Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

G.R. No. 144104 ● Under P.D.

1823, LCP was organized for the welfare and benefit of the
Lung Center v. Quezon City Filipino people to help combat the high incidence of lung and
Callejo, Sr. pulmonary
diseases (45% of annual deaths in the country). Under its Articles of
All credit goes to Faye Banogon (with permission haha) Incorporation, LCP is to render medical services to the public in
general.
The Lung Center of the Philippines was assessed for real property taxes by the ● A charitable institution does not lose exemption from taxes just because
City Assessor of Quezon City. The petitioner claimed that under Sec 28 (3), Art 6 of the it derives income from paying patients. The money received becomes a
Constitution it is a charitable institution and thus, exempted from paying real property part of the trust fund and must be devoted to public trust purposes and
taxes. The Court partially granted the petition and ruled that only the portions of the cannot be diverted to private profit or benefit.
land/building used exclusively, directly and actually for charitable purposes are exempt ● A charitable institution does not lose its character because of
from taxes. government subsidies as such are to be considered as gifts or
donation. LCP spent its income, including subsidies form gov’t for its
DOCTRINE patients and hospital operations.
For a property to be exempt from tax, it should be actually, directly and
exclusively used for a tax-exempt purpose. 2. Whether or not Lung Center of the Philippines is exempted from real
property taxes.
FACTS Only the portion of LCP that is actually, directly and exclusively for
1. Lung Center of the Philippines (LCP) was created under PD No. 1823 on charitable purposes is exempted from real property tax.
Jan. 16, 1981. The institution own a land located at Quezon City. In the ● Petitioner - Even if a portion of its property is leased, charitable
middle of the land is the LCP (the hospital itself). The ground floor of the character stays and remains exempted from real property taxes.
building is leased to private parties, canteen/stores and for private ● Respondent - LCP is not a charitable entity. It failed to prove that
practitioners for their clinics. The left side of the building is vacant while the its property is actually, directly and exclusively used for charitable
right side is leased to Elliptical Orchids and Garden Center. purposes.
2. The City Assessor of QC assessed LCP for real property taxes amounting to ● Laws granting tax exemptions are to be construed strictissimi juris
P4.6M. LCP filed a Claim for Exemption claiming that it is a charitable against the taxpayer. Taxation is the rule and exemption is the
institution and under Sec 28(3), Art 6 of the Constitution it is exempted from exception.
real property taxes. o Section 2 of PD1823 – all donations, contributions,
3. The City Assessor denied LCP’s claim. LCP filed a petition before the Local endowments, equipment and supplies shall be exempt
Board of Assessment Appeals of QC (QC-LBAA), it was denied. QC-LBAA’s from income and gift taxes.
decision was affirmed by Central Board of Assessment Appeals of QC o LCP does not enjoy property tax exemption under the
(CBAA) saying that it was not a charitable institution. The Court of Appeals above decree
then affirmed CBAA’s decision. o Expressio unius est exclusio alterius applies – express
mention of a thing implies exclusion of all others
ISSUE with HOLDING ● LCP may avail of tax exemption under Sec 28 (3), Art 6 of the
1. Whether or not Lung Center of the Philippines is a charitable institution. 1987 Constitution “all lands, building, and improvements, actually,
Yes. The Lung Center of the Philippines is a charitable institution. directly and exclusively used for charitable purposes shall be
● Petitioner – It is a charitable institution within Sec 28 (3), Art 6 of the exempt from taxation” (The provision is also implemented by Sec
Constitution and its character as such is not altered because it admits 234 (b) of RA No. 7160 or Local Government Code of 1991)
paying patients (60% of bed capacity for charity patients). ● Exemption – LCP must prove that it is a charitable institution and
that its real properties are actually, directly and exclusively used
● Respondent - LCP is not a charitable entity. It failed to prove that its for charitable purposes.
property is actually, directly and exclusively used for charitable o Exclusive – possessed and enjoyed to the exclusion of
purposes. others

1
o If a real property is used for one or more commercial
purposes it is not exclusively used for the exempted
charitable purpose
● Actual, direct and exclusive use of property for charitable purpose
means the direct and immediate and actual application of the
property for the charitable purpose and not the use of the income
of the property for such tax-exempt purpose
● Portions of the hospital are leased to private individuals. Such
portions are not exempt from taxes. Only portions of land occupied
by the hospital and portions of it used for patients are exempted.

DISPOSITIVE PORTION
Petition partially granted. The QC Assessor is directed to determine the portions
of the land which are leased to private persons and compute real property taxes
due thereon.

Вам также может понравиться