Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Jean-Louis Habert
Alstom Grid
GIS product Line
z GIS introduction
z Surrounding conditions
6,0
z Dimensional
comparison, at 362 kV,
of a support insulator on Height (m)
its frame, within an air-
insulated substation
(AIS) and a GIS element 2,5
z Dimensional
comparison, at 362 kV,
of an AIS main busbar
crossing, and a GIS
busbar crossing 6,0
Height (m)
z GIS technology enables
to divide by minimum 3
the height of a HV 2,5
switchyard
0,5
0,0
2014/04 - Houston - CED – GIS - 5
GIS introduction 4/7
SF6 properties – current interruption capability 1/1
z Arc cooling
z High dissociation energy
z Free electrons capture
z Fluor ions electronegativity
z Fast recovery of voltage withstand
z Very fast recombination of dissociated
molecules
z Oil to SF6 move, through
compressed air, enabled to Canada -
Mica - 550 kV
drastically simplify circuit-breakers - old 6-breaks
z At 550 kV, number of breaking CB replaced
chambers has been divided by up to by 2-breaks
modern CB
6, while both short-circuit current and
breaking requirements went up
2014/04 - Houston - CED – GIS - 6
GIS introduction 5/7
Applications - Generation 1/3
UK –
Norton –
420 kV
USA - Anaheim – 69 kV
France -
Strasbourg -
72 kV
France - Paris –
72 and 245 kV
Spain – Biscaya –
420 kV on sea side
UK – Barrow wind
farm – 132 kV
offshore platform
Saudi Arabia –
Jubail – 420kV
Singapore – 72 kV GIS
Santiago
z Main international stds
z IEEE 693 (1997)
z CEI 62271-2 (2003-02), 60068-3-3 (1991-02), 62155
(2003-05)
Concepción
z Main national stds
z Chili ETG 1.015 (1993), ETG 1.020 (1997)
z Venezuela ETGS/PAS 001 Rev 01(1999)
z New Zealand TZ 7881, TZ 7967
z Canada SN 29.1a (1990)
z India IS 1893 (1984)
z China GB/T 13540-92
France – Flandres
refinery - 100 kV -
GIS and trafos
building can
withstand a major
blast – GIS is split
in two parts to
improve power
availability
Canada - 330 kV -
140 m below the
ground surface
Double busbar -
Ring busbar One circuit-breaker and a half
double circuit-breaker
z Accessibility
z Despite commonplace, this matter shall be carefully consider, in order to
avoid “domino effect”
Access corridor
z Safety rules
z Specific safety rules : no additional mechanical stress shall be applied to
any pressurized gas-barrier
z Any component removal – with its gas barriers - requires to de-energize,
then de-pressurize all adjacent electrical circuits
Gas barrier
SF6 @ atm. pressure Gas barrier
/ air / “shield” insulator
z Safety rules
z Safety rules and gas partitioning deeply impact the repair process
z Repair process impacts compartments close to repair zone and can
require complete substation shutdown
Mitigation : partitioning and shield insulators
Medium-class partitioning
=> 5 bays shutdown
during repair
Medium-class partitioning
=> 3 bays shutdown
during repair
Best partitioning
=> Single bay shutdown
during repair
2014/04 - Houston - CED – GIS - 38
Reliability-Availability-Maintainability 13/28
NA upon repair 7/7
z HV tests impact
z GIS features short clearances and high electric fields
=> High-voltage tests are mandatory to ascertain reliable operation after
heavy maintenance
z Disconnectors cannot withstand network voltage on one terminal while the
other terminal is connected to HV test voltage
z Without specific features, such as additional isolating gaps, HV tests can
require to de-energize the complete substation
z Mitigation
z Double isolating gap between tested (shutdown) busbar and the other
busbar
z Isolating devices: implemented transversally (e.g. MID) or longitudinally
(e.g. busbar longitudinal disconnectors)
Aluminium
smelter - 245 kV
GIS with N-1
continuous
availability
Close-close MID
Open disconnector
Close-open MID
1CB1/2-2 feeders
DBB-overall GIS
1CB1/2-1 feeder
without buffer
without buffer
without buffer
without buffer
without buffer
without buffer
SBB-half GIS
SBB-1 feeder
DBB-1 feeder
Voltage class (kV) 1 2 3 4 5 6 4
(ppm)
2BB bay MTBF (y) 500 200 125 28 22 15 28
Item
NA
3ph. CB 4 31 14 20 4 4 20
3ph. CB mech. 5 32 14 20 5 5 20
3 ph. DS 1 24 11 20 10 10 20
3 ph. ES 1 9 8 1 1 1 1 busduct
1 m of 3ph. 0
3ph. CT 1 3 1 1 1 1 3ph. CB1 397 1 1
3ph. VT 2 19 5 1 1 1 3ph. CB1mech. 397 1 1
Immediate NA
3 ph. DS 132 3 3 3 3
Cable / TA / Tfo connect 1 8 7 11 6 6 11
3 ph. ES 5 4 4 3 4
Sigma 15 126 60 74 28 28 3ph. CT74 20 2 1 1 1
Voltage range (kV) 60-100 100-200 200-300 300-500 500-700 >700 3ph.300-500
VT 20 2 1 1 1
Cable / TA / Tfo connect 218 1 1 1
x 0
Total 1 507 456 1 463 0 674 0
1 m of 3ph. busduct 0
3ph. CB 132 2 3 6 7 3 2
NA during
Test NA (hour/
Failure MTTR
Test duration
Failure SDTR
Total NA (%)
comp.*years
Failure non-
Failure non-
Re-pair non-
Re-pair non-
MTBF (year)
duration (h)
CIGRE data
NCY nb. of
3ph. CB mech. 79
NCF nb. of
(hour/year)
year (ppm)
(hour/year)
availability
availability
availability
failures
Repair
(hour)
(hour)
(ppm)
3 ph. DS 44 10 12
year)
(1/y)
bay
(h)
%
repair
3 ph. ES 2 5 6
Additional
3ph. CT 7 2 2 2
3ph. VT 4
1 m of 3ph. busduct 0 0 0 0 0,0000 0 360 120 0,000 Cable0 / TA / 120
Tfo connect
0,000 44 0 24 0,000 0 0
300-500 kV voltage class -
x 397 0132
Failure MTTR= 15 days
3ph. CB 20 27 27 2 800 0,0097 104 360 120 3,475 120 1,158 24 0,232 26 1
3ph. CB mech. 20 27 27 2 800 0,0097 104 360 120 3,475 Total
397 72 0,695 79264 410
24 1 242
0,232 1 464
26 410 278
1
3 ph. DS 27 27 8 400 0,0032 311 360 120 1,158 1m of 3ph. busduct
132 120 0,386 0 44 0 240 0,077 9 0 03
Additional NA during HV
20
3 ph. ES 1 1 1 11 200 0,0001 8 288 360 120 0,043 3ph. 5CB 120 0,014 26 2 3 243 0,003 0 0 04
3ph. CT 1 1 1 2 800 0,0005 2 072 360 120 0,174 3ph.20CB mech.120 0,058 26 7 24 0,012 1 0 01
3ph. VT 1 1 2 800 0,0005 2 072 360 120 0,174 3 ph.
20DS 72 0,035 9 4 3 243 2
0,012 21 3 01
1
tests
3 ph. ES 0
Cable / TA / Tfo connect 11 15 15 2 800 0,0053 188 360 120 1,911 218 72 0,382 44 4 244 4
0,127 4
15 4 0
1
3ph. CT 1 2 3 3 2
x 0 0 0 0 0,0000 0 360 120 0,000 0 72 0,000 0 24 0,000 0 0
3ph. VT 1 2 1 2 2 1 0
Sigma 74 100 100 2 800 0,0357 28 12,857 1 468 3,544 405 0,857 98
Cable / TA / Tfo connect 15 1 0 1 0
x 0 0 0 0 0
Total 127 112 22 22 48 3
z Assessed SLD’s
z Single busbar
z Double busbar – single CB
z Double busbar – single CB with bypass
z Double busbar – single CB with transfer busbar
z One and a half circuit-breaker
z Bus tie
z Bus tie is a circuit-breaker bay which normally features one CT on either
CB side in order to provide the appropriate BB protection (87N)
z Single busbar diagram:
z No special gas partitioning is usually required, despite any bus tie CB repair/HV
test would shutdown the entire substation
z Double busbar diagram:
z No special gas partitioning is usually required
z Single busbar
z 2*6 CB bays with double
busbar isolator (full
redundancy)
z Sectionalized (double DS)
single busbar is acceptable,
for industrial application,
when full redundancy is
implemented
z Double busbar
z 6 feeders + 1 coupler
z Buffers significantly decrease NA
z With no availability features,
double busbar is not that much
better than single busbar
z With availability features, double
BB is much better than single BB
z Appropriate partitioning mitigates
repair NA but does not mitigates
HV tests NA
z Isolating devices (when they do
not require compartment opening
and gas treatment) mitigate HV
tests NA
2014/04 - Houston - CED – GIS - 51
Reliability-Availability-Maintainability 26/28
Availability assessment 8/10
z Civil interfaces
z Buildings
z High-voltage interfaces
z Low-voltage interfaces
z GIS elements
z Monitoring
z Floor design
z Accommodate CB dynamic loads
z Floor flexibility shall be avoided to
prevent excess movements which
stress live parts
Switzerland – Wimmis - 72 kV
USA – Port
Arthur – 69 kV
2014/04 - Houston - CED – GIS - 61
Buildings 3/6
Prefabricated electrical building - steel 1/1
Malaysia –
Pergau –
245 kV
z Features to specify
z Ambient temp range
z Earthquake withstand
z Voltage withstand
z Insulator material
z Porcelain, composite
z Creepage distance
z Based on phase-to-
phase voltage
z Mechanical loads
z Altitude a.s.l.
India – Bhavini – 245 kV
z Terminal material and
dimensions
z IEC 60137-2008 std.
z Features to specify
z IEC std no. 62271-209
zTo avoid tough site difficulties
z Cable termination types
z Dry-type, plug-in / Fluid-type, not plug-in
z Important issues
z Bending radius 72 kV plug-in cable terminations
z Cable laying/support
z GIS test requirements
z Cable disconnection during tests
Plug-in cable
termination – 72 kV
2014/04 - Houston - CED – GIS - 67
HV interfaces 3/5
HV cable connection 1/2
Control Voltage
cubicle transformer
VT manual
link
Make proof
grounding
switch
Combined
isolator /
Combined grounding
isolator / switch
grounding Cable
switch Circuit-breaker Current termination
transformer
z Aluminium alloy
z No corrosion
z Low resistance
to return
current
z No eddy
current losses
z Lower weight
z Industrial
castings,
except straight
extruded /
welded tubes
z Insulators 3-phase
gas barrier
z Gas barriers
z Support insulators
z Different types
z Spring drives, with no driving fluid
z Recognized by CIGRE report as
more reliable
z Hydraulic drives
z Gas storage
z Spring storage
z Pneumatic drives
z Out-dated
z Need of water draining
Grounding
switch
Isolator
z Speed
z Low speed, sometimes combined with an isolator
z High-speed, with short-circuit making capability
z Interrupting capability
z Inductive coupling current, when both ends of a parallel OHL are grounded
z Capacitive coupling current, when one end of a parallel OHL is grounded
z Ratings
z Power
z Quite often over-specified
z Accuracy
z Safety factor
z No more an issue with modern measuring units
z Saturation
z To be carefully engineered
z Low ratios
z Difficult to achieve with a single primary turn
z Overvoltage protection
z Specific design to implement inside GIS
z Ratings
z Power
z Quite often over-specified
z Accuracy
z Ferro-resonance
z Mainly in case of CB grading
capacitors
z Can be avoided using a special
inductance
z Requires a specific study
concept
Reliability
Operation continuity
= Availability
Local
control User-friendly
cubicle HMI
Monitoring
BCU
Sensors
Internet link
Expert remote support
Copper wires
Ethernet fiber optic
BWatch
sensor User-friendly HMI
2014/04 - Houston - CED – GIS - 91
Monitoring 3/6
Circuit-breaker, isolator, grounding switch 1/1
z CB
z Travel curve
z Need of a sensor
z Contact wear
z Σ I² * t
z Isolator / grounding switch
z Operating time
z Motor inrush current
to 1,2 GHz
z Sensor location is essential
INCOMING ORDER
SYNCHRONIZATION
OUTGOING ORDER 1
OUTGOING ORDER 2
OUTGOING ORDER 3
z Additional requirements
z Compensated overhead lines
z Entails “beat waves”
-0.5
-1
-1.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Tim e (m s )
Prospective flux
Instant of energisation
No-load curren
Circuit-breaker current
z POW will trigger the closing order in order to make the current
z RFQ specification
z Has to specify the functions / features / ratings to achieve
z Has to let free the ways to get these achievements
disconnector
z Internal failure localisation system is appropriate to ascertain
z Customer benefits
z Proven algorithms of conventional applications remain unchanged, no need for
reapprove
z Time-critical performance is maintained irrespective of the architecture, number of
functions enabled, or extent of logic programmed
z Safer test and maintenance operations – no wired CT
z Accurate measurement capabilities
z Station bus communication redundancy available: PRP (Parallel Redundancy
Protocol) and RSTP (Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol)
z Issues to be managed
z Substation automation
z Redundant architectures
z Substation/grid control room communications
z Cyber security