CA plane, the evidence shows that overshooting of the
runway and crash-landing at the mangrove was Facts: caused by the pilot for which acts the defendant Private respondent Jesus Samson was a regular co- must answer for damages caused thereby. And for pilot of PAL. During one of his flights from Manila to the negligence of defendant’s employee, it is Legazpi with Captain Delfin Bustamante, they made liable. At least, the law presumes the employer a crash landing at Daet where Samson suffered negligent imposing upon it the burden of proving physical injuries in the head. Samson alleges that that it exercised the diligence of a good father of a the accident was due to the gross negligence of PAL family in the supervision of its employees. in allowing Bustamante who was suffering from a long standing tumor of the Nasopharynx but was As defined in Art. 1732, NCC, petitioner is a also allowed by the Civil Aeronautics Administration common carrier. The law is clear in requiring a to fly as a co-pilot; and that because of the tumor common carrier to exercise the highest degree of Bustamante has a slow reaction and poor judgment. care in the discharge of its duty and business of carriage and transportation under Art. 1733, 1755 Issue: and 1756, NCC. WON PAL was negligent as a common carrier in The duty to exercise the utmost diligence on the allowing Bustamante to fly as a First Officer the day part of common carriers is for the safety of of the accident. Or, WON the same carrier is liable passengers as well as for the members of the crew for the accident even if Bustamante was not sick. or the complement operating the carrier, the airplane in the case at bar. And this must be so for Held: YES and YES. any omission, lapse or neglect thereof will certainly For having allowed Bustamante to fly as a First result to the damage, prejudice, nay injuries and Officer on January 8, 1951, defendant is guilty of even death to all aboard the plane, passengers and gross negligence and therefore should be made crew members alike. liable for the resulting accident. (Even) assuming that the pilot was not sick or that the tumor did not affect the pilot in managing the
United States v. Charles Focht, An Individual, and Mark Focht, An Individual, Doing Business Under The Name Liberty Industries, 882 F.2d 55, 3rd Cir. (1989)