Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
According to Kanazawa, 2004; Sternberg, 1997; Wolman, 1989, Intelligence is defined as the
mental ability that enable us to adapt to shape or select one's environment; ability to deal with
novel situations, ability to judge, comprehend and reason'; ability to act purposefully, think
rationally and deal effectively with the environment.
Neisser et al. in 1996 have defined intelligence as the ability to understand complex ideas, to
adapt effectively to the environment, to learn from experiences, to engage in various forms of
reasoning, to overcome obstacles by careful thought.
In the book “Psychology an Introduction” by Benjamin B Lahey, 1995, has defined Intelligence as
cognitive abilities of an individual to learn from experience, to reason well, and to cope effectively
with the demands of daily living.
These and many other definitions of intelligence from different psychologists can be summarized
into three points as below:
One of the best used and applicable definition of intelligence given by David Wechsler in 1958
explains that intelligence is the aggregate or global capability of the individual to act purposefully,
think rationally, and to deal effectively with his environment.
Cattel and Horn concluded that over our life span, we progress from using fluid
intelligence to depending more in crystallized intelligence. Early in life, we encounter
many problems for the first time so we need fluid intelligence to figure out solutions. As
experience makes us more knowledgeable, we have less need to approach each situation
as a new problem. Instead we simply call up appropriate information and techniques from
long term memory thereby utilizing our crystallized intelligence.
Intelligence Quotient
Intelligence quotient or I.Q is the numerical or quantified form of the intelligence. In earlier times,
I.Q was calculated with a simple formula of Mental Age, M.A. divided by Chronological Age C.A
multiplied by 100. Here Mental age stands for the cognitive maturity of an individual regardless of
their chronological age whereas chronological age stands for the age defined by the birth date. At
this time, the people who scored 100 were taken as having an average I.Q. While anyone who
scored less than 100 as mentally retarded and more than 100 as mentally gifted.
Later on, through several tests and surveys and experiments, Intelligence quotient (I.Q.) scores
were distributed in the population in such a way that scores of most people tend to fall in the
middle range of distribution. Only a few people have either very high or very low scores. The
frequency distribution for the IQ scores tends to approximate a bell shaped curve called the
normal distribution curve. The distribution of IQ scores in the form of a normal distribution.
The average IQ score is 100 and 95.44 % have IQ scores between 70 and 130. About 68.26% have
IQ scores between 85 and 115.
About 2.3 % have IQ scores below 70. Likewise, just 2.3 % have IQ scores just above 130.
Whether a person is mentally retarded or not to find it out, we look at two main things.
a. Ability of a person’s brain to learn, think, solve problems, and make sense of the world
called intellectual functioning
b. And whether the person has skills he or she needs to live independently called adaptive
functioning.
Intellectual functioning is usually measured by a test called on IQ test. The average score is
100. People scoring below 70 are thought to have mental retardation. To measure adaptive
functioning, professionals look at what a child can do in comparison to other children of his or
her age.
On the basis of IQ scores and adaptive skills four levels of retardation have been identified.
IQ score ranges from 39/40 to 54/55. Their mental age ranges from 6 to 8.5years. They
have difficulty and require training but they can learn adequate self help skills. Their
receptive and expressive language is adequate but they have speech problems. They
have very few academic skills and first or second grade is maximum achievable. They
are capable of making friends but have difficulty in many social situations. They can
work in sheltered work environment but they usually need consistent supervision.
They usually do not marry nor have children. Their motor coordination is poor.
IQ range is below 25 and their mental age is below 3 and three quarters. They are
totally dependent on others for self care. There might be physical deformity, brain
anomalies, and convulsive seizures. Deafness and dumbness is a common problem.
They have short life span for their immunity power or disease resistance is low. They
need constant full care.
2. Mentally gifted
At the right hand end of the bell shaped curve of intelligence lie the mentally gifted people.
These individual have IQ scores more than 120.
A moderately gifted are usually defined as those whose IQ scores lies between 130 and
150 and a profoundly gifted has an IQ above 180.
According to another categorization, very superior are defined as people with IQ 120-130
while near genius are defined as those with IQ above 130.
The study of gifted individuals began in 192 when Lewis Terman selected a sample of over
1500 gifted children with IQs ranging from 135 to 200. Over next 65 years, researchers
repeatedly tested these individuals to determine what they had achieved and how they
had adjusted.
Although 10-30% of the gifted men obtained advanced degrees compared with men in
general population, 30% never finished college and 2% actually flunked out or failed to
finish college due to academic shortcomings.
During their childhood, they were taller than other children of same age, their birth
weight were above normal, they also showed early signs of intellectual superiority like
they showed larger attention span, good recognition memory, early signs of language skills,
etc.
Although gifted individual generally showed better health, adjustment, life satisfaction,
and achievement than people with average IQs, about 9% had serious emotional problems
and 7% committed suicide (Chegarty, 2007; Holahan & Sears, 1995; Terman & Oden, 1959).
Research shows that only gifted children who have demanding and critical parents are
more likely to have social and emotional problems than children with normal intelligence
(Elias, 2005)
When placed in regular classroom, gifted children face a number of problems. They are
bored of lack of stimulation and they may feel lonely or develop social problems because
they are labeled as geeks. Researchers recommend that gifted children be placed in
special academic programs that challenge and help them develop their potentials (Goode,
2002, Winner, 2000)
In the early 1900’s, intelligence was believed to be primarily inherited or due to nature
(Terman, 1916).
Role of heredity
Identical twins have nearly 100% of their genes in common whereas fraternal twins have
just 50% of their genes in common
The above data shows that the correlation of IQ scores between identical twins who share
nearly 100% of their genes is 0.85. This value is higher than the correlation coefficient
between fraternal twins who share 50% of their genes and also that of siblings.
What would happen if children with limited socio-educational opportunities and low IQs
were adopted by parents who could provide better social and educational opportunities?
Researchers reasoned that if environmental factors influence development of intelligence,
then providing more environmental opportunities should increase IOQ scores.
To determine whether environment can increase IQ scores, are research study examined
the IQs of African American children from impoverished environments who were adopted
by middle class families, some white and some African Americans; all the families provided
many social educational opportunities for the adapted children. Researchers found that
the IQs of the adopted children were as much as 10 points higher than those of African
American children raised in disadvantaged homes (Scarr & Weinberg, 1976).
A similar study, this time focusing on children living in Romania, examined the intellectual
functioning of children abandoned at birth and placed in state-run-institutions (well
known for not providing children with appropriate cognitive stimulation). Those children
who remained in institutions during the first several years of life demonstrated
significantly poorer intellectual functioning when compared with children who soon
moved into foster care. Children living in foster care are much more likely to have good
educational opportunities than children remaining in state-run-institutions (C.A. Nelson, et.
al., 2007).
These kinds of studies show that children with poor educational opportunities and low IQ
scores can show an increase in IQ scores when they are provided better educational
opportunities rich nutrition, good social environment. Performance on IQ tests has
increased substantially around the world at all age levels in recent decades. This
phenomenon is now as Flynn Effect (Flynn, 1987, 1996).
The average IQ scores for many populations have been rising at an average rate of three
points per decade since the early 20th century. This phenomenon has been named after
Richard Lynn and James R Flynn. Attempted explanations have included improved
nutrition, a trend towards smaller families, better education, etc. such increases have
averaged around about 3 IQ points per decade worldwide but in some countries they have
been even larger change
1952 1962 1972
Britain 87 93 95
Netherlands 79 85 92
Norway 77 83 88
The following variables or factors have been suggested as possible contributors to the
continuing rising IQ (Flynn, 1999; Williams, 1998);
1. Better nutrition
2. Increased urbanization
3. The advent of television
4. More and better education
5. More cognitively demanding jobs
6. Exposure to computer games
Proper childhood nutrition appears critical for cognitive development while malnutrition can lower
IQ.
A recent study found that the FADS2 gene, along with breast feeding adds about 7IQ points to
those with the “C” version of genes. Those with the “G” version of FADS2 gene see no advantage
(Capsi, Williams, Kim-Cohen et. al., 2007; Turkheimer Haley, Waldron, Onofrio, Gottesman II,
2003).
In sum, many forms of evidence support the view that intelligence is determined at least in part by
environmental factors.
Many study the nature-nurture issue with respect to intelligence, now believe that our genes
endow supply us with a reaction range- that is a range of possible intellectual levels that we may
attain, depending in part on the nature and quality of environment into which we are born and
within which we mature.
To understand reaction range, we may refer to Curt Stein’s “Rubber Band” analogy. The amount
of stretch a particular rubber band actually shows will depend upon both its native endowment-
its basic “stretchability”- and the amount of pressure or “pull” exerted by people in its
environment. Similarly, the amount of any particular characteristic that a person will show
depends upon that person’s inborn potential or “stretch” for the characteristics and the degree to
which person’s environment “pulls for” the development of that characteristics.
Researchers estimate that the reaction range may vary up or down by as much as 10 points in
one’s IQ scores.
For example, a person’s IQ may vary from 80 to 100 depending on whether he/she has an
impoverished or enriched environment (Zigler & Seitz, 1982).
Emotional intelligence
The concept of emotional intelligence was first formulated by Peter Salovey and John Mayer in
1990. Emotional intelligence is the ability to perceive, express, understand, and regulate emotions
(Peter Salovey and John Mayer, 1994; Salovey and others, 2002). Peter Salovey and John Mayer
defined emotional intelligence in terms of being able to monitor and regulate one’s own and
other’s feelings and to show feeling to guide thought and actions.
Emotional intelligence may also be defined as the capacity for recognizing our own feeling and
those others for motivation ourselves and for managing emotions well in us and in our
relationships.’
Being emotionally skilled can make us more flexible, adaptable, and emotionally mature (Bonanno
et. al., 2004). People who excel in life tend to be emotionally intelligent (Mehrabian, 200).
People with high emotional skills are more agreeable than people with low emotional skills (Haas
et. A., 2007)
People who are low in emotional intelligence are often unable to identify their own emotions. The
costs of poor emotional skills range from problems in marriage and parenting to poor physical
health as well as problems in workplace. A lack of emotional intelligence can ruin careers.
The greatest effects of poor emotional skills fall on children and teenagers. For them, having poor
emotional intelligence can contribute to depression, eating disorders, unwanted pregnancy,
aggression, violent crime, and poor academic performance (Parker, 2005).
Daniel Goleman (1995) suggests that emotional intelligence consist of five major parts:
This is the ability to understand one’s own emotions, feeding, and needs. Emotionally
intelligent people are able to recognize quickly if they are angry or envious, r feeling guilty
or depressed. And when they know how they are feeling deep inside, they can make
intelligent choices. If people do not themselves know or are not aware of their own
emotions, they wouldn’t be able to express how they are feeling at a moment through
facial expressions, body language, etc. because of such lack of expression; other people
find it hard to know how a particular person is feeling as a result inter-personal
relationships get affected.
3. Self motivation
It refers to our ability to move on irrespective of our failures, setbacks, hurdles etc.
according to Shoda, Mischel, Peake, 1990), self motivation refers to being able to motivate
oneself to work along and work hard on a task, remaining optimistic about the factors,
outcome, working with enthusiasm and being able to put off receiving small rewards now
in order to get larger ones later on.
4. Empathy
The ability to accurately perceive emotions in others and sense what others are feeling.
They are good at “reading” facial expressions, tone of voice, and other signs of emotion.
This sign is valuable in many practical settings. For example, if you can accurately know
another person’s current mood, you can tell whether it is the right time to ask her or him
for a favor.
Therefore, we can say that if people who work in an organization or company are aware about
their emotions and manage them accordingly, the workplace will be a better place to work, place
where there is cooperation among employees; understanding is there; ether is peace and
harmony; feelings of helping and supporting others are there.
Deviant workplace behaviors will be reduced. Through the better regulation of emotions of its
staffs, organization can make better decisions; can come up with new ideas, new vision which help
the organization form a separate niche in the business world.
Emotionally intelligent people work with great effort, enthusiasm and has optimistic outlook in life
which can even help the fulfilling company. Emotional intelligence is not only beneficial for the
organization as a whole but for individual staff as well. Those who are emotionally intelligent are
liked y their colleagues and boss. So, they are more likely to get new opportunities, help and
benefits. Because of their emotional skills, they are more likely to be selected over the people who
are equally intellectual, capable as them but lack skills to control their emotions and form positive
relationships/ healthy relationships with others.