Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 19

CASES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II

Atty. Adonis Gabriel

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE PHILIPPINES

1. De Leon vs. Esguerra

2. Manila Prince Hotel Vs. GSIS

3. Francisco vs. House of Representatives

4. Gonzales vs. COMELEC

5. Imbong vs. COMELEC

6. Occena vs. COMELEC

7. Tolentino vs. COMELEC

8. Sanidad vs. COMELEC

9. Province of Cotabato vs. The Gov’t of the RP Peace Panel on Ancestral Domain

10. Santiago vs. COMELEC

11. Lambino vs. COMELEC

FUNDAMENTAL POWERS OF THE STATE

POLICE POWER

1. Philippines Association of Service Exporters

2. Ichong vs Hernandez

3. Luts vs. Araneta

4. Association of Small Landowners vs. Secretary of Agrarian Reform


5. Lozano vs. Martinez

6. Department of Education, Culture and Sports vs. San Diego

7. Ynot vs. Intermediate Appellate Court

8. City Government of Quezon City vs. Ericta

9. Manila Memorial Park vs. Secretary of DSWD

POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN

1. City of Manila vs. Chinese Community in Manila

2. Republic vs. Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co.

3. People vs. Fajardo

4. Republic vs. Vda De Castelvi

5. Amigable vs. Cuenca

6. Philippine Press Institute vs. COMELEC

7. Sumulong vs. Guerrero

8. Manosca vs. Court of Appeals

9. EPZA vs. Dulay

10. Municipality of Parañaque vs. V.M. Realty Corp.

11. Republic vs. Lim

12. Rule 67, Revised Rules of Court

POWER OF TAXATION
1. Sison vs. Ancheta

2. Pascual vs. Secretary of Public Works

3. Punsalan vs. Municipal Board of Manila

4. Lladoc vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

ARTICLE III

SECTION 1

DUE PROCESS OF LAW

1. Ichong vs. Hernandez

2. Philippine Phosphate Fertilizer Corp.

3. Ynot vs. Intemediate Appellate Court

4. Alonte cs. Savellano

5. Aniag vs. COMELEC

6. Spouses Romualdez vs. COMELEC

7. Philippine Communications Satellite Corp. vs. Alcuaz

8. Ang Tibay vs. COurt of Industrial Relatons

9. Ateneo de Manila vs. Capulong

10. Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network Inc. vs. Anti-Terrorism Council

EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE


1. People vs. Vera

2. Ichong vs. Hernandez

3. Villegas vs. Hiu Chiong

4. People vs. Cayat

5. Dumlao vs. COMELEC

6. Philippine Association of Service Exporters vs. Drilon

7. Himagan vs. People

8. Quinto vs. COMELEC

9. Biraogo vs. The Philippine Truth Commission

10. Almonte vs Vazquez

11. Ormoc Sugar Co., Inc. vs. Treasurer of Ormoc City

Section 2:

SEARCHES AND SEIZURES

1. People vs. Marti

2. Stonehill vs. Diokno

3. Mantaring vs. Judge Roman

4. Soliven vs. Makasiar

5. SIlva vs. Presiding Judge of RTC, Negros Oriental

6. Morano vs Vivo

7. Harvey vs. Santiago


8. Salazar vs. Achacoso

9. Alvarez vs. CFI

10. Mata vs. Bayona

11. People vs. Del Rosario

12. People vs. Gerente

13. Umil vs. Ramos

14. People vs. Sucro

15. People vs. Rodrigueza

16. Go vs. CA

17. Posadas vs. CA

18. People vs. Mengote

19. Malacat vs. CA

20. People vs. Aminnudin

21. People vs. Malmstedt

22. Luz vs. People

23. Espano vs. Ca

24. United Laboratories vs. Isip

25. Papa vs. Mago

26. People vs. Musa

27. People vs. Peralta

28. Valmonte vs. De Villa


29. Rule 113 of the Revised Rules of Court

30. Rule 126 of the Revised Rules of Court

Section 3:

PRIVACY OF COMMUNICATION & CORRESPONDENCE

1. Ramirez vs CA

2. Zulueta vs. CA

3. Navarro vs CA

4. Ople vs. Torres

5. Disini s. Secretary of Justice

Section 4

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

1. Diocese of Bacolod vs. COMELEC

2. United States vs. Bustos

3. People vs. Alarcon

4. Ayer Productions PTY Ktd. vs. Capulong


5. Borjal vs. CA

6. Reyes vs. Bagatsing

7. Pita vs. CA

8. Social Weather Stations, INC., vs COMELEC

ASSEMBLY AND PETITION

1. Primicias vs Fugoso

2. Malabanan vs. Ramento

3. De la Cruz vs. CA

4. PBM Employees Association vs. Philippine Blloming Mills

5. Bayan vs. Ermita

6. Batas Pambansa Blg. 880

Section 5:

FREEDOM OF RELIGION

1. Aglipay vs. Ruiz

2. Graces Vs. Estenzo

3. American Bible Society vs. City of Manila

4. Iglesia ni Cristo vs. Court of Appeals

5. Ebralinag vs. Division Superintendent of Cebu


6. Estrada vs. Escritor

7. Imbong vs. Ochoa

Section 6:

LIBERTY OF ABODE AND TRAVEL

1. Marcos vs. Manglapus

2. Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals

3. Silverio vs. Court of Appeals

Section 7:

RIGHT OF INFORMATION

1. Legaspi vs. Civil Service Commission

2. Valmonte vs. Belmonte

3. Province of Cotabato vs. The Gov’t of the RP Peace Panel on Ancestral Domain

4. Echagaray vs. Secretary of Justice

5. Chavez vs. Presidential Commission on Good Government

6. In Re: Production of Court Records and Documents and the Attendance of Court officials and employees as

witnesses under the subpoenas of February 10, 2012 and the various letters for the impeachment Prosecution

Panel date January 19 and 25, 2012


Section 8:

RIGHT TO FORM ASSOCIATIONS

1. SSS Employees Association vs. Court of Appeals

2. Victoriano vs. Elizalde Rope Workers’ Union

3. In Re: IBP Membership Dues Delinquency of Atty. Marcial Edillon

Section 10:

NON-IMPAIRMENT CLAUSE

1. Rutter vs. Esteben

2. Ortigas & Co. Ltd. Partnership vs. Feati Bank & Trust Co.

3. Lozano vs. Martinez

4. Ganzon vs. Inserto

Section 11:

FREE ACCESS TO THE COURTS

1. In Re: Query of Mr. Roger Prioreschi

Section 12:
CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION

1. Ho Wai Pang vs. People of the Philippines

2. Gamboa vs. Cruz

3. People vs. Macam

4. People vs. Judge Ayson

5. People vs. Pinlac

6. People vs. Bolanos

7. People vs. Andan

8. Navallo vs. Sandigan Bayan

9. People vs. Dy

10. People vs. Alicando

Republic Act 7438

Section 13:

RIGHT TO BAIL

1. Basco vs. Rapatalo

2. People vs. Judge Donato

3. People v. Fortez

4. Comendador vs. De Villa


5. Baylon vs. Judge Sison

6. Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals

7. Government of the US vs. Judge Puruganan

8. Government of Hong Kong Vs. Hon. Olalia

Rule 114, Revised Rules of Court

Section 14

CRIMINAL DUE PROCESS

1. Tatad vs. Sandiganbayan

2. Galman vs. Sandiganbayan

3. Alonte vs. Savellano

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

1. People vs. Dramayo

2. Dumlao vs. COMELEC

3. Marquez vs. COMELEC

4. Corpus vs. People

5. Feeder International Line vs. CA

RIGHT TO BE HEARD BY HIMSELF AND COUNSEL


1. People vs. Holgado

2. People vs. Agbayani

3. Amion vs. Judge Chiongson

RIGHT TO BE INFORMED OF THE

NATURE AND CAUSE OF ACCUSATION

1. People vs. Quitlong

2. Pecho vs. People

3. Soriano vs. Sandiganbayan

4. Borja vs. Mendoza

RIGHT TO SPEEDY, IMPARTIAL AND PUBLIC TRIAL

1. People vs. Tee

2. Flores vs. People

3. Conde vs. Rivera

4. Republic Act No. 8493

5. Mateo, Jr. vs. Villaluz

6. Garcia vs. Domingo

7. People vs. Teehankee

8. In Re: Request for Live Radio and TV Coverage of the trial in the Sandiganbayan of the Plunder cases

against former President Joseph Estrada


9. In Re: Petition for radio and Television Coverage of the Multiple Murder Cases of against Maguindanao

Governor Zaldy Ampatuan

10. People vs. Mapalao

11. People vs. Valeriano

RIGHT OF CONFRONTATION

1. United States vs. Javier

2. Talino vs. Sandiganbayan

COMPULSORY PROCESSES

1. Roco vs. Contreras

Section 15:

SUSPENSION OF THE PRIVILEGE OF THE

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

1. Lansang vs. Garcia

2. Jackson vs. Macalino

3. In re: Issuance of the Writ of Habeas Corpus for Dr. Aurora Parong

4. Rules on Habeas Data


5. Rules on Writ of Amparo

Section 16:

RIGHT TO A SPEEDY DISPOSITION OF CASES

1. Padua vs. Ericta

2. Flores vs. People

Section 17:

RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION

1. United Sates vs. Tan Teng

2. Villaflor vs. Summers

3. Beltran vs. Samson

4. Chavez vs. CA

5. People vs. Gallarde

6. Pascual vs. Board of Medical Examiners

7. Mapa, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan

Section 18:

RIGHT AGAINST INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE


1. Philippine Refining Company Worker’s Union vs. Philippine Refining CO.

2. In the Matter of Petition of Writ of Habeas Corpus of Segifredo Aclaracion

3. Republic Act No. 10364

Section 19:

PROHIBITED PUNISHMENT

1. People vs. Estoista

2. People vs. Esparas

3. Echagaray vs. Secretary of Justice

Section 20:

NON-IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT

1. Serafin vs. Lindayag

2. Lozano vs. Martinez

Section 21:

DOUBLE JEOPARDY
1. Philippines Savings Bank vs. Bermoy

2. People vs. Obsania

3. Paulin vs. Gimenez

4. Icasiano Vs. Sandiganbayan

5. Lejano vs. People of the Philippines

6. People vs. Balisacan

7. People vs. City Court of Silay

8. Esmeña vs. Pogoy

9. People vs. Pineda

10. People vs. Tampal

11. Melo vs. People

12. People vs. Adil

13. People vs. Relova

Section 22:

EX POST FACTO LAW AND BILL OF ATTAINDER

1. United States vs. Conde

2. Concepcion vs. Garcia

3. Nasi-Villar vs. People of the Philippines

4. Salvador vs. Mapa, Jr.


Article 4:

CITIZENSHIP

1. Tecson vs. COMELEC

2. Republic vs. Lim

3. Co vs. House of Representatives

4. In re: Application for Admission to the Bar of Vicente Ching

5. Cabiling Ma. vs. Fernandez

6. Yu vs. Defensor-Santiago

7. Maquiling vs. COMELEC

8. Frivaldo vs. COMELEC

9. Republic vs. Dela Rosa

10. Labo vs. COMELEC

11. Aznar vs. COMELEC

12. Mercado vs. Manzano

13. Bengzon III vs. HRET

14. Mo Ya Lim Yao vs. Commissioner of Immigration

15. Altajeros vs. COMELEC


COLLEGE OF LAW

SAN BEDA COLLEGE

MENDIOLA, MANILA

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 2 AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Compilation of Case Digests

Submitted to:

ATTY. ADONIS V. GABRIEL


Submitted by:

EUNICE B. JUMALON

L-160461

1-N