Hocheng Phil. Corp. v. Farrales PDF

7/31/2018 G.R. No. 211497, March 18, 2015 - HOCHENG PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ANTONIO M. FARRALES, Respondent.
: MAR…

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™
Tweet

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2015 > March 2015 Decisions > G.R. No. 211497, March 18,
2015 HOCHENG PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ANTONIO M. FARRALES, Respondent.:

G.R. No. 211497, March 18, 2015 HOCHENG PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ANTONIO M.
FARRALES, Respondent.

ChanRobles OnLine Bar Review

THIRD DIVISION
G.R. No. 211497, March 18, 2015
HOCHENG PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ANTONIO M. FARRALES, Respondent.
D E C I S I O N
REYES, J .:
Before this Court on Petition for Review on Certiorari1 is the Decision2 dated October 17, 2013 of the
Court of Appeals (CA) in CAG.R. SP No. 125103, which reversed the Decision3 dated February 29, 2012
and Resolution4 dated May 7, 2012 of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in NLRC LAC No.
0800224911, and reinstated with modifications the Decision5 dated April 29, 2011 of the Labor Arbiter
(LA) in NLRC Case No. RABIV030061810C, which found that respondent Antonio M. Farrales
(Farrales) was illegally dismissed by Hocheng Philippines Corporation (HPC). The fallo of the appellate
decision reads:
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Decision of the Labor Arbiter dated April 29, 2011
in NLRC Case No. RABIV030061810C is reinstated with modifications. Private
respondent Hocheng Philippines Corporation is liable to pay [Farrales] the following: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary

DebtKollect Company, Inc. (1) Full backwages from date of dismissal on February 15, 2010 until date of decision
equivalent to P276,466.67;
(2) Separation pay of one (1) month salary per year of service for a period of twelve
years equivalent to P228,800.00;
(3) Appraisal yearend bonus in the sum of P11,000.00; and,
(4) Attorney�s fees equivalent to 10% of the total award.

SO ORDERED.6
The Facts

Farrales was first employed by HPC on May 12, 1998 as Production Operator, followed by promotions as
(1) Leadman in 2004, (2) Acting Assistant Unit Chief in 2007, and (3) Assistant Unit Chief of Production
in 2008, a supervisory position with a monthly salary of ?17,600.00. He was a consistent recipient of
citations for outstanding performance, as well as appraisal and yearend bonuses.7 chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary

On December 2, 2009, a report reached HPC management that a motorcycle helmet of an employee,
Reymar Solas (Reymar), was stolen at the parking lot within its premises on November 27, 2009. On
December 3, 2009, Security Officer Francisco Paragas III confirmed a video sequence recorded on
closedcircuit television (CCTV) around 3:00 p.m. on November 27, 2009 showing Farrales taking the
missing helmet from a parked motorcycle, to wit:
ChanRobles Intellectual Property
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
Division a. At around 3:07:44, [Farrales] was seen walking towards the motorcycle parking
lot;

chanrobleslaw

b. At around 3:08:47, [Farrales] walked back towards the pedestrian gate of the
company, passing by the motorcycle parking lot; chanrobleslaw

c. At around 3:08:51, [Farrales] walked back towards the motorcycle parking lot and
returned to the pedestrian gate; chanrobleslaw

d. At around 3:09:10, [Farrales] called on the person of Andy Lopega and instructed
him to get the helmet he was pointing at; [and]

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015marchdecisions.php?id=124 1/7
7/31/2018 G.R. No. 211497, March 18, 2015 - HOCHENG PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ANTONIO M. FARRALES, Respondent. : MAR…
e. At around 3:09:30, Andy gave the helmet to [Farrales].8
Later that day, HPC sent Farrales a notice to explain his involvement in the alleged theft. The
investigation was supported by the employees� union, ULOHocheng.9Below is Farrales� explanation, as
summarized by the CA: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
On November 27, 2009, [Farrales] borrowed a helmet from his coworker Eric Libutan
(�Eric�) since they reside in the same barangay. They agreed that Eric could get it at the
house of [Farrales] or the latter could return it the next time that they will see each other.
Eric told him that his motorcycle was black in color. As there were many motorcycles with
helmets, he asked another employee, Andy Lopega (�Andy�) who was in the parking area
where he could find Eric�s helmet. Andy handed over to him the supposed helmet which
he believed to be owned by Eric, then he went home.

On November 28, 2009, at around 6 o�clock in the morning, he saw Eric at their barangay
and told him to get the helmet. But Eric was in a rush to go to work, he did not bother to
get it.

In the morning of December 3, 2009, upon seeing Eric in the workplace, [Farrales] asked
him why he did not get the helmet from his house. Eric told him that, �Hindi po sa akin
yung nakuha nyong helmet.� [Farrales] was shocked and he immediately phoned the
HPC�s guard to report the situation that he mistook the helmet which he thought
belonged to Eric. After several employees were asked as to the ownership of the helmet,
he finally found the owner thereof, which is Jun Reyes�s (�Jun�) nephew, Reymar, who
was with him on November 27, 2009. [Farrales] promptly apologized to Jun and undertook
to return the helmet the following day and explained that it was an honest mistake. These
all happened in the morning of December 3, 2009; [Farrales] did not know yet that HPC
will send a letter demanding him to explain.10
A hearing was held on December 10, 2009 at 1:00 p.m. Present were Farrales, Eric Libutan (Eric), Andy
Lopega (Andy), Jun Reyes, Antonio Alinda, a witness, and Rolando Garciso, representing ULOHocheng.
From Andy it was learned that at the time of the alleged incident, he was already seated on his
motorcycle and about to leave the company compound when Farrales approached and asked him to hand
to him a yellow helmet hanging from a motorcycle parked next to him. When Andy hesitated, Farrales
explained that he owned it, and so Andy complied. But Eric had specifically told Farrales that his helmet
was colored red and black and his motorcycle was a black Honda XRM125 with plate number 8746DI,

parked near the perimeter fence away from the walkway to the pedestrian gate. The CCTV showed
Farrales instructing Andy to fetch a yellow helmet from a blue Rossi 110 motorcycle with plate number
3653DN parked in the middle of the parking lot, opposite the location given by Eric. Farrales in his
defense claimed he could no longer remember the details of what transpired that time, nor could he
A.C. No. 7158, March 09, 2015 YOLANDA A. explain why he missed Eric�s specific directions.11 chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
ANDRES, MINETTE A. MERCADO, AND ELITO P.

ANDRES , Complainants, v. ATTY. SALIMATHAR V.
On February 15, 2010, the HPC issued a Notice of Termination12 to Farrales dismissing him for violation
NAMBI, Respondent.
of Article 69, Class A, Item No. 29 of the HPC Code of Discipline, which provides that �stealing from the
A.C. No. 5816, March 10, 2015 DR. ELMAR O. company, its employees and officials, or from its contractors, visitors or clients,� is akin to serious
PEREZ, Complainant, v. ATTY. TRISTAN A. CATINDIG misconduct and fraud or w illful breach by the employee of the trust reposed in him by his
AND ATTY. KAREN E. BAYDO, Respondents. employer or duly authorized representative, which are just causes for termination of employment
under Article 282 of the Labor Code.
G.R. No. 211497, March 18, 2015 HOCHENG
PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ANTONIO On March 25, 2010, Farrales filed a complaint for illegal dismissal, nonpayment of appraisal and mid
M. FARRALES, Respondent. year bonuses, service incentive leave pay and 13th month pay. He also prayed for reinstatement, or in
lieu thereof, separation pay with full backwages, plus moral and exemplary damages and attorney�s
G.R. No. 190828, March 16, 2015 ONOFRE V. fees. During the mandatory conference, HPC paid Farrales ?10,914.51, representing his 13th month pay
MONTERO, EDGARDO N. ESTRA�ERO, RENING P. for the period of January to February 2010 and vacation leave/sick leave conversion. Farrales agreed to
PADRE, GABRIEL A. MADERA, HERMINIO T. TACLA,
NELSON C. VILORIA, DEMETRIO Q. PAJARILLO, waive his claim for incentive bonus.13 chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
ALFREDO R. AGANON, REYNALDO AVILA, ALBERT T.

RUIZ, NESTOR Y. YAGO, HARTY M. TUPASI, AGUSTIN On April 29, 2011, the LA ruled in favor of Farrales,14 the fallo of which is as follows: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
R. AVILA, JR. OR MARCOS R. AVILA, BONIFACIO B.

GAANO, JOSELITO D. CUENTA, JONAS P. ESTILONG, WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, all the respondents Hocheng Phils. Corporation,
DOMINADOR C. CANARIA, GENARO C. RONDARIS, Inc. Sam Chen[g] and Judy Geregale are found guilty of illegal dismissal and ordered
HERARDO M. DULAY, FRANKLIN A. RAVINA, JR., AND jointly and severally to pay complainant the following: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
RUBEN C. CABELLO, Petitioners, v. TIMES

TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., AND SANTIAGO 1.� Full backwages from date of dismissal on February 15, 2010 until date of
RONDARIS, MENCORP TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, INC.,
decision equivalent to P276,466.67.
VIRGINIA R. MENDOZA AND REYNALDO MENDOZA,

Respondents.
2.� Separation pay of one (1) month salary per year of service for a period of
A.C. No. 7593, March 11, 2015 ALVIN S. twelve years equivalent to P228,800.00.
FELICIANO, Complainant, v. ATTY. CARMELITA
BAUTISTALOZADA, Respondents. 3.� Appraisal yearend bonus in the sum of P11,000.00.

G.R. No. 195661, March 11, 2015 UNKNOWN 4.� Moral damages in the sum of P200,000.00.
OWNER OF THE VESSEL M/V CHINA JOY, SAMSUN
SHIPPING LTD., AND INTERASIA MARINE 5.� Exemplary damages in the sum of P100,000.00.
TRANSPORT, INC., Petitioners, v. ASIAN TERMINALS,
INC., Respondent. 6.� 10% of all sums owing as attorney�s fees or the amount of P81,626.67.

A.C. No. 5914, March 11, 2015 SPOUSES ROGELIO
AMATORIO AND AIDA AMATORIO, Complainants, v. SO ORDERED.15
ATTY. FRANCISCO DY YAP AND ATTY. WHELMA F.
SITONYAP, Respondents. On appeal by HPC,16 the NLRC reversed the LA,17 and denied Farrales� motion for reconsideration,
finding substantial evidence of just cause to terminate Farrales.18 chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
G.R. No. 215630, March 09, 2015 METROGUARDS
SECURITY AGENCY CORPORATION (FORMERLY On petition for certiorari to the CA,19 Farrales sought to refute the NLRC�s factual finding that he
KNOWN AS BEEGUARDS CORPORATION) AND MS.
committed theft, as well as to question NLRC�s jurisdiction over HPC�s appeal for nonpayment of
MILAGROS T. CHAN, Petitioners, v. ALBERTO N.
HILONGO, Respondent.
appeal fees. But the CA found that HPC was able to perfect its appeal by posting a bond equivalent to the
monetary award of ?897,893.37 and paying the appeal fees by postal money order in the amount of ?
G.R. No. 199113, March 18, 2015 RENATO M. 520.00.20
chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
DAVID, Petitioner, v. EDITHA A. AGBAY AND PEOPLE

OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondents. Concerning the substantive issues, the appellate court agreed with the LA that Farrales� act of taking
Reymar�s helmet did not amount to theft, holding that HPC failed to prove that Farrales� conduct was
G.R. No. 205300, March 18, 2015 FONTERRA induced by a perverse and wrongful intent to gain, in light of the admission of Eric that he did let Farrales
BRANDS PHILS., INC., Petitioner, v. LEONARDO1 borrow one of his two helmets, only that Farrales mistook Reymar�s helmet as the one belonging to
LARGADO AND TEOTIMO ESTRELLADO, Respondents.
him.

G.R. No. 206019, March 18, 2015 PHILIPPINE
NATIONAL BANK, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF Petition for Review to the Supreme Court
INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
In this petition, HPC raises the following grounds for this Court�s review: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
G.R. No. 204757, March 17, 2015 ATTY. JANET D.
NACION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, MA. A. THE HONORABLE [CA] PLAINLY ERRED AND ACTED CONTRARY TO EXISTING LAW
GRACIA PULIDOTAN, JUANITO ESPINO AND HEIDI AND JURISPRUDENCE IN REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE [NLRC] AND
MENDOZA, Respondents. DECLARING ILLEGAL THE DISMISSAL FOR [HPC�s] ALLEGED FAILURE TO PROVE
THE EXISTENCE OF JUST CAUSE.
G.R. No. 187836, March 10, 2015 SOCIAL
JUSTICE SOCIETY (SJS) OFFICERS, NAMELY, SAMSON 1. THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT [FARRALES]
S. ALCANTARA, AND VLADIMIR ALARIQUE T. COMMITTED THEFT IN [HPC�s] PREMISES.
CABIGAO, Petitioners, v. ALFREDO S. LIM, IN HIS
CAPACITY AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MANILA, 2. THEFT IS A JUST CAUSE FOR TERMINATION.
Respondent.; G.R. No. 187916 JOSE L. ATIENZA, JR.,

BIENVINIDO M. ABANTE, MA. LOURDES M. ISIP
GARCIA, RAFAEL P. BORROMEO JOCELYN DAWIS 3. BY COMMITTING THEFT, [FARRALES], BEING A SUPERVISORIAL
ASUNCION, MINORS MARIAN REGINA B. TARAN, EMPLOYEE, FORFEITED THE TRUST REPOSED IN HIM BY [HPC], THUS
MACAILA RICCI B. TARAN, RICHARD KENNETH B. RENDERING HIM DISMISSIBLE FOR LOSS OF CONFIDENCE.
TARAN, REPRESENTED AND JOINED BY THEIR
PARENTS RICHARD AND MARITES TARAN, MINORS B. IN DECLARING ILLEGAL THE DISMISSAL OF [FARRALES], THE HONORABLE [CA]
CZARINA ALYSANDRA C. RAMOS, CEZARAH VIOLATED DOCTRINES LAID DOWN BY THE SUPREME COURT.
ADRIANNA C. RAMOS, AND CRISTEN AIDAN C.

RAMOS REPRESENTED AND JOINED BY THEIR
MOTHER DONNA C. RAMOS, MINORS JAZMIN SYLLITA 1. COURTS CANNOT SUBSTITUTE THEIR JUDGMENT FOR THAT OF THE
T. VILA AND ANTONIO T. CRUZ IV, REPRESENTED MANAGEMENT.
AND JOINED BY THEIR MOTHER MAUREEN C.
TOLENTINO, Petitioners, v. MAYOR ALFREDO S. LIM, 2. COURTS MUST ACCORD DUE RESPECT TO THE FINDINGS OF
VICE MAYOR FRANCISCO DOMAGOSO, COUNCILORS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES.21
ARLENE W. KOA, MOISES T. LIM, JESUS FAJARDO
LOUISITO N. CHUA, VICTORIANO A. MELENDEZ, JOHN Chiefly, HPC insists that since the complaint below involves an administrative case, only substantial
MARVIN C. NIETO, ROLANDO M. VALERIANO, evidence, not proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt, is required to prove the guilt of Farrales;22 that
RAYMUNDO R. YUPANGCO, EDWARD VP MACEDA, what the CA has done is substitute its judgment for that of the NLRC, which is vested with statutory duty
RODERICK D. VALBUENA, JOSEFINA M. SISCAR,
SALVADOR PHILLIP H. LACUNA, LUCIANO M. VELOSO, to make factual determinations based on the evidence on record.23 chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
CARLO V. LOPEZ, ERNESTO F. RIVERA,1 DANILO

VICTOR H. LACUNA, JR., ERNESTO G. ISIP, HONEY H. Ruling of the Court
LACUNAPANGAN, ERNESTO M. DIONISO, JR. AND
ERICK IAN O. NIEVA, Respondents.; CHEVRON The Court resolves to deny the petition.
PHILIPPINES INC., PETRON CORPORATION AND
PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, To validly dismiss an employee, the law requires the employer to prove the existence of any of the valid
Intervenors. or authorized causes,24 which, as enumerated in Article 282 of the Labor Code, are: (a) serious

misconduct or willful disobedience by the employee of the lawful orders of his employer or the latter�s
G.R. No. 187606, March 09, 2015 NORMA V.
JAVATE, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES RENATO J. TIOTUICO representative in connection with his work; (b) gross and habitual neglect by the employee of his duties;
AND LERMA C. TIOTUICO, Respondents. (c) fraud or willful breach by the employee of the trust reposed in him by his employer or his duly
authorized representative; (d) commission of a crime or offense by the employee against the person of
G.R. No. 207133, March 09, 2015 SWIRE REALTY his employer or any immediate member of his family or his duly authorized representative; and (e) other
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. JAYNE causes analogous to the foregoing.25 As a supervisorial employee, Farrales is admittedly subject to
YU, Respondent. stricter rules of trust and confidence, and thus pursuant to its management prerogative HPC enjoys a
wider latitude of discretion to assess his continuing trustworthiness, than if he were an ordinary rank
G.R. No. 207747, March 11, 2015 SPOUSES CHIN
andfile employee.26 HPC therefore insists that only substantial proof of Farrales� guilt for theft is
KONG WONG CHOI AND ANA O. CHUA, Petitioners, v.
UNITED COCONUT PLANTERS BANK, Respondent. needed to establish the just causes to dismiss him, as the NLRC lengthily asserted in its decision.

G.R. No. 209383, March 11, 2015 SEACREST Article 4 of the Labor Code mandates that all doubts in the implementation and interpretation of the
MARITIME MANAGEMENT, INC., ROLANDO B. provisions thereof shall be resolved in favor of labor. Consistent with the State�s avowed policy to afford
MAGCALE, AND SEALION SHIPPING LIMITED � protection to labor, as Article 3 of the Labor Code and Section 3, Article XIII of the 1987 Constitution
UNITED KINGDOM, Petitioners, v. MAURICIO G. have enunciated, particularly in relation to the worker�s security of tenure, the Court held that �[t]o be
PICAR, JR., Respondent. lawful, the cause for termination must be a serious and grave malfeasance to justify the deprivation of a
means of livelihood. This is merely in keeping with the spirit of our Constitution and laws which lean over
G.R. No. 183511, March 25, 2015 REPUBLIC OF backwards in favor of the working class, and mandate that every doubt must be resolved in their
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. EMETERIA G.
favor.�27 Moreover, the penalty imposed on the erring employee ought to be proportionate to the
LUALHATI, Respondent.
offense, taking into account its nature and surrounding circumstances.
A.C. No. 10679, March 10, 2015 PO1 JOSE B.
CASPE, Complainant, v. ATTY. AQUILINO A. MEJICA, The Court has always taken care, therefore, that the employer does not invoke any baseless justification,
Respondent. much less management prerogative, as a subterfuge by which to rid himself of an undesirable worker,28
and thus in exceptional cases the Court has never hesitated to delve into the NLRC�s factual conclusions
G.R. No. 203774, March 11, 2015 CARGILL where evidence was found insufficient to support them, or too much was deduced from the bare facts
PHILIPPINES, INC., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF submitted by the parties, or the LA and the NLRC came up with conflicting positions, as is true in this
INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
case.29

G.R. No. 198024, March 16, 2015 PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. RAFAEL CUNANAN As aptly pointed out by the LA, while HPC has the onus probandi that the taking of Reymar�s helmet by
Y DAVID ALIAS �PAENG PUTOL�, AccusedAppellant. Farrales was with intent to gain, it failed to discharge this burden, as shown by the following
circumstances: Farrales sought and obtained the permission of Eric, his coemployee as well as barangay
G.R. No. 212054, March 11, 2015 ST. LUKE�S coresident, to borrow his helmet; at the parking lot, Farrales asked another employee, Andy, to fetch a
MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. MARIA yellow helmet from one of the parked motorcycles, mistakenly thinking it belonged to Eric (whom he
THERESA V. SANCHEZ, Respondent. knew owned two helmets); the following day, November 28, Farrales asked Eric why he had not dropped
by his house to get his helmet, and Eric replied that Farrales got the wrong helmet because he still had
G.R. No. 200983, March 18, 2015 REPUBLIC OF his other helmet with him; Farrales immediately sought the help of the company guards to locate the
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. HUANG TE FU, A.K.A. owner of the yellow helmet, who turned out to be Reymar; Farrales apologized to Reymar for his
ROBERT UY, Respondent.
mistake, and his apology was promptly accepted.30 All these circumstances belie HPC�s claim that
G.R. No. 175433, March 11, 2015 ATTY. JACINTO Farrales took Reymar�s helmet with intent to gain, the LA said.
C. GONZALES, Petitioner, v. MAILA CLEMEN F.
SERRANO, Respondent. In ruling that Farrales� dismissal by HPC was attended with utmost malice and bad faith as to justify an
award of moral and exemplary damages and attorney�s fees, the LA stated that �[i]t is succinctly clear
G.R. No. 201427, March 18, 2015 TEOFILO B. that [the] respondents [therein] tried to blow out of proportions the indiscretion of [Farrales] for reasons
ADOLFO, Petitioner, v. FE. T. ADOLFO, Respondent. known only to them,� and moreover, �[f]inding that the dismissal on the ground of theft is unavailing,
[the] respondents [therein] immediately offered [Farrales] his former position when he filed [his]
G.R. No. 155701, March 11, 2015 LIM TECK complaint. What does this act of [the] respondents [therein] speak [of]?�31
CHUAN, Petitioner, v. SERAFIN UY AND LEOPOLDA

CECILIO, LIM SING CHAN @ HENRY LIM,
Respondents. On the other hand, the NLRC found that Farrales lied, first, when he told Andy, then already astride his
motorbike at the parking area and about to leave the company premises, that the yellow helmet
G.R. No. 176908, March 25, 2015 PURISIMO M. belonged to him,32 and second, when he claimed that Eric was his neighbor, although they were not. It
CABAOBAS, EXUPERIO C. MOLINA, GILBERTO V. ruled as doubtful Farrales� hazy recollection about what happened that afternoon at the parking lot,
OPINION, VICENTE R. LAURON, RAMON M. DE PAZ, since he could not even give a description of the motorcycle from which he took the yellow helmet. These
JR., ZACARIAS E. CARBO, JULITO G. ABARRACOSO, circumstances, the NLRC determined, comprise substantial proof belying Farrales� claim of good faith.
DOMINGO B. GLORIA, AND FRANCISCO P. CUMPIO, As a supervisory employee, he held a position of high responsibility in the company making him
Petitioners, v. PEPSICOLA PRODUCTS, PHILIPPINES, accountable to stricter rules of trust and confidence than an ordinary employee, and under Article 282 of
INC., Respondents. the Labor Code, he is guilty of a serious misconduct and a willful breach of trust. The NLRC went on to

cite a settled policy that in trying to protect the rights of labor, the law does not authorize the oppression
G.R. No. 200620, March 18, 2015 ROBERTO L.
ABAD, MANUEL D. ANDAL, BENITO V. ARANETA, or selfdestruction of the employer. Management also has its own rights, which as such, are entitled to
PHILIP G. BRODETT, ENRIQUE L. LOCSIN AND respect and enforcement in the interest of simple fair play.33 chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
ROBERTO V. SAN JOSE, Petitioners, v. PHILIPPINE

COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE CORPORATION, But the Court agrees with the CA that Farrales committed no serious or willful misconduct or
REPRESENTED BY VICTOR AFRICA, Respondent. disobedience to warrant his dismissal. It is not disputed that Farrales lost no time in returning the helmet
to Reymar the moment he was apprised of his mistake by Eric, which proves, according to the CA, that
A.C. No. 10132, March 24, 2015 HEIRS OF PEDRO he was not possessed of a depravity of conduct as would justify HPC�s claimed loss of trust in him.
ALILANO REPRESENTED BY DAVID ALILANO, Farrales immediately admitted his error to the company guard and sought help to find the owner of the
Complainants, v. ATTY. ROBERTO E. EXAMEN, yellow helmet, and this, the appellate court said, only shows that Farrales did indeed mistakenly think
Respondent.
that the helmet he took belonged to Eric.

G.R. No. 209843, March 25, 2015 TAIWAN KOLIN
CORPORATION, LTD., Petitioner, v. KOLIN It is not, then, difficult to surmise that when Farrales told Andy that the yellow helmet was his, his intent
ELECTRONICS CO., INC., Respondent. was not to put up a pretence of ownership over it and thus betray his intent to gain, as the NLRC held,
but rather simply to assuage Andy�s reluctance to heed his passing request to reach for the helmet for
G.R. No. 203655, March 18, 2015 SM LAND, INC., him; Andy, it will be recalled, was at that moment already seated in his motorbike and about to drive out
Petitioner, v. BASES CONVERSION AND when Farrales made his request. As to Farrales� claim that he and Eric were neighbors, suffice it to say
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ARNEL PACIANO D. that as the CA noted, they resided in the same barangay, and thus, loosely, were neighbors.
CASANOVA, ESQ., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
PRESIDENT AND CEO OF BCDA, Respondents. The CA also pointed out that although the alleged theft occurred within its premises, HPC was not
prejudiced in any way by Farrales� conduct since the helmet did not belong to it but to Reymar. In light
of Article 69, Class A, Item No. 29 of the HPC Code of Discipline, this observation may be irrelevant,
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. CHARLIE
although it may be that the LA regarded it as proving HPC�s bad faith.
OROSCO, AccusedAppellant.

G.R. No. 205469, March 25, 2015 BPI FAMILY Theft committed by an employee against a person other than his employer, if proven by substantial
SAVINGS BANK, INC., Petitioner, v. ST. MICHAEL evidence, is a cause analogous to serious misconduct.34 Misconduct is improper or wrong conduct, it is
MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Respondent. the transgression of some established and definite rule of action, a forbidden act, a dereliction of duty,
willful in character, and implies wrongful intent and not mere error in judgment. The misconduct to be
serious must be of such grave and aggravated character and not merely trivial or unimportant. Such
g gg y p
OCA IPI NO. 14220CAJ, March 17, 2015 RE: misconduct, however serious, must, nevertheless, be in connection with the employee�s work to
COMPLAINT DATED JANUARY 28, 2014 OF constitute just cause for his separation.35
WENEFREDO PARRE�O, ET AL., AGAINST HON. CELIA

C. LIBREALEAGOGO, HON. ELIHU A. YBA�EZ AND
But where there is no showing of a clear, valid and legal cause for termination of employment, the law
HON. AMY C. LAZAROJAVIER, ASSOCIATE JUSTICES
OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, RELATIVE TO CA G.R. SP considers the case a matter of illegal dismissal.36 If doubts exist between the evidence presented by the
NO. 108807 employer and that of the employee, the scales of justice must be tilted in favor of the latter. The
employer must affirmatively show rationally adequate evidence that the dismissal was for a justifiable
G.R. No. 206381, March 25, 2015 PEOPLE OF THE cause.37
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. DANIEL MATIBAG
Y DE VILLA @ �DANI� OR �DANILO,� Accused Nonetheless, the Court agrees with the CA�s dismissal of the award of moral and exemplary damages
Appellant. for lack of merit. There is no satisfactory proof that the concerned officers of HPC acted in bad faith or

with malice in terminating Farrales. Notwithstanding the LA�s assertion to this effect, Farrales� bare
G.R. No. 192284, March 11, 2015 ALEX TIONCO Y
ORTEGA, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, allegations of bad faith deserve no credence, and neither is the mere fact that he was illegally dismissed
Respondent. sufficient to prove bad faith on the part of HPC�s officers.38 But concerning the award of attorney�s
fees, Farrales was dismissed for a flimsy charge, and he was compelled to litigate to secure what is due
A.C. No. 8330, March 16, 2015 TERESITA B. him which HPC unjustifiably withheld.
ENRIQUEZ, Complainant, v. ATTY. TRINA DE VERA,
Respondent. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the petition for review is DENIED.

G.R. No. 183212, March 16, 2015 WALLEM SO ORDERED.
PHILIPPINES SERVICES, INC. AND WALLEM SHIP
MANAGEMENT, LTD., Petitioners, v. HEIRS OF THE
Velasco, Jr., (Chairperson), Peralta, Villarama, Jr., and Jardeleza, JJ., concur.
LATE PETER PADRONES, Respondents.
cralawlawlibrary

Endnotes:
G.R. No. 179640, March 18, 2015 HACIENDA
CATAYWA/MANUEL VILLANUEVA, owner, JOEMARIE
VILLANUEVA, manager, MANCY AND SONS 1Rollo, pp. 2249.
ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioners, v. ROSARIO
LOREZO, Respondent.
2 Penned by Associate Justice Florito S. Macalino, with Associate Justices Sesinando E.
G.R. No. 212496, March 18, 2015 NESTOR Villon and Pedro B. Corales concurring; id. at 5464.
BRACERO, Petitioner, v. RODULFO ARCELO AND THE
HEIRS OF VICTORIANO MONISIT, namely: LOURDES 3 Penned by Presiding Commissioner Herminio V. Suelo, with Commissioners Angelo Ang
MENCHAVEZ, ROGELIO RUELO, AND MARTINIANA
Palana and Numeriano D. Villena concurring; id. at 150168.
APOR, Respondents.

4 Id. at 170172.
G.R. No. 196750, March 11, 2015 MA. ELENA R.
DIVINAGRACIA, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE
ESTATE OF THE LATE SANTIAGO C. DIVINAGRACIA, 5 Issued by Labor Arbiter Edgar B. Bisana; id. at 117124.
Petitioner, v. CORONACION PARILLA, CELESTIAL
NOBLEZA, CECILIA LELINA, CELEDONIO NOBLEZA, 6 Id. at 6364.
AND MAUDE NOBLEZA, Respondent.

7 Id. at 55.
G.R. No. 209370, March 25, 2015 FORT
BONIFACIO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
Petitioner, v. VALENTIN L. FONG, Respondent. 8 Id. at 5556.

A.C. No. 8826, March 25, 2015 SHIRLEY OLAYTA 9 Id. at 56.
CAMBA, Complainant, v. ATTY. OTILIO SY BONGON,
Respondent.
10 Id. at 5657.

G.R. No. 203240, March 18, 2015 NORTHERN
ISLANDS, CO., INC., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES DENNIS 11 Id. at 5758.
AND CHERYLIN* GARCIA, DOING BUSINESS UNDER
THE NAME AND STYLE �ECOLAMP MULTI 12 Id. at 8889.
RESOURCES,�, Respondents.

13 Id. at 5859.
A.C. No. 8776, March 22, 2015 ANTONINA S.
SOSA, Complainant, v. ATTY. MANUEL V. MENDOZA,
Respondent. 14 Id. at 117124.

G.R. No. 209283, March 11, 2015 CECILIA 15 Id. at 123124.
RACHEL V. QUISUMBING, Petitioner, v. LORETTA ANN
P. ROSALES, MA. VICTORIA V. CARDONA AND
16 Id. at 125127.
NORBERTO DELA CRUZ, IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS
CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS, RESPECTIVELY, OF
THE COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, Respondent. 17 Id. at 150168.

A.C. No. 10672, March 18, 2015 EDUARDO A. 18 Id. at 170172.
MAGLENTE, Complainant, v. ATTY. DELFIN R.
AGCAOILI, JR., Respondent.
19 Id. at 173194.

G.R. No. 208908, March 11, 2015 THE COFFEE
BEAN AND TEA LEAF PHILIPPINES, INC. AND 20 Id. at 60.
WALDEN CHU, Petitioners, v. ROLLY P. ARENAS,
Respondent. 21 Id. at 3233.

A.C. No. 10695, March 18, 2015 CRESCENCIANO

22 Id. at 3334.
M. PITOGO, Complainant, v. ATTY. JOSELITO TROY
SUELLO, Respondent.
23 Id. at 4245.
G.R. No. 200759, March 25, 2015 FAJ
CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 24Lynvil Fishing Enterprises, Inc. v. Ariola, G.R. No. 181974, February 1, 2012, 664 SCRA
Petitioner, v. SUSAN M. SAULOG, Respondent.
679, 692.
G.R. No. 207988, March 11, 2015 THE PEOPLE OF
25Concepcion v. Minex Import Corporation/Minerama Corporation, G.R. No. 153569,
THE PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. BRIAN
MERCADO Y SARMIENTO, AccusedAppellant. January 24, 2012, 663 SCRA 497, 504505.

G.R. No. 185374, March 11, 2015 SIMPLICIA 26Aurelio v. NLRC, G.R. No. 99034, April 12, 1993, 221 SCRA 432, 442.
CERCADOSIGA AND LIGAYA CERCADOBELISON,
Petitioners, v. VICENTE CERCADO, JR., MANUELA C. 27Gutierrez v. Singer Sewing Machine Company, 458 Phil. 401, 413 (2003), citing The
ARABIT, LOLITA C. BASCO, MARIA C. ARALAR AND
VIOLETA C. BINADAS, Respondent. Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. NLRC, 328 Phil. 1156, 1166 (1996).

G.R. No. 176033, March 11, 2015 FELILIBETH 28Jarcia Machine Shop and Auto Supply, Inc. v. NLRC, 334 Phil. 84, 93 (1997).
AGUINALDO AND BENJAMIN PEREZ, Petitioners, v.
REYNALDO P. VENTUS AND JOJO B. JOSON, 29Nisda v. Sea Serve Maritime Agency, et al., 611 Phil. 291, 311 (2009).
Respondent.

30 Per Antonio�s explanation, rollo, p. 312.
G.R. No. 205492, March 11, 2015 REPUBLIC OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES DANTE
AND LOLITA BENIGNO, Respondent. 31 Id. at 123.

G.R. No. 202805, March 23, 2015 ROSARIO 32 Id. at 327.
BANGUISTAMBUYAT, Petitioner, v. WENIFREDA

BALCOMTAMBUYAT, Respondent. 33 Id. at 167.

G.R. No. 202943, March 25, 2015 THE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, REPRESENTED BY 34Cosmos Bottling Corp. v. Fermin, G.R. No. 193676, June 20, 2012, 674 SCRA 310, 317.
SECRETARY ENRIQUE T. ONA, AND THE FOOD AND
DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FORMERLY THE BUREAU OF 35Cosep v. NLRC, 353 Phil. 148, 158159 (1998).
FOOD AND DRUGS), REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT

SECRETARY OF HEALTH NICOLAS B. LUTERO III,
36Sevillana v. I.T. (International) Corp./Samir Maddah & Travellers Insurance & Surety
OFFICERINCHARGE, Petitioners, v. PHILIP MORRIS
PHILIPPINES MANUFACTURING, INC., Respondent. Corp., 408 Phil. 570, 584 (2001).

G.R. No. 160914, March 25, 2015 MARCELA M. 37Asuncion v. NLRC, 414 Phil. 329, 341342 (2001); Nicario v. NLRC, 356 Phil. 936, 943
DELA CRUZ, Petitioner, v. ANTONIO Q. HERMANO AND (1998).
HIS WIFE REMEDIOS HERMANO, Respondent.
38See Aliling v. Feliciano, G.R. No. 185829, April 25, 2012, 671 SCRA 186, 217.
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. RECTO ANGNGAO
Y MAKAY AND ROBERT CARLIN Y PECDASEN,
ACCUSED, RECTO ANGNGAO Y MAKAY, Accused
Appellant.

G.R. No. 202989, March 25, 2015 COMGLASCO
CORPORATION/AGUILA GLASS, Petitioner, v. SANTOS
CAR CHECK CENTER CORPORATION, Respondent. Back to Home | Back to Main

G.R. No. 167052, March 11, 2015 BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS SECURITIES CORPORATION,
Petitioner, v. EDGARDO V. GUEVARA, Respondent. QUICK SEARCH

G.R. No. 183531, March 25, 2015 EASTERN
TELECOMMUNICATIONS PHILIPPINES, INC.,
Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE, Respondent. 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908
1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916
G.R. No. 184301, March 23, 2015 GE MONEY
BANK, INC. (FORMERLY KEPPEL BANK PHILIPPINES, 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924
INC.), Petitioner, v. SPOUSES VICTORINO M. DIZON 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932
AND ROSALINA L. DIZON, Respondent.
1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
G.R. No. 198753, March 25, 2015 JOSE �PEPE� 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
SANICO, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES
AND JENNIFER SONTENIO, Respondent. 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956
1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
G.R. No. 202970, March 25, 2015 NATANYA
JOANA D. ARGEL, Petitioner, v. GOV. LUIS C. 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
SINGSON, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE GOVERNOR OF 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
THE PROVINCE OF ILOCOS SUR, Respondent.
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
G.R. No. 197556, March 25, 2015 WATERFRONT 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
CEBU CITY CASINO HOTEL, INC. AND MARCO
PROTACIO, Petitioners, v. ILDEBRANDO LEDESMA, 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Respondent. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

G.R. No. 211199, March 25, 2015 PEOPLE OF THE 2013 2014 2015 2016
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RANDY
ROLLO Y LAGASCA, Defendant and Appellant.

G.R. No. 173241, March 25, 2015 SILICON
PHILIPPINES, INC. (FORMERLY INTEL PHILIPPINES
MANUFACTURING, INC.), Petitioner, v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 193809, March 23, 2015 SATURNINO
NOVECIO, GAVINO NOVECIO, ANASTACIO GOLEZ,
ABUNDIO SOMBILON, BERTING RODRIGUEZ,
MELITON CATALAN, Petitioners, v. HON. RODRIGO F.
LIM, JR., AS CHAIRMAN, HON. LEONCIA R. DIMAGIBA
AS PONENTE AND AS MEMBER AND HON. ANGELITA
A. GACUTAN AS MEMBER, FORMER TWENTYTHIRD
DIVISION, COURT OF APPEALS, MINDANAO STATION,
HON. JUDGE BENJAMIN ESTRADA, IN HIS CAPACITY
AS PRESIDING JUDGE OF BRANCH 9, RTC,
MALAYBALAY, BUKIDNON, MARIA CARMEN J.
TUAZON, REP. BY HER ATTORNEYINFACT, LOPE
DUROTAN, Respondents.; VERGELIO ROSALES, LUIS
TEQUILIO, GREGORIO PANANGIN, JOSEPH
RODRIQUEZ, EDDIE RODRIGUEZ, Petitioners, v. HON.
RODRIGO F. LIM, JR., AS CHAIRMAN, HON. LEONCIA
R. DIMAGIBA AS PONENTE AND AS MEMBER
DESIGNATED AS ACTING CHAIRPERSON, PER
SPECIAL ORDER NO. 1955 DATED MARCH 23, 2015.
DESIGNATED AS ACTING MEMBER VICE ASSOCIATE
JUSTICE ANTONIO T. CARPIO, PER SPECIAL ORDER
NO. 1956 DATED MARCH 23, 2015. AND HON.
ANGELITA A. GACUTAN AS MEMBER, FORMER
TWENTYTHIRD DIVISION, COURT OF APPEALS,
MINDANAO STATION, HON. JUDGE BENJAMIN
ESTRADA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDING JUDGE OF
BRANCH 9, RTC, MALAYBALAY, BUKIDNON, MANUEL
V. NIETO, REP. BY HIS ATTORNEYINFACT, LOPE
DUROTAN, Respondent.

G.R. No. 207422, March 18, 2015 ANGEL ABAD,
Petitioner, v. HERMINIO DELA CRUZ, Respondent.

PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. RODRIGO
CASACOP Y DE CASTRO, AccusedAppellant.

PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. MARCELINO
OLOVERIO, AccusedAppellant.

G.R. No. 175842, March 18, 2015 NILO MACAYAN,
JR. Y MALANA, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 189949, March 25, 2015 CASTILLEJOS
CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION, INC. (CASCONA),
Petitioner, v. JOSE S. DOMINGUEZ, ISIAS Q. VIDUA,
VICENTE M. BARRETO, JOSE M. SANTIAGO, JOSE
NASERIV C. DOLOJAN, JUAN FERNANDEZ,
HONORARIO DILAG, JR., FIDEL CORREA, ALICIA
MERCADO, LECIRA JUAREZ, ATTY. FULGENCIO
VIGARE, JR., ANGELITO U. SACRO, MILDRED
ESGUERRA, ANTONIO APALISOK, SALAMAN D.
MANGCA, DANILO S. SEGOBRE, EDMUNDO D. ENGAO,
P/SUPT. ROLAND FELIX, P/SUPT. JERRY SUMBAD,
P/INSP. GERRY HADUCA, P/INSP. ROBIN FUGIRAN,
COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (CDA),
BARTOLOME GALARITA, JR., WILFRE0O JIMENEZ,
HITLER UNTAL, JOEL JOHN PACTORES, ROLLY
CADORNA, RUDY ELIPSE, IBRAHIM LAHI, RODOLFO
BONIFACIO, JR., ANECITO VIEJO, JR., JONARD IRAN,
ANGELITO BALDONAZA, NIKKO DAJAY, ROLANDO
ASPA, JESON CABATINGAN, JOBERT UGANG
(SECURITY GUARDS), JOHN DOES (MEMBERS OF THE
ZAMBALES PROVINCIAL MOBILE GROUP OF THE
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE), Respondent.

G.R. No. 178407, March 18, 2015 METROPOLITAN
BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Petitioner, v. S.F.
NAGUIAT ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent.

G.R. No. 155405, March 18, 2015 THE HEIRS OF
EUGENIO LOPEZ, SR. NAMELY, OSCAR M. LOPEZ,
MANUEL M. LOPEZ AND PRESENTACION L. PSINAKIS,
Petitioners, v. THE HONORABLE FRANCISCO
QUERUBIN, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDING JUDGE
OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF ANTIPOLO,
BRANCH 74, THE HEIRS OF ALFONSO SANDOVAL AND
HIS WIFE ROSA RUIZ, REPRESENTED BY THEIR
ATTORNEYINFACT, MRS. IMELDA RIVERA,
Respondents.; G.R. No. 164092 HEIRS OF EUGENIO
LOPEZ, Petitioners, v. ALFONSO SANDOVAL AND
ROMAN OZAETA, JR., Respondent.

PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. CHARLIE SORIN Y
TAGAYLO, AccusedAppellant.

G.R. No. 171127, March 11, 2015 NOEL
CASUMPANG, RUBY SANGAMIRANDA AND SAN JUAN
DE DIOS HOSPITAL, Petitioners, v. NELSON CORTEJO,
Respondent.; G.R. No. 171217 DRA. RUBY SANGA
MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. NELSON CORTEJO,
Respondent; G.R. No. 171228 SAN JUAN DE DIOS
HOSPITAL, Petitioner, v. NELSON CORTEJO,
Respondent.

THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
OF AGRICULTURE, Petitioner, v. FEDERICO DACLAN,
JOSEFINA COLLADO AND HER HUSBAND FEDERICO
DACLAN, TEODORO DACLAN AND MINVILUZ DACLAN
AS SURVIVING HEIRS OF DECEASED JOSE DACLAN,
Respondents.; [G.R. NO. 197267] FEDERICO
DACLAN, JOSEFINA COLLADO, TEODORO DACLAN
AND MINVILUZ DACLAN AS SURVIVING HEIRS OF
DECEASED JOSE DACLAN, Petitioners, v. REPUBLIC
OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE
SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE AND PROVINCE OF LA
UNION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROVINCIAL
GOVERNOR, Respondent.

G.R. No. 160728, March 11, 2015 CLT REALTY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. PHIL
VILLE DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING CORPORATION,
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES (THROUGH THE
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL), AND THE
REGISTER OF DEEDS OF METRO MANILA DISTRICT
III, CALOOCAN CITY, Respondent.

G.R. No. 193038, March 11, 2015 JOSEFINA V.
NOBLEZA, Petitioner, v. SHIRLEY B. NUEGA,
Respondent.

G.R. Nos. 21178990, March 17, 2015 DR. REY B.
AQUINO, Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS,
Respondent.

A.C. No. 8261, March 11, 2015 JESSIE T.
CAMPUGAN AND ROBERT C. TORRES, Complainants,
v. ATTY. FEDERICO S. TOLENTINO, JR., ATTY. RENATO
G. CUNANAN, ATTY. DANIEL F. VICTORIO, JR., AND
ATTY. ELBERT T. QUILALA, Respondents.; A.C. No.
8725 JESSIE T. CAMPUGAN AND ROBERT C. TORRES,
Complainants, v. ATTY. CONSTANTE P. CALUYA, JR.,
AND ATTY. ELBERT T. QUILALA, Respondent.

PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. RONNIE BUAT
ALIAS DATU SINSUAT, AccusedAppellant.

G.R. No. 182886, March 09, 2015 SPOUSES
SALVADOR P. NORBERTE, JR. AND ELIZABETH S.
NORBERTE, Petitioners, v. SPOUSES FELICISIMO G.
MEJIA AND ELVIRA C. MEJIA AND/OR THEIR HEIRS,
REPRESENTED BY ALEXIS MEJIAQUERUBIN,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 169407, March 25, 2015 BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Petitioner, v. AMADOR
DOMINGO, Respondent.

G.R. No. 201248, March 11, 2015 LETICIA
NAGUIT AQUINO, MELVIN NAGUIT, ROMMEL NAGUIT,
ELMA NAGUIT TAYAG, YSSEL L. NAGUIT, ROSALINA
NAGUIT AUMENTADO, RIZEL NAGUIT CUNANAN,
CARIDAD NAGUIT PARAJAS, MILLIE NAGUIT
FLORENDO, MARNEL NAGUIT, EDUARDO NAGUIT,
JOSE NAGUIT, ZOILO NAGUIT, AND AMELIA NAGUIT
DIZON, REPRESENTED BY YSSEL L. NAGUIT,
Petitioners, v. CESAR B. QUIAZON, AMANDA
QUIAZON, JOSE B. QUIAZON AND REYNALDO B.
QUIAZON, REPRESENTED BY JAIME B. QUIAZON,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 193890, March 11, 2015 ESTANISLAO
AND AFRICA SINAMBAN, Petitioners, v. CHINA
BANKING CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 191945, March 11, 2015 NATIONAL
POWER CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SOCORRO T.
POSADA, RENATO BUENO, ALICE BALIN, ADRIAN
TABLIZO, TEOFILO TABLIZO, AND LYDIA T. OLIVO,
SUBSTITUTED BY HER HEIRS, ALFREDO M. OLIVO,
ALICIA O. SALAZAR, ANITA O. ORDONO, ANGELITA O.
LIM, AND ADELFA O. ESPINAS, Respondents.

THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. HEIRS OF GABRIEL
Q. FERNANDEZ, Respondents.

PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. BAYANI DE LEON,
ANTONIO DE LEON, DANILO DE LEON AND YOYONG
DE LEON, AccusedAppellants.

G.R. No. 195956, March 11, 2015 ABSCBN
CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. FELIPE GOZON,
GILBERTO R. DUAVIT, JR., MARISSA L. FLORES,
JESSICA A. SOHO, GRACE DELA PE�AREYES, JOHN
OLIVER T. MANALASTAS, JOHN DOES AND JANE
DOES, Respondents.

G.R. No. 184355, March 23, 2015 ARNULFO A.K.A.
ARNOLD JACABAN, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 179047, March 11, 2015 SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. SUBIC
BAY GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB, INC. AND UNIVERSAL
INTERNATIONAL GROUP DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, Respondents.

Copyright © 1998 2018 ChanRobles Publishing Company Disclaimer | Email Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™ RED

Hocheng Phil. Corp. v. Farrales PDF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Hocheng Phil. Corp. v. Farrales PDF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

7/31/2018 G.R. No. 211497, March 18, 2015 - HOCHENG PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ANTONIO M. FARRALES, Respondent.

ANDRES, MINETTE A. MERCADO, AND ELITO P.

ALFREDO R. AGANON, REYNALDO AVILA, ALBERT T.

R. AVILA, JR. OR MARCOS R. AVILA, BONIFACIO B.

RUBEN C. CABELLO, Petitioners, v. TIMES

DAVID, Petitioner, v. EDITHA A. AGBAY AND PEOPLE

CARLO V. LOPEZ, ERNESTO F. RIVERA,1 DANILO

ROBERTO V. SAN JOSE, Petitioners, v. PHILIPPINE

Вам также может понравиться