Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Pharmacists with specialized education, training, or experience 1. Swen JJ, Nijenhuis M, de Boer A, et al. Pharmaco-
in pharmacogenomics should also assume the following ad- genetics: from bench to byte—an update of guidelines.
ditional functions: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 89(5):662–73.
2. Manolio TA, Chisholm RL, Ozenberger B, et al.
• Developing pharmacogenomic-specific clinical de- Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the fu-
cision support tools in electronic health record sys- ture is now. Genet Med. 2013; 15(4):258–67.
tems that guide prescribers on the appropriate use and 3. Wu AC, Fuhlbrigge AL. Economic evaluation of
dosing of medicines based on a patient’s pharmaco- pharmacogenetic tests. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;
genomic profile.11-13 84(2):272–4.
• Developing a process, including patient-specific edu- 4. Relling MV, Klein TE. CPIC: Clinical Pharmaco-
cational materials, to explain to patients the impor- genetics Implementation Consortium of the Pharmaco-
tance and significance of their pharmacogenomic test genomics Research Network. Clin Pharmacol Ther.
results, not only in the short term but also over the pa- 2011; 89(3):464–7.
tient’s lifetime. 5. ASHP policy position 1104: Pharmacogenomics. In:
• Developing institutional guidelines and processes Hawkins B, ed. Best practices for hospital and health-
for implementation of a clinical pharmacogenomic system pharmacy: positions and guidance documents
service. of ASHP. 2013–2014 ed. Bethesda, MD: American
• Establishing a process for communicating patient- Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2013:162.
specific results, including documentation of the results http://www.ashp.org/DocLibrary/BestPractices/
in the patient’s health record. FormularyPositions.aspx (accessed 2014 Jun 19).
• Establishing a mechanism for revisable reporting (re- 6. Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug
interpretation of findings based on evolving science) Labeling. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/scienceresearch/
over the course of the patient’s care with the institution researchareas/pharmacogenetics/ucm083378.htm (ac-
and beyond. cessed 2014 Jun 19).
• Developing processes to document improved patient 7. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium
outcomes and economic benefits resulting from clini- [CPIC]. Drug-Gene Pairs. www.pharmgkb.org/page/
cal pharmacogenomics. cpicGeneDrugPairs (accessed 2014 Jun 19).
• Serving as an expert consultant on a clinical pharma- 8. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
cogenomics service. Endorsed Documents. http://www.ashp.org/menu/
• Contributing to the evaluation and implementation of PracticePolicy/PolicyPositionsGuidelinesBestPractices/
clinical pharmacogenomic testing as an integral part of BrowsebyDocumentType/EndorsedDocuments.aspx
medication therapy. (accessed 2014 Jun 19).
• Promoting collaborative relationships with other 9. Feero WG, Kuo GM, Jenkins JR, et al. Pharmacist ed-
health care professionals and departments involved in ucation in the era of genomic medicine. J Am Pharm
drug therapy to encourage the development and appro- Assoc. 2012; 52:e113–e121.
priate use of pharmacogenomic principles in patient 10. Hicks JK, Crews KR, Hoffman JM, et al. A clinician-
care. driven automated system for integration of pharma-
332 Medication Therapy and Patient Care: Specific Practice Areas–Statements
cogenetic interpretations into an electronic medical FCCP, BCPS (AQ-Cardiology) are gratefully acknowledged for
record. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 92(5):563–6. drafting this statement. Mary V. Relling, Pharm.D., and Kristine R.
11. Welch BM, Kawamoto K. Clinical decision sup- Crews, Pharm.D., BCPS, are gratefully acknowledged for their re-
port for genetically guided personalized medicine: view of and contributions to the statement.
a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;
20(2):388–400. The following individuals are gratefully acknowledged for review-
12. Pulley JM,, et al. Operational implementation of ing this statement (review does not imply endorsement): Manju T.
prospective genotyping for personalized medicine: Beier, Pharm.D., CGP; Gillian C. Bell, Pharm.D.; Larisa H. Caval-
the design of the Vanderbilt PREDICT project. Clin lari, Pharm.D., BCPS; J. Kevin Hicks, Pharm.D., Ph.D.; Shannon
Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 92(1):87–95. Manzi, Pharm.D.; Darius Mason, Pharm.D., BCPS; Teresa Vo,
13. Bell GC, Crews KR, Wilkinson MR, et al. Development Pharm.D.; and Kristin Weitzel, Pharm.D., CDE, FAPhA.
and use of active clinical decision support for preemp-
tive pharmacogenomics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Copyright © 2015, American Society of Health-System Pharma-
2013. DOI: 10.1136/anuajnl-2013-001993 [Epub ahead cists, Inc. All rights reserved.
of print].
The bibliographic citation for this document is as follows: Ameri-
can Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP statement on the
Developed through the ASHP Section of Clinical Specialists and pharmacist’s role in clinical pharmacogenomics. Am J Health-Syst
Scientists Section Advisory Group on Emerging Sciences, and ap- Pharm. 2015; 72:579–81.
proved by the ASHP Board of Directors on April 10, 2014, and by
the ASHP House of Delegates on June 1, 2014.