Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
OBJECT Movable or immovable as long as Non- Fungible (consumable thing) GR: Movable
Consumable (non fungible) XPN: Immovable is allowed if it is a
JUDICIAL deposit (sequestration,
Could also be fungible so long as the use is attachment
merely for exhibition (1936)
RIGHT TO USE Use of the thing Since there is transfer of ownership, the GR: Not allowed to use the thing deposited
GR: Allowed to use by bailee and household debtor can use the thing loaned and its XPN: if (1) there is stipulation and (2) the
members fruits use is merely incidental (3) safekeeping is
XPN: unless there is stipulation against HH still the principal purpose of the deposit
members or when the nature of the thing — it will become irregular deposit
forbids use (CDM is a purely personal contract) OR
(4) if the use is for the preservation of the
Use of fruits thing
GR: No right to use the fruits (1935)
XPN: Stipulation (1940)
OWNERSHIP The bailor need not be the owner of the thing Must be the owner of the thing loaned. No transfer of ownership. The depositor
loaned remains to be the owner of the thing
There is a transfer of ownership, from deposited
there is no transfer of ownership in creditor to debtor.
commodatum
RIGHT OF Only for hidden defects - the bailee may retain YES. It is a legal pledge.
RETENTION the thing borrowed
COMMODATUM SIMPLE LOAN DEPOSIT
LIABILITY FOR 1941. ORDINARY EXPENSES (use and 1992. ORDINARY EXPENSES (preservation
EXPENSES preservation) - bailee of the thing) - depositor if gratuitous;
depositary if onerous
1949. EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSES
(preservation and not due to actual use | with EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSES
notice from bailee) - bailor (due to the character of the thing deposited)
- depositor
EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSES (due to actual XPN: if he notified the DTY of the defect
use) if the DTY was aware of it
w/ fault of bailee - bailee if he DTR was not aware of it or is not
w/o fault of bailee - bailee and bailor (unless expected to know the dangerous character
there is a stipulation)
ie. nabanggang kotse
The ostensible discord is not difficult to explain. The factual circumstances may have called for different applications, guided by the rule that the courts are vested
with discretion, depending on the equities of each case, on the award of interest. Nonetheless, it may not be unwise, by way of clarification and reconciliation, to
suggest the following rules of thumb for future guidance.
I. When an obligation, regardless of its source, i.e., law, contracts, quasi-contracts, delicts or quasi-delicts is breached, the contravenor can be held liable for
damages. The provisions under Title XVIII on "Damages" of the Civil Code govern in determining the measure of recoverable damages.
II. With regard particularly to an award of interest in the concept of actual and compensatory damages, the rate of interest, as well as the accrual thereof, is
imposed, as follows:
1. When the obligation is breached, and it consists in the payment of a sum of money, i.e., a loan or forbearance of money, the interest due should be that which may
have been stipulated in writing. Furthermore, the interest due shall itself earn legal interest from the time it is judicially demanded. In the absence of stipulation, the
rate of interest shall be 12% per annum to be computed from default (NOW 6%), i.e., from judicial or extrajudicial demand under and subject to the provisions of
Article 1169 of the Civil Code.
2. When an obligation, not constituting a loan or forbearance of money, is breached, an interest on the amount of damages awarded may be imposed at the
discretion of the court at the rate of 6% per annum. No interest, however, shall be adjudged on unliquidated claims or damages except when or until the
demand can be established with reasonable certainty. Accordingly, where the demand is established with reasonable certainty, the interest shall begin to run
from the time the claim is made judicially or extrajudicially (Art. 1169, Civil Code) but when such certainty cannot be so reasonably established at the time the
demand is made, the interest shall begin to run only from the date the judgment of the court is made (at which time the quantification of damages may be deemed to
have been reasonably ascertained). The actual base for the computation of legal interest shall, in any case, be on the amount finally adjudged.
3. When the judgment of the court awarding a sum of money becomes final and executory, the rate of legal interest, whether the case falls under paragraph 1 or
paragraph 2, above, shall be 12% per annum (NOW 6%) from such finality until its satisfaction, this interim period being deemed to be by then an equivalent to a
forbearance of credit.
1. File a case with the RTC for damages - no interest yet since the amount is 1. there is a loan remained unpaid with stipulated interest of 24% PA
not yet liquidated 2. File a case for sum of money with RTC - interest will begin to run from the
2. RTC awards actual, moral, exemplary damages (100,000) time there is judicial demand (monetary interest of 24% PA)
3. from the decision of the RTC the interest will begin to run (6% per annum When RTC rules in favour of plaintiff - interest will begin to run on top of the
as compensatory interest) monetary interest (compensatory interest of 6% PA)
4. from the time the court awarding a sum of money becomes final and Upon the finality of the decision - add compensatory interest as forbearance
executory — it becomes a forbearance of money 12% PA — ( now 6% PA) of money - 12% (now 6%)
SPS. MAMARIL VS. BOY SCOUTS OF THE PHILIPPINES
Moreover, the Court concurs with the finding of the CA that the contract between the parties herein was one of lease as defined under Article 1643 of the Civil Code.
It has been held that the act of parking a vehicle in a garage, upon payment of a fixed amount, is a lease. Even in a majority of American cases, it has been ruled
that where a customer simply pays a fee, parks his car in any available space in the lot, locks the car and takes the key with him, the possession and control of the
car, necessary elements in bailment, do not pass to the parking lot operator, hence, the contractual relationship between the parties is one of lease.?r?l1
Anent Sps. Mamaril's claim that the exculpatory clause: "Management shall not be responsible for loss of vehicle or any of its accessories or article left therein"31
contained in the BSP issued parking ticket was void for being a contract of adhesion and against public policy, suffice it to state that contracts of adhesion are not
void per se. It is binding as any other ordinary contract and a party who enters into it is free to reject the stipulations in its entirety. If the terms thereof are accepted
without objection, as in this case, where plaintiffs-appellants have been leasing BSP's parking space for more or less 20 years,32 then the contract serves as the law
between them.33 Besides, the parking fee of P300.00 per month or P10.00 a day for each unit is too minimal an amount to even create an inference that BSP
undertook to be an insurer of the safety of plaintiffs-appellants' vehicles.
GUARANTY PLEDGE REAL ESTATE CHATTEL ANTICHRESIS
MORTGAGE MORTGAGE
Indivisible
FORM May be oral or in writing Must be in public inst to bind 3rd Registration Registration must be in writing to be valid
REQUIRED persons: description and date required to be required for
binding to 3rd validity
persons
OBJECT Movables (within the commerce 1. Immovable Movables Fruits of the Immovables
of man & susceptible of 2. Inalienable real
possession) right over an
ie vessel - delivery of keys is immovable
sufficient
REQUISITES GUARANTOR: PLEDGOR must be the owner of MORTGAGOR must be the owner of
1. integrity the thing pledged; the thing mortgaged;
2. capacity to bind himself He must have free disposal of
3. sufficient properties the thing pledged He must have free disposal of the thing
4. not convicted of crime mortgaged
involving dishonesty
5. not insolvent
(for 4 & 5, the Creditor can
demand replacement, unless the
Guarantor is a specified person;
2026)
PARTIES TO Guarantor and the Creditor Pledgor - Pledgee Mortgagor - Mortgagee Creditor - Debtor
THE
CONTRACT There may be sub guarantors.
(2051 2nd par)
Co-guarantors
Liability of Co-Guarantors
GR: joint
XPN: solidary if there is a
stipulation
but ceases in case of insolvency
of one of the co-G (Mam Sena:
confusing provision. in OBLICON,
the insolvency of one of the joint
debtors shall not be answerable
by the others. There is no mutual
guaranty between them)
CONSENT There must be consent of the No consent needed from the mortgagee No consent needed from the
pledgee (C), subject to the to sell the property debtor to sell the property
pledge.
XPNS:
1. negligence or wilful act of the
pledgee there is danger that
the thing pledged will be lost
or impaired - deposit to 3rd
person
2. Fear of destruction or
impairment without fault of C
- demand the return and offer
another w the same kind and
quality (2107)
XPN: stipulation
excluding the
improvements etc
after acquired
properties
GR: No
XPN: stipulation
(for the benefit of
the MGEE, to
mantain the value
of the security)
THIRD PARTY 3rd party pledgor - has the rights There could be a
of a guarantor: 3rd party
2066-2070; 2077-2081 mortgagor
GUARANTY PLEDGE REAL ESTATE CHATTEL ANTICHRESIS
MORTGAGE MORTGAGE
WHAT MAY BE • Valid obligation SAME AS GUARANTY (2086) Dragnet clause Only the present
SECURED/ • voidable Same property can obligation
EXTENT OF • unenforceable secure future For future
SECURITY • natural obligation obligations obligation, another
• conditional obligation - reliance on the CM must again be
• Future debts - but there can be security test registered
no claim against the G unless
liquidated Affidavit of Good
Faith - that the
Simple/Indefinite (2055 2nd par) obligation secured
Guaranty by the CM is valid
1. Principal obligation and without fraud
2. Accessories (you cannot extend
3. Judicial cost from the time this kind of
there is judicial demand stipulation to future
obligations)
Definite Guaranty (2055 1st par) - it will create a
- only to the amount so stipulated preference to
the lien
GUARANTY PLEDGE REAL ESTATE CHATTEL ANTICHRESIS
MORTGAGE MORTGAGE
REQUIREMEN 1. Run after the debtor first: 1. Debt is due and remains The mortgage directly and immediately
T BEFORE exhaust ALL the properties of unsatisfied subjects the property upon which it is
GOING AFTER the debtor in the PH and resort 2. Pledgee can go after the imposed, whoever the possessor may
THE to ALL the legal remedies pledge be, to the fulfilment of the obligation for
SECURITY against the debtor whose security it was constituted (2126)
2. Insolvency of the debtor - in
the form of an unsatisfied — no need to run after the debtor first.
writ of execution
3. Proceed with the Guaranty Options of the Creditor (Mortgage
lien upon the estate of the debtor) -
Benefit of Excussion (2060) Rule 86, Sec 7
1. Demand to the guarantor 1. File a complaint of sum of money
2. The guarantor must first against the debtor and waive the
invoke his right of excussion mortgage
3. Point out to the Creditor the 2. Foreclose the mortgage and recover
properties of the Debtor within the deficiency by filing a claim
the PHILIPPINES against the estate
3. Rely on his security alone -
No benefit of excussion if: Foreclose the mortgage and waive
SIAP all other action as against the Debtor
1. Stipulated
2. Insolvency of debtor
3. Absconded (G) unless he left
manager or reps
4. Presumption that the exercise
of the ROE will not result to
the satisfaction of the
obligation
GUARANTY PLEDGE REAL ESTATE CHATTEL ANTICHRESIS
MORTGAGE MORTGAGE
Legal pledge
1. Make a demand for the
amount due
2. Foreclose within ONE
MONTH, otherwise, the D
may require return