Introduction to
Contact
Contact 33, 34, 36, 46
Problem description
Outline Creation of a pen and a plane model, and different contact types are
used for presenting their function
Draft version 1 / 11
Background information
Contact-impact phenomena occur in many fields of applied mechanics. For reasons of
computational economy or accuracy, however, distinctions are often made in the numerical
treatments.
The computer time of contact-intensive models (e.g. crash simulation) may be dominated by
the contact algorithm used. It is therefore of prime importance to achieve computational
efficiency, and much effort has been devoted to this subject: specific types of interfaces have
been developed for some problems, and parallel efficiency is regularly increased.
In this tutorial, the four basic types of contacts used in crash simulation will be introduced.
The following image shows the configuration of the pen and plane model.
Plane Model
Pen Model
Draft version 2 / 11
Plane’s boundary condition
Pen’s imposed velocity curve
Material:
Remark: Assign the created material to Pen and Plane through PART card.
Supplied datasets
It is recommended that you use the following names for the PAM-CRASH input and results
files:
Draft version 3 / 11
• Contact Surface: Set of segments that contact themselves or each other.
• Contact Segment: Three or four node polygons composing the contact surface.
Draft version 4 / 11
Self Impacting (contact 36)
• Improve contact for Shell/Solid structures with sharp edges or corners (to be used in
addition to a node-surface type)
• Improve contact in structures where sharp edges can be formed, especially membrane
structures.
1. Definition of Contact 33
(2) We choose the Slave Selection as Seg and select the pen’s triangular head as shown
(yellow highlight). After selection click the Update Selection button to confirm.
(3) Choose the Master Selection as Seg again, and choose Plane’s all segment (highlighted
in yellow lines). After selection click Update Selection button to confirm.
(4) Click the Apply button to finish creating the contact card.
Remarks: You can check the selection part by the following image. You can also select the
object as Part but choosing the exact selection can save CPU time.
2. Definition of Contact 34
Contact 34 has the same definition steps as contact 33. You can define this contact card using
the anterior four steps except for the contact type choice; just replace 33-SYMMETRIC
Draft version 5 / 11
NODE-TO-SEGMENT WITH EDGE TREATMENT into 34-Non-Symmetric
Node-to-Segment Contact with Edge Treatment.
3. Definition of Contact 36
(1) Right click on the tabs Crash>Contacts and choose the Type as 36- Self-impacting
Node-to-Segment Contact with Edge Treatment
(2) The key parameters is the same as Contact 33 (hcont, FRICT, IREMOV).
(3) Choose the Slave Selection as Ele. and select the pen’s triangular head and Plane’s all
elements. After selection click the Update Selection button to confirm.
(4) Click the Apply button to finish creating the contact card.
Remarks: In this contact you need not to choose the master parts, every part are treated as
slave elements.
4. Definition of Contact 46
(1) Right click on the tabs Crash>Contacts and choose the Type as 46-Edge-to-Edge
Self-impacting Contact
Remarks: In this contact you has better choose Slave Selection as Edge, but this selection is
kind of time-consuming. There is no IREMOV and FRICT parameter in this card.
Click Results > Contour and under Entity types activate Node and select Displacement_Z to
show the contour distribution of nodal displacement in Z axis. Through the result we can see
that there is no penetration.
Draft version 6 / 11
The following images are respective the contact force time histories and
contact pressures on mesh plots of contact 33.
To show the contour distribution of nodal displacement in Z axis. Through the result we can
see that there is no penetration.
Draft version 7 / 11
If in VCP you have chosen the pen as master and the plane as slave, then the simulation will
show an apparent perforation. The contact 34 is not symmetrical.
If you are sure of your master and slave parts selection, you can make good use of this contact
type. It is computationally cheap.
In some cases, you do not have a choice and need to use it. For example, if you work with
SPH elements, these elements can only interact with FE as slave nodes in a node-to-surface
contact.
If you are not sure which part should be slave or master, you should choose a contact of type
33, which uses more CPU but is safer. The following image shows the result of wrong
selection of contact 34.
3. Results of Contact 36
To show the contour distribution of nodal displacement in Z axis. Through the result we can
see that there is no penetration.
This contact is the easiest to define, as there is no need to worry about master and slave
definitions. You can just select all parts of your model.
However, it may be more expensive and requires extra steps if you need to know the contact
force: you need to define a section force of type “contact”.
Draft version 8 / 11
The following images are respective the section force and contact pressures
on mesh plots of contact 36.
Draft version 9 / 11
The following images are respective the contact force time histories and
contact pressures on mesh plots of contact 46.
Draft version 10 / 11
Comparison between contact 33 and contact 46
We can see that part 1 has crossed part 2 without any resistance, which means the contact 33
does not prevent the edge to edge impact. When contact 46 is defined, the edges of plane 1
cannot be penetrated by the edges of plane 2. A penalty force is applied to both planes, which
leads to the bending of plane 2.
The following images are respective the contact force time histories and
contact pressures on mesh plots of the plane to plane impact.
Draft version 11 / 11