Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
diversions-database
The diversions drained hundreds of millions of dollars
from institutions that are underwritten by public
donations and government funds. Just 10 of the largest
disclosures identified by The Post cited combined losses
to nonprofit groups and their affiliates that potentially
totaled more than a half-billion dollars.
While some of the diversions have come to public
attention, many others — such as the one at the
American Legacy Foundation — have not been reported
in the news media. And The Post found that nonprofits
routinely omitted important details from their public
filings, leaving the public to guess what had happened
— even though federal disclosure instructions direct
nonprofit groups to explain the circumstances. About
half the organizations did not disclose the total amount
lost.
The findings are striking because organizations are
required to report only diversions of more than
$250,000 or those identified as having exceeded
5 percent of an organization’s annual gross receipts or
total assets. Of those, filing instructions direct
nonprofits to disclose “any unauthorized conversion or
use of the organization’s assets other than for the
organization’s authorized purposes, including but not
limited to embezzlement or theft.”
send a tip: Has your nonprofit experienced a
significant diversion of assets? Contact the reporter.
diversions-tearsheets
A few blocks farther is AARP, the national charity that
advocates for older Americans. In 2011, it disclosed two
incidents with losses totaling more than $230,000,
attributed to embezzlement and billing irregularities. An
organization spokesman said no one has been charged
in those incidents.
And just outside the Beltway, the Maryland Legal Aid
Bureau, with offices throughout the state, disclosed two
years ago that a former finance director and an
accomplice had been convicted of making off with
$1.1 million; officials there said in interviews they now
think the total loss was closer to $2.5 million.
Investment fraud was blamed for some of the largest
losses identified. Funds linked to Madoff’s scheme,
which bilked investors across the country for decades,
reportedly drained $106 million from Yeshiva University
and its affiliates, $38.8 million from the Upstate New
York Engineers Health Fund and $26 million from New
York University, according to the disclosures they filed.
But hefty sums disappeared in many other ways, too:
●The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and
Malaria, based in Geneva but registered and largely
financed in the United States, reported in 2012 that it
had found evidence of misuse or unsubstantiated
spending of $43 million in grant funds.
●The Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against
Germany, a New York-based charity for Holocaust
survivors, reported in 2010 that it had been bilked out
of $42 million in an elaborate, decade-long conspiracy
by swindlers who created thousands of fake identities.
A spokesman said the estimate has since been raised
to $60 million.
●The Vassar Brothers Medical Center in Poughkeepsie,
N.Y., in 2011 reported a loss of $8.6 million through the
“theft of certain medical devices.” A medical center
spokeswoman said a confidentiality agreement
prohibited her from explaining further.
●The Miami Beach Community Health Center in 2012
reported losing $7 million to alleged embezzlement by
its former chief executive, later convicted of theft.
● Columbia University disclosed in 2011 that it had
been defrauded of $5.2 million in “electronic
payments.” A university spokesman confirmed that the
disclosure referred to an incident involving a former
university accounting clerk and three associates, later
convicted of redirecting $5.7 million meant for a New
York hospital.
●And the 140-year-old Woodcock Foundation of
Kentucky, which awards scholarships to students in
need, disclosed that alleged fraud by a former
chairman drained more than $1 million from its
accounts, leaving the charity with assets totaling just
$8.
“You go out of your way to trust a nonprofit. People give
their money and expect integrity. And when the
integrity goes out the window, it just hurts everybody. It
hurts the community, it hurts the organization,
everything. It’s just tragic.”
The Rev. Raymond Moreland, Maryland Bible
Society
“We need to seek out and stop those who are hiding
behind tax-exempt status for their own gain,” Senate
Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.)
said in 2007 after a string of high-profile financial
scandals.
Matt McClain
diversions-timeline
Deen Sanwoola, they said, was a charismatic computer
specialist who was Legacy’s sixth hire. He was tasked
with building the organization’s information technology
department.
No one realized, during Legacy’s frenetic early days,
that the department had been formed without
adequate financial controls, Legacy officials said. Or
that Sanwoola had been placed in charge of both
ordering electronic equipment and logging it as having
been received — a mix of responsibilities that an
outside auditor later described as a classic error that
placed Legacy at risk.
“He had the keys to the kingdom of IT,” said Healton,
who as Legacy’s president and chief executive received
a compensation package worth $729,000 in fiscal 2012.
Reached by phone recently, Sanwoola, 43, told The Post
he has had no contact with Legacy for six years and
had no idea that anyone had raised questions about his
department’s operations. “You’re kidding, right?”
Sanwoola asked.
Sanwoola promised to call back with additional
information. He did not and did not respond to
numerous subsequent attempts to contact him by
telephone and e-mail about Legacy’s allegations that
he defrauded the organization.
After Sanwoola’s arrival in October 1999, Legacy’s IT
department began spending freely on computers,
monitors and software, much of it purchased from a
single company in suburban Maryland, Healton said.
Thanks to the court settlement, Legacy enjoyed a
tremendous flow of cash, with revenue exceeding
$320 million.
The first questionable purchase came in December
1999, according to a forensic audit conducted years
later. “The fraudulent billing started almost
immediately on his arrival,” said Wasden, the board
chairman.
In that first transaction, the foundation paid more than
$18,000 for a computer processor and related
equipment that auditors concluded should have retailed
for less than $7,000.
Data, documents and a summary of findings that
Wasden provided to The Post show that questionable
purchases of printers, software and servers steadily
increased in size and frequency, peaking with 49
charges in 2006. In some instances, Legacy appeared
to have paid many times an item’s worth, auditors said.
In others, auditors said Legacy paid an inflated price for
“phantom purchases” of equipment that apparently
never arrived.
Mary F. Calvert
Disclosure
Lee Jin-man
AP
Charles Krupa
AP