Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
In this scenario, regarding several projects which were offered to us, we have chosen
the project entitled “Analysis and Design of Office Building of Earthquake Resistance”.
Comparing various models of building structures, we found public building as the most
challenging project. Thus, we have given preference to the construction of the frame
structured municipal building which is a frame structure of three-stories with basement.
There are total 17 frames. These frames are analyzed for various vertical (Live, Dead) and
horizontal (Earthquake, wind) loads. The site is located in Kathmandu valley at Kirtipur.
According to IS 1893-2002 (Criteria for Earthquake Resistant design of structures), Kirtipur
lying on Vth zone, earthquake load was found to be pre-dominant in case of lateral load.
Earthquake is a natural phenomenon as old as the history of the earth itself. It occurs
rarely at any particular location. However the effects of these events are very destructive.
Amongst the other natural disasters, earthquake is the most unpredictable one with
maximum risk. Massive loss of lives and properties occurs. Now a days, designers and
engineers are giving more emphasis towards the earthquake resistance while analyzing and
designing any structure to minimize the seismic impact.
Various types of loads during the design phase are considered. While analyzing the
structure, internal forces in various structural members are discussed. Structural design deals
with the designing various members of the structure to resist these internal forces to which
they might be subjected during the life period of the structure.
1
While analysis, frames are analyzed for earthquake as lateral or horizontal load. During
the earthquake, structural and non-structural damages occur in which both of them are
hazardous to occupants. When earthquake shaking occurs, a building gets thrown from side
to side or up and down. i.e. ground moves violently side by side and building stay at rest.
Thus the building gets thrown back and forth by the motion of the ground with some part of
building lagging behind and then moving in the opposite direction. The level of damage
depends upon how well the building has been designed and constructed.
The project report has been prepared in complete conformity with various provisions in
Indian Standards as Code of practice for plain & reinforced concrete IS 456-2000; Code of
practice for Design loads IS 875 (Part 2)-1987: Design Aids for Reinforcement Concrete (SP
16) IS 456-1978; Handbook on Concrete Reinforcement and Detailing SP 34 (1987) are
thoroughly referred for proper analysis, design and detailing of structural elements viz.
beam, slab, column, staircase, foundation, basement wall with respect to safety, strength,
stability, ductility & economy in addition to adequate serviceability requirements of cracking
and deflection in concrete structures. All the codes are based on the principles of limit state
of design.
The project report posses modeling output (SAP 2000), analysis results, load
calculations, architectural drawings, structural drawings and sample calculations of various
structural elements and their detailing as well.
2
Beside the utilization of analytical methods and design approaches, exposure and
application of various available codes of practices is another aim of the project work.
1.2 OBJECTIVES:
1.5. ASSIGNMENTS:
3
Assess unit weight of dead load for materials used, intensity of live load for the
particular type of building occupancy and other loads used and load combinations to
be analyzed.
Find preliminary sizes of beam, column, slab, wall, footing and stair by conventional
methods.
Assess loads for slab and stair, find typical panels of slab according to their panel and
loads and design typical panels of slab and stair.
Assess gravity and seismic loads.
Numerate column, beams and building frames, Idealize structure and loads for all
combinations of loads subjected to the building.
Analyze the idealized frames by using computer software for all load combinations.
Find maximum of BM, SF, AF of structural members and find storey drift and
stability index of each storey.
List the typical beams, column according to their span, length, size and responses and
design typical beams, columns, beam-column joint with ductile detailing.
Assess loads for footing. Find safe bearing capacity of footing. Decide depth, type
and sizes of footing.
Design typical footing for worst responses of superstructure.
Prepare structural drawing of slab, beam, column and footing.
Finalize plan, elevation and sections of building.
FRAME SYSTEM
4
1.7 METHODOLOGY
Initially, the architectural drawing of the building was studied. Rooms within this
office building were allocated to various purposes such as staff room, administration,
seminar hall, storage etc.
b) Preliminary Design
Estimation of various structural elements such as beam and slab were designed and
checks were done with the help of deflection criteria and moment criteria. For the column,
vertical axial capacity was taken for the design and percentage of steel was checked.
c) Load Calculation
After the study architectural drawing and preliminary design, load calculation was
done. In vertical, dead load was obtained by the sized determined in preliminary design
and live load was determined by using code for design loads (IS 875 part 2) for various
types and purposes of rooms. In horizontal load, earthquake load was determined by
calculating lumped mass at floor level and horizontal base shear (IS 1893). It was done by
Seismic Coefficient Method. Wind load (IS 875 Part 3) was obtained by design wind speed
and design wind pressure. Earthquake load being the pre-dominant one between the two
lateral loads, hence its effect was only considered.
For the purpose of Seismic analysis of our building we have used the structural
analysis program SAP 2000. It has a special option for modeling horizontal rigid floor
diaphragm system. A floor diaphragm is modeled as a rigid horizontal plane parallel to
global X-Y plane, so that all points on any floor diaphragm cannot displace relative to each
other in X-Y plane. Initially, the characteristics of the materials used were defined such as
concrete – M20 and reinforcement – Fe415. Then, the load cases as well as their
combinations with load factors were introduced. Next, structures were analyzed for
5
different load combinations and the final output was determined in the form of SF, BM and
AF etc.
e) Design
Design was done on the basis of limit state of design for collapse and serviceability. The
sample calculations of various structural elements were done with numerous checks and
with the help of MS-excel, the formulation was done for each and every structural member
in the building.
f) Detailing
Detailing was to done by determining number, size, layout and location of reinforcement,
given the element dimensions and areas of steel required. Certain details such as lap and
development lengths, hook requirements, cut-off points etc. were covered by the code.
6
CHAPTER-02
ANALYSIS OF BUILDING
The analysis of the building was done by the estimation of dimensions of various structural
members such as slab, beam, column, staircase, foundation, and basement wall with the
help of preliminary design. And different types of loads such as vertical load (Dead +
finishes, and Live) and Lateral Load (earthquake and wind load) were calculated.
Earthquake being pre-dominant, only its effect was taken for lateral loads. Also
combinations of such loads were taken into consideration. With the help of SAP 2000,
element stresses in beams and column were calculated in the provision of rigid
diaphragm with.
2.1PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Preliminary design is carried out to estimate approximate size of the structural members.
Grid diagram is taken as basic guideline for analysis. Preliminary design of flexural
members of the structural system i.e. for beam and slab are done as per the limit state of
serviceability. Work out is done from deflection criteria and moment criteria. And for
column, it was done from net vertical axial load capacity assuming suitable percentage
of steel.
7
≤ 32
{From Pillai book (page 432) L/d =32 for Fe415 & continuous slab or IS 456:2000, cl
24.4, Note 2}
Where,
Span (l) = 4.5 =4500mm (i.e. the smallest of the two dimension as the slab is two way slab
with (ly/lx) ≤ 2.)
Overall Depth of slab (D) = Effective Depth + 0.5*dia. of main bar +clear cover
= 140.62+0.5*10+15
=160.62 mm
Rounding off to nearest multiple of five, we take the preliminary thickness of slab = 175mm
Materials:
Grade of concrete: M20
Fe415 (TOR Steel)
8
3. Effective Span of Slab:-
Lx = lxc+dx= 3750+161 = 4500+155 = 4655mm
Ly= lyc +dy=4700+153 = 4900+145 =5045 mm
lef/ d = 15
d = 4900/15 = 326.67
Assuming effective cover of 40mm,
Overall depth of beam (D) = 366.67 mm
Adopt, D = 400mm
Width of beam (b) = D/3 to (¾) D
Adopt b = 300mm
Check:
b≥200
b/D = 3/4> 0.3 OK
1. Materials:
Grade of concrete: M20
9
Fe415 (TOR Steel)
2. Member size
Width of beam=300 mm
Depth of beam, D=400 mm
3. Load Calculation
Area contributing to loads on Beam (4.9*4.5) is 5.9625*2=11.925 m2.
10
Total design load (Pu) =1.5*1108.008=1662.012 KN
For an axially loaded column,
Pu = 0.4*fck*Ac + 0.67*fy*Asc {IS456:2000 CL39.3}
Assuming 2% of compression reinforcement and M25 concrete grade,
1662.012*1000 = 0.4*25*(Ag – p*Ag/100) + 0.67*415*p*Ag/100
Ag = 124021.49mm2
Dimensions for rectangular column:
Using square column,
B=D =124021.49)0.5 = 352.167 mm
Adopt 400mm
11
We, know
No of Riser-No of tread=1
There for no of tread =No of riser-1
=R-1
=8-1=7 (no each flight)
RA+RB= (17.43*1.375)*2+26.69*1.750
= 89.30KN
RA=RB = (89.30/2)=44.65KN
For the point of maximum moment*distance from A
RA-17.43*(1.375)*23.64*(x-1.375) =0
44.65-23.39+32.50-23.64x=0
X= (53.465/23.64) = 2.25m (at mid span)
There for moment at(x=2.25m)
Mx=44.65*2.25-17.43*1.375*[(1.375/2) + (2.25-1.375)]-
17.43*(1.75/2)*(1.75/2)*2
=62.26KM-m
There for MUR=0.138fck*bd2
»62.26*106=0.138*20*1000*d2
d=150.19mm
We know, D=150.19+20+ (12/2) =176.19mm<225mm (i.e. ok)
[Assume 20mm cover and 12mm Ø bars]
Hence adopt depth of waist slab is 180mm.
Ly
2.2 VERTICAL LOADS
DEAD LOAD
Lx
Dead load from slab is trapezoidal acts on beams
Dead load from walls are UDL also acts on beams
Self-wt. of beam is UDL and acts on the same beam
Self-wt. of columns are considered point loads action on joints
Dead load intensity of floor slab
12
= Unit wt. of concrete*thickness [RCC + floor finishes (Marble +screed)]
= (25*0.125) + (27*0.015) + (21*0.025)
= (3.125+0.405+0.525) KN/m2
For toilet, bathroom, passage, kitchen
Dead load intensity of slab=4.055KN/m2
For living room &meeting room=3.65KN/m2 (marble is not used)
Dead load of roof slab:-
=25*0.125+ (25mm plaster)*unit wt.
=25*0.125+0.025*22
=3.675KN/m2
Unit wt. of different materials () (Approximate value from IS 875: PART 1)
Reinforced Concrete = 25 KN/m3
Marble = 27 KN/m3
Screed = 21 KN/m3
Plaster = 22 KN/m3
Brick = 19 KN/m3 (Approximate for common bricks)
Cement Concrete = 24 KN/m3
LIVE LOAD
While analyzing, we are concerned with various types of vertical and horizontal/lateral
loads. Earthquake load as a lateral load should be considered during design in order to
meet the acceptable level of responses. The main objective of design is to emphasize the
probable deformation or response to their considerable limit within their lifetime. The
structural elements should sustain entire possible loads within the suitable degree of
safety, upgrade the durability of structure, and be resistive towards misuse and fire.
13
Grid No. Length (m) Grid No. Length (m)
A-A 24.90 1-1 17.4
B-B 24.90 2-2 17.4
C-C 11.40 3-3 11.6
D-D 5.80 4-4 11.6
E-E 5.80 5-5 11.6
F-F 11.60 6-6 17.7
G-G 24.90 7-7 17.7
H-H 24.90
Total 134.40 105.60
II) WALL:
I) Wall= (30*4.1+16*4.5+2.3*2) *19*0.23*2.7/2 (230mm wall)
=199.60*19*0.23*1.35 *0.7
=1177.54KN*0.7=824.278
Wall= (110.88*0.7*19*0.11*1.35) (110mm wall)
=218.99KN
Total wall load=1043.268
14
III) Tie Beam:
=236.70*0.30*0.3*25
=521KN
IV) STAIR CASE:
=70.20KN
V) FLOOR FINISH:
25mm screed=440.36*21*0.025=231.18KN
12mm plastering inside & outside of wall=297.22/2=139.61KN
Total load on Ground floor=2051.06KN
B) FIRST FLOOR
I) BEAM:
DL = 236.70*0.30*0.4*25 = 710.10 KN
II) WALL:
230mm wall = 0.7*199.60*0.23*(2.7-0.4)*19 = 5416.68 KN
110mm wall= 0.7*110.88*0.11*(2.7-0.15)*19=413.65
= 5830.33 KN
III) COLUM:
DL=40*0.42*25*2.7/2=432KN
IV) SLAB:
DL=25*484.62*0.15=1817.32KN 2KN/m2
LL=Area of slab having 2KN/m2 (All room)+Area of slab having 3KN/m2 (staircase)
=2KN/m2*(14*14.5)25%+(4KN/m2)*(11.07*2)*50%+[3.55*0.89*14)]3*25%
=266.02KN/m2
v) SRAIR CASE:
DL= (UDL of inclined converted to*width)*2+ (UDL of loading *width*2)*no of flight
= [(23.64*1.1*2) + (17.43*1.175*2)]*2
= (2*92.968)
= 115.937KN/m2
VI) FLOOR FINISH:
a) marble=Total area*thickness
15
= [Area of ocorridors + stair case + kitchen +w/c]
= 188.75*0.015*27
= 76.435KN
b) Screed = Total area * thickness *rscreed
= 484.62*0.025*21
= 254.42KN
c) 12mm plaster in celling =321.02*0.012.22
= 84.70KN
d) 12mm plaster in out of & inner side = (1057.62/2) *0.012*22)
= 139.61
Total Dead load of floor finish =555.16KN
Total DL of first floor is=555.16KN
Total LL of first floor is=266.02KN
(The total DL & LL of First floor, Second floor, Third floor, Fourth floor are same)
4) FIFTH FLOOR
I) BEAM:-
DL= 710.10KN
II) COLUMN:-
DL= (32*0.402*2.7/2*+8*0.42*2.7)*25=259.25KN
III) WALL:-
DL= [(432/2+21* (2.7/2-0.40)+94.70*0.11*0.80]*19
= 394.28KN
IV) STAIR CASE:-
DL=115.37/2
V) SLAB:-
DL= 462.26*25*0.125=1444.56KN
LL= 413.88*1.5*50%=155.20KN
VI) FLOOR FINISHING:-
Terrace screed = (Area of slab-Area of stair)*21*0.025
= (484.62-9.43*2)*21*0.025
= 244.52KN
10mm punning = 468.11*22*0.01=167.04KN
12 mm Plastering in ceiling = 84.70KN
12mm plastering inside & outside = (297.22/2) KN
Total DL of floor finish= 635.87KN
From lumped mass calculation, following result should obtain.
16
Slab (KN) Floor
Beam
Column Wall fini Total
( Staircase
Floor (K (K sh (K
K (KN)
N) N) (K N)
N)
DL LL N)
Ground
flo 521 216 1043.27 0 0 57.9685 139.61 1977.85
or
First
flo 710.1 432 5830.33 18170.33 266.02 115.937 555.16 26079.9
or
Second
flo 710.1 432 5830.33 18170.33 266.02 115.937 555.16 26079.9
or
Third
flo 710.1 432 5830.33 18170.33 266.02 115.937 555.16 26079.9
or
Fourth
flo 710.1 432 5830.33 18170.33 266.02 115.937 555.16 26079.9
or
Fifth
flo 710.1 259.2 394.28 1444. 56 155.2 57.9685 635.87 2212.62
or
Sixth
flo 63.9 43.2 88.43 75.94 7.312 24.52 303.302
or
Total 4135.4 2246.4 24847.3 72757.24 1226.592 579.685 3020.64 108813
17
2.5 HORIZONTAL BASE SHEAR CALCULATION
Then, the horizontal base shear is determined,
It is given by
Vb = Ah*W (from IS1893 PART 1, cl 7.5.3)
Where, Vb = Horizontal Base Shear
Ah = Design horizontal seismic Coefficient
W = Total lumped weight of building
ZI S a
Again, Ah = * (from IS 1893 PART 1, cl 6.4.2)
2R g
18
Storey Storey
le force Storey
Mass of
ve Qi=( she
each Lateral Horizontal
l Wih2 ar
Floor floor Wihi2 (KNm) Load In each
hi /∑Wi vi
(wi) column (KN)
( hi2)* (K
(KN)
m Vb N)
) (KN)
Ground
14689.79
floo 0.000
0
0.000
r 1977.8485 0 0.000
First
14689.79
floo 457.327
0
11.433
r 26079.872 2.7 190122.267
Second
14232.46
floo 1829.307
3
45.733
r 26079.872 5.4 760489.068
Third
12403.15
floo 4115.940
7
102.898
r 26079.872 8.1 1711100.402
Fourth
floo 7317.226 8287.217 182.931
r 26079.872 10.8 3041956.270
Fifth
floo 969.991 969.991 24.250
r 2212.6185 13.5 403249.722
Sixth
floo 191.469 0.000
r 303.302 16.2 79598.577 23.934
19
2.6 SEISMIC LOAD DISTRIBUTION
The lateral seismic load obtained from the calculation of lumped mass at floor level and
horizontal base shear is then distributed within the building in both X and Y direction.
While distributing in each grid, the lateral load in each column is obtained by dividing
total lateral load in a floor to the no. of column in that floor. Then, at the time of
distribution grid wise, no. of column is counted in each grid and it is multiplied by
lateral load in each column. The magnitude of seismic lateral load is same in both
positive and negative direction.
Lateral Load on each column = (Qi/No. of column)
Ground floor = 457.32/40=11.443 KN
First Floor = 1829.32/40=45.733KN
Second Floor = 4115.6/40 = 102.89 KN
Third Floor = 7317.24/40 = 182.931 KN
Fourth Floor =970/40 =24.25KN
Fifth Floor =957.36/40 =23.931
X-Direction Y-Direction
Load on Load on
each eac
Lateral Grid Lateral
No. of Colu No. of h
Grid No. Lo N Loa
Column mn Column Col
ad o. d
um
n
A-A 7 11.433 80.031 1-1 7 11.433 80.031
B-B 7 11.433 80.031 2-2 7 11.433 80.031
C-C 4 11.433 45.732 3-3 4 11.433 45.732
D-D 2 11.433 22.866 4-4 4 11.433 45.732
E-E 2 11.433 22.866 5-5 4 11.433 45.732
X-Direction Y-Direction
Load on Load on
each eac
Lateral Grid Lateral
No. of Colu No. of h
Grid No. Lo N Loa
Column mn Column Col
ad o. d
um
n
F-F 4 11.433 45.732 6-6 7 11.433 80.031
G-G 7 11.433 80.031 7-7 7 11.433 80.031
H-H 7 11.433 80.031
Total 40 457.32 40 457.32
20
(For both EQL-Positive and EQL-Negative)
TABLE-4 SEISMIC LOAD DISTRIBUTION ON FIRST FLOOR
X-Direction Y-Direction
Load on Load on
each No. of eac
Lateral Grid Lateral
No. of Colu Colu h
Grid No. Loa N Loa
Column mn m Col
d o. d
n um
n
A-A 7 45.733 320.341 1-1 7 45.733 320.341
B-B 7 45.733 320.341 2-2 7 45.733 320.341
C-C 4 45.733 183.052 3-3 4 45.733 183.052
D-D 2 45.733 91.526 4-4 4 45.733 183.052
E-E 2 45.733 91.526 5-5 4 45.733 183.052
F-F 4 45.733 183.052 6-6 7 45.733 320.341
G-G 7 45.733 320.341 7-7 7 45.733 320.341
H-H 7 45.733 320.341
Total 40 1829.32 40 1829.32
X-Direction Y-Direction
Load on Load on
each No. of eac
Lateral Grid Lateral
No. of Colu Colu h
Grid No. Loa N Loa
Column mn m Col
d o. d
n um
n
A-A 7 102.89 720.23 1-1 7 102.89 720.23
B-B 7 102.89 720.23 2-2 7 102.89 720.23
C-C 4 102.89 411.56 3-3 4 102.89 411.56
D-D 2 102.89 205.78 4-4 4 102.89 411.56
E-E 2 102.89 205.78 5-5 4 102.89 411.56
F-F 4 102.89 411.56 6-6 7 102.89 720.23
G-G 7 102.89 720.23 7-7 7 102.89 720.23
H-H 7 102.89 720.23
Total 40 4115.6 40 4115.6
21
TABLE-6 SEISMIC LOAD DISTRIBUTION ON THIRD FLOOR
X-Direction Y-Direction
Load on Load on
each No. of eac
Lateral Grid Lateral
No. of Colu Colu h
Grid No. Loa N Loa
Column mn m Col
d o. d
n um
n
A-A 7 182.931 1280.517 1-1 7 182.931 1280.51
B-B 7 182.931 1280.517 2-2 7 182.931 1280.51
C-C 4 182.931 731.724 3-3 4 182.931 731.724
D-D 2 182.931 365.862 4-4 4 182.931 731.724
E-E 2 182.931 365.862 5-5 4 182.931 731.724
F-F 4 182.931 731.724 6-6 7 182.931 1280.51
G-G 7 182.931 1280.517 7-7 7 182.931 1280.51
H-H 7 182.931 1280.517
Total 40 7317.24 40 7317.24
22
(For both EQL-Positive and EQL-Negative)
TABLE-7 SEISMIC LOAD DISTRIBUTION ON FIFTH FLOOR
X-Direction Y-Direction
Load on Load on
each Grid eac
Lateral No. of Lateral
No. of Colu N h
Grid No. Loa Colum Lo
Column mn o Col
d n ad
. um
n
A-A 0 0 0 1-1 2 23.934 47.868
B-B 0 0 0 2-2 2 23.934 47.868
C-C 2 23.934 47.868 3-3 0 0 0
D-D 2 23.934 47.868 4-4 0 0 0
E-E 2 23.934 47.868 5-5 0 0 0
F-F 2 23.934 47.868 6-6 2 23.934 47.868
G-G 0 0 0 7-7 2 23.934 47.868
H-H 0 0 0
Total 8 191.47 8 191.47
23
(For both EQL-Positive and EQL-Negative)
LOAD CASES:
Dead Load
Live Load
Earthquake Load
LOAD COMBINATIONS (from IS 1893:2002 cl 6.3.2.1)
1.5(DL + LL)
0.9 DL ± 1.5 EQ (both +ve and –ve)
1.2 (DL + LL) ± 1.2 EQ (both +ve and –ve)
1.5(DL±EQ) (both +ve and –ve)
(Total no. of combinations = 13)
The above values obtained from modeling analysis are less than the permissible limits.
Hence it is further procedure for the designing of the building structural elements.
The time period we used for the base shear calculation is 0.605 sec calculated as per IS Code
1893 (part 1): 2002.
24
CHAPTER-3
MODELLING
3.1 INTRODUCTION
For the purpose of Seismic analysis of our building we have used the Structural
Analysis Program (SAP 2000). It has a special option for modeling horizontal rigid
floor diaphragm system. A floor diaphragm is modeled as a rigid horizontal plane
parallel to global X-Y plane, so that all points on any floor diaphragm cannot displace
relative to each other in X-Y plane. Initially, the characteristics of the materials used
were defined such as concrete – M20 and reinforcement – Fe415. Then, the load cases
as well as their combinations with load factors were introduced. Next, structures were
analyzed for different load combinations and the final output was determined in the
form of SF, BM and AF etc.
The concept of Finite Element Method is also used thoroughly. This method deals
with the elementary analysis of any structure. While analyzing the building, it was
divided into no. of structural elements. For example, during calculation of lumped
mass, the whole building mass was calculated as the summation of masses at floor
level. Similarly, various structural elements such as beam, slab, column, and
foundation were analyzed in the elementary basis.
The building was restrained at the basement. During seismic analysis, while
calculating base shear, the time period was dependent upon the height of the building.
In our context, the height of basement storey was included due to presence of
ventilation in the basement wall. If the whole basement storey was of RCC wall
without ventilation, then it was possible to restrain at the ground level.
25
There are following step to be used in modeling process in (SAP2000, 14) programme.
i) Click the file menu >New model command or New model button.
ii) The model form allows for quick generation of numerous model type using
parameter generation techniques.
iii) Click on grid only and also set unit in KN-m or KN-mm.
iv) Click the ok button to accept the change.
v) Right click in the left active windows and click Edit Grid Data. Or double click on any
grid of model.
A) Modify X grid spacing as:
X-Grid
Grid no Cum length (mm)
1' -890
1 0
1'' 3550
2 4500
2' 6325
2'' 8050
3 9000
3'' 12550
4 13500
4'' 17125
5 18000
5'' 18950
5' 20675
6 22500
6'' 23450
7 27000
7' 27890
B) Modify Y grid spacing as:
Y-Grid
Grid no Cum length (mm)
a -890
A 0
B 4900
C 6300
c'' 7250
Y-Grid
21
Grid no Cum length (mm)
D 9000
E 10800
d'' 12550
F 13500
G 14900
H 19800
h 20690
Z-Grid
Grid no Cum length (mm)
Z1 0
Z2 2700
Z3 5400
Z4 8100
Z5 10800
Z6 13500
Z7 16200
v) Click on ok button.
22
Concrete cover: 40mm (effective)
iii) Click ok.
23
EQX- Quake 0
EQY+ Quake 0
EQY- Quake 0
iii) Click on ok button.
24
Storey Load on each X-Grid in ( +x-x & -x-x) Y-Grid in (+ y-y & - y-y)
grid No of column Total load No of column Total load
(KN)
1 11.433 7 80.032 7 80.032
2 45.733 7 320.129 7 320.129
3 102.898 7 720.289 7 720.289
4 182.931 7 1280.515 7 1280.515
5 24.250 7 169.748 7 169.748
6 23.934 2 47.867 2 47.867
Select outer face column in x-y plan in grid wise and assign EQX load .similarly EQX-, EQY&
EQY-.
25
26
27
Introduction