼ 7,
p , :001, p , :001,
Dx2 ¼ 5:62, df ¼ 1, Dx2 ¼ 9:84, df ¼ 2,
p , :05 p , :01
þþ
p , :15;þp , :10; *p , :05; **p , :01; ***p , :001:
Repres. understanding ¼ representational understanding.
Discussion
In this study of 8-year-old children of postnatally depressed and well mothers, we used
an ecologically valid, homework-based procedure to conduct direct observations of
naturalistic interactions of direct relevance to the demands currently placed on children
and their parents. A number of features of the study are notable and extend current
findings in the literature. First, whereas studies of parental support for child problem-
solving have generally focused on single aspects of parental interaction style, the current
study examined the relative contribution of different aspects of parental engagement
with the child and addressed the question of the specificity of each sort of input’s
effects. Second, since child characteristics may themselves have an impact on parental
behaviour, we capitalized on the longitudinal investigation of this sample to take child
characteristics into account when evaluating the contribution of parental communi-
cation to child outcome. Finally, we directly observed the contribution of fathers as well
as mothers.
A number of aspects of our findings require further comment. First, in contrast to
findings for this sample earlier on in the children’s development, we found no
association between the original postnatal depressive episode and either current
maternal interactions with the child or child functioning. Maternal depression in the
child’s school years, by contrast, was associated with all aspects of maternal discourse
examined, as well as three of the four child outcomes considered. The link was
particularly evident in relation to low child self-esteem, where exposure to maternal
depression in this latter period was influential, even when taking other family
characteristics into account. For each of the other areas of functioning, however, the
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
strongest predictor of development at age 8 was the child’s previous performance at age
5 and when this was taken into account, along with other family characteristics, an
independent effect of maternal depression in the child’s school years was not identified.
The fact that postnatal depression was not associated with the current quality of mother-
child interactions is consistent with previous findings for this sample at 5 years (Murray
et al., 1999), together with other studies showing that remitted mothers generally show
improvements in the way they interact with their children (Campbell, Cohn, & Meyers,
1995; Mills, Puckering, Pound, & Cox, 1985). Nevertheless, the significance of postnatal
depression should not be overlooked: those mothers who experienced depression
during the child’s school years were generally mothers who had also experienced
postnatal depression. Insofar as its occurrence raises the risk of later episodes that are
themselves associated with both poor maternal interactions and child outcome, it is
therefore important that those experiencing postnatal depression are monitored
beyond the postnatal episode so that, should depression re-occur, clinical interventions
can be quickly mounted. It is also worth noting that the strong continuities in child
behaviour in school and cognitive functioning from 5 to 8 years may, in part, also reflect
an impact of postnatal depression; thus, the occurrence of behaviour problems at 5
years were predicted by postnatal episodes (Sinclair & Murray, 1998). Similarly,
particularly poor maternal interactions with the child arising in the context of the
postnatal episode were predictive of poor cognitive functioning in late infancy and
persisted to 5 years (Murray et al., 1996); such difficulties, in turn, predicted worse
outcomes on the measures of IQ and school achievements at 8 years. The fact that
patterns of achievement and behavioural adjustment evident within the first term of
school have such a strong bearing on future child performance emphasises the
importance of preschool and the earliest school experiences in launching children along
particular developmental pathways (Sylva, 1994).
With regard to the effects of parent-child discourse, we found evidence that the
current quality of parental conversations with the child during homework sessions
significantly contributed to each of the child outcomes investigated, over and above the
well-established effects of family characteristics such as family social class and parental
IQ. Indeed, in a number of instances, when the quality of parental communication during
homework was taken into account, the effects of family background variables ceased to
be significant. A number of the findings concerning the role of parental discourse with the
child are particularly notable. First, for all but one child outcome (school maladjustment)
the univariate associations obtained between aspects of fathers’ engagement and child
outcome were also obtained for maternal discourse; for school maladjustment, this was
also true for one of the two dimensions of paternal discourse, namely, the presence of
coercive control. On balance, therefore, paternal and maternal discourse styles operated
in very similar ways in relation to child outcome. Nevertheless, once the joint
contributions of maternal and paternal discourse were considered, the nature of mothers’
communication appeared to be of greater significance for child functioning than that of
fathers. This finding, based on direct observations of parent-child interactions, appears to
be part of a more general process reflected in the parents’ own reports of the extent and
nature of their involvement with their children. Thus, whereas fathers and mothers
reported similar levels of involvement in their children’s out-of-school activities, mothers
were significantly more likely than fathers to report playing an active role in their
children’s school and to spend more time assisting their children in school-related
activities. This pattern of difference in the roles of the two parents is consistent with
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
sociological evidence showing that mothers are far more active than fathers in
determining basic aspects of children’s educational experience (David, 2002).
A related question arises, however, of whether the different impact of mothers’ and
fathers’ conversations reflects specifically school-relevant aspects of the parents’
involvement with the child, as evidenced during the homework task, or else simply
reflects the generally greater amount of time mothers spent in interactions with their
children. In our previous investigations of the role of maternal interactions with the
child where significant associations with child cognitive development and behaviour
problems have been found, observations have been conducted during free play sessions
(Murray et al., 1996, 1993) or during an informal snack (Murray et al., 1999). This
suggests that the wider range of parent-child interactions where opportunities for
promoting the child’s cognitive development and regulating behaviour still occur may
be just as important as the specific opportunities afforded by homework tasks; this
hypothesis, however, requires a formal comparison of the effects of discourse in both
types of situation.
A third key aspect of the findings regarding the role of parental homework
communication was evidence for specificity of effects. Thus, broadly in line with our
initial predictions, we found child academic achievements and higher IQ to be promoted
by parental discourse that stimulated the child’s thinking and fostered enthusiasm for
tackling academic problems. By contrast, good emotional and behavioural outcomes
were best promoted by the parent being attentive and supportive of the child’s
endeavours and a parenting style that did not coerce or undermine the child’s efforts.
These findings are broadly consistent with those in the literature on the effects of
particular forms of parental interaction on different child outcomes, but extend previous
findings insofar as multiple measures were used simultaneously to identify the relative
importance of the different forms of input.
The findings of the present study concerning the role of parental psychiatric
problems and communication with the child about homework raise questions about
both clinical practice, particularly in relation to the long-term monitoring of those
mothers who experience depression in the postnatal months, and public policy on
education. Our observations showed striking variability in parents’ capacities to support
their children, including a significant number of parents who clearly felt helpless and
slipped into critical and coercive styles of relating that were associated with poor child
outcome. This suggests that it may be inappropriate for schools to assume parental
competence in this area and, indeed, that such an assumption may have the effect of
widening the divide between children from more privileged and less privileged
backgrounds. This suggestion is in line with previous research showing that the gap in
attainment between more and less disadvantaged children widens as a function of the
child’s reliance on home-based compared with school-based input (Heyns, 1978).
Together the findings indicate that parents themselves may require support as to
how to assist their children. Moreover, the study findings suggest areas of parental
behaviour where supportive interventions specific to the child outcomes of concern
might be targeted. If, for whatever reason, such interventions cannot be provided, then
additional school-based practices may be required to address inequalities in education
and personal opportunity.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by the Tedworth Charitable Trust and the Medical Research Council.
We thank Wendy Gibbons, Paul Patterson and Steven Briers for assistance with coding and data
collection, and Alistair Pollitt for help with preparing homework materials.
References
Barocas, R., Seifer, R., Sameroff, A. J., Andrews, T. A., Croft, R. T., & Ostrow, E. (1991). Social and
interpersonal determinants of developmental risk. Developmental Psychology, 27, 479–488.
Campbell, S. B., Cohn, J. F., & Meyers, T. (1995). Depression in first-time mothers: Mother-infant
interaction and depression chronicity. Developmental Psychology, 31(3), 349–357.
Cooper, H., Lindsay, J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about
homework, amount of homework assigned and completed and student achievement. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 70–83.
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of
the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786.
Cowan, R., & Hallam, S. (1999). What do we know about homework? Viewpoint No. 9. London:
Institute of Education.
Cowan, R., & Traill, D. (1998). Homework for primary schoolchildren: Ideals and reality.
Psychology of Education Review, 22(2), 20–27.
Culp, A., Hubbs-Tait, L., Culp, R. E., & Starost, R. (2000). Maternal parenting characteristics and
school involvement. Predictors of kindergarten cognitive competence among head start
children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15, 5–17.
David, M. (2002). Equality in action. In J. Wilson (Ed.), Seminar 3: Addressing inequalities in
education. London: The Smith Institute.
Department of Education and Skills (DfES). (2004). Helping Parents Help their Children.
(Document 0137–2004). Nottingham, UK: Author.
Diaz, R. M., Neal, C. J., & Vachio, A. (1991). Maternal teaching in the zone of proximal development:
A comparison of low- and high-risk dyads. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37(1), 83–108.
Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1997). How the experience of early physical abuse leads
children to become chronically aggressive. In D. Cicchetti & S. Toth (Eds.), Rochester
symposium on developmental psychopathology. Vol. 8: The effects of traumas on the
developmental process. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Egeland, B., Pianta, R., & O’Brien, M. A. (1993). Maternal intrusiveness in infancy and child
maladaptation in early school years. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 359–370.
Epstein, J. (1986). Parents’ reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. Elementary
School Journal, 86, 277–294.
Estrada, P., Arsenio, W. F., Hess, R. D., & Holloway, S. D. (1987). Affective quality of the mother-
child relationship: Longitudinal consequences for children’s school relevant cognitive
functioning. Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 210–215.
Fagot, B. I., & Gauvain, M. (1997). Mother-child problem solving: Continuity through the early
childhood years. Developmental Psychology, 33, 480–488.
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (1996). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis
I. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department.
Goldsmith, D. F., & Rogoff, B. (1995). Sensitivity and teaching by dysphoric and nondysphoric
women in structured versus unstructured situations. Developmental Psychology, 31(3),
388–394.
Goodman, S. H., & Gotlib, I. H. (1999). Risk for psychopathology in the children of depressed
mothers: A developmental model for understanding mechanisms of transmission.
Psychological Review, 106(3), 458–490.
Gordon, P. (1980). Homework: Origins and justifications. Westminster Studies in Education, 3,
27–46.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Murray, L., Hipwell, A., Hooper, R., Stein, A., & Cooper, P. J. (1996). The cognitive development of
five year old children of postnatally depressed mothers. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 37, 927–935.
Murray, L., Kempton, C., Woolgar, M., & Hooper, R. (1993). Depressed mothers’ speech to their
infants and its relation to infant gender and cognitive development. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 1083–1101.
Murray, L., Sinclair, D., Cooper, P., Ducournau, P., Turner, P., & Stein, A. (1999). The socio-
emotional development of five year old children of postnatally depressed mothers. Journal of
Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(8), 1259–1272.
Murray, L., Woolgar, M., Cooper, P. J., & Hipwell, A. (2001). Cognitive vulnerability in five year old
children of depressed mothers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(7), 891–899.
Nelson, H. E. & Willison, J. (1991). National Adult Reading Test (NART). Test Manual (2nd ed.).
Windsor: nferNelson.
Nix, R. L., Pinderhughes, E. E., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., & McFadyen-Ketchum, S. A.
(1999). The relation between mothers’ hostile attribution tendencies and children’s
externalizing behavior problems: The mediating role of mothers’ harsh discipline practices.
Child Development, 70, 896–909.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wolfson, A., Mumme, D., & Guskin, K. (1995). Helplessness in children of
depressed and nondepressed mothers. Developmental Psychology, 31(3), 377–387.
Pollitt, A., & Munro, L. (1989). The Primary Maths Bank. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
Ratner, H. H., & Stettnet, L. J. (1991). Thinking and feeling: Putting humpty dumpty together again.
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 1–26.
Rutter, M. (1967). A children’s behaviour questionnaire for completion by teachers: Preliminary
findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 8, 1–11.
Senechal, M., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s
reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 331–666.
Shumow, L. (1998). Promoting parental attunement to children’s mathematical reasoning through
parent education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 109–127.
Sigel, I. E. (1982). The relationship between parental distancing strategies and the child’s cognitive
behaviour. In L. M. Laosa & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Families as learning environments for children
(pp. 47–86). New York: Plenum.
Sinclair, D., & Murray, L. (1998). The effects of postnatal depression on children’s adjustment to
school: Teacher reports. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 58–63.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of
marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
Spitzer, R. C., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. (1978). Research diagnostic criteria: Rationale and
reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 733–782.
Sylva, K. (1994). School influences on children’s development. Journal of Psychology and
Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 35(1), 135–170.
US Department of Education. (1994). Strong families, strong schools: Building community
partnerships for learning. Washington DC: Author.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of
Technology Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wechsler, D. (1992). WISC-III Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonia, TX:
Psychological Corporation.