Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Types of
Direct Taxes
Capital Gains
Income Tax Corporate Tax Wealth Tax*
Tax
Wealth tax is levied on the net wealth owned by a person on the valuation date, i.e., 31st
March of every year.
Wealth-tax is levied at 1% on the net wealth in excess of Rs. 30,00,000.
∙ Revenue from wealth tax over the time vs the burden on
administration (GRAPH)-table from budget 2012-2013
• In 1992-93, wealth tax collection was ₹468 crore, it dropped to ₹78 crore in 1996-97 after
removing financial assets from the wealth tax net, and since has grown to about ₹950 crore
in 2014-15. That’s a miniscule fraction of the ₹2.7 lakh crore collected by way of taxes on
income on non-corporates in 2014-15.
• Rs.788.67 crore and Rs.844.12 crore were collected as wealth tax in 2011-12 and 2012-13
respectively. And For the financial year 2013-14, total wealth tax collection was Rs.1,008
crore.
Reasons for abolishment of wealth tax in
India
• Incurs high collection costs but provides low yield: The cost of collecting the tax is much
higher compared to the low yield. Also, wealth tax does not form a major chunk of collection of
direct taxes in India (Rs.788.67 crore and Rs.844.12 crore were collected as wealth tax in 2011-12
and 2012-13 respectively).
• Additional administrative burden: Taxpayers had to value their assets as per the Wealth Tax
Rules to compute their net wealth. For certain assets such as jewellery, taxpayers had to obtain
a valuation report from a registered valuer. Assets like Jeweleries, unaccounted assets etc. are
not easily traced.
• Simplification of tax procedures: According to experts, Indian tax laws are, by and large, very
complex and therefore, prone to litigations. Government wants to simplify procedures for
easier tracking and enhance transparency.
• Tax compliance and widening the tax base: Government wants to bring more persons under
its tax net given that individuals who file income tax returns outnumber those who file wealth
tax returns. In 2011-12, the number of wealth tax assessees in India stood at 1.15 lakhs. Many of
the assessees in the country are only dimly aware of the existence of the wealth tax.
wealth tax Abolishment
• The government decided to increase the surcharge levied on the ‘super rich’ class by 2%
to 12%. Super rich are persons with incomes of Rs.1 crore or higher and companies that
earn Rs.10 crores or higher.
• The abolition was a move to do away with high costs of collection and also to simplify the
existing tax structure thereby discouraging tax evasion.
• Increase the revenue collection: By abolishing the wealth tax and replacing it with
additional surcharge, government can collect up to Rs. 9000 crore in a fiscal year, opined
the finance minister in his budget speech.
Double Taxation
Double taxation is a taxation principle referring to income taxes paid twice on the same source of
earned income.
• It can occur when income is taxed at both the corporate level and personal level.
• Double taxation also occurs in international trade when the same income is taxed in two
different countries
Double Taxation of Corporations and Shareholders
Double taxation often occurs because corporations are considered separate legal entities from
their shareholders. As such, corporations pay taxes on their annual earnings, just like
individuals. When corporations pay out dividends to shareholders, those dividend payments
incur income-tax liabilities for the shareholders who receive them, even though the earnings
that provided the cash to pay the dividends were already taxed at the corporate level.
Tax avoidance
Tax avoidance is an exercise in which the assesse legally tries to defeat the basic intention of
the law, by taking advantage of the shortcomings in the legislature. It refers to finding out new
methods or tools to avoid the payment of taxes which are within the limits of the law.
• Businesses avoid taxes by taking all legitimate deductions and by sheltering income from
taxes by setting up employee retirement plans
• Taking legitimate tax deductions to minimize business expenses and thus lower your
business tax bill.
• Setting up a tax deferral plan such as an IRA, SEP-IRA, or 401(k) plan to delay taxes until a
later date.
• Taking tax credits for spending money for legitimate purposes, like taking a Work
Opportunity Tax Credit for hiring workers in your business.
Tax Evasion
tax evasion is a practice of reducing tax liability through illegal means, i.e. by suppressing
income or inflating expenses or by showing lower income. Such illegal practices can be
deliberate concealment of income, manipulation in accounts, disclosure of unreal expenses
for deductions, showing personal expenditure as business expenses, overstatement of tax
credit or exemptions suppression of profits and capital gains, etc. This will result in the
disclosure of income which is not the actual income earned by the entity
Tax Evasion is a criminal activity for which the assessee is subject to punishment under the
law. It involves acts like:
Happened when Before the occurrence of tax liability. After tax liability arises.
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
1.
2.
3.
▶
1.
2.
3.
4.
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
▶
Merits and Demerits of Direct Taxes
Merits of Direct Taxes
1) EQUITABLE
2) ECONOMICAL
3) CERTAINTY
4) PRODUCTIVITY
5) CONSCIOUSNESS OF DUTY AND CIVIC SENSE
6) ELASTIC
7) ANTI INFLATIONARY
8) AFFECTS SAVINGS AND INVESTMENTS
EQUITABLE
The burden of direct taxes can’t be shifted, and an equitable sacrifice of income and wealth can be achieved
from all sections of society through progressive taxation.
a) ABILITY TO PAY:
❖ Idea of Social Justice
❖ Horizontal and Vertical Equity
❖ Income tax, wealth tax, etc.
❖ Special Exemptions based on different criteria
b) CANON OF EQUALITY:
❖ Taxes based on notion of equality
❖ The rich should pay more taxes, while the poor shouldn’t.
❖ Must be applicable to certain categories and income-groups
❖ Reduce income inequalities and bring about adequate social & economic justice
❖ They can serve as an important fiscal weapon of reducing the gap of inequalities in income and wealth.
ECONOMICAL
a) HONORARY TAX COLLECTION AT SOURCE: Income tax and most
other forms of direct taxation are done at source with the help of
TDS (Tax Deduction at Source) and are hence not a problem for the
government to collect.
b) CANON OF ECONOMY: Direct taxes like income tax etc. being
collected annually in lump-sum, the administrative cost of such
collection will be minimum as compared to the indirect taxes like
sales tax, excise duties, etc. which are collected at short intervals
(usually quarterly) and thus involve a high cost of collection.
c) MINIMIZES CHANCES OF TAX EVASION
d) SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES
CERTAINITY
a) CANON OF CERTAINTY: Compared to indirect taxes, direct taxes
are more exact and precise in estimating the revenue. Further, in
direct taxes, the tax-payer knows how much he has to pay and the
State can estimate the yields correctly. There is certainty on both
sides.
b) MINIMIZES CORRUPTION ON THE PART OF COLLECTING
OFFICIALS.
c) EFFECTIVE FISCAL ADMINISTRATION: The Government can also
estimate the tax revenue from direct taxes with a fair accuracy due
to pre-decided tax rates. Accordingly, the Government can make
adjustments in its income and expenditure.
PRODUCTIVITY
a) Direct taxes are very productive in the sense that as the
working population and community grows, so do the
returns from direct taxation.
b) Revenue from direct taxes increases or decrease
automatically with the change in the national income or
wealth of the country.
CONSCIOUSNESS OF DUTY AND
CIVIC SENSE
a) RESPONSIBLE CITIZEN: When people consciously pay their taxes, they can claim the
right to know how their money is being spent by the government. In the case of a direct
tax, a person knows that he is paying a tax, he feels conscious of his rights. He claims the
right to know how the Government uses his money and approves or criticizes it. Civic
sense is thus developed. He behaves as a responsible citizen.
b) CREATES SOCIAL AWARENESS: Since you have to pay a certain sum of money to the
government, you expect something back as well. Moreover, you tend to feel more
socially aware and responsible, as it is your money that is spent all around you. Direct tax
has been proven to be a positive contributing factor in lesser crimes, littering and
damaging public goods.
c) EDUCATIVE: Direct taxes have an educative value as they create a civic sense among the
tax-payers. Citizens realize their duty to pay taxes and because of the direct burden of
taxes they become conscious and keep vigil on how the public income is spent by the
government in a democratic country.
ELASTIC
a) CANON OF ELASTICITY: If the State suddenly stands in need of more funds in an
emergency, direct taxes can well serve the purpose. The yield from income tax or death
duties can be easily increased by raising their rate. People cannot stop dying for fear of
paying death duties.
❖ It is elastic in the sense that the government can change rate of taxes according to its
needs. Whenever income or wealth rises, the government takes appropriate measures to
increase the rates of direct taxes to raise its revenue.
a) BUOYANCY EFFECT OF TAXES: The direct taxes are relatively elastic. With an increase
in income and wealth of individuals and companies, the yield from direct taxes will also
increase automatically.
ANTI - INFLATIONARY
a) TARGET THE DEMAND SIDE: If the government wants to decrease the inflation rate by
decreasing the demand of the product, direct taxes are increased. As a result, the rich
class of people that usually spend a lot of their money on buying different products and
services will now have constrained spending capacity (reduced disposable income). This,
in turn, reduces the consumption of products and services, and hence, the inflation rate.
b) AUTOMATIC STABILIZERS: The amount of tax revenue rises when economic growth
takes place and declines when national income declines. In this way, it
removes ‘inflationary heat’ as well as ‘depressionary impact’ from the economy.
AFFECTS SAVINGS AND
INVESTMENTS
a) Direct taxes directly affect the level of savings and
investment – for an individual and for the overall economy
as well. These direct taxes, therefore, can be used to affect
the overall ratio of savings in an economy – by decreasing
or increasing the tax rate.
b) When a direct tax is decreased, the person has been left
with more money to save, and hence, the investment level
of the economy is increased and vice versa.
c) This technique is used to create more investment
opportunities and employment in an economy.
DEMERITS OF DIRECT TAXES
1) TAX EVASION
2) INCONVENIENT
3) PEOPLE’S INDIFFERENCE
4) LACK OF POPULARITY & SOCIAL CONFLICT
5) DAMPENS CAPITAL FORMATION AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY
6) DISINCENTIVE TO WORK AND SAVE
7) ARBITRARY
8) NARROW COVERAGE
9) SECTORAL IMBALANCE
TAX EVASION
a) A direct tax is also liable to evasion specially when the rate of taxes becomes high or tax
structure becomes unduly complicated. This system of taxation thus leads people to
evade taxes. Tax evasion then leads to the emergence of a parallel economy of black
income.
b) The immediate effect of black money is the accentuation of the degree of inequality in
the distribution of income. Further, black income fuels inflation.
c) Thus, ‘a direct tax creates civic consciousness’ is not true. A conscious citizen is not
expected to evade taxes he can avoid tax in a legal way.
d) In India, there is good amount of tax evasion. The tax evasion is due to high tax rates,
documentation and formalities, poor and corrupt tax administration.
e) It is easier for the businessmen to evade direct taxes. They invariable suppress correct
information about their incomes by manipulating their accounts and evade tax on it.
INCONVENIENT
a) CANON OF CONVENIENCE: In order to submit the tax, a person has to undergo several
formalities and procedures which is very time-consuming procedure.
❖ As it is paid in lump-sum, it becomes inconvenient to the taxpayers particularly when they
experience liquidity crises.
❖ Further, a taxpayer is supposed to provide various data relating to his income or wealth for
the satisfaction of the tax-levying authority.
b) COST FACTOR: Because of complexities involved in the Indian Income Tax Act,
taxpayers are virtually compelled to take the services of tax consultants.
❖ Further every one who is required to pay a direct tax has to furnish appropriate evidence
in support of the statement of his income & wealth & for this he has to maintain his
accounts in proper form. Thus, direct tax system is also expensive to the taxpayers.
PEOPLE’S INDIFFERENCE
a) Another disadvantage of a direct tax is that it does not develop the civic sense of those
who do not pay such taxes. In the case of income tax, people with incomes below a
certain level are not liable to pay tax. In a low-income country like India, the majority of
the people are not required to pay income tax.
b) When a man directly bears the burden of a tax, he tries to know how the government
spends that money. Those who are not directly affected by the burden of taxation
remain indifferent as to the way the public expenditure is incurred.
LACK OF POPULARITY & SOCIAL
CONFLICTS
a) First, such taxes are not very popular, because the people have to bear the burden of
such taxes directly. That is why, when the rate of a direct tax is raised, most people
express their resentment against the government.
b) For instance, when the rate of personal income tax or corporate profit tax is raised,
criticism from those affected becomes very strong.
c) Since not everybody has to pay direct taxes, it is often responsible for creating social
conflict amongst societies.
d) It also leads to crimes, social injustice and a sense of inferiority among different groups
of people.
DAMPENS CAPITAL FORMATION AND
INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY
a) It is usually the elite class that invests their money and form capital
within an economy. Since direct taxes – in accordance with the
canon of equality – are specifically applied on the elite class of
people, it significantly limits the capital formation and investment
opportunities in an economy. This, in turn, leads to higher
unemployment and lower growth of economy.
b) The direct taxes can affect savings and investment. Due to taxes, the
net income of the people gets reduced. This in turn reduces savings.
Reduction in savings results in low investment. The low investment
affects capital formation in the country.
DISINCENTIVE TO WORK AND
SAVE
a) As a taxpayer, you know that the harder you work and generate more income, the more
you will have to pay in direct taxes – usually, at an exponential rate, as it is in certain
countries. This goes with the canon of equality that people with more money should be
paying more taxes.
b) Therefore, it dramatically affects your ability to work and motivation to excel. Direct
taxes have been a chief cause of hurting the job performances.
c) If tax burden is high, people's consumption level gets adversely affected. High taxes also
discourage people from working harder in order to earn and save more.
d) Many business ventures are not undertaken on the ground that a large part of the
income earned will have to be given to the government in the form of taxes.
ARBITRARY
a) DIFFICULTY IN MEASURING ABILITY TO PAY: It is difficult to measure the ability to pay of each and
every taxpayer since ability to pay taxes is not governed alone by income or wealth of an individual.
❖ A highly salaried person with a large number of dependents may not have higher ability to pay taxes
compared to a middle income salaried person having no or one or two dependents. Consequently, the rate
of direct taxes becomes - to some extent arbitrary.
b) NATURE OF GOVERNMENT: Tax and Politics go hand in hand. A leftist government may impose a high
rate of taxes while a ‘rightist’ government may levy a low rate of taxes.
c) ILLOGICAL BASIS: Critics point out that there cannot be any objective basis for determining tax rates
of direct taxes.
❖ Also, the exemption limits in the case of personal income tax, wealth tax, etc., are determined in an
arbitrary manner. A precise degree of progression in taxation is also difficult to achieve. Therefore direct
taxes may not always fulfill the canon of equality.
NARROW COVERAGE
a) In India, there is a narrow coverage of direct taxes. It is
estimated that only three percent of the population pay
personal income tax.
b) Due to low coverage, the government does not get enough
funds for public expenditure.
c) Estate duty & wealth tax are equally narrow based and thus
revenue proceeds from these taxes are invariably small.
SECTORAL IMBALANCE
a) In India, there is Sectoral imbalance as far as direct taxes
are concerned.
b) Certain sectors like the corporate sector is heavily taxed,
whereas, the agriculture sector is 100% tax free.
c) Even the large rich farmers are exempted from payment of
personal income tax.
Scope of Improvement
Scope of Improvement
Source: http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/income-tax-law-5-much-needed-changes-modis-task-force-should-consider-to-improve-compliance/943753/
Lowering Rate and Narrowing Spread
• In order to make the direct tax system more effective, it is
necessary to reduce the tax rate so that there is less tax evasion and
avoidance.
• There is also the need to narrow the spread between the lowest
rate and maximum marginal rate (the rate of the highest slab).
• To neutralise the fall in revenue due to lowering of the rates of
taxation it will be necessary to withdraw some of the tax incentives.
• In other words, there is need to provide minimum tax incentives.
Source: 1991 Tax Reforms Committee under the Chairmanship of Raja J. Chelliah
Targeted Relaxation
• Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) on SEZ profits
• Post withdrawal, activities in development of SEZ and units in SEZ has considerably slowed down.
• Reinstating the exemption will immensely boost non-resident investors in manufacturing goods in
an SEZ providing fillip to the “Make in India” campaign.
• Foreign technology and relaxation in tax compliances/litigation procedure
• Foreign technology plays a very vital role in overall development of a developing country such as India.
• However, the cost of using the said technology is very high, in view of which, the same is not effectively
used in India.
• Therefore, in order to reduce cost of technology, the rate of withholding tax on royalty payments should be
reduced to zero.
• This would reduce cost to the Indian arm and also eliminate hassles in compliances faced by foreign
technology providers.
• Toll manufacturing
• In order to encourage the growth of India as a manufacturing hub, the domestic tax provisions should
exempt foreign principals from creating a taxable presence in India in case of toll manufacturing
arrangement with Indian manufacturers.be reduced to zero.
Source: Ernst & Young Report: “Enabling India through effective Tax reforms (Dec-2017)
Link Tax deductions to Inflation
• Some of the tax deductions have remained unchanged for nearly
two decades.
• The government could consider adjusting these deductions to
inflation and removing the ones which are redundant.
• This can be done for individual taxpayers.
• In the US, personal tax deductions are inflation adjusted every year.
• While corporate tax rates could be linked to encouraging
investment and flow of capital.
• Or tax-free regime to encourage startups or specific sectors such as
fintech.
Source: https://blog.cleartax.in/4-suggestions-make-indias-tax-structure-world-class/
Increase share of Direct Taxes
• The share of direct taxes in total collections has been seeing a
downward trend.
• Since direct taxes play an important role in ensuring equality, they
should form a larger portion of total tax collections.
• Indirect taxes are consumption based and impact everyone equally,
India must focus on raising the share of direct taxes like the US and
UK.
• This can be done with a play of tax rates (between direct and
indirect taxes) and widening of base.
Source: Rao, Govinda. (2005). Tax system reform in India: Achievements and challenges ahead. Journal of Asian Economics. 16. 993-1011.
10.1016/j.asieco.2005.10.003.
Reform Income Tax Department
• Government must continue its efforts to bring more people under
the tax net.
• The tax department has gone digital in a big way.
• E-verification and e-notices were introduced in the recent past and
this eases hardships taxpayers face during filing.
• This ecosystem should continue to thrive.
• While India has just 20 people engaged in analytics in the tax
department, the UK has 400. There is a great need for capacity
building in this area.
Source: https://blog.cleartax.in/4-suggestions-make-indias-tax-structure-world-class/
Any Questions?
Thank You