Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 8
Method in Archaeology: Middle-Range Theory as Hermeneuties Peter Kosso American Antiquity, Vol. 56, No. 4 (Oct., 1991), 621-627. Stable URL htp:/flinks.jstor-org/sicsici=0002-73 16% 28199 1 10%2956%3A4%3C621%3AMIAMTA% 3E2.0.CO®3B2- American Antiquity is currently published by Society for American Archaeology Your use of the ISTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at hup:/www,jstororglabout/terms.hml. ISTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www jstor.org/journals/sam. html ch copy of any part of'a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the sereen or printed page of such transmission, ISTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support @ jstor.org. hupulwwwjstor.org/ ‘Sat Nov 19 13:32:01 2005 METHOD IN ARCHAEOLOGY: MIDDLE-RANGE THEORY AS HERMENEUTICS Peter Koso Disagreements about methodology inarchacology are often located in terms ofthe mddle-range-theory approach of Lewis Binford and the hermeneutic, contextual archacology of lan Hodder. These positions are usually presented, in oppasition to each ather, but here they are shown to present very mauch the same methodological picture of “archaeology. This specific analysis is more generally informative ofthe methodological relation between the natural ‘and Socal scences, Desacuerdos aceren de metadologia en arqueotogta son frecuentementeplanteados en términas del enfogue de teortade rango medio de Lewis Binfordy la perspectva hermenéuticay contextual de lan Hodder. Estas posciones son presentadas normalmente en oposicidn, pero en el presente articulo se demuestra que ambas ofrecen una imagen metodolégica similar de la arqueoiogia. Este andlsis resulta mas informativo

Вам также может понравиться