some people believe that countries have moral obligation to help each other, while

others worry that aids money cannot get to the poor of the world. Discuss both
views and give your opinion?
it has been said that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the
laws of gravity countries ( who are members a global organizations usually provide
international aids to other countries) having problems. However, the opponents say
that financial support cannot get the needy. In the following essay, justification
for both school of thoughts will be discussed
On the one hand, it is important to recognize that humaniatian relief show the
tolenrance to the victimes who are suffering, tough conditions. Needless to sa, the
core virtue of caring and sharing is common throughout the world. In particular,
it is principle tha when other members of communities are having difficulties,
people should express mutual understanding and then give them listening ears and
helping hand, which is known as an action of philanthropy. From national
perpective, the provision of monetary support is consistent to the ethos of
humanity. For example, wealthy countries are recommended to provide financial
assistance to others which are in crisis, such as civil war, inhabitable
environment because of pollution or food shortage due to extreme weather, although
it is not imperative. Furthermore, under guise of humanitarian aids, affluent
countries can prevent the victimization of problems that are derived from
neighbouring, countries by helping them to solve problems at early stages.
On the other hand, international relief unter some circumstances cannot approach
the poor. It is common that less developed countries which are in absence of modern
technologies, state of the art equipment, well educated staff usually have
countless difficulties in promoting economies. In other words, the root cause of
crisis in such countries in the lack of novel technology, latest knowledge among
human resources. Therefore, at the heart of the matter is neccessity of providing
receipient countries techonology exchanges, training causes. Such projects are
believed to lief poor countries out of poverty by giving them solid backgrounds to
gain self-sufficency in the long run. Otherwise, financial support is only
temporary solution. More seriously carruptive regimes can mispend money on
inapproriate
In conclusion, it is ethically compulsory that countries should give humanization
aids to the needy. However, to the best of my knowledge, international reliefs
should be conducted in the exchange of technology
We can get knowledge from news but some people think we cannot trust journalist.
What do you think? What qualities do you think a sucessful journalist should have?
In the information era, audiences have a growing appetite for news about the ever-
changing world. Journalists play an integral, crucial role from meeting this nees.
In my opinion, although reports can convey messages pricisely to the public, it is
not always the case reader should question the creditability of journalists
Firstl, it is important to recognize that journalists should alwys bear in mind a
clear-cut distinction between neutral information and subjective opinion. They are
expected deliver new to views without introducing biased opinions. However, in
fact, due to the lack of knowledge In some fields, the writing content in some
cases consist partial opinion rather than being objective. Furthermore, another
reason that contribute to the erosion of journalist�s reliability is twisting the
fact because of commercial �s political pressure. For example, in many countries,
local governments impose pressure on writers to distort the fact, aimming at
misguilding the public. In other words, journalists are not always trustworthy
because sometimes rulers inforce them to disseminate information intendedly
To become successful journalist, they should always persue objectively with is the
core factor of the core factor of journalism. They are recommended to introduce
inbiased opinion, impertial information, that is to say neutralization is necessary
in writings. If the wise to spread they personal view, they should make thoughful,
careful��.. furthermore, consistency to the truth, reporting new to the public
accurately not withstanding huge pressure is an action of defending the freedom of
prers. When it comes to journalism, the willingness to how much a journalist show
to protect the freedom of speech is the yardstick for their success
In conclusion, audidences should challenge the trust worthiness of reporters. Only
when journalists show respect to the truth not exaggerate or downplay, could they
become successful journalist