Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
Correlations
SEX KNOWLEDGE
OF
PREVENTION
OF HIV
N 4 4
Pearson Correlation -.864 1
KNOWLEDGE OF
Sig. (2-tailed) .136
PREVENTION OF HIV
N 4 9
Interpretation: The Pearson correlation value is -0.864. This means that there is a strong association between the two variables. In other words, there is a
negatively strong relationship between the sex and knowledge of prevention of HIV
At ∝ = 0.05, sig. value (0.136) >∝ we cannot reject 𝐻0 . We then conclude that there is no association between the sex and knowledge of prevention of HIV.
Table: 3.2
Correlations
AGE KNOWLEDGE
OF
PREVENTION
OF HIV
N 6 6
Pearson Correlation -.153 1
KNOWLEDGE OF
Sig. (2-tailed) .772
PREVENTION OF HIV
N 6 9
Interpretation: The Pearson correlation value is -0.153. This means that there is a very weak association between the two variables. In other words, there is
a negatively very weak relationship between the age and knowledge of prevention of HIV.
At ∝ = 0.05, sig. value (0.772) >∝ we cannot reject 𝐻0 . We then conclude that there is no association between the age and knowledge of prevention of HIV.
Table: 3.3
Correlations
SETTLEMENT KNOWLEDGE
OF
PREVENTION
OF HIV
N 6 6
Pearson Correlation -.148 1
KNOWLEDGE OF
Sig. (2-tailed) .780
PREVENTION OF HIV
N 6 9
Interpretation: The Pearson correlation value is -0.148. This means that there is a very weak association between the two variables. In other words, there is
a negatively very weak relationship between the settlement and knowledge of prevention of HIV.
At ∝ = 0.05, sig. value (0.780) >∝ we cannot reject 𝐻0 . We then conclude that there is no association between the settlement and knowledge of prevention
of HIV.
Table: 3.4
Correlations
N SEX 4 4 4 4
AGE 4 4 4 4
SETTLEMENT 4 4 4 4
Interpretation: