Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Particulars Description
1)Features a)Undertaken within a framework of set of philosophies:
The research shall cover a major part by quantitative way,
where data shall be collected and a specific relationship
would be setup between the variables. Modeling is to be done
in structured way in preset format where it shall be compared
with realistic field data and various other accepted models.
b)Valid and reliable methodology: A preset procedure is to
be followed making the process valid and repetition of the
process can be done to make it more accurate and reliable.
c)Designed to be unbiased and objective: The outcome is
unknown and shall be compared with the standard values so it
is unbiased. The research is focused on taking significant
physical characteristics in simulated models based on
materials mechanics behaviors, thus, the result obtained
wouldn’t be subjective but would be defined as per the
material properties and behaviors
1. Emmanuel O. Ekwulo and Dennis B. Eme , “Fatigue and rutting strain analysis of flexible pavements
designed using CBR methods”, Civil Engineering Department, Rivers State University of Science and
Technology P.M.B. 5080 Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. 25 November, 2009
2. Rabbira Garba, “Permanent Deformation Properties of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures” , Department of
Road end Railway Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU August,
2002
3. George Alberto Prozzi, “Modeling Pavement Performance by combining field and experimental
data”, Graduate Division of University of California, Berkeley Fall 2001
4. Abubeker Worake Ahmed, “Mechanistic-Empirical Modelling of Flexible Pavement Performance:
Verifications Using APT Measurements”, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, Stockholm, 23 rd of
May 2014
5. Mehdi Akbarian , Franz Josef Ulm, “Model Based Pavement Vehicle Interaction Simulation for Life
Cycle Assessment of Pavements”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
6. Regis Luis Egual de Carvalho, “Prediction of Permanent Deformation in Asphalt Concrete”, 2012
7. Loay Akram Al-Khateeb , Andrews Saoud and Mohammad Fawaz Al-Msouti, “Rutting Prediction
of Flexible Pavement Using Finite Element Method”, Department of Transport and Communication,
Faculty of civil Engineering, Damascus University, Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 2011
8. Prithivi S.Kandal, Mary Stroup Gardiner, “Flexible pavement Rehabilitation and Maintenance”
Books Studied:
Collection of Themes
Flexible Pavement
[12] The pavement structure or system as it is sometimes referred to, is the pavement layers designed to
support traffic loads and distribute them to the roadbed soil or select embankment material
[9] Flexible pavements are those which on the whole have low or, negligible flexural strength and are rather
flexible in their structural action under the loads
[10] The pavement thickness is designed so that the stresses on the subgrade soil are kept within its bearing
power and the subgrade is prevented from excessive deformations
[8] An important prerequisite for proper maintenance and rehabilitation strategy is the knowledge of how
traffic loads affect the pavement condition at different ages and under different vehicular and environmental
conditions.
[11] Pavement deterioration is caused by the interacting damaging effects of traffic and the environment.
[1] It is generally known that failure of asphalt pavement is due to fatigue cracking and rutting deformation,
caused by excessive horizontal tensile strain at the bottom of the asphalt layer and vertical compressive
strain on top of the subgrade. In the design of asphalt pavement, it is necessary to investigate these critical
stresses and strains and design against them.
[2] Rutting is recognized to be the major distress mechanism in flexible pavements as a result of increase
in tire pressures and axle loads. Rutting is caused by the accumulation of permanent deformation in all or
some of the layers in the pavement structure. The accumulation of permanent deformation in the asphalt
surfacing layer is now recognized to be the major component of rutting in flexible pavements.
[6] The total measured rutting is a combination of the settlement in the center and the heave at the edges of
the wheel path.
[7] The width and depth of the rut are widely affected by structural characters of the pavement layers
(thickness and material quality), traffic loads and environmental conditions.
[12] Pavement Rehabilitation consists of restoration, resurfacing, recycling and reconstruction.
[13] Pavement construction is a complex process involving many factors—each of which has the potential
of affecting the quality of the constructed pavement in a very significant way. The process of good
construction should start with the identification/adoption or creation of an appropriate specification.
Factors effecting the performance of flexible pavement
[2] Asphalt pavement rutting from weak asphalt mixtures is a high temperature phenomenon, i.e., it most
often occurs during the summer when high pavement temperatures are evident
[2] One can get an insight into the effect of aggregate properties on shear strength of mixtures by
considering their effect on c and ϕ in the above equation. For a given level of stress, temperature and rate
of loading, the shear strength depends on the cohesion c and angle of internal friction ϕ. The cohesion c is
affected by the viscosity of asphalt binder and the proportion of fines. The angle of internal friction is
obtained from aggregate interlocking. Higher values of ϕ are developed if the aggregate is rough textured,
angular and well graded. The mechanical interlock of the aggregate particles thus plays a key role in
shearing resistance. The binder content is also known to affect ϕ because it changes the degree of
mechanical interlock between the particles, i.e., the higher the proportion of binder in the mix, the further
apart the aggregate particles are spread
[5] The main model parameters that affect pavement deflection, hence PVI (Pavement Vehicle Interaction)
is impact on fuel consumption, are:
[1] As elastic theory can be used to compute only the effect of traffic loads, most of the principles in
mechanistic design of highway pavements are based on limiting strains in the asphalt bound layer (fatigue
analysis) and permanent deformation (rutting) in the subgrade.
[1] (Fatigue Cracking)
The asphalt institute (Asphalt Institute, 1982) suggested that the relationship between fatigue failure of
asphalt concrete and tensile strain is represented by the number of load repetitions as follows:
Nf = 0.0796(∑ t) −3.291 (E)−0.854
Where; Nf = Number of load applications to failure ∑ t = Horizontal tensile strain at the bottom of asphalt
bound layer E = Elastic Modulus of asphalt concrete
[1] The relationship between rutting failure and compressive strain at the top of the subgrade is represented
by the number of load applications as suggested by asphalt institute (Asphalt Institute, 1982) in the
following form:
Nf = 1.365 x10 −9 (c) −4.477
[1] The Layered Elastic Analysis (LEA) is a mechanistic procedure capable of determining pavement
responses (stress and strain) in asphalt pavement. The major assumptions in the use of layered elastic
analysis are that;
i) The pavement structure is regarded as a linear elastic multilayered system in which the stress-strain
solution of the material are characterized by the Young’s modulus of Elasticity E and poison’s ratio µ.
ii) Each layer has a finite thickness h except the lower layer, and all are infinite in the horizontal direction
iii) The surface loading P can be represented vertically by a uniformly distributed vertical stress over a
circular area.
[2] The theory of viscoelasticity might be appropriate to model deformation at low temperatures and high
frequencies of loading. But at high temperatures and slow rate of loading, where rutting or permanent
deformation is of crucial importance, this theory might not be appropriate because it fails to take account
of the time independent plastic component of the strain. While elasto-viscoplasticity can be used to take
account of most of the behavior of asphalt concrete under load, it is sophisticated and requires substantial
effort in material testing and computations.
[4] Asphalt mixtures exhibit unique characteristics of both viscous and elastic properties, and hence are
categorized as viscoelastic materials. Moreover, understanding the viscoelastic properties of asphalt
[4] Advanced models for predicting permanent deformation in asphalt mixtures consider the viscous nature
of asphalt mixtures through viscoelastic or viscoelastoplastic constitutive equations. Both linear and
nonlinear viscoelasticity approaches have been examined.
[5] The beam on an elastic foundation represents various properties of a pavement. It draws a relationship
between pavement material properties of top layer elastic modulus E, mass per unit length m, and subgrade
modulus k, along with the structural property of moment of inertia I, with deflection y under an external
load q (x; t). By assuming a moving coordinate system η on the load (vehicle wheel) a relationship between
deflection under (and at distances away from) the load can be calculated.
[6] The use of advanced mechanistic modeling can help address some of the issues mentioned and reduce
the gap between rutting predictions and field measured performance. Advanced mechanistic modeling
employs theories of mechanics that are more suitable to describe the real material behavior. The
shortcoming is the complexity of these theories, and in particular the constitutive models. Asphalt concrete
is a complex material in which recoverable and irrecoverable strains are dependent on temperature, stress
and strain rates. Therefore, viscoelasticity and viscoplasticity theories are most appropriate to model the
recoverable and irrecoverable behavior respectively. A framework for applying a viscoelastic-viscoplastic
model based on Schapery’s viscoelasticity theory and Perzyna’s viscoplasticity formulation was presented.
[6] The finite element model is used to simulate a moving wheel and to analyze the permanent deformation
behavior in the asphalt concrete layer in three dimensional pavement structures
[7] The dynamic modulus is the absolute value of the complex modulus, and is basically an elastic modulus
obtained from a viscoelastic model which incorporates factors such as temperature, loading rate, bitumen
viscosity and grain size characteristics of the mix, among others
[7] Some materials can carry only limited tensile stress and can undergo plastic deformation under high
compressive stress. One of the most common ways of simulating such material behavior and limiting the
tensile stress in finite element models is elastoplasticity. A linear-elastic perfectly-plastic Drucker– Prager
model was chosen to simulate this stress–strain behavior because of its simplicity
Mechanistic Models
[3] These deterioration models rely on the use of material behavior and pavement response models, which
are believed to represent the actual behavior of the pavement structure under the combined actions of traffic
and the environment. These behavior and response models are used to estimate strains, stresses and
deflections at various locations in the pavement structure. These critical responses are in turn, used to
predict in terms of surface deformation (rutting) and crack propagation (fatigue cracking)
[4] Mechanistic-Empirical (M-E) pavement design procedures are composed of a reliable response model
to estimate the state of stress in the pavement and distress models in order to predict the different types of
pavement distresses due to the prevailing traffic and environmental conditions.
Finite Element Method
[6] The viscoelastic-viscoplastic model developed and calibrated in this research was implemented in
ABAQUS™ (2006), a commercial finite element package widely employed in pavement engineering
research. The objective was to have a robust but simple to use tool for analyzing permanent deformations
[7] The difference in maximum rut depths from the two models (3D & 2D) is less than 2%. Therefore, 2D
plane strain models were appropriate for this study.
[7] For a linear–elastic perfectly-plastic material, the yield surface is fixed in stress space, and therefore
plastic deformation occurs only when the stress path moves on the yield surface
Vertical Strain
[2] Generally there are three causes of rutting in asphalt pavements: accumulation of permanent
deformation in the asphalt surfacing layer, permanent deformation of subgrade, and wear of pavements
caused by studded tires.
Stresses/Strains at different layers
[1]The Everstress (Sivaneswaran et al., 2001) layered elastic analysis software was employed in the the
simulation of stresses, fatigue and rutting strains in the designed pavements. Stresses, strains and deflection
due to 80 kN single axle load having a tyre pressure of 690.78 kPa was computed by analyzing the effect
due to 20 kN single axle load spaced 30.5 mm centre to centre. Evaluation of fatigue and rutting strains
were carried out on the underside of the asphalt bound layer and on top of the subgrade at 15.25 mm (X=0,
Y = 15.25) between the 20 kN axle loads.
[4] In addition to the stress state, the permanent deformation behavior of UGMs is also affected by the
stress history. This is due to the fact that the stiffness of the material gradually increases due to the
compaction effect of the repeated loading, resulting in a reduction in permanent deformation for subsequent
loadings.
[7] In the beginning, the material shows a considerable increase in the amount of permanent deformation
(accumulated plastic strain). However, as the number of loads increases, the accumulated plastic strain
levels off and the material is essentially elastic (recoverable strain). This phenomenon usually occurs after
100 to 200 load applications (Dormon, 1962)
Vehicular loading
[1] Stresses, strains and deflection due to 80 kN single axle load having a tyre pressure of 690.78 kPa was
computed by analyzing the effect due to 20 kN single axle load spaced 30.5 mm centre to centre.
[6] The tire footprint was modeled as a pressure load of 690 kPa (100 psi) applied directly on the set of
elements beneath the wheel. The moving wheel was simulated by incrementally moving the load footprint
Research Questions