Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The Pitch: A coastal town at the far end (defended by the Commagene army) on a headland between
two rivers and some marshy and rough ground. There was some urban development beyond the
bypass along with a small fort. The ground then opened up into a plain with the attacker’s (Corinthians)
fort at the near end with its rear protected by steep hills.
The Teams: Both sides numbered about 5,500 with their cores being low quality close order infantry.
The Commagene phalangites had better armour than the Corinthian hoplites and also the Commagene
force had a stronger cavalry contingent.
Corinthians Commagene
200 Good Hoplites (Strategos’ Guard) 1,600 Militia Phalangites
1,800 Militia Hoplites 1,600 Raw Phalangites
1,800 Raw Hoplites 300 Militia Peltasts
150 Aristocratic Peltasts 900 Pressed Archers
150 Trained Peltasts 300 Guard Cavalry (King’s Escort)
600 Volunteer Peltasts 300 Militia Cavalry
400 Foot Skirmishers 200 Aristocratic Cataphracts
150 Volunteer Cavalry 300 Horse Archers
200 Light Cavalry
The Tactics: The Commagene King had his troops spread throughout the town with the fort manned
by the peltasts and his horse
archers billeted in the
outlying villages. His plan was
to use his phalangites to hold
the main road into town
whilst he led his cavalry
round to join the horse
archers and fall on the enemy
flank. The levy archers were
to make their way through
the rough ground (hexes
closest to camera in this
photograph) and support the
phalanx. Once the phalanx
commander could see both
archers and cavalry in
position he should advance and attack.
The Conclusions: The Commagene King probably had the better tactics, but the Corinthian Strategos
could have played a stronger hand and might have been better off either changing direction and trying
to focus on taking out the Commagene cavalry first or continuing to advance with his two lead divisions
to gang up on the first phalangite unit and ignore the fort. The phalangites put up better resistance
than expected and I put this down to their better defensive armour and bigger unit sizes enabling
them to soak up more punishment than their oppositon. Whether the characteristics of the two
commanders played a role, I’m not sure yet but it is likely that the “royal” and stronger leadership
rating for the Commagene King enabled him to inspire his troops more than the “appointed” Strategos
who also had a “weak” leadership rating.
The Postscript: As this battle ran its course very quickly and I still had some play time left, I decided to
go for the second leg with the Corinthians at home this time. So the terrain and armies were the same
but their roles switched.
Briefly: The Commagene King planned to make best use of the open plain and led off with his
phalangites. These had orders to form up
and halt until his cavalry was on the right
and the archers one the left (as they are
seen doing in the photo on the left). They
could then advance in line.