TESOL Certificate Programs

Rubric for Written Assignments V4

Student Name: Claudia Walukouw Date: September 3, 2018 Instructor Name: Sapir Levin Class: Grammar Structure/Methods Assignment: Lesson Plan

Overall The lesson plan was The lesson plan may The lesson plan evidences The lesson plan demonstrates The lesson plan clearly
performance not submitted, or not demonstrate an some understanding of the understanding of the demonstrates a thorough
(approach, the submitted understanding of how approach, methods, and approach, methods and understanding of the
methods, lesson plan was not to teach the skill(s) at techniques used to teach the techniques used to teach the approach, methods and
techniques) relevant to the hand. It may not reflect skill at hand. It somewhat skill at hand. It reflects the techniques used to teach the
approaches, the methods or reflects the methodology methodology as covered in skill at hand. It clearly
methods, and techniques from the prescribed in the course. It the course. It includes reflects the methodology
techniques used to course. The connection may include some techniques techniques for teaching the prescribed in the course, with
teach the skill. The between theory and for teaching the skill. The skill. The connection between effective techniques for
connection between lesson plan is not connection between theory theory and lesson plan is teaching the skill. The
theory and lesson apparent or not and lesson plan may not be apparent. connection between theory
plan is missing. accurate. apparent or may be inaccurate. 26points and lesson plan is obvious
0points 20points 23points and accurate.
30points

Lesson Plan The lesson plan was The lesson plan may
not submitted, or not clearly describe
the submitted setting, level, L1, age.
lesson plan was not The objectives may be
relevant to the inaccurate or missing.
assignment. LP may be hard to
0points follow, and may lack
appropriate activities.
Activities may not
support objectives.
20points
The lesson plan may not
clearly describe setting, level,
L1, age. The objectives may
not follow the prescribed
format. LP may have some
timestamps and grouping
strategies, but they may be
inaccurate. The activities may
fit the lesson somewhat, but
may be unorganized or may
not fully support the
objectives.
23points
The lesson plan describes
student setting, level, L1, age.
The lesson plan has
objectives that are
observable, measurable, and
student-centered. LP includes
notations for time and
grouping strategies that are
feasible for the lesson. The
activities follow a logical
progression and support the
objectives.
26points
The lesson plan clearly
describes student setting,
level, L1, age. The lesson
plan has objectives that are
observable, measurable, and
student-centered. LP includes
notation for time and
grouping strategies, which
are both very appropriate for
the lesson. The activities
follow logical progression,
and are effective,
appropriate, and engaging for
the students. The activities
clearly and effectively
support objectives.
30points
 Materials/ The lesson plan was The materials, The materials, resources and The materials, resources and The materials, resources and
Resources/ not submitted, or resources and technology used in the lesson technology used in the lesson technology used in the lesson
Technology the submitted technology used in the plan may reflect some plan reflect an understanding plan reflect a thorough
lesson plan lesson plan may not understanding of the content, of the content, learning understanding of the content,
included materials, reflect an understanding learning context, and students. context, and students. They learning context, and
resources and of the content, learning The materials are somewhat improve upon the lesson by students. They are
technology that context, and students. relevant or authentic for making it more engaging. implemented seamlessly into
were not relevant to The materials may not students. The technology or The materials are be relevant the lesson in a way that
the assignment. be relevant, interesting, resources may be outdated. and authentic for students. enhances student engagement
0points or authentic for 15points The technology and resources and learning. The materials
students. The are updated. are relevant, authentic, and
technology and 17points interesting for students. The
resources may be very technology and resources are
outdated. cutting-edge.
13points 20points

Writing The lesson plan was Linguistic features of Linguistic features of the Linguistic features of the Linguistic features of the
not submitted, or the writing (syntax, writing (syntax, usage, word writing (syntax, usage, word writing (syntax, usage, word
the submitted usage, word form, form, tone/register, spelling, form, tone/register, spelling, form, tone/register, spelling,
lesson plan was not tone/register, spelling, capitalization, punctuation, capitalization, punctuation, capitalization, punctuation,
relevant to the capitalization, etc.) are somewhat effective. etc.) are effective and etc.) are highly effective. The
assignment. punctuation, etc.) are The errors may be distracting professional/academic. There writing is very professional
0points not effective. Errors are and/or interfere with the may be a few errors, but they and academic. There are no
very distracting and/or comprehensibility of the do not interfere with the apparent errors.
interfere greatly with message. comprehensibility of the 20points
the comprehensibility 15points message.
of the message. 17points
13points .

Score: 100/100