Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 9

22/08/2018

DISPOSITIONAL THEORIES

Allport, Eysenck, Cattell,


Costa & McCrae

GORDON ALLPORT

Themes in Allport’s work B. The Concept of the Self


A. Consistency of Personality • Allport argued for the idea of self as a major
• Allport argued that humans are consistent focus of personality growth.
(“remarkably recognizable”) in personality
even though they may vary from situation to
situation. • Today, a good deal of research in clinical &
social psychology focuses on the idea of the
• Some research supports Allport’s view; self (e.g., self-concept, self-esteem, self-
other studies suggest situations make efficacy).
people change their behavior (Mischel,
1984a).

C. Interaction of Personality & Social


Influences Traits
• Although Allport focused on personality • Allport felt that our personality was made
traits, he did recognize the importance of up of traits.
social factors & how they influence
individuals. • If you know a person’s traits, you can
provide a description of their personality.

1
22/08/2018

Can we all be described by the


What are traits? same traits?
• A trait is a • Do we each have different traits or do we all
consistent, long- have the same traits in varying amounts?
What do you think?
lasting tendency
in behavior.
• Allport wasn’t willing to rule either of these
out, although most researchers agree we
• E.g., shyness, have the same traits in different degrees.
hostility,
gregariousness • If a studious person decides not to study for a
particular exam, does this nullify his
studiousness?

Individual Vs. Common Traits How do we know what traits


a person possesses?
• Allport argued we have
both individual traits & 1. Inferring traits from language
common traits. (Dictionary Study).
• Individual traits --
possessed by only 1 • Allport & Odbert identified 17,953 trait
person. names, from the dictionary (4.5% of total
words).
• Common traits --
possessed by all people
to a varying extent.

2. Inferring traits from behavior 3. Inferring traits from


Personality measurement
• Allport argues that what people do, is a
great clue as to their personality traits. • We can also infer traits from personality tests.

• If people like to run, hike, & ride bikes • Allport examined people’s values, because
we can infer they are athletic (a trait). he felt that you could understand people’s
motivations from their value systems.

• By observing others either in naturalistic


settings or through experiments, we can • He along with other colleagues developed the
infer some of their traits. Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values.

2
22/08/2018

Allport-Vernon Lindzey How pervasive is the influence of a


Study of Values trait?
• It varies with the trait.
• Self-report questionnaire-- 60 questions. Scores have
norms based on 1960. Looks at who scores high on
which values.
• Allport argued we have three categories of
• Allport reported that college students who entered traits: cardinal, secondary, & central.
different occupations had different value scores.

• Recently, Huntley and Davis (1983) found that scores on • Cardinal traits are most pervasive;
the study of values taken during college were associated secondary traits least pervasive.
with occupations of male students 25 years later.

Allport’s Disposition Theory A. Central traits


• Allport suggested that each individual has • Central traits are the major
characteristics of an individual.
a unique set of personality traits • These usually number from 5 to
–He called these personal dispositions 10 in any one person (e.g.,
honesty, sociability).
–Like the DNA, but even the identical twins have • building blocks of personality
different dispositions • traits that people usually write
–Allport divided traits into three categories: when you request for a
recommendation letter
•Cardinal • If a medicine/pill will be created
•Central based on your body fluids, what
traits will the person acquire if
•Secondary he/she takes that pill?

B. Secondary traits C. Cardinal traits


• These are characteristics that
• This is a single characteristic that
effect behavior in fewer
directs most of a person’s activities.
situations & are less influential
than central or cardinal traits.
• One that tends to be dominant in the
individual’s personality.
• Less conspicuous, less
• If being industrious is the cardinal of
generalized, less consistent, but an individual, industriousness is
still part of you that others rarely shown in everything that the person
see does.
• Usually elicits reactions like, ”I • your name can already be used as a
can’t believe you did/said that!”; trait or adjective like quixotic (from
• Traits that are relatively easier to Don Quixote), sadistic or Don Juan.
change (e.g. a religious person • If your name will be in the dictionary,
telling green jokes) what will be the definition?

3
22/08/2018

FUNCTIONAL AUTONOMY • For example, many children who read frequently


because their parents insist on it become avid
readers as adults.
• Allport also disagreed with Freud on the
relationship between childhood and adult
personalities. • But this does not mean the adults read for the
same reasons they did in childhood. The
behavior that was once a means to an end
• According to Freud, the roots of adults
(pleasing the parents) has become
personality are planted during childhood.
FUNCTIONALLY AUTONOMOUS, that is,
reading is now enjoyable for its own sake.
• Allport argued that childhood behavior’s may
resemble adult behaviors, but they don’t
necessarily represent the underlying motives.

PROPRIUM
• Children have no concept of themselves as
• The aspects of personality forming distinct from their environment. Gradually, they
the integrated unity that constitutes come to sense that their bodies are somehow
different from other objects in the world. Babies
the individual’s uniqueness and soon discover that, unlike other parts of the
sense of individuality. environment, they can control the movement of
• Most adults talk about a “self” and their bodies and sense when a part of their
recognize our identity separate body has been touched. Child develops a
from others. But how is this notion sense of self-identity and self-esteem, until
finally the full sense of control.
developed?

• Allport agreed with Neo-Freudians, who


argued that the development of
personality continues long after the first
few years of life. OTHER TRAIT THEORIES
• He was well aware of the difficulty in EYSENCK, CATTELL, COSTA &
defining and measuring personality McCRAE
something as conceptually fuzzy as a
self.

4
22/08/2018

Factor Analysis
Factor Analytic Theories
 A statistical produce based on correlation,
• Factor analytic theories that is used to examine factor analytic
strive to summarize the theories.
relationships among a
large number of  A correlation coefficient provides an index of
variables into fewer, the relationship between two or more
more general patterns. variables.

• This is done to describe  It may range from –1.00 to +1.00, where the
the fundamental sign indicates the direction & the #
dimensions of individual indicates the magnitude of the relationship.
differences.

 Many correlation coefficients are computed during Imagine we administer intelligence tests. We
the course of a factor analysis. would find that:

Tests of verbal ability would be positively


 The correlations among all pairs of variables are correlated (vocabulary, grammar, & spelling),
computed to form a correlation matrix. but have lower correlations with tests of
mathematical abilities.

 Patterns of correlations often disclose redundant Tests of math ability would be positively
information, which may be systematically correlated (geometry, algebra, calculus), but
described. have lower correlations with tests of verbal
ability.

 Factor analysis allows the personality researcher Factor analysis of these variables would
to identify a smaller number of dimensions reveals two factors: mathematical ability and
verbal ability.
(factors) that the variables fit into.

CATTELL
• Cattell’s factor analytic theory made use of
an inductive method and gave importance to
the biological aspects of personality

• Traits, which are derived from factor


analysis, are relatively stable reaction
tendencies.

• Traits can be classified into 1) common or


unique traits, 2) source or surface traits and
RAYMOND CATTELL 3) temperament, motivation or ability.

5
22/08/2018

CATTELL Types of data


• Cattell studied 35 personality traits, 23 normal primary source 1. Q-data (questionnaire data) –is obtained
traits and 12 abnormal primary source traits. by asking people to describe themselves in
response to a set of standard questions
• Cattell’s popular 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF)
is in its 5th edition
(Multiple choice, true/false).
• In order to apply factor analysis to personality, Cattell believed
it was necessary to sample the widest possible range of
variables. He specified three kinds of data for comprehensive  Pros—easy to administer & quick access
sampling, to capture the full range of personality dimensions: to information.
 Con– people may impression manage
• The types of data are L-data (life reports), Q-data (self-report
questionnaire) and T-data (objective tests). (e.g., lie to make themselves look good).

Types of data Types of data


2. T-data (objective test data) –is obtained by 3. L-data (life record data) – is obtained by
asking people to take various tests (projective, gathering life history of person (personal
physical, reaction times) in which the purpose of records), such as grade point average,
the test isn’t obvious. driving history, letters of recommendation,
etc.
• Pros-this should reduce impression managing;
provides objective data.
 Pros—information can be obtained with
requiring subjects to fill out questionnaires.
• Cons-objective tests may be of limited use.  Cons– provides limited information about
the individual.

Surface traits Source traits


 Refers to the deeper patterns underlying personality.
Refers to those traits that seem readily
apparent.
 Basic traits that make up the human personality.

 E.g., you encounter a friendly, gregarious  These source traits emerge despite differences in
librarian who is very helpful & you infer she testing situations, questionnaire methods, & so forth.
possesses the trait of sociability.
 Cattell used factor analysis to identify 16 source traits.
 However, surface traits are based on people’s Using these 16 source traits he developed the 16PF.
perceptions of personality; they don’t
necessarily provide the best description of  The set of scores on all factors is the profile of the
underlying personality dimensions. individual.

6
22/08/2018

Second-Order Factors Three types of traits


 There may be correlations among the 16 1. Ability traits- define intelligence.
factors. That is, there is some redundancy
in the 16 source traits Cattell identified.
• Cattell argued that we have 2 types of
 We can reduce this number down, by intelligence: Fluid & crystallized.
doing another factor analysis on the 16
personality factors.
• Fluid intelligence-the innate ability to
learn
 This second-order analysis, often yields 5
second-order factors. • Crystallized intelligence-what has been
learned from education.

2. Temperament traits
Intelligence
These traits determine the general way a
• Cattell believed that 80% of the variance in person behaves (high-strungness, speed,
intelligence was the result of heredity; the energy, etc.).
remaining 20% due to experience.
****Thought to be largely inherited.
• This position supported both the Eugenics
movement & the Nazis.

3. Dynamic traits
 Dynamic traits—are motivational. These
guide us in our behaviors & interactions
with others.

 Cattell felt some of these are inherited,


others learned.

HANS EYSENCK

7
22/08/2018

EYSENCK EYSENCK
• Eysenck believed that personality had biological • Extraversion is associated with low cortical arousal while
bases. This is supported by genetic and cross- introversion is associated with high cortical arousal.
cultural studies Introverts are more sensitive to sensory stimulation and
pain.
• He used a hypothetico-deductive approach that
yielded the three personality dimensions or • For Neuroticism-Emotional stability, neuroticism is related
to being anxious, emotional, moody, shy, irrational,
superfactors of Psychoticism, Extraversion, and tense, depressed, and having low self-esteem and guilty
Neuroticism. feelings.
• These superfactors are bipolar and should be able to • Both normal and non-normal people can score high in
predict behavior. neuroticism. However, high scorers require a lower level
of stress to precipitate a neurotic disorder. Eysenck
• For Extraversion-Introversion, Extraversion is related accepted the diathesis-stress model.
to being sociable, lively, active, sensation-. seeking,
carefree, dominant, surgent and venturesome. • High N scorers have greater biological reactivity in the
sympathetic autonomic nervous system.

EYSENCK
• For Psychoticism-Superego Function,
Psychoticism is associated with being tough-
minded, aggressive, cold, egocentric, impersonal,
impulsive, antisocial, and unempathetic. This was
the last and weakest superfactor.

• Both normal and non-normal people can score


high in psychoticism. However, high scorers are
more vulnerable to developing psychotic illnesses
when faced with stress.

• Psychoticism has been linked with creativity.


McCRAE & COSTA

The Big Five: McCRAE & The Big Five: McCRAE &
COSTA COSTA
• Based on Cattell’s model of factor Five broad factors have been identified to describe
personality. They are:
analysis, five factors have been identified
that may describe the full spectrum of Extraversion
personality. Agreeableness
Neuroticism
Conscientiousness
• The proponents of the Big Five are Paul Openness
Costa Jr. & Robert McCrae, who are
interested in describing personality. (They spell “OCEAN”)

8
22/08/2018

1. Extraversion 2. Agreeableness
 Agreeableness refers to how
 People high in extraversion are “likable” we are.
often talkative, passionate,
active, dominant, & sociable.  People scoring high on
agreeableness tend to be good-
natured, soft-hearted, and
 Those scoring high have more trusting. Those low on the
interactions with others than factor are irritable, ruthless, and
those scoring low. suspicious.

 People who score high on this


 Extraverts tend to develop more factor report little conflict in their
social relationships during relationships. They are less
college, are more likely to fall in likely to assert power when they
love, & are more responsive to do experience conflict as well.
pleasure.

3. Neuroticism 4. Conscientiousness
 Describes people who frequently  Describes someone who is
are troubled by negative emotions hardworking, dependable,
such as worry & insecurity. ambitious, responsible, & is
tenacious.
 People high on neuroticism can be
 People scoring high on this
described as those who worry,
dimension value cleanliness, &
those who emotionally unstable, ambitiousness.
they are often anxious, & have low
self-esteem.
 They tend to be organized,
punctual, do well academically,
 People who score low on this factor are well liked by their superiors,
report being much happier than & dedicated to their significant
people scoring higher on this others.
dimension.

5. Openness To Experience

• Refers to how cultured,


intelligent, & receptive a
person is to new ideas,
places, & interests.

• Those who score high in


openness are more likely
to be artistic, curious,
imaginative, insightful,
and intuitive.

Вам также может понравиться