SCORESHEET

stage: fight (round no.): room: problem no.: Juror’s name:

REPORTER Start from 1 and add/subtract
reporter: opponent: reviewer: signature:
1 + + - =
REPORT DISCUSSION WITH OPPONENT ANSWERS TO JURY,
phenomenon relevant comparison between scientific relevant reporter’s conduct OPPONENT and
theory/model own contribution task fulfilment
explanation experiments theory and experiment contribution arguments/responses at the discussion
0 REVIEWER’S QUESTIONS
almost no almost no too few no/ almost no others’ data, incorrectly cited misunderstood almost no too few poor
1 0
some some some some review of sources, cited partly only technical concise and correct or
some some aspects fine
2 fair fair fair not well fitting some own input average 1 points cleared 0 no questions asked
3 well performed, deviations interesting some scientific
good good + some interesting results 2 many good some incorrect,
sufficient number qualitatively analysed solution points cleared -1
4 interesting points + data/theory some aspects inconclusive or too long
detailed quite detailed, + results explained + theory limits considerable experimental some aspects
5 3
demonstrative correct errors analysed explained, conclusive or theoretical above average discussed convincingly supported efficient deeply incorrect or show
-2
6 deep and comprehensible, detailed, complex, + reproducible, well fitting, deviations considerable experimental greater extent 4 brought in new proved deep deep misconceptions
overall efficient
shows physical insight completely testable convincing analysis analysed, conclusive and theoretical than expected physics understanding

NOTES:

OPPONENT Start from 1 and add/subtract

1 + + + - =
QUESTIONS ASKED OPPOSITION (SPEECH) DISCUSSION WITH REPORTER ANSWERS TO JURY and
0 almost no, irrelevant understanding of relevant topics own opinions time scientific relevance own opinions opponent’s conduct REVIEWER’S QUESTIONS
prioritisation prioritisation
relevant, aimed at resolving presentation addressed presented management contribution of topics presented of the discussion concise and correct or
1 0 almost nothing no or irrelevant very little no poor almost no irrelevant very little poor no
0
unclear points in the report 0 no questions asked
1 some main points few some some reasonable 1 little some some some aspects fine some
2 + short, apt and clear, well some incorrect,
prioritized, all time used 2 main points some some correct reasonable fair
2 partial average some correct good reasonable -1 inconclusive or too long
all relevant points many many correct fair efficient good most many correct some aspects efficient fair
3 3 deeply incorrect or show
NOTES: + improvement + new crucial all relevant + improvement
4 practically all points practically all
suggestions
very good
all time used 4 overall efficient very good -2 deep misconceptions
point(s) discussed suggestions

REVIEWER Start from 1 and add/subtract

1 + + + - =
QUESTIONS ASKED REVIEW OF REPORT REVIEW OF OPPOSITION ANSWERS TO JURY
0 too few, mostly irrelevant report summary discussion speech discussion QUESTIONS
pros & cons own opinions prioritisation pros & cons own opinions prioritisation
some relevant, sufficient number, & understanding analysis summary analysis concise and correct or
0 0 0
1 contributed to clarify some unclear points poor irrelevant almost no too few no poor irrelevant almost no too few no no questions asked
many unclear points resolved; most time 1 partial partially relevant too short/long some some 1 too short/long partially relevant too short/long some some some incorrect,
2 -1
used, suitably allotted to Rep & Opp 2 good mostly adequate relevant parts many reasonable informative, apt mostly adequate relevant parts many reasonable inconclusive or too long
2
+ short, apt and clear, well prioritized, detailed, fully accurate, + improvement condensed fully accurate, + improvement deeply incorrect or show
3 3 good 3 good -2
time managed efficiently complex adequate conclusive suggestions and accurate adequate conclusive suggestions deep misconceptions

NOTES: IYPT – Feb 2018