Assessment Matrix for Community Health Visit Report
Student Name: ……………………………………………………………………………… Batch: …………………………………
Facet of Work Good (G)
(70-100)%
☐ Able to present a brief and well-structured
A. Abstract summary of the study
☐ Identification of all knowledge gaps with
accurate justification of need for the study
B. Introduction
☐ Comprehensive and valid scientific evaluation of
C. Objectives objectives with strong insight
☐ Comprehensive and valid scientific reasoning on
D. Methodology assessment of research methodology with
strong insight
☐ Able to correctly interpret all of the information
E. Results displayed in tables or graphs
☐ Able to discuss in detail by citing appropriate
F. Discussions references for all major findings
☐ All citations and references are presented in
G. Citations and References Vancouver style of referencing
☐ All the questions are very clear and no
H. Questionnaire Evaluation interpretive question is present
(Appendix)
☐ Work is ingeniously designed and represents a
I. Originality and Novelty significantly new direction or approach
☐ Demonstrates appropriate self-reflections for
J Self-Reflections improvement
Total Marks: ___________ / 100 Name of Assessor: _____________________
Registration Number: ……………………………………………………………………………….
Satisfactory (S) Unsatisfactory (U) Marks
Remarks
(50-69)% (<50%) (100)
G/S/U
☐ Able to present only a semi-structured ☐ Unable to present a structured summary of
summary of the study the study
(10)
☐ Identification of some of the knowledge gaps ☐ No identification of any knowledge gaps with
with inaccurate justification of need for the inaccurate justification of need for the study
study (10)
☐ Little valid scientific evaluation of objectives ☐ No evaluation of objectives
(10)
☐ Little valid scientific reasoning on assessment ☐ Invalid or no scientific reasoning on
of research methodology assessment of research methodology
(10)
☐ Able to correctly interpret only a few of the ☐ Unable to correctly interpret any of the
information displayed in tables or graphs information displayed in tables or graphs
(10)
☐ Able to provide minimum discussion by citing ☐ Unable discuss anything by citing at least one
only a few appropriate references appropriate reference
(10)
☐ Some of the citations and references are ☐ Only a few or none of the citations and
presented in Vancouver style of referencing references are presented in Vancouver style
of referencing (10)
☐ Some of the questions are very clear. ☐ Majority or all of the questions are unclear
However, some interpretive questions are and majority of them are interpretive type
also present (10)
☐ Work has not been done before, but is an ☐ Work completely lacks originality or repeats
obvious extension of previous work with work of others with only minor changes
major changes (10)
☐ Demonstrates minimum self-reflections for ☐ Unable to demonstrate any self-reflections
improvement for improvement
(10)
Signature of Assessor: ____________________ Date: ________________