Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Where the distances are the same, or very close, things might or might not work. For example,
adapting a Leica R mount lens (distance 47mm) to a Nikon F mount (distance 46.5mm) leaves only
0.5mm space, which might be too thin to make a usable adapter. Close cases also require that the
thread or bayonet of the lens must be small enough to fit entirely inside the mount of the body, and
this list gives no information. That said, there are examples where an adapter between two mounts of
exactly the same distance is possible, notably the Pentax K, for which Pentax M42 adapters are
readily available. Presumably Pentax designed the K mount with this in mind. Where no adapter is
possible, it is sometimes possible to modify a camera body with a mounting flange from some other
system; look here for an example. Note that this isn't a cheap option unless you are a Leica owner. Of
course, we can also modify the lens.
Where the distances are widely different, e.g. when adapting most medium-format lenses to most
35mm bodies, an adapter is usually feasible. Some manufacturers even encourage this, e.g. Pentax
and Contax.
More modern cameras make things much more complicated with proprietary electronic lens/body
connections for aperture control, autofocus, etc; even after buying or making a mechanical adapter,
many features of the lens just won't work. Most lens mount conversions sacrifice autofocus,
automatic exposure, or both. In some cases, even the camera's light-metering and focus confirm are
crippled. One exception is Canon and Sigma SA mounts; apparently the electronic protocols
reportedly match, and the lens register seems to be identical. Someone in China has apparently
converted a Canon L-series lens to work on his Sigma digital SLR; there is a discussion of the
relevant issues in this forum.
A more challenging approach is to build circuitry to translate between camera and lens; this is done
in a somewhat pricey conversion of Contax N lenses for modern cameras with automatic features
supported.
I have tried to code each entry by color corresponding to the original image format:
1 of 4 7/15/18, 8:48 PM
Camera Mounts Sorted by Register https://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~westin/misc/mounts-by-regist...
Bessamatic
D-mount 0.625″×32tpi 12.29 15.88 Exakta/Topcon RE bayonet 44.7 46
C-S mount 1″×32tpi 12.526 25.4 Voigtländer bayonet 44.7
thread Vitessa T
Bolex H8RX 1″×32tpi 15.31 25.4 Asahiflex M37×1 45.46 37
thread thread
Nikon 1 bayonet 17 40 ZM39 M39×26tpi 45.46 39
C-mount 1″×32tpi 17.526 25.4 M42: Pentax, M42×1 45.46 42
thread Praktica, Contax thread
S, …
Fujifilm X bayonet 17.7 Pentax K bayonet 45.46 44
Sony E bayonet 18 Petri bayonet 45.5 43
Micro Four Thirds bayonet 19.25 Contax/Yashica bayonet 45.5 48
Canon EX1/2 VL bayonet 20 Pentina breech 45.5
camcorder lock
Bolex breech 23.22 Ricoh breech 45.5
mount
Samsung NX bayonet 25.5 Olympus OM bayonet 46 46
Pentax Auto 110 bayonet 27 Contarex bayonet 46
Leica M bayonet 27.95 44 Nikon F bayonet 46.5 44
Konica Hexar RF bayonet 28 Leica R bayonet 47 49
Narcissus M24×1 28.8 24 Éclair CA-1 bayonet 48 46
thread
Canon screw M39×1 28.8 39 Contax N bayonet 48 55
thread
Leica screw M39×26tpi 28.8 39 B4 bayonet 48
Opema 38mm thread 28.8 HDTV 2/3″ B4 48
bayonet
Olympus Pen F bayonet 28.95 Icarex breech 48
lock
Contax G1 bayonet 29 44 Praktina breech 50 46
lock
Robot M26×0.5 31 26 Adaptall bayonet(?) 50.7 54
thread
Robot bayonet 31 Arri Maxi PL breech 52 64
lock
Hasselblad Xpan bayonet 34.27 46 Arri PL breech 52 64
lock
Contax RF dual bayonet 34.85 44 Arriflex bayonet 52
2 of 4 7/15/18, 8:48 PM
Camera Mounts Sorted by Register https://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~westin/misc/mounts-by-regist...
3 of 4 7/15/18, 8:48 PM
Camera Mounts Sorted by Register https://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~westin/misc/mounts-by-regist...
4 of 4 7/15/18, 8:48 PM