Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
156 Contributors
68
More Permanent than Snow
The Photographing
of van Eyck’s Playgrounds
Nicolas Stutzin
It all started in 1947 when a small square in the south of Amsterdam for these playgrounds quite like their sheer proliferation. Inven-
opened as a new public playground. The relatively humble task of tories by different scholars situate the actual number designed by
its design had been handed down to a callow 29-year-old architect van Eyck as somewhere between 730 and 740, all carried out from
named Aldo van Eyck, who was then just five years out of the ETH 1947 to 1978. This would suggest that on average one playground
Zurich and working for the Amsterdam Public Works Department was produced every two weeks. Statistics of their scale are equally
under CIAM architect and planner Cornelis van Eesteren. Despite overwhelming. Although they vary in size often quite dramatically,
the modesty of the commission, the unveiling of the Bertelman- one could timidly estimate the average area occupied by a given
plein speelplaats was greeted with huge public approval, and playground at 150m2, in which case the total sum of land covered by
prompted commissions over the next three decades for an unprec- the playgrounds would be close to 105,000m2, or the entirety of the
edented number of similar playgrounds, all designed by van Eyck, area taken up by the city’s nineteenth-century Oosterpark.
in empty lots, streets, squares and parks all around the city. In this sense, mathematics, or at least the inviolability of raw
Today, almost 70 years later, this first foundational playground data, certainly helped transform the playgrounds into a kind of
remains remarkably unaltered. Its only adornment is the addition architectural and urban myth: one of largest, most radical and excit-
of a large sign installed across the street, celebrating its impor- ing exercises in serial architecture ever conceived. Despite their
tance as the starting point in both a distinguished architectural shared authorship, relative resemblance and repetition of common
career and a profound transformation of Amsterdam’s urban and elements, in actuality each playground represented a very particu-
social landscape. While the serial qualities of the project as a whole lar exercise and a single commission subjected to specific rules.
should really pale in comparison with these Ultimately, however, the defining element that
Aldo van Eyck, Speeltuin Jekerstraat,
deeper architectural and cultural resonances, Amsterdam, 1949–50, modified 1971 helped bring these playgrounds together as a
somehow nothing conveys the euphoria felt Photo © Nicolas Stutzin, 2013 narrative and as part of an urbanistic ideology
108 aa files 68
was not the physical trail they left behind but a series of photographs the Dutch-Hungarian photographer Eva Besnyö is credited in just
of children playing in them as they transformed the streets of Amster- a few photographs from 1959 and 1960, depicting children playing
dam: the most wonderful collection of images of an urban utopia. in various playgrounds as part of a series on Amsterdam street life.
Aldo van Eyck’s playgrounds, then, offer a photographic legacy In the same way, there is almost no reference to their architect – van
perhaps more enduring than their actual architecture – a subver- Eyck’s name is noted in only two photographs, one of the Zeedijk
sion of architectural value and importance that the Amsterdam playground (Besnyö, 1959) and one of the Koningsstraat playground
municipal archive in many ways conspired with, by systematically (anonymous, 1971).
commissioning photographs of each playground. The archive holds Immediately following van Eyck’s death in 1999, and as part of
more than a thousand of the resulting images, which depict in a number of efforts to catalogue and define his incredibly rich archi-
black-and-white and subtle sepia tones both an urban morphology tectural output, Liane Lefaivre and Alexander Tzonis wrote Aldo van
and children happy in play. What is significant is that the images do Eyck: Humanist Rebel – Inbetweening in a Postwar World. Although the
not simply capture the completed playground, but also show their book appeared more than half a century after the first playground
sites as they once were, so that each commission produced excep- photographs were taken, it seems to have been the first published
tionally photogenic ‘before and after’ images. Right from the outset, study to feature some of the archival ‘before and after’ images and
therefore, the playgrounds represented a perfect scenario for care- the impact of the playgrounds on the city’s landscape. By this stage,
fully photographing the recovery of Amsterdam’s postwar street life however, so many of the playgrounds the book was celebrating had
in a style that was both quasi-scientific and incredibly artful. already vanished. As Amsterdam continued to develop, over the 31
Ironically, its architect was also complicit in this seeming pro- years of their design and construction, the playgrounds were disap-
motion of photography over architecture, for it was almost uniquely pearing as fast as they were being built (and in fact, many of them
via photographs that van Eyck presented the project, and therefore were never built at all). So although more than 700 playgrounds
it was through pictures – both commissioned and as reference – were designed, at no point in time did they all exist together.
that the playgrounds were circulated within architectural circles. Drawn to these playgrounds and the myths surrounding them by
Their first major public appearance was in the ‘Lost Identity Grid’ the handful of wonderful images in Lefaivre and Tzonis’s book, in
introduced by van Eyck at the CIAM X meeting in Dubrovnik in 1956. 2013 I set out to trace a map of Amsterdam in which I would include
Like the archive in Amsterdam, this grid contained not a single the position of as many playground sites as I could find so as to
architectural drawing, but instead only featured large photographs visualise their distribution in both space and time. To do this I used
– by Wim Brusse, Cas Oorthuys and others – depicting empty the only known comprehensive list. This was compiled by Francis
Amsterdam streets alongside new images of the playgrounds glee- Strauven in 1980, based on the archive of the Site Preparation
fully occupied by local children. These were accompanied by a text Division of the Urban Development Department of the Amsterdam
by van Eyck, including his famously lyrical line that gave sense to Local Authority, and later published in the catalogue for the exhi-
the playgrounds as a corpus: ‘what we need is something more bition ‘Playgrounds by Aldo van Eyck’ that opened at the Stedelijk
permanent than snow’. Museum in Amsterdam in September 2002. Despite the unbe-
As much as it drew on Amsterdam’s own system of catalogu- lievable accuracy of Strauven’s list, using it to find more than 700
ing and archiving the city’s urban projects, van Eyck’s attention to locations proved to be quite a challenge. Having cycled across seem-
photography possibly also reflected an upsurge of interest in the ingly every inch of the city in a ten-day frenzy of surveying, I was
medium following the hugely successful ‘The Family of Man’ exhi- able to pinpoint only around 640 playgrounds, photographing them
bition held at the Museum of Modern Art in New York in 1955, just where I could so as to reconstruct the project from their ruins up.
a year before the Dubrovnik meeting. Curated by the American This archaeology revealed that a number of playgrounds remain
photographer Edward Steichen, the show featured over 500 images in a beautiful condition, largely because they have been lovingly
drawn from more than 60 different countries. Over the next eight restored, and even now have commemorative plaques. Others
years it toured different galleries and museums throughout the survive with little glory or fanfare, maintained but somehow now
world, including Holland, and its accompanying catalogue went on lost amid the modern housing slabs of van Eesteren’s Amsterdam
to sell over four million copies, symbolically cementing photogra- expansion plan. Several more have been renovated, their swings,
phy’s place as the best possible way of documenting what Steichen sandpits and climbing-frames replaced with playground furniture
saw as the universality of human experience. that is simple, generic and almost wholly plastic. In a few cases
Just like The Family of Man book and exhibition, the vast image all I could find were small traces – abandoned ruins of fragments
bank of playground photographs in Amsterdam’s municipal archive of the earlier sites – while for many others there is no trace at all,
is housed in small groups and in rather generic inventories, like the and the original playgrounds have long disappeared under subse-
‘City of Amsterdam Archive’ or the ‘Urban Development Depart- quent building and redevelopment. But of course what does still
ment’ collections. As a result, there is no systematic way of finding exist – full, complete and as wonderful as ever – are the archival
specific playgrounds. Moreover, and again very much in the spirit photographs. Hundreds and hundreds of images of both vernacu-
of Steichen’s egalitarian visual sweep through the world’s diverse lar Dutch gables and modern blocks enclosing little playground
places and cultures, with few exceptions the photographers remain oases, sometimes elegiacally empty, but in most cases full of chil-
anonymous. This, though, probably relates to dren totally lost in play. To see them in the
the fact that they were commissioned by the Research for this project was made possible Amsterdam municipal archive is to appreciate
by the support of a William Kinne Travelling
city archive and taken by staff photographers, the enduring qualities of an utterly compelling
Fellowship from the Graduate School
not out of artistic free will, but in response to of Architecture Planning and Preservation, piece of serial architecture reassuringly now
a civic mandate for documentary images. Only Columbia University more permanent than snow.
Moddermolensteeg, Tuinstraat,
Ponomastraat, Saffierstraat 42–46,
Joop Gerritzestraat 1–2–3,
Bertelmanplein 7–13
Moddermolensteeg, Tuinstraat,
Ponomastraat, Saffierstraat 42–46, Gordijnensteeg,
Joop Gerritzestraat 1–2–3, Zeedijk (between 104–120),
Bertelmanplein 7–13 Laagte Kadijk, Boerensteeg
Elzenstraat, Antillenstraat 20, Jekerstraat 55–59,
Laurierstraat, Palmgracht, Palmgracht, Prins, Bernhardpark,
Madelievenstraat, Mariniersplein,Zaanhof 33–34,
Sarphatipark, Pieter Vlamingstraat, Zeedijk 106–118,
Westzaanstraat 2, Saffierstraat 18–24, Jac P Thijsseplein