Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SHARE
With a potential outbreak of a trade war between China and the US, talks of
the Chinese using currency devaluation as a strategy have been rumbling.
However, the volatility and risks involved may not make it worth it this time, as
China has made recent efforts to stabilize and globalize the Yuan.
In the past, the Chinese denied it, but the second largest economy in the
world has time and time again been accused of devaluing its currency in order
to advantage its own economy, especially by Donald Trump. The ironic thing
is that for many years, the United States government had been pressuring the
Chinese to devalue the Yuan, arguing that it gave them an unfair advantage in
international trade and kept their prices for capital and labor artificially low.
Ever since world currencies abandoned the gold standard and allowed their
exchange rates to float freely against each other, there have been many
currency devaluation events that have hurt not only the citizens of the country
involved but have also rippled across the globe. If the fallout can be so
widespread, why do countries devalue their currency?
To Boost Exports
On a world market, goods from one country must compete with those from all
other countries. Car makers in America must compete with car makers in
Europe and Japan. If the value of the euro decreases against the dollar, the
price of the cars sold by European manufacturers in America, in dollars, will
be effectively less expensive than they were before. On the other hand, a
more valuable currency make exports relatively more expensive for purchase
in foreign markets. (See also: Interesting Facts About Imports and Exports.)
Again, this tactic should be used with caution. As most countries around the
globe have some debt outstanding in one form or another, a race to the
bottom currency war could be initiated. This tactic will also fail if the country in
question holds a large number of foreign bonds since it will
make those interest payments relatively more costly.
On Aug. 11, 2015, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) surprised markets with
three consecutive devaluations of the yuan renminbi or yuan for short (CNY),
knocking over 3% off its value. Since 2005, China’s currency has appreciated
33% against the U.S. dollar, and the first devaluation marked the largest
single drop in 20 years. While the move was unexpected and believed by
many to be a desperate attempt by China to boost exports in support of an
economy that was growing at its slowest rate in a quarter century, the PBOC
claimed that the devaluation is all part of its reforms to move towards a
more market-oriented economy. The move had serious repercussions around
the world.
Surprised Markets
After a decade of a steady appreciation against the US dollar, investors had
become accustomed to the stability and growing strength of the yuan. Thus,
while a somewhat insignificant change in the grand scheme of Forex things,
the drop – which amounted to 4% over the next two days – had investors
rattled.
U.S. stock markets and indexes, including the Dow Jones Industrial Average
(DJIA) and the S&P 500, as well as European and Latin American markets,
fell in response. Most currencies were set reeling as well. While some argued
that the move signaled an attempt to make exports look more attractive, even
as the Chinese economy's expansion was bogging down, the PBOC indicated
that the devaluation was motivated by other factors. (For more, see: China’s
Economic Indicators, Impact On Markets.)
At the time, one professor at Cornell University indicated that the move was
also consistent with China’s “slow but steady” market-oriented reforms. And in
fact, the currency devaluation was one of many monetary policy tools the
PBOC employed in 2015, including interest rate cuts and tighter financial
market regulation.
Within in the basket, the Chinese renminbi has a weight of 10.92%, which is
more than the weights of the Japanese yen (JPY) and U.K. pound sterling
(GBP), at 8.33% and 8.09%, respectively. The rate of borrowing funds from
the IMF depends on the interest rate of the SDR. As currency rates and
interest rates are interlinked, the cost of borrowing from the IMF for its 188
member nations will now in part hinge on China's interest and currency rates.
Skeptical Views
Despite the IMF response, many doubted China’s commitment to free market
values, arguing that the new exchange-rate policy was still akin to a
“managed float"; the devaluation was just another intervention and the yuan’s
value would continue to be closely monitored and managed by the PBOC,
they charged. Also, the devaluation occurred just days after data showed a
sharp fall in China’s exports – down 8.3% in July from the previous year –
evidence that the government's slashing of interest rates and fiscal stimulus
had not been as effective as hoped. So, skeptics didn't buy the market-
oriented-reform rationale, instead interpreting the devaluation as a desperate
attempt to stimulate China's sluggish economy and keep exports from falling
further.
Impact on India
For India in particular, a weaker Chinese currency had several implications.
As a result of China’s decision to let the yuan fall against the dollar, demand
for dollars surged around the globe, including in India, where investors bought
into the safety of the greenback at the expense of the rupee. The Indian
currency immediately plunged to a two-year low against the dollar and
remained low throughout the latter half of 2015. The dollar-to-rupee exchange
rate referenced by the global currency markets strengthened more than 5%
since mid-August. The threat of greater emerging market risk-off as a result of
the yuan devaluation led to increased volatility in Indian bond markets, which
triggered additional weakness for the rupee.
On the flip side, falling commodity prices are making it much more difficult for
Indian producers to remain competitive, especially
highly leveraged companies operating in the steel, mining and chemical
industries. In addition, it is reasonable to expect the yuan depreciation will
lead to further weakness in the price of other commodities that India imports
from China, making it all the more difficult for India to remain competitive both
domestically and internationally.