Document Code: OD-CS-ETEEAP

MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Document Title: Course Syllabus – MNAB 3323
An Autonomous University Engineering Management
LUCENA CITY Page No: 1 of 6
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 24, 2018
OFFICE OF THE DEAN Date Revised: 0
Prepared by:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE./ A.L. AVILES
Professor
Accreditation Program (ETEEAP) Date: August 24, 2018
Reviewed by:
GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE.
COURSE SYLLABUS Dean, CEng
Approved by:
DR. BENILDA N. VILLENAS, Ph.D.
VPAR /Director ETEEAP

COURSE SYLLABUS

1. Course Code: MNAB 3323

2. Course Title: Engineering Management
3. Prerequisite:
4. Corequisite: None
5. Credit/Class Schedule: 3 units/3 hours a week
6. Course Description: The course deals with the study of management concepts, theories, principles, functions,
practices and human behavior. It includes decision making tools, managing production and service operations,
managing the marketing as well as the finance functions.

7. Student Outcomes and Relationship to Program Educational Objectives:

Student Outcomes Program Educational
Objectives
1 2 3 4
a. Apply knowledge of mathematics, physical sciences, and engineering sciences to    
solve engineering problems.
b. Use the appropriate techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for    
the practice of engineering.
c. Know and understand engineering and management principles as a member and a    
leader of a team, and to manage projects in a multidisciplinary environment

8. Course Outcomes and Relationship to Student Outcomes:

Course Outcomes a b c
After completing the course, the student must be able to:
1. Identify the different functions and field of engineering management and enumerate R R R
the decision-making process.
2. Distinguish and explain the functions of management such as planning, organizing, R R R
staffing and Communicating
3. Identify and explain the functions of management such as motivating, leading and R R R
controlling.
4. Classify and apply the functions of engineering management in product and service R R R
operation, marketing function and finance function.

Level: I – Introduced R – Reinforced D – Demonstrated

9. Course Coverage:
Date Course Outcomes Topics Teaching and Assessment Tools
Learning Activities
Discussion and
Presentation of the Syllabus and Course Discussion/Open Q and A
Requirements and forum Recitation
Course Introduction
August CO1: 1. Identify the PART I:
25-26, different functions THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING Lecture-Discussion Assignment
2018 and field of MANAGEMENT AND DECISION
engineering MAKING PROCESS Case Analysis Case Study
management and Analysis
enumerate the Assignment/
 Document Code: OD-CS-ETEEAP
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Document Title: Course Syllabus – MNAB 3323
An Autonomous University Engineering Management
LUCENA CITY Page No: 2 of 6
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 24, 2018
OFFICE OF THE DEAN Date Revised: 0
Prepared by:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE./ A.L. AVILES
Professor
Accreditation Program (ETEEAP) Date: August 24, 2018
Reviewed by:
GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE.
COURSE SYLLABUS Dean, CEng
Approved by:
DR. BENILDA N. VILLENAS, Ph.D.
VPAR /Director ETEEAP

decision making 1. The field of engineering Research Work Research Output

process. data management:
required for the a. The Functions of the Engineer
design of products, b. Engineer in various types of
services and organization
processes c. What is Engineering Management

2. Decision Making Process

a. Quantitative approach on decision
making
Assignment: 1. Pick one of the BEST MANAGERS and one of the WORST MANAGERS (preperably
from the organization/company where you belong)
Date of a. what makes them GOOD or BAD?
Submission: what are their STRONGEST & WEAKEST skills.
Sept. 22-23, 2018 b. Cite an example of management function where they performed well or poorly.
2. Prepare an analysis of the case (to be given)
Sept. 22- CO2: Distinguish PART II: Lecture-Discussion Assignment
23, 2018 and explain the FUNCTIONS OF MANAGEMENT
functions of (1st PART) Case Analysis
management such as Case Study
planning, 1. Planning Assignment Analysis
organizing, staffing 2. Organizing
and Communicating 3. Staffing Internet Research Research Output
4. Communicating
Assignment: 1. Find out as much as you can about the mission, vision, values, and major goals of the
organization/company where you belong. Evaluate the firm’s mission, vision, values,
Date of and goals. What are the positive aspects of these statements? Is there anything you
Submission: would criticize?
Oct. 13-14, 2018
2. How is the strategy of your company/ organization communicated? Is this
communication appropriate? Why? Can you find any evidence of communication
problems or breakdowns?

3. Case Analysis (to be given)

October 13-14, 2018 MIDTERM EXAMINATION

CO3: Identify and PART III: Lecture-Discussion Assignment

Nov. 10- explain the FUNCTIONS OF MANAGEMENT
11, 2018 functions of (2nd PART) Case Analysis Case Study
management such as Analysis
motivating, leading 1. Motivating Assignment
and controlling. 2. Leading Research Output
3. Controlling Library/Internet
Research
Assignment: 1. Find out about your company’s practices for motivating and supporting employees.
Does your organization sufficiently support each of the drives identified in four-drive
theory? Does the organization seem to keep the four drives in balance, in your opinion?
Date of
Submission: 2. What can you find out about the leadership style of the chief executive officer of
Nov. 24-25, 2018 your company? How would you characterize his or her leadership style? Would you
 Document Code: OD-CS-ETEEAP
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Document Title: Course Syllabus – MNAB 3323
An Autonomous University Engineering Management
LUCENA CITY Page No: 3 of 6
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 24, 2018
OFFICE OF THE DEAN Date Revised: 0
Prepared by:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE./ A.L. AVILES
Professor
Accreditation Program (ETEEAP) Date: August 24, 2018
Reviewed by:
GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE.
COURSE SYLLABUS Dean, CEng
Approved by:
DR. BENILDA N. VILLENAS, Ph.D.
VPAR /Director ETEEAP

characterize the CEO as an effective leader? How would you explain his or her success
or lack thereof?

3. Provide an analysis of the case (to be given)

Nov. 24- CO4: Classify and PART IV: Lecture-Discussion Recitation
25, 2018 apply the functions MANAGING THE BUSINESS
of engineering FUNCTIONS Case Analysis Case Study
management in Analysis
product and service 1. Managing Product and Service Assignment/Research
operation, marketing Operations Work Library Research
function and finance 2. Managing the Marketing Function Output
function. 3. Managing the Finance Function

Assignment: 1. Why is operations management an important activity? Who are qualified to become
operations manager?
Date of 2. Identify the existing marketing unit of your company and draw the organization chart
Submission: of the firm showing the marketing unit and its relationship with other unit.
Dec 15-16, 2018 3. Provide an example of the following from your company:
a. Advertising Message
b. Publicity Release

December 15-16, 2018 FINAL EXAMINATION

Re-set / Re-exam and Submission

of Portfolio

10. Contribution of Course to Meeting the Professional Component:

BSCE BSGE BSIE BSME BSEE BSECE BSCpE
Mathematics & 17.43% 17.12% 19.00% 16.90% 15.97% 16.96% 17.43%
Natural/Physical Sciences
Basic Engineering Sciences 9.63% 9.46% 10.50% 9.33% 8.82% 9.375% 9.64%
Professional Courses 45.42% 46.40% 40.50% 47.11% 50.00% 46.875% 45.41%
General Education Courses 27.52% 27.02% 30.00% 26.66% 25.21% 26.79% 27.52%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

11. Reference Materials:

Assen, M.V. (2009). Key management models: The 60+ models every manager needs to know. England: FT Prentice Hall
Bird, P. (2010). Improve your time management. London, McGraw Hill
Daft, R.L. (2005) Management. Australia: Thomson/South-Western
Robbins, S., Coulter M. (2007), Management.9th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Prentice Hall
Shermerhorn, J. R. (2005), Management. New York: John Wiley & Son
Sibal, J. (2010). Management values, principles and cultures. Quezon City: Central Book Supply

12. Textbook/Instructional Material:

Meneses, J.L., Rago, G.M., Aviles, A.L.. (2014). Engineering Management with Special Topics on Quantitative Tools
 Document Code: OD-CS-ETEEAP
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Document Title: Course Syllabus – MNAB 3323
An Autonomous University Engineering Management
LUCENA CITY Page No: 4 of 6
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 24, 2018
OFFICE OF THE DEAN Date Revised: 0
Prepared by:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE./ A.L. AVILES
Professor
Accreditation Program (ETEEAP) Date: August 24, 2018
Reviewed by:
GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE.
COURSE SYLLABUS Dean, CEng
Approved by:
DR. BENILDA N. VILLENAS, Ph.D.
VPAR /Director ETEEAP

13. Course Evaluation:

Student performance will be rated based on the following:
Assessment Tasks Weight Minimum Average for
Satisfactory Performance
CO1 Assignment, Seatwork 15% 11.25
CO2 Quiz 20% 15.00
Recitation 5% 3.75
Preliminary Examination 30% 22.50
Mid-term Examination 30% 22.50
100% 75%
Previous (Midterm) Grade = 100% x 40%

CO3 Assignment, Seatwork 15% 11.25

CO4 Quiz 20% 15.00
Recitation 5% 3.75
Semi Final Examination 30% 22.50
Final Examination 30% 22.50
100% 75%
Present (Final) Grade = 100% x 60%
40% Previous Grade + 60% Present Grade = Final Grade

The following table will be used in giving the final grades:

Percentage 75-77 78 - 80 81-83 84-86 87-88 89-91 92-94 95-97 98-100
Equivalent
Final Grade 3.00 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00

ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION OF PROGRAM/STUDENT OUTCOMES

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR: ASSESSMENT TARGETS AND
TOOL STANDARDS
1. Identify the different functions and field of engineering 80% of the students
management and enumerate the decision-making process. assessment rubric shall have a rating of
at least 75%
2. Distinguish and explain the functions of management such as 80% of the students
planning, organizing, staffing and Communicating assessment rubric shall have a rating of
at least 75%
3. Identify and explain the functions of management such as 80% of the students
motivating, leading and controlling. assessment rubric shall have a rating of
at least 75%
4. Classify and apply the functions of engineering management in 80% of the students
product and service operation, marketing function and finance assessment rubric shall have a rating of
function. at least 75%

Rubrics will be used for other types of assessment such as return demonstration, simulation, etc.
1 2 3 4 5
BEGINNING APPROACHING
(Minimal and DEVELOPING PROFICIENCY PROFICIENT ADVANCE
Limited Evidence (Some evidence of (Adequate (Commendable (Exceptional
of Achievement) Achievement) Evidence of Achievement) Achievement)
Achievement)
 Document Code: OD-CS-ETEEAP
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Document Title: Course Syllabus – MNAB 3323
An Autonomous University Engineering Management
LUCENA CITY Page No: 5 of 6
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 24, 2018
OFFICE OF THE DEAN Date Revised: 0
Prepared by:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE./ A.L. AVILES
Professor
Accreditation Program (ETEEAP) Date: August 24, 2018
Reviewed by:
GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE.
COURSE SYLLABUS Dean, CEng
Approved by:
DR. BENILDA N. VILLENAS, Ph.D.
VPAR /Director ETEEAP

75 - 77 78 - 80 81 - 83 84 - 86 87 - 88 89 - 91 92 - 94 95 - 97 98 – 100
Aside from academic deficiency, other grounds for Incomplete/Failing grade are:
a Incomplete Grade
1. Non-submission of project
2. Lacks one major examination

b. Failing Grade:
1. Grave misconduct other than cheating//submitting plagiarized paper
2. Excessive absences (in excess of 20% of the total class hours)

14. Course Policies:

a. Attendance
The checking of attendance starts from the regular meeting of the class. A student shall be
considered absent if he/she is not present within 15 minutes from the scheduled time and
shall secure an admission slip from the department guidance counselor for readmission to
classes.

b. Submission of Assessment Tasks

Late submission of learning activities shall not be accepted.

c. Written Examination
There will be two major examinations –Mid-Term, and Final Examinations – covering the
intended COs. The final grade is the summative assessment of the four COs and will have to
demonstrate understanding of the course. Test booklet will be used as answer sheet in all
written examinations.

d. Re-set, Re-examinations
e. Issuance of Mid-Term Grade
The mid-term grade is issued to students so that formal consultation where students are
apprised of their class standing is done to afford them the opportunity to make up and to cope
with the rigors of the course.

f. Course Portfolio
Examination results, assignment and internet researches, manual and other semestral
projects are to be compiled and collected before the end of the semester. The selection is based
on statistical data gathering (minimal and limited evidence of achievement, some evidence of
achievement, adequate evidence of achievement, commendable achievement and exceptional
achievement). Learning tasks and examinations with marks minimal & limited, some,
adequate, commendable and exceptional evidence of achievement must be photocopied and
returned to the Instructor/professor for course portfolio keeping.

g. Language of Instruction
Lectures, discussions and documentation will be in English. Written and spoken work may
receive a lower mark, if the student is deficient in English.

h. Classroom Discipline
Students are not allowed to use electronic gadgets such as cell phones, I-pads and head/ear
sets/pads inside the classroom to avoid disruption of the lesson.
 Document Code: OD-CS-ETEEAP
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Document Title: Course Syllabus – MNAB 3323
An Autonomous University Engineering Management
LUCENA CITY Page No: 6 of 6
Revision No.: 0
Effectivity Date: August 24, 2018
OFFICE OF THE DEAN Date Revised: 0
Prepared by:
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE./ A.L. AVILES
Professor
Accreditation Program (ETEEAP) Date: August 24, 2018
Reviewed by:
GUILLERMO M. RAGO JR. Ed.D.,CE.
COURSE SYLLABUS Dean, CEng
Approved by:
DR. BENILDA N. VILLENAS, Ph.D.
VPAR /Director ETEEAP

i. Honor, Dress and Grooming Codes

Students must wear the prescribed school uniform with pin and the school ID as provided in
the Student Decorum of the Collegiate Student Handbook.

For this course, the Honor Code is that there will be no plagiarizing on written work and no
cheating on examinations. Proper citation must be given to authors whose works were used
in the preparation of any material for this course. If a student is caught cheating on an
examination, they will be given zero mark for the examination. If a student is caught cheating
twice, they will be referred to the Prefect of Discipline and be given a failing grade.

j. Consultation Schedule
Consultation schedules are announced by the Instructor/Professor at the beginning of the
semester. For this course, students may consult with the Instructor/Professor at the indicated
consultation schedule posted outside the Office. It is recommended that the student set an
appointment first to confirm the Instructor/Professor’s availability.

15. Revision History:

NO DATE REVISIONS
0 Initial Release
1 June 02, 2014 Revised to OBE Format
2 June 08, 2015 Revised the contents based on the 2015 Curriculum Mapping
3 January 05, 2017 Added newly acquired library references

16. Course Materials Made Available

Syllabus for MNAB 3323
Handouts/lecture Notes
Sourcebook
Guidelines, Grading Criteria: Refer to the rubrics above