Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Types of Audit
Financial statement audit
-Audit conducted to determine whether the financial statements of an
entity are fairly presented in accordance with an identified financial
reporting framework.
Compliance Audit
-review of an organization's procedure to determine whether the
organization has adhered to specific procedures, rules and regulations.
Operational audit (Performance/Management audit)
-study of a specific unit of an organization for the purpose of measuring
its performance.
Types of Auditors
External Auditors
-independent CPAs who offer their professional service to different
client. (FS audit)
Internal Auditors (Operational Audit)
-entity's own employees who investigate and appraise the
effectiveness and efficiency of operations and internal control.
Government Auditors (Compliance Audit)
-government employees whose main concern is to determine whether
persons or entities comply with government laws and regulations.
Independent FS Audit
-enable the auditor to express an opinion whether the financial statements are
prepared, in all material respects. In accordance with an identified financial reporting
framework.
-management is responsible for preparing and presenting the FS in
accordance with the framework.
-provide only reasonable assurance.
Limitations
1. The use of testing/Sampling Risk
-auditors do not examine all evidence available.
2. Error in application of judgment/Non-sampling Risk
-human weakness can cause auditors to commit mistakes in the
application of audit procedures and evaluation of evidence.
3. Reliance on Management's representation
-if management lacks integrity, management may provide the auditor
with false representations causing the auditor to rely on unreliable
evidence.
4. Inherent limitations of the client's accounting and internal control system
-cannot detect all fraud like collusion between employees
5. Nature of evidence
-evidence does not contain "hard facts" and generally persuasive
rather than conclusive in nature.
Ethical Requirements
Integrity
Objectivity
Professional competence and due care
Confidentiality
Professional behavior
Engagement Letter –this serves as the written contract between the auditor and the
client.
The objective of the audit of financial statements which is to express an
opinion on the financial statements.
The management's responsibility for the fair presentation of the financial
statement.
The scope of the audit.
The forms or any reports or other communication that the auditor expects to
issue.
The facts that because of the limitations of the audit, there is an unavoidable
risk that material misstatements may remain undiscovered.
The responsibility of the client to allow the auditor to have unrestricted access
to whatever records, documentation and other information requested in
connection with the audit.
Importance of the engagement letter
Avoid misunderstandings with respects to the engagement.
Document and confirm the auditor's acceptance of the appointment.
*does not need to send another engagement letter for a recurring audits to the same
client unless needed.
Audit Planning
-involves developing a general audit strategy and a detailed approach
for the expected conduct of the audit.
Materiality
-information is material if its omission or misstatement could influence
the economic decision of the users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
Materiality may be viewed as:
The largest amount of misstatement that the auditor could tolerate in the
financial statement.
The smallest aggregate amount that could misstate the financial statement.
-have inversed relationship with evidence.
Uses of Materiality
In the planning stage, to determine the scope of audit procedure.
In the completion phase, to evaluate the effect of misstatement on the
financial statement.
Audit Risk -refers to the risk that the auditor gives an inappropriate audit opinion on
the financial statements.
Inherent Risk –is the susceptibility of an account balance or class of transactions to
a material misstatement assuming there were no related internal controls.
Control Risk –is the risk that a material misstatement that could occur in an account
balance or class of transactions will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a
timely basis by accounting and internal control system.
Detection Risk –is the risk that an auditors' substantive procedure will not detect a
material misstatement. The only risk that can be control by the auditor by performing
more effective substantive test.
Internal Control –is the process designed and effected by those charged with
governance, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance
about the achievement of the entity's objectives with regard to reliability of financial
reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations and compliance with applicable
laws and regulations.
Types of Objectives
Effectiveness and efficiency of operations
Compliance with laws and regulations
Reliability of financial reporting –most relevant to the audit
*Consideration of the entity's internal control systems involves the following steps:
1. Obtain Understanding of the Internal Control –Obtaining an understanding
of internal controls involves:
a. Evaluating the design of a control –involves considering whether the
control, individually or in combination with other controls, is capable of
effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material
misstatement. Obtained by:
i. Making inquiries of appropriate individuals
ii. Inspecting documents and records
iii. Observing of entity's activities and operations
b. Determining whether it has been implemented –means that the
control have been placed in operation. Accomplished by:
i. "Walk-through" test –involves tracing one or two transactions
through the entire accounting systems, from their initial
recording at source to their final destination. ("cradle to grave" /
sample of one test)
Auditor's Test
Data
Processed using
clients program
Processed
using client's
program
Processed Processed
using client's using auditor's
program program
Audit Evidence –refers to the information obtained by the auditor in arriving at the
conclusions on which the audit opinion is based
*the auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to be able to draw
reasonable conclusions on which to base the audit. Audit evidence consists of:
Underlying accounting data –refers to the accounting records underlying
the financial statements.
Corroborating information –supporting the underlying accounting data
obtained from client and other sources.
Qualities of Evidence
Sufficiency –refers to the amount of evidence that the auditor should
accumulate. Factors may be considered in evaluating the sufficiency of
evidence because an auditor cannot examine all evidence because of
cost/benefit consideration:
o Competence of evidence –the more competent the evidence, the less
amount of evidence is needed to support the auditor's opinion. (inverse
relationship)
o Materiality of the item being examined –the more material the FS
amount being examined, the more evidence will be needed to support
its validity.
o Risk involved in a particular account –as the risk of misstatement in a
particular account increases, the more evidence will be needed.
o Experience –gained during previous audit may indicate the amount of
evidence taken before and whether such evidence was enough.
Appropriateness –measure of the quality of audit evidence and its relevance
to a particular assertion and its reliability.
o Relevance –relates the timeliness of evidence and its ability to satisfy
the audit objective.
o Reliability –relates to the objectivity of evidence and is influenced by its
sources and by its nature.
Audit evidence obtained from independent outside sources is
more reliable than that generated internally.
Audit evidence generated internally is more reliable when the
related accounting and internal control systems are
effective.
Audit evidence obtained directly by the auditor is more
reliable than obtained from the entity.
Audit evidence in the form of documents and written
representation is more reliable than oral representations.
*Audit documentation depends upon the auditor's judgment, but the following
important items would normally require audit documentation:
Significant matters discussed with the management
Reason for departure from a basic principle or an essential procedure and
other necessary items.
Nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures performed, the auditor should
record:
o Who performed the audit work and the date such work was completed
o Who reviewed the audit work performed and the date and extent of such
review
Expert –is a person or a firm possessing special skill, knowledge and experience in
a particular field other than accounting and auditing.
Auditor's Expert –expert whose work in his/her field of specialization, is used
by the auditor to assist in obtaining sufficient appropriate evidence
Management's Expert –expert whose work in his/her field of expertise, is
used by the entity to assist the entity in preparing the financial statements.
Determining the need for an Auditor's Expert
Whether management has used a management's expert in preparing the FS
The nature and significance of the matter, including its complexity
The risk of material misstatement in the matter
The expected nature of procedures to respond to identified risks, including the
auditor's knowledge of and experience with the work of experts in relation to
such matters; and the availability of alternative sources of audit evidence
*The auditor has sole responsibility for the audit opinion expressed and that
responsibility is not reduced by the auditor's use of the work of an expert.
*Using the work of an expert is only permitted when issuing a modified opinion, but
not in unmodified opinion.
Audit Sampling –the application of audit procedures to less than 100% of the items
within an account balance or class of transactions such that all sampling units have a
chance of selection (PSA 530)
*sampling is performed on the assumption that the sample selected for testing is
representative of the population.
Sampling Risk –risk that the sample selected for testing may not be truly
representative of the population. Two types of sampling risk are:
Alpha Risk –risk the auditor will conclude, (affects efficiency)
o In the case of test of control, that internal control is not reliable when in
fact it Is effective and can be relied upon. (risk of under reliance)
o In the case of substantive test, that material misstatement exists in an
account balance or transaction class when in fact such misstatement
does not exist. (risk of incorrect rejection)
Beta Risk –is the risk the auditor will conclude, (affects effectiveness)
o In the case of test of control, that the internal control is reliable when in
fact it is not effective and cannot be relied upon. (risk of over reliance)
o In the case of substantive test, that material misstatement does not exist
when in fact material misstatement does exist. (risk of incorrect
acceptance)
Non-Sampling Risk –risk that the auditor may draw incorrect conclusions about the
account balance or class transactions because of human errors.
*Sampling risk can be eliminated by examining the whole population but it is not
feasible.
*Auditors can control sampling risk by:
Increasing the sample size
Using an appropriate sample selection method
*Non-sampling risk cannot be eliminated but can be minimized by:
Proper planning
Adequate direction, review, and supervision of the audit team
Audit Sampling Plans –when statistical sampling is used, the auditor may use
either:
Attribute Sampling –used to estimate the frequency of occurrence of a
certain characteristic in a population. (occurrence rate) It is generally used
when performing test of controls to estimate the rate of deviation from
prescribed internal control policies.
Variable Sampling – this is a sampling plan used to estimate a numerical
measurement of a population such as peso value. It is generally used in
performing substantive tests to estimate the amount of misstatements in
the FS.
Basic Steps in Audit Sampling
Steps Basic Steps in Audit Sampling
1 Define the Objective
2 Determine the procedure
3 Determine the sample size
4 Select the sample
5 Apply the procedures
6 Evaluate the results
*Anomalous Errors –arise from isolated events that has not recurred other than
specifically identifiable occasions and are therefore not representative of errors in the
population. Such error should be excluded when projecting sample error to the
population. However, the effect of such error must be considered together with
projected error in order to determine the combined effect of the errors on the account
balance or transaction class.
Wrap-up Procedures –those procedures done at the end of the audit that
generally cannot be performed before the other audit work is complete. These
include:
o Final Analytical Procedures –this should focus on
Identifying unusual fluctuations that were not previously
identified
Assessing the validity of the conclusions reached and evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation.
o Evaluation of the entity's ability to continue as a going concern –
auditor's responsibility is to consider the appropriateness of
management's use of the going concern assumption in the preparation
of FS. For this purpose:
The auditor should consider whether there are events or
conditions which may cast significant doubt on the entity's ability
to continue as a going concern.
In addition, the auditor should evaluate management's
assessment of the entity's ability to continue as a going concern
*If there is a reasonable assurance that the entity is a going concern, the auditor
should express an unmodified audit report.
*If there is an uncertainty about the entity's ability to continue as going concern, the
auditor's report will depend on whether this uncertainty is adequately disclosed
Adequately disclosed –auditor should issue an unmodified opinion with
emphasis of a matter paragraph
Not Adequately disclosed –auditor should issue either qualified or adverse
opinion
*If going concern is not appropriate, the financial statements should be prepared
using other appropriate basis otherwise the auditor will issue a adverse opinion.
*The auditor has no obligation to make any inquiry regarding previously issued
financial statements unless he became aware of a material fact,
Which existed at the date of the auditor's report; and
Which, if known at that date, may have caused the auditor to modify the report
Subsequent discovery of omitted procedures –in this situation the auditor should
follow these guidelines:
Assess the importance of the omitted procedures to the auditor's ability
to support his opinion –results of other audit procedures that were applied
may compensate for or make the omitted procedures less important.
Evaluating such results may involve:
o Reviewing the working paper
o Discussing the circumstances with the engagement personnel
o Reevaluating the scope of the audit
Undertake to apply the omitted procedures or the corresponding
alternative procedures –this is done when the auditor determines that the
omission of the procedures impairs his current ability to support his opinion. If
after the procedures taken the auditors determined that the FS is materially
misstated and that the auditor's report is inappropriate, the auditor should
discuss the matter with the management and take steps to prevent future
reliance on the report.
Unmodified Opinion –this type of opinion is issued when the auditor concludes,
based on audit evidence obtained, that the FS are fairly presented.
Basic Elements of the Unmodified Report
1. Title –title of the report should clearly indicate that it is the report of an
independent auditor. This is done in order to:
a. To emphasize the independence of the auditor with respect to the
client being audited
b. To distinguish the auditor's report from the reports that might be issued
by others
2. Addressee –the report should be addressed to those parties for whom the
report is prepared.
3. Introductory Paragraph –introductory paragraph should:
a. Identify the name of the entity whose FS have been audited
b. State that the FS have been audited
c. Identify the title of each of the FS audited including the date and
period covered by the FS
d. Refer to the summary of significant accounting policies and
explanatory notes.
4. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements –this section
should describe management's responsibility:
a. for the preparation and fair presentation of the FS in accordance
with applicable financial reporting framework
b. for the design, implementation and maintenance of such internal
control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial
statement that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or not
5. Auditor's Responsibility –this section should:
a. State that the responsibility of the auditor is to express an opinion
on the FS based on the audit in order to contrast it to management's
responsibility for the preparation of the FS
b. State that the audit was conducted in accordance with Philippine
Standards on Auditing (PSAs) to inform the users that the auditor
has complied with the standard of performance established by the
profession.
c. Give a general description of an audit
d. State that the auditor believes that the audit evidence obtained is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for the auditor's opinion.
6. Auditor's Opinion –state that the financial statement are presented fairly in
all material respects in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework
7. Other Reporting Responsibilities –auditor may have additional
responsibilities to report on other matter that are supplementary to the
auditor's responsibility under PSA. If it have a separate section, it should have
a sub-title of "Report on the Financial Statements"
8. Auditor's Signature –report should be signed in the name of the audit firm
and/or the personal name of the auditor as appropriate. However report to
be submitted to the SEC requires that the related auditor's report be signed in
the personal name of the partner
9. Date of the Report –it is important because it informs the readers that the
auditor has considered the FS effects of subsequent events that occurred up
to this date.
10. Auditor's address –name of the location in the jurisdiction where the auditor
maintains his office
Modification to the Opinion
Scope Limitation –arises when the auditor is unable to perform necessary audit
procedures or the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence. This
may be imposed by the client or by circumstances:
Circumstances beyond the control of the entity such as inadequacy of
accounting record
Circumstances relating to the nature or timing of the auditor's work like
when the auditor is engaged only after client's fiscal period ends.
Limitations imposed by management like when management prevents the
auditor from requesting external confirmation of specific accounts.
*In addition to the Basis for the Modification paragraph, the following modification
should be observed when issuing a modified opinion:
Opinion paragraph
1. The auditor's opinion paragraph should use the heading "Qualified
Opinion", "Adverse Opinion" , or "Disclaimer of opinion" as appropriate.
2. When the auditor expresses a qualified opinion due to material misstatement,
the auditor should use the phrase "except for the effects of the matter
described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the financial statement
present fairly…"
3. When the auditor expresses a qualified opinion due to scope limitation, the
auditor should use the phrase "except for the possible effects of the matter
described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the FS present fairly.."
4. When the auditor expresses an adverse opinion, the auditor should state that
in the auditor's opinion, because of the significance of the matter described in
the Basis for adverse Opinion paragraph, the financial statements do not
present fairly…
5. When the auditor disclaims an opinion, the auditor should state that because
of the significance of the matter described in the Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion paragraph, the auditor has not been able to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion; and,
accordingly, the auditor does not express an opinion on the FS.
Auditor's Responsibility paragraph
6. When qualified or adverse opinion is expressed the last sentence of the
auditor's responsibility paragraph should be modified to state that the auditor
believes that the audit evidence the auditor has obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for the auditor's qualified or adverse opinion
7. When the auditor disclaims an opinion, the auditor should amend the
description of the auditor's responsibility such as this: "Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the FS based on conducting the audit in accordance
with the Philippine Standards on Auditing. Because of the matter described in
the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion paragraph, however, we were not able to
obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to provide basis for an audit.
Emphasis of Matter –paragraph included in the report to draw the reader's attention
to a matter presented or disclosed in the financial statement that, in the auditor's
judgment is of such importance that it is fundamental to the readers' understanding,
the auditor.
Uncertainty –is a matter whose outcome depends on future actions or events
not under the direct control of the entity that may affect the FS.
Going Concern Uncertainty – a material uncertainty exist when the impact
of the going concern problem is significant such that, in the auditor's
judgment, clear disclosure of the nature and implications of the uncertainties
is necessary for the fair presentation of the FS.
o If going concern uncertainty is adequately disclosed, the auditor should
express an unmodified opinion with emphasis of matter paragraph
o If the going concern uncertainty is not adequately disclosed, a
qualified or an adverse opinion will be issued.
Early application of new accounting standard –standard setting bodies
sometimes allow or even encourage entities to apply a new accounting
standard prior to its mandatory date.
Major catastrophe –that has, or continues to have, a significant effect on the
entity's financial position will have to be disclosed.
Subsequent discovery of facts that affect the auditor's opinion -
discussed earlier
Financial statement prepared using a special purpose framework –
preparing FS using cash basis of accounting and other bases of accounting
*When multiple uncertainties affect the financial statement, the auditor may consider
to issue a disclaimer of opinion to be more appropriate.
*The auditor has no responsibility to corroborate the other information. However, the
auditor should read the other information to determine that it is not materially
inconsistent with the audited financial statements.
*Effects when the other information has material inconsistencies with the FS
If amendment is necessary in the audited financial statements –if the
entity refuses to make the amendment, the auditor should express a qualified
or an adverse opinion
If the amendment is necessary in the other information –if the entity
refuses to eliminate the material consistency, the auditor should consider:
o Adding an Other Matter Paragraph to describe the material
inconsistency
o Withholding the auditor's report
o Withdrawing from the engagement
Group Auditor –is the auditor with responsibility for reporting on the FS of an entity
when those FS include financial information of one or more components audited by
another auditor.
Consideration need to be consider when acting as a group auditor
The materiality of the portion of the FS audited
The auditor's knowledge of the overall FS
The importance of the components audited by another auditor
Types of services that are normally performed in connection with the entity's
FS:
Audit –conducted primarily to enable the auditor to express an opinion on the
entity's FS. Provides reasonable or high level of assurance that the FS is
free from material misstatement. (positive assurance)
Review –objective is to enable auditor to state whether, on basis of
procedures which do not provide all the evidence that would be required in an
audit, anything has come to the auditor's attention that causes the auditor to
believe that the FS are not prepared in all material respect, in accordance with
an identified financial reporting framework.
o Can only provide moderate level of assurance (negative
assurance).
o Consist principally of inquiry and analytical procedures.
Reporting Responsibility –the auditor may issue a :
Unmodified Review Report –issued when the auditor believes, based
on the evidence obtained, that there are no material modifications that
should be made to the FS.
Modification of the Review Report
o Material Misstatement –when the modification is because of
material misstatement the report should describe those
matter that impair a fair presentation of FS, including, unless
impracticable, a quantification of the possible effect(s) on the
FS and either:
Express a qualification of the negative assurance
When the effect of the matter is material and pervasive
to the FS that the auditor concludes that a qualification is
not adequate to disclose the misleading or incomplete
nature of the FS, give an adverse statement that the FS
are not presented fairly.
o Scope Limitation –the report should describe the limitation either
Express a qualification of the negative assurance
regarding the possible adjustment to the financial
statements that might have been determined to be
necessary had the limitation not existed
When the possible effect of the limitation is material and
pervasive that the auditor concludes that no level of
assurance can be provided, the auditor should not
provide any assurance
Compilation –provide assistance to the entities in the preparation and
presentation of their FS. Objective of this engagement is for the accountant to
use accounting expertise, as opposed to auditing expertise, to collect,
classify and summarize financial information.
o This engagement is not designed and do not enable the accountant to
express any assurance
o The accountant should read the compiled information and consider
whether it appears to be appropriate in form and free from obvious
material misstatement
o The accountant is not ordinarily
Make inquiries of management to assess reliability and
completeness of the information
Assess internal control
Verify any matter
Verify any explanation
*The financial information compiled by the accountant should contain a
reference such as "Unaudited", "Compiled without audit or revie"
or "Refer to Compilation Report" on each page.
Modification of the compilation report
Material Misstatement –the accountant should disclose the nature of the
misstatement in a separate paragraph of the report although their effect do
not have to be quantified. If the accountant feels that modification of the report
is not sufficient and the client is not willing to correct the deficiencies, the
accountant may withdraw.
Scope Limitation –normally cause the accountant to withdraw