Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CONE Q2
arXiv:1703.07664v1 [math.GM] 7 Mar 2017
1. Introduction
Human being were bewitched by curves and curved shapes long before they took
into account them as mathematical objects. But the greatest effect in the research
of curves was, of course, the discovery of the calculus. Geometry before calculus
includes only the simplest curves.
In classical curve theory, the geometry of a curve in three-dimensions is actually
characterized by Frenet vectors.
Smarandache geometry is a geometry which has at least one Smarandachely
denied axiom [4]. An axiom is said to be Smarandachely denied, if it behaves in at
least two different ways within the same space. Smarandache curve is defined as a
regular curve whose position vector is composed by Frenet frame vectors of another
regular curve. Smarandache curves in various ambient spaces have been classfied
in [1]-[14], [19], [21]-[32].
In this study, we define special Smarandache curves such as xα, xy, αy and xαy
Smarandache curves according to asymptotic orthonormal frame in the null cone
Q2 and we examine the curvature and the asymptotic orthonormal frame’s vectors
of Smarandache curves. We also give an example related to these curves.
2. Preliminaries
Some basics of the curves in the null cone are provided from, [15]-[18].
Let E13 be the 3−dimensional pseudo-Euclidean space with the
g(X, Y ) = hX, Y i = x1 y1 + x2 y2 − x3 y3
e
for all X = (x1 , x2 , x3 ), Y = (y1 , y2 , y3 ) ∈ E13 . E13 is a flat pseudo-Riemannian
manifold of signature (2, 1).
Date: 2017.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 53A40; Secondary 53A35.
Key words and phrases. Smarandache curve, asymptotic orthonormal frame, null cone, cone
frame formulas.
This paper is in final form and no version of it will be submitted for publication elsewhere.
1
2 MIHRIBAN KULAHCI AND FATMA ALMAZ
x′ (s) = α(s)
(2.1) α′ (s) = κ(s)x(s) − y(s)
y ′ (s) = −κ(s)α(s)
where the function κ(s) is called cone curvature function of the curve x(s), [17].
Let x : I → Q2 ⊂ E13 be a spacelike curve in Q2 with an arc length parameter
s. Then x = x(s) = (x1 , x2 , x3 ) can be written as
fs−1 2
(2.2) x(s) = (f − 1, 2f, f 2 + 1)
2
for some non constant function f (s) and fs = f ′ , [18].
where c, b ∈ R+
0.
Theorem 1. Let x be unit speed spacelike curve in Q2 with the moving asymptotic
orthonormal frame {x, α, y} and cone curvature κ(s) and let γxα be xα−smarandache
curve with asymptotic orthonormal frame {γxα , αxα , yxα } . Then the following re-
lations hold:
i) The asymptotic orthonormal frame {γxα , αxα , yxα } of the xα-smarandache
curve γxα is given as
c
γxα b 1 0 x
(3.2) αxα = ψ b κψ − b ψ α
c c
yxα ̺1 ̺2 ̺3 y
where
c
(3.3) ψ= √ ,
c2 − 2κb2
b b b2 2
Υ1 = ( κ′ + κ)ψψ ′ + 2 κ (ψ ′ ) ,
c c c
b b
(3.4) Υ2 = ψ(ψ ′ + 2 κψ),
c c
b b
Υ3 = − ψ( ψ ′ + ψ)
c c
and
c c
̺1 = −(Υ1 + 2Υ1 Υ3 + Υ22 ) = −Υ1 + κγxα (s∗ ),
2b b
1
(3.5) ̺2 = −(Υ2 + 2Υ1 Υ3 + Υ22 ) = −Υ2 + κγxα (s∗ ),
2
̺3 = −Υ3 .
ii) The cone curvature κγxα (s∗ ) of the curve γxα is given by
1
(3.6) κγxα (s∗ ) = − 2Υ1 Υ3 + Υ22 .
2
where Z
1 p 2
s∗ = c − 2b2 κ(s)ds.
b
Proof. i) We assume that the curve x is a unit speed spacelike curve with the
asymptotic orthonormal frame {x, α, y} and cone curvature κ. Differentiating the
equation (3.1) with respect to s and considering (2.1), we have
′ b b
(3.7) γxα (s∗ ) = A α(s) + κx(s) − y(s) ,
c c
where
ds∗ 1p 2
(3.8) = c − 2b2 κ(s),
ds b
c
(3.9) ψ=p .
c − 2κ(s)b2
2
′
It can be easily seen that the tangent vector γxα (s∗ ) = αxα (s∗ ) is a unit spacelike
vector.
Differentiating (3.7) , we obtain equation as follows
′′
(3.10) γxα (s∗ ) = Υ1 x(s) + Υ2 α(s) + Υ3 y(s),
4 MIHRIBAN KULAHCI AND FATMA ALMAZ
where
b b b2 2
Υ1 = ( κ′ + κ)ψψ ′ + 2 κ (ψ ′ ) ,
c c c
b b
Υ2 = ψ(ψ ′ + 2 κψ),
c c
b b ′
Υ3 = − ψ( ψ + ψ).
c c
1 ′′
(3.11) yxα (s∗ ) = −γxα
′′
− hγ , γ ′′ i γxα
2 xα xα
By the help of previous equation (3.11), we obtain
(3.12) yxα (s∗ ) = ̺1 x(s) + ̺2 α(s) + ̺3 y(s),
where ̺1 = −(Υ1 + 2bc
2Υ1 Υ3 + Υ22 ), ̺2 = −(Υ2 + 21 2Υ1 Υ3 + Υ22 ), ̺3 = −Υ3 .
ii) The curvature κγxα (s∗ ) of the γxα (s∗ ) is explicity obtained by
1 ′′
κγxα (s∗ ) = − hγxα ′′
, γxα i
2
1
(3.13) = − 2Υ1 Υ3 + Υ22 .
2
Thus, the theorem is proved.
Definition 2. Let x be unit speed spacelike curve lying on Q2 with the moving as-
ymptotic orthonormal frame {x, α, y} . Then, xy−smarandache curve of x is defined
by
1
(3.14) γxy (s∗ ) = √ (cx(s) + by(s)) ,
2cb
where c, b ∈ R+
0.
Theorem 2. Let x be unit speed spacelike curve in Q2 with the moving asymptotic
orthonormal frame {x, α, y} and cone curvature κ and let γxy be xy−smarandache
curve with asymptotic orthonormal frame {γxy , αxy , yxy } . Then the following re-
lations hold:
i) The asymptotic orthonormal frame {γxy , αxy , yxy } of the xy−smarandache
curve γxy is given as
p q
c b
γxy 2b 0 2c x
(3.15) αxy = 0 0
2√ 1 √ α .
yxy bκ 2bc c 2bc
0 (c−bκ)2 y
(c−bκ)2
ii) The cone curvature κγxy (s∗ ) of the curve γxy is given by
2bcκ(s)
(3.16) κγxy (s∗ ) = 2,
(c − bκ(s))
where
Z
∗ 1
(3.17) s =√ (c − bκ(s)) ds.
2cb
FIRAT UNIVERSITY 5
Proof. i) We assume that the curve x is a unit speed spacelike curve with the
asymptotic orthonormal frame {x, α, y} and cone curvature κ. Differentiating the
equation (3.14) with respect to s and considering (2.1), we have
ds∗ 1
(3.18) ′
γxy (s∗ ) =√ (c − bκ(s)) −
→
α (s).
ds 2cb
By considering (3.17), we get
′
(3.19) γxy (s∗ ) = α(s) = αxy .
′′ ds∗
(3.20) γxy (s∗ ) = κx(s) − y(s).
ds
By substituting (3.17) into (3.20) and making necessary calculations, we obtain
√ √
′′ ∗ κ 2bc − → 2bc − →
(3.21) γxy (s ) = x − 2 y .
(c − bκ) (c − bκ)
′′ ′′
By the help of equation yxy (s∗ ) = −γxy′′
− 21 γxy , γxy γxy , we write
√ √
b 2bc.κ2 c 2bc
(3.22) yxy (s∗ ) = x(s) + y(s).
(c − bκ)2 (c − bκ)2
ii) The curvature κγxy (s∗ ) of the γxy (s∗ ) is explicity obtained by
1
′′ ′′ 2bcκ(s)
κγxy (s∗ ) = − γ ,γ = .
2 xy xy (c − bκ(s))2
Definition 3. Let x be unit speed spacelike curve lying on Q2 with the moving as-
ymptotic orthonormal frame {x, α, y} . Then, αy−smarandache curve of x is defined
by
b
(3.23) γαy (s∗ ) = α(s) + y(s),
c
where c, b ∈ R+
0.
Theorem 3. Let x be unit speed spacelike curve in Q2 with the moving asymptotic
orthonormal frame {x, α, y} and cone curvature κ and let γαy be αy−smarandache
curve with asymptotic orthonormal frame {γαy , ααy , yαy } . Then the following re-
lations hold:
i) The asymptotic orthonormal frame {γαy , ααy , yαy } of the αy−smarandache
curve γαy is given as
b
γαy 0
√
1
√ c
√ x
(3.24) ααy = c κ
b2 −2c2
√ √ b κ √c κ
α ,
b2 −2c2 κ b2 −2c2
yαy ω1 ω2 ω3 y
6 MIHRIBAN KULAHCI AND FATMA ALMAZ
where
cκ′ c − 2κb
ζ1 = 2 ,
b − 2c2 2κ
cκ′ c−b−1
(3.25) ζ2 = 2 2
,
b − 2c 2κ
cκ′ bκ − c
ζ3 = 2 2
b − 2c 2κ2
and
ω1 = −ζ1 ,
1
(3.26) ω2 = −(ζ2 + 2ζ1 ζ3 + ζ22 ),
2
b
ω3 = −(ζ3 + 2ζ1 ζ3 + ζ22 ).
2c
ii) The cone curvature κγαy (s∗ ) of the curve γαy is given by
∗ c2 κ′ 2 1 2
(3.27) κγαy (s ) = − ( ) (c − 2κb) (bκ − c) + (c − b − 1) ,
8 (b2 − 2c2 )2 κ κ
where
√ Z p
∗ b2 − 2c2
(3.28) s = κ(s)ds.
c
Proof. i) Let the curve x be a unit speed spacelike curve with the asymptotic
orthonormal frame {x, α, y} and cone curvature κ. Differentiating the equation
(3.23) with respect to s and considering (2.1), we find
′ ds∗ −−→ b −−→ −−→
γαy (s∗ ) = κx(s) − κα(s) − y(s).
ds c
This can be written as following
ds∗ −−→ b −−→ −−→
(3.29) ααy (s∗ ) = κx(s) − κα(s) − y(s),
ds c
where
√
ds∗ b2 − 2c2 p
(3.30) = κ(s).
ds c
By substituting (3.30) into (3.29), we find
√ √ √
∗ c κ − → b κ − → c κ →
−
(3.31) ααy (s ) = √ x −√ α − √ y.
b2 − 2c2 b2 − 2c2 κ b2 − 2c2
Differentiating (3.31) and using (3.30), we get
′′
γαy (s∗ ) = ζ1 x(s) + ζ2 α(s) + ζ3 y(s),
′ ′ ′
where ζ1 = b2cκ
−2c2
c−2κb
2κ , ζ2 = b2cκ
−2c2
c−b−1
2κ , ζ3 = b2cκ
−2c2
bκ−c
2κ2 .
1
′′
(3.32) yαy (s∗ ) = −γαy ′′
− γ , γ ′′ γαy .
2 αy αy
By the help of equation (3.32), we obtain
(3.33) yαy (s∗ ) = ω1 x(s) + ω2 α(s) + ω3 y(s),
where ω1 = −ζ1 , ω2 = −(ζ2 + 12 2ζ1 ζ3 + ζ22 ), ω3 = −(ζ3 + 2c b
2ζ1 ζ3 + ζ22 ).
FIRAT UNIVERSITY 7
ii) The curvature κγαy (s∗ ) of the γαy (s∗ ) is explicity obtained by
′ 2
∗ c2 κ (c − 2κb) (bκ − c) 2
κγαy (s ) = − 2 + (c − b − 1) .
8 (b2 − 2c2 ) κ κ
Definition 4. Let x be unit speed spacelike curve lying on Q2 with the moving
asymptotic orthonormal frame {x, α, y} . Then, xαy−smarandache curve of x is
defined by
1
(3.34) γxαy (s∗ ) = √ (cx(s) + bα(s) + c∗ y(s)) ,
2cc∗ + b2
where c, c∗ , b ∈ R+
0.
Theorem 4. Let x be unit speed spacelike curve in Q2 with the moving asymptotic
orthonormal frame {x, α, y} and cone curvature κ and let γxαy be xαy−smarandache
curve with asymptotic orthonormal frame {γxαy , αxαy , yxαy } . Then the following
relations hold:
i) The asymptotic orthonormal frame {γxαy , αxαy , yxαy } of the xαy−smarandache
curve γxαy is given as
∗
γxαy √ c √ b √ c x
2cc∗ +b2 2cc∗ +b2 2cc∗ +b2
(3.35) αxαy = ρ1 ρ2 ρ3 α
yxαy σ1 σ2 σ3 y
where
q
η= (c − c∗ κ(s))2 − 2b2 κ(s)
bκ(s) c − c∗ κ(s) b
(3.36) ρ1 = , ρ2 = , ρ3 = −
η η η
ξ1 = (ρ′1 + ρ2 κ) , ξ2 = ρ′2 + ρ1 + ρ3 κ, ξ3 = −ρ′3 − ρ2
and
c
σ1 = −ξ1 − √ 2ξ1 ξ3 + ξ22 ,
2 2cc + b
∗ 2
b
(3.37) σ2 = −ξ2 − √ 2ξ1 ξ3 + ξ22 ,
2 2cc + b
∗ 2
c∗
σ3 = −ξ3 − √ 2ξ1 ξ3 + ξ22 .
2 2cc + b
∗ 2
ii) The cone curvature κγxαy (s∗ ) of the curve γxαy is given by
′ ! !
∗ ′ ∗
κ c − c κ b c − c κ
κγyxα (s∗ ) = b + κ +
η η η η
′
1 c − c∗ κ
(3.38) − .
2 η
where
Z q
1 2
(3.39) ∗
s = √ (c − c∗ κ(s)) − 2b2 κ(s)ds, b, c, c∗ ∈ R+
0.
2cc∗ + b2
8 MIHRIBAN KULAHCI AND FATMA ALMAZ
Proof. i) Differentiating the equation (3.34) with respect to s and considering (2.1),
we find
ds∗ 1 −−→ −−→ −−−→
′
(3.40) γxαy (s∗ ) =√ bκx(s) + (c − c∗ κ) α(s) − by(s) .
ds 2cc∗ + b2
This can be written as follows
bκ −−→ c − c∗ κ −−→ b −−→
(3.41) αxαy (s∗ ) = x(s) + α(s) − y(s),
η η η
or
−−→ −−→ −−→
(3.42) αxαy (s∗ ) = ρ1 x(s) + ρ2 α(s) − ρ3 y(s).
where
q
ds∗ 1 2
(3.43) = √ (c − c∗ κ) − 2b2 κ
ds 2cc∗ + b2
Differentiating (3.42) and using (3.43), we get
′′
γxyα (s∗ ) = ξ1 x(s) + ξ2 α(s) + ξ3 y(s),
where ξ1 = (ρ′1 + ρ2 κ) , ξ2 = ρ′2 + ρ1 + ρ3 κ, ξ3 = −ρ′3 − ρ2 .
1
′′
(3.44) yxαy (s∗ ) = −γxαy
′′
− γ , γ ′′ γxαy .
2 xαy xαy
By the help of equation (3.44), we obtain
(3.45) yxay (s∗ ) = σ1 x(s) + σ2 α(s) + σ3 y(s),
where σ1 = −ξ1 − 2√2ccc∗ +b2 2ξ1 ξ3 + ξ22 , σ2 = −ξ2 − 2√2ccb∗ +b2 2ξ1 ξ3 + ξ22 , σ3 =
c∗
−ξ3 − 2√2cc ∗ +b2
2ξ1 ξ3 + ξ22 .
′′
ii) From κγxαy (s∗ ) = − 12 γxαy ′′
, γxαy , we have
′ ! ! ′
′
∗ κ c − c∗ κ b c − c∗ κ 1 c − c∗ κ
κγyxα (s ) = b + κ + − .
η η η η 2 η
Figure 1
FIRAT UNIVERSITY 11
References
[1] Abdel-Aziz, H.S., Saad, M.K., Smarandache Curves of Some Special Curves in the Galilean
3−Space, Honan Mathematical J., 37(2), 253-264, 2015.
[2] Ali, A.T., ” Special Smarandache Curves in the Euclidean Space”, International Journal of
Mathematical Combinatorics, vol.2, 30-36, 2010.
[3] Ali, A.T., Time-like Smarandache Curves Derived from a Space-like Helix, Journal of Dy-
namical Systems and Geometric Theories, 8(1), 93-100, 2010.
[4] Ashbacher, C., Smarandache Geometries, Smarandache Notions Journal, 8(1-3), 212-215,
1997.
[5] Bayrak, N., Bektas, O. and Yuce, S., Special Smarandache Curves in R31 , Commun. Fac. Sci.
Univ. Ank. Ser. A1 Math. Stat., 65(2), 143-160, 2016.
[6] Bektas, O. and Yuce, S., ”Special Smarandache Curves According to Darboux Frame in E 3 ”,
Romanian Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 3(1),48-59, 2013.
[7] Cetin, M., Kocayiğit, H., On the Quaternionic Smarandache Curves in Euclidean 3−Space,
8(3),139-150, 2013.
[8] Cetin, M., Tuncer, Y., Karacan, M.K., Smarandache Curves According to Bishop Frame in
Euclidean 3−Space, Gen. Math. Notes, 20(2), 50-66, 2014.
[9] Elzawy, M., Mosa, S., Smarandache Curves in the Galilean 4−Space G4 , Journal of the
Egyptian Math. Soc., 25, 53–56, 2017.
[10] Kahraman, T., Ugurlu, H.H., Dual Smarandashe Curves and Smarandache Ruled Surfaces,
Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes, 2(1), 83-98,2014.
[11] Kahraman, T., Ugurlu, H.H., Smarandache Curves of a Spacelike Curve Lying on Unit Dual
Lorentzian Sphere Se12 , CBU J. of Sci., 11(2), 93-105, 2015.
[12] Korpinar, T., Turhan, E., Smarandache π1 π2 Curves of Biharmonic New Type Constant
π2 −Slope Curves According to type−2 Bishop Frame in the Sol Space GDL3 , Acta Univer-
sitatis Apulensis, No.35, 245-249, 2013.
[13] Korpinar, T., New type Surfaces in terms of B−Smarandache Curves in Sol3 , Acta Scien-
tiarum Technology, 37(3), 389-393, 2015.
[14] Korpinar, T., Turhan, E., A New Characterization of Smarandache tsα Curves According
to Sabban Frame in Heisenberg Group Heis3 , Int. J. Open Problems Compt. Math., 5(4),
147-155, 2012.
[15] Kulahci, M., Bektas, M., Ergüt, M., Curves of AW(k)-Type in 3-Dimensional Null Cone,
Physics Letters A 371, 275-277, 2007.
[16] Kulahci, M., Almaz, F., Some Characterizations of Osculating in the Lightlike Cone, Bol.
Soc. Paran. Math., 35(2), 39-48, 2017.
[17] Liu, H., Curves in the Lightlike Cone, Contribbutions to Algebra and Geometry, 45 (1),
291-303, 2004.
[18] Liu, H., Meng, Q., Representation Formulas of Curves in a Two- and Three-Dimensional
Lightlike Cone, Results Math. 59, 437-451, 2011.
[19] Mak, M., Altinbas, H., Spacelike Smarandache Curves of a Timelike Curves in Anti de Sitter
3-Space, International J. Math. Combin., Vol.3, 1-16,2016.
[20] O’Neill, B., ”Semi-Riemannian Geometry with Applications to Relativity”, Academic Press,
London, 1983.
[21] Ozturk, U. and Ozturk, E.B.K., ” Smarandache Curves According to Curves on Spacelike Sur-
face in Minkowski 3−Space R31 ”, Journal of Discrete Mathematics, vol. 2014, article ID829581,
10 pages, 2014.
[22] Ozturk, U. and Ozturk, E.B.K., Ilarslan, K., Nesovic, E., On Smarandache Curves Lying in
Lightcone in Minkowski 3−Space, Journal of Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories,
12(1), 81-91, 2014.
[23] Savas, M., Yakut, A.T., Tamirci, T., The Smarandache Curves on H02 , Gazi University
Journal of Science, 29(1), 69-77, 2016.
[24] Senyurt, S., Calıskan, A., Celik, U., N ∗ C ∗ -Smarandache Curves of Bertrand Curves Pair
According to Frenet Frame, International J. Math. Combin., 1, 1-7,2016.
[25] Senyurt, S., Cevahir, C., Altun, Y., On Spatial Quaternionic Involute Curve a New View,
Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, DOI: 10.1007/s00006-016-0669-7, 2016.
[26] Senyurt, S., Calıskan, A., Smarandache Curves in Terms of Sabban Frame of Fixed Pole
Curve, Bol. Soc. Paran. Math., 34(2), 53-62, 2016.
12 MIHRIBAN KULAHCI AND FATMA ALMAZ
[27] Senyurt, S., Calıskan, A., Smarandache Curves in Terms of Sabban Frame of Spherical Indi-
catrix Curves, Gen. Math. Notes, 31(2), 1-15, 2015.
[28] Taskopru, K. and Tosun, M., ”Smarandache Curves on S 2 ”, Boletim da Sociedade Paranaense
de Matematica, 32(1), 51-59, 2014.
[29] Turgut, M. and Yilmaz, S., Smarandache Curves in Minkowski Spacetime, International
Journal of Mathematical Combinatorics, vol.3, 51-55, 2008.
[30] Turhan, E., Korpinar, T., On Smarandache ts Curves of Biharmonic s-Curves According
to Sabban Frame in Heisenberg group Heis3 , Advances Modeling and Optimization, 14(2),
343-349, 2012.
[31] Yilmaz, S., Unluturk, Y., A Note on Spacelike Curves According to Type−2 Bishop Frame
in Minkowski 3−Space E13 , International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 103(2),
321-332, 2015.
[32] Yilmaz, S., Savcı, U.Z., Smarandache Curves and Applications According to Type−2 Bishop
Frame in Euclidean 3−Space, Int. J. Math. Combin. Vol.2, 1-15, 2016.