ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We owe a debt of gratitude to our lecturer Madam Siti Maryam binti Abdul Wahab for her
kind direction and proper guidance to us in conducting the practical task. In every phase of this
practical task, her supervision and guidance shaped this report to be completed perfectly.

We would also like to thank to our group members which are Harith Najmi bin Abd Rashid,
Intan Maisarah binti Hashim, Mohd Iqram Hafiz bin Mahazir, Arina binti Azmi and Nurul Izzah
binti Ismail for giving good cooperation and commitment in conducting the practical task and
completing this report.

1|Page
ABSTRACT
The main thing of this report is the ‘why’, ‘how’ and ‘what’ of precise levelling. The
definition of precise levelling is reviewed. The main reasons or objectives for this term are
discussed which leads to a discussion of what objectives of the practical task that we achieve.

The report then discusses how we conduct the precise levelling referred to Circular
Cadastre Survey Rule 2002 (CSR 2002).

The report is concluded by reviewing problems that we faced in execution of project,

general comments on group members and suggestion for a better practical task in future.

2|Page
 CONTENT

NO CONTENT PAGE

1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 1

2 ABSTRACT 2

3 CONTENT 3

4 INTRODUCTION 4

5 OBJECTIVE 5

6 INSTRUMENT USED 6

7 METHODOLOGY 9

8 DATA PROCESSING 12

9 RESULTS 19

10 ANALYSIS 27

11 REFERENCE 29

12 INDIVIDUAL COMMENT 30

13 ATTACHMENT 35

3|Page
INTRODUCTION
We did our practical task by doing precise levelling. Firstly, we conduct the two peg test
near to the Geomatics instrument store to check whether the instrument is in a good condition.
Then, we started our precise levelling from the Standard Bench Mark (SBM) at Masjid An-Nur in
UiTM Perlis to the bench mark at Gate B and returned back to the SBM. For your information,
precise levelling is the method available to determine height precisely. In other word, precise
levelling is the most accurate vertical measurement method. It is the process of measuring the
difference in height precisely between benchmarks (BM, TBM) relative to the datum. The process
of precise levelling is to measure height differences and to sum these to get the height of other
points in a precise way. By using the instrument that is called digital level, the heights on the staff
are being read and the value of reduced level of the bench mark at Gate B can be determined. As
you know, one of the applications of precise levelling is to determine or check the reduced level
of bench marks by using the standard bench marks (SBM). Actually, there are a few applications
of precise levelling instead of checking up or determining the reduced level of bench marks by
using the standard bench marks (SBM) are widely used in precision engineering structure such as
irrigation scheme, dam and tunnels and beneficial for precision dimensional surveys.

4|Page
OBJECTIVE
 Able to conduct and understand the two peg test that is important for checking up the
instrument before proceed to the precise levelling process
 Able to learn and use new instrument such as Digital level,bipods,change plate and a few
more thing while conducting precise levelling
 Able to describe the concept, terminologies and principle of precise levelling
 Able to solve the problem & necessary calculations for determining height by using precise
levelling
 Able to identify the sources of error in precise levelling
 Able to explain application of precise levelling which is determining the reduced level of
bench marks by using standard bench marks

5|Page
INSTRUMENTS USED
Equipment used for Two Peg Test and Precise Levelling are:

 Invar or bar-coded Staff x 2

 Is used to measure the vertical distance from the horizontal plane

established by a level to points where heights are required.

 It also can have length up to 5 metre.

 It also can be fitted to the circular bubble (staff bubble) so that a staff
can be held vertically at each point.

 Staff bubble x2

 use to make sure the staff level and center

 bubble must be in the circle at the staff bubble to ensure staff is level
correctly

6|Page
  Digital Level x1

 Determine accurate height information 60% faster than with automatic

leveling

 Eliminate errors and reduce rework with digital readings

 Transfer data to the office easily

 Level Accuracy 0.3 or 0.7 mm

 the level consist of telescope and compensator

 Tape(50metre) x1

 used to measured distance accurately

 necessary in 2 peg test but optional in leveling work

7|Page
  Tripod x1

 use to place the level for easier leveling work

 Change Plate x1

 small flat metal plate with a raised point in centre that is used to support the
the ground.

 The plate is firmly embedded into the ground to stop the staff from
subsiding.

8|Page
METHODOLOGY

TWO PEG PRECISE

TEST LEVELLING

9|Page
TWO PEG TEST
All instruments are subject to errors. The checking of the instrument (in this case level) is
therefore important. The main error is where the line of sight is not parallel to the horizontal line
of collimation. In this case levels will not be correct. A test for checking the level is known as
the two peg test. Two peg test must be carry out before strating the leveling job to insure the
instrument in good condition. This test determines the amount of errors and if an error occurs
notify the technician (the level must be serviced). Purpose of Test Purpose of doing this test is to
determine the collimation error of a level instrument.

TWO PEG TEST PROCEDURE

 measure tape 30m from point C to point A and B. You also can do by 25m. Choose flat
area for this test and observe the staff A and B.
 After that, the digital level move to point D where is about L/10 meter. L is total length
from point A to B. Jot down the Staff A and B reading.
 Do comparison between 2 set of readings and the collimation should within 1mm. If
more than that it is advised to do instrument calibration.

10 | P a g e
PRECISE LEVELLING
Precise levelling is used where a high degree of accuracy is required for determination of the
elevations of various points. Also known as First Order Levelling. Being used as a method of
height transfer from one point to another .It is also required to set up critical engineering
structure such as dam, tunnel etc.

PRECISE LEVELLING PROCEDURE

 The backsights and foresights shall be approximately of the same length. The maximum
length of sight shall not be more than 40 meter. Due to the slope of the ground or to
shimmer the length of sight may often be shorter than this. Total distances of works is
normally 1.5km but it may varies due to suitability of the area.
 Two backward and two foresight observations shall be taken. Differences between
observations shall not exceed 0.04572 cm. The difference in length between backsight
and corresponding foresight shall not exceed 1.2 meter.
 Acceptable precise levelling Invar staff shall be used. The staff is to be set always on a
staff set up pin. These pins are different length for hard and soft ground and have rounded
tops. A ring is attached to the pin to facilitate lifting and carrying. The stave shall be
erected vertically by using plate bubble attached on the stave.
 Observation of new benchmarks shall only be taken at least after one month of their
construction. If the work is stopped on other than permanent benchmark, at least two
temporary Benchmarks are to be established. On resuming work the marks must be
checked for disturbance or change of relative height.
 Read out from the instrument shall be set to five (5) decimal places.
 The minimum stave reading shall not be less than 0.5 meter.
 Height closes within an allowable error of ± 3 √k mm where k is the distance in kilometre

11 | P a g e
DATA PROCESSING

Result of 2 peg test

BACKSIGHT FORESIGHT DIFFERENCE DISTANCE (m)

1.3109 14.96
1.3324 -0.0215 29.80
1.3409 14.97
1.3188 0.0221 29.79

THE DIFFERENCE

-0.0215-0.0221= -0.0436

MEAN DISTANCE

(14.96 + 29.80) +( 14.97 + 29.79) / 4 = 22.38

THE TOLERANCE

The tolerance of the two peg test must be ±0.002m

-0.0436/22.38= -0.002m
So as -0.002m is within the tolerance,so the result is acceptable and the instrument can be used
for precise levelling process.

12 | P a g e
RESULT OF BENCHMARK

BACKSIGHT FORESIGHT MEAN MEAN RISE FALL RL

BS FS
SBM=34.187
1.3164 1.3980 1.3164 1.3979 0.0815
1.3164 1.3978

0.5708 1.9311 0.5708 1.9311 1.3603

0.5707 1.9311

0.9582 1.8052 0.9585 1.8052 0.8467

0.9587 1.8052

0.7532 2.0122 0.7532 2.0122 1.2590

0.7532 2.0122

0.6015 1.7806 0.6015 1.7806 1.1791

0.6015 1.7805
TBM1=29.4604
1.2526 1.4036 1.2526 1.4036 0.1510
1.2525 1.4036

1.3015 1.6646 1.3015 1.6646 0.3631

1.3015 1.6646

0.6034 2.6538 0.6034 2.6584 2.0550

13 | P a g e
 0.6034 2.6584

0.6296 1.8601 0.6294 1.8601 1.2307

0.6292 1.8601

0.7619 1.9601 0.7618 1.9601 1.1983

0.7616 1.9600

0.8053 1.7773 0.8053 1.7773 0.9720

0.8052 1.7773

1.0278 1.6096 1.0278 1.6096 0.5818

1.0277 1.6096

1.1993 1.5149 1.1993 1.5149 0.3156

1.1992 1.5148

1.2585 1.7418 1.2584 1.7418 0.4834

1.2583 1.7418

1.0792 1.6369 1.0791 1.6368 0.5577

1.0790 1.6366

0.9275 1.8341 0.9274 1.8341 0.9067

0.9272 1.8341

14 | P a g e
 BACKSIGHT FORESIGHT MEAN MEAN RISE FALL RL
BS FS
0.8526 1.8641 0.8527 1.8641 1.0114
0.8527 1.8641
TBM2=19.6337
0.8101 1.9585 0.8101 1.9585 1.1484
0.8101 1.9585

1.1981 2.0363 1.1980 2.0364 0.8384

1.1979 2.0365

0.7024 2.0720 0.7023 2.0720 1.3697

0.7022 2.0720

0.5732 2.6408 0.5732 2.6408 2.0676

0.5731 2.6407

0.5973 1.9529 0.5973 1.9530 1.3557

0.5973 1.9530
BM=12.8539
2.3061 0.7054 2.3062 0.7055 1.6007
2.3063 0.7056

3.1339 0.3379 3.1341 0.3381 2.7960

3.1342 0.3383

2.3216 0.4395 2.3217 0.4397 1.8820

2.3217 0.4398

15 | P a g e
 TBM3=19.1326
2.3097 0.5311 2.3097 0.5311 1.7786
2.3097 0.5311

3.2841 2.9098 3.2841 2.9099 0.3742

3.2841 2.9099

1.1385 1.2716 1.1385 1.2716 0.1331

1.1385 1.2715
TBM4=21.1523
1.6346 0.8431 1.6346 0.8431 0.7915
1.6345 0.8431

1.9615 0.3259 1.9614 0.3259 1.6355

1.9613 0.3258

2.2362 0.4308 2.2362 0.4309 1.8053

2.2362 0.4309
TBM5=25.3846
3.0621 0.7939 3.0622 0.7939 2.2683
3.0622 0.7939

1.3783 1.2621 1.3784 1.2622 0.1162

1.3784 1.2622

BACKSIGHT FORESIGHT MEAN MEAN RISE FALL RL

BS FS
2.1245 0.3111 2.1245 0.3112 1.8133

16 | P a g e
 2.1244 0.3113

2.0265 0.6857 2.0265 0.6857 1.3408

2.0265 0.6856

2.0127 0.3635 2.0125 0.3631 1.6494

2.0123 0.3627

1.2379 1.1852 1.2380 1.1852 0.0528

1.2381 1.1851

1.3716 1.4131 1.3716 1.4132 0.0416

1.3716 1.4133
SBM=32.5838
53.3202-54.9234= - 19.9046- 32.5838m - 34.187m = -
1.6032m 21.5078= - 1.6032m
1.6032m

17 | P a g e
TOLERANCE
Final reduced level of SBM - initial reduced level of SBM = Height difference
32.5838m - 34.187m = -1.6032m

3√K where K is total distance in kilometer,

Total distance,K = 1966.53m ÷ 1000

= 1.96653 km

So, ±3√K =±3√1.96653= ±4.206990611 mm/± 0.00420699 m

As -1.6032m is not within the tolerance, ±4.206990611 mm or ±0.00420699 m. So,our precise

levelling observation is out of the tolerance or not acceptable.The difference of mean backsight
with mean foresight and rise with fall are same with the difference between the initial and the
final reduced levels of standard bench mark which is -1.6032m by doing arithmetical checking.

18 | P a g e
 RESULTS

Result of 2 peg test

BACKSIGHT FORESIGHT DIFFERENCE DISTANCE (m)

1.3109 14.96

1.3324 -0.0215 29.80

1.3409 14.97

1.3188 0.0221 29.79

THE DIFFERENCE

-0.0215-0.0221= -0.0436

MEAN DISTANCE

(14.96 + 29.80) + (14.97 + 29.79) / 4 = 22.38

19 | P a g e
 THE TOLERANCE

The tolerance of the two peg test must be ±0.002m

-0.0436/22.38= -0.002m

So as -0.002m is within the tolerance, so the result is acceptable and the instrument can

be used for precise levelling process.

20 | P a g e
 RESULT OF BENCHMARK

BACKSIGHT FORESIGHT MEAN BS MEAN RISE FALL RL

FS

SBM=

34.187

1.3164 1.3980 1.3164 1.3979 0.0815

1.3164 1.3978

0.5708 1.9311 0.5708 1.9311 1.3603

0.5707 1.9311

0.9582 1.8052 0.9585 1.8052 0.8467

0.9587 1.8052

0.7532 2.0122 0.7532 2.0122 1.2590

0.7532 2.0122

0.6015 1.7806 0.6015 1.7806 1.1791

0.6015 1.7805
TBM1=
29.4604
1.2526 1.4036 1.2526 1.4036 0.1510
1.2525 1.4036

1.3015 1.6646 1.3015 1.6646 0.3631

1.3015 1.6646

21 | P a g e
 0.6034 2.6538 0.6034 2.6584 2.0550
0.6034 2.6584

0.6296 1.8601 0.6294 1.8601 1.2307

0.6292 1.8601

0.7619 1.9601 0.7618 1.9601 1.1983

0.7616 1.9600

0.8053 1.7773 0.8053 1.7773 0.9720

0.8052 1.7773

1.0278 1.6096 1.0278 1.6096 0.5818

1.0277 1.6096

1.1993 1.5149 1.1993 1.5149 0.3156

1.1992 1.5148

1.2585 1.7418 1.2584 1.7418 0.4834

1.2583 1.7418

1.0792 1.6369 1.0791 1.6368 0.5577

1.0790 1.6366

0.9275 1.8341 0.9274 1.8341 0.9067

0.9272 1.8341

22 | P a g e
 BACKSIGHT FORESIGHT MEAN BS MEAN RISE FALL RL
FS
0.8526 1.8641 0.8527 1.8641 1.0114
0.8527 1.8641
TBM2=
19.6337
0.8101 1.9585 0.8101 1.9585 1.1484
0.8101 1.9585

1.1981 2.0363 1.1980 2.0364 0.8384

1.1979 2.0365

0.7024 2.0720 0.7023 2.0720 1.3697

0.7022 2.0720

0.5732 2.6408 0.5732 2.6408 2.0676

0.5731 2.6407

0.5973 1.9529 0.5973 1.9530 1.3557

0.5973 1.9530
BM=
12.8539
2.3061 0.7054 2.3062 0.7055 1.6007
2.3063 0.7056

3.1339 0.3379 3.1341 0.3381 2.7960

3.1342 0.3383

2.3216 0.4395 2.3217 0.4397 1.8820

2.3217 0.4398

23 | P a g e
 TBM3=
19.1326
2.3097 0.5311 2.3097 0.5311 1.7786
2.3097 0.5311

3.2841 2.9098 3.2841 2.9099 0.3742

3.2841 2.9099

1.1385 1.2716 1.1385 1.2716 0.1331

1.1385 1.2715
TBM4=
21.1523
1.6346 0.8431 1.6346 0.8431 0.7915
1.6345 0.8431

1.9615 0.3259 1.9614 0.3259 1.6355

1.9613 0.3258

2.2362 0.4308 2.2362 0.4309 1.8053

2.2362 0.4309
TBM5=
25.3846
3.0621 0.7939 3.0622 0.7939 2.2683
3.0622 0.7939

1.3783 1.2621 1.3784 1.2622 0.1162

1.3784 1.2622

24 | P a g e
 BACKSIGHT FORESIGHT MEAN BS MEAN RISE FALL RL
FS
2.1245 0.3111 2.1245 0.3112 1.8133
2.1244 0.3113

2.0265 0.6857 2.0265 0.6857 1.3408

2.0265 0.6856

2.0127 0.3635 2.0125 0.3631 1.6494

2.0123 0.3627

1.2379 1.1852 1.2380 1.1852 0.0528

1.2381 1.1851

1.3716 1.4131 1.3716 1.4132 0.0416

1.3716 1.4133
SBM=
32.5838

25 | P a g e
 TOLERANCE

Final reduced level of SBM - initial reduced level of SBM = Height difference

32.5838m - 34.187m = -1.6032m

3√K where K is total distance in kilometer,

Total distance, K = 1966.53m ÷ 1000

= 1.96653 km

So, ±3√K =±3√1.96653= ±4.206990611 mm/± 0.00420699 m

As a result, the observed reduced level of bench mark at Gate B which is 12.8539m

cannot be used as reference for further engineering field work. This is because the difference

between the final reduced level and the initial reduced level of standard bench

Mark (SBM) which is 1.6032m is not within the tolerance, ±4.206990611 mm or

±0.00420699 m. So, our precise levelling observation is out of the tolerance or not acceptable.

26 | P a g e
 ANALYSIS

The standard bench mark (SBM) is fixed at a reduced level (RL) of 34.187m. For

each turning point (TP) or changing point (CP), the back sight (CP) and foresight (FS) must be

collected and recorded down. The digital level will be shifted to another point and established

temporary bench marks throughout the precise levelling process. After shifting 22 points to the

bench mark at Gate B, we will get back to the beginning which is the standard bench mark

(SBM).

The reduced level is being calculated through the rise and fall method. We must

do the method in a row to be more accurate. The final reduced level of SBM is to make sure the

value is equal or close to the initial reduced level of SBM. For the precision of our observation,

we make sure that the line of sight should not pass close to the ground as readings must not be

made to the lowest 0.3m of the staff. The length of sight is about 20-30m for all stations. Then,

we make sure that the back and forward bar-coded staffs should be equidistant from the digital

level within 1 metre after we ignored this observation requirement at the first 5 stations of the

precise levelling from standard bench mark to the bench mark where the error occurred

throughout the fieldwork.

27 | P a g e
 In this report, the data we collected, the final reduced level is more than the initial

reduced level. Therefore, we know that there is a misclosure during our precise levelling

fieldwork process. If the error occurred, we must adjust the reduced level by using the loop

misclosure method that had been taught in the class, which is ±3√K where K is the total distance

in kilometre. The answer must be within the loop misclosure or the tolerance. If the answer is not

within the loop misclosure, so the error is not acceptable. Based on our result, the difference is

not acceptable as it is out of the loop misclosure or the tolerance. The loop misclosure is

4.206990611mm. The error which is the difference between the final reduced level and the initial

reduced level of SBM is -1.6032m. As you know, the value of difference is larger than the loop

misclosure. The consequence is the observed value of the bench mark at Gate B cannot be used

as a reference for further engineering fieldwork.

The error can be caused by the random error where the observer observes the bar-

coded staffs in strong sunlight without using the umbrella. There is a chance for him to observe

the wrong bar code on the staff as it is influenced by the refraction. Then, the error occurred

when the distance between the back and forward bar-coded staffs and the digital level for the

first 5 stations of our observation we ignored. The difference in distance between the two bar-

coded staffs and the digital level is more than 1 metre. The difference is about 2-3 metres. So, we

think that this is the main cause for the error to be occurred during our observation and the result

of our precise levelling work is not acceptable due to the error that is out of the loop misclosure.

28 | P a g e
 REFERENCES

Support and questions

 Madam Siti Maryam

 Other group members

 Faculty of Architecture,Planning and Surveying Senoirs

Books

 The Practical Handout

 Engineering Surveying 2 Notes

Internet

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/preciselevelling

 http://www.melakasurveyor.com/2009/08/two-peg-test-in-levelling.html

 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact
=8&ved=0ahUKEwjO8oPrgvPSAhUaSY8KHZawDxwQFggbMAE&url=http%3A%2F
%2Fwww.hbp.usm.my%2Fhilmy%2F20745951-Tacheometric-
Surveying.ppt&usg=AFQjCNHPFsBelzTwWIO-Ram5GYp-nvSrwg

 http://surfcivil.blogspot.my/2010/05/traverse-surveying.html

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traverse_(surveying)

 http://www.civileblog.com/levelling/

29 | P a g e
 INDIVIDUAL COMMENT

 INTAN MAISARAH BT HASHIM

The most successful achievement that I had achieved is when I managed to follow the
rules and procedure as well .I managed to achieve all the aim and the main objectives of this
practical task eventhought that our results does not achive the statisfaction.The new things that I
have learned in this practical task is firstly, I know how to do precise levelling really well .
Secondly, by this practical its give a lots of basic knowledge to me on how to handle the new
levelling equipment,such as Digital level. . So, I was so confident to handle any equipment for
the next semester.Thirdly,I know how do to conduct the levelling by using the digital level and
another equipment and by the results that I get,I must compute all the booking data or results
collected by booking procedures.Next,I know how to used the formula to calculated the data that
I get to get the accurate results and preciesely.Lastly,I managed to find that it is important to
realize that all instruments are subject to errors. The checking of the instrument (in this case
level) is therefore important

MEMBERS COMMITMENT LEADERSHIP ATTENDENCES

HARITH NAJMI 10 10 10

ARINA AZMI 10 10 10

NURUL IZZAH 10 10 9

IQRAM HAFIZ 10 9 9

30 | P a g e
  HARITH NAJMI BIN ABD RASHID

I have learned the importance to take this all engineering work data to fulfil all of our
engineering surveying work . It was not an easy work as it seems because the distance for our
levelling works from the SBM to our station is quite far. If our levelling was not acceptable, we
had to redo all over again. It was kind of frustrated but we had to do it anyways. Secondly, our
levelling was not acceptable. We had to redo the procedure again and for the second time our
levelling was also not acceptable.Without hesitate, we proceed to other work.

I am grateful that my team were never complain when we did the levelling twise. I was
the observer and I was waiting for someone to blame me and take my place as an observer
because it was not acceptable. They did not say anything and just proceed to redo the works.
Because of that, I know that they put all their trust on me and so I did my best.

My team really gave their full cooperation during the practical task. Every each
member get the opportunity to used and learn the new instrument that we used this semester. We
also learned to read the reading from the staff and how to write the reading that have been taken.

10 new things I have learned from this levelling field work:

 How to use the levelling instrument that is Digital Level

 Procedure of Precise levelling

 Taking the backsight and foresight reading

 Apply the theory of that have learned in lecture class to the practical task

 How to calculate the data

 I learned that the Digital level consist of compensator that will ensure the line of sight
will always be horizontal and the instrument may provide an accurate data.

31 | P a g e
 MEMBERS COMMITMENT LEADERSHIP ATTENDENCES

INTAN MAISARAH 10 10 10

ARINA AZMI 10 10 10

NURUL IZZAH 9 10 9

IQRAM HAFIZ 10 9 9

 NURUL IZZAH BINTI ISMAIL

In the beginning ,I could not set up the equipment quickly as it is new for us which result
in slow progress and also our levelling was not acceptable at first. However, the time flies and
we manage ourselves better with other helps for the second time.

I gave attendance, leadership and commitment for all the group members are
between 9 out of 10 for every one of them because of the time they have gave to finish this task
which is a lot. They really gave a full commitment throughout the project from the beginning to
the end of the project. By then, they develop the leadership skill as we learn to be a responsible
to each of our equipment. For the attendance, I gave between 10 out of 10.

MEMBERS COMMITMENT LEADERSHIP ATTENDENCES

HARITH NAJMI 10 10 10

ARINA AZMI 10 10 10

INTAN MAISARAH 10 10 10

IQRAM HAFIZ 10 9 9

32 | P a g e
  ARINA BINTI AZMI

We were given a task to do Presice levelling practical task by our lecturer Madam Siti
Maryam. There are 5 members in my team which are 3 girls and 2 boys. I am glad to be in a
team where there is no arguing and blaming each other when one of us makes mistakes. Doing
this field work may be tiring since we were under the sun for a long time but my team manage to
finish it with the time given. I feel very proud to be in this group and do the practical task
together. I learn how to be in a team work, cooperation, patient even sometime we have made a
mistake but we still together to complete this task. Before this, we not really know each other.
After being in the group, we become more friendly and closed. We study together when do the
practical. For example, We have many mistake when do the levelling. We not really understand
how to use the Digital level. We take a long time to finish our work. Then, we try to ask another
student to help and finally we can do by our own. When one of our friend did not understand, we
try to explain until all of us really understand. When do the report, we divide the task equally to
make sure this task complete in time.

Rating from (0 to 10) will be given to my group members according to their attendances,
leadership and commitments.

MEMBERS COMMITMENT LEADERSHIP ATTENDENCES

HARITH NAJMI 10 10 10

NURUL IZZAH 10 10 10

INTAN MAISARAH 10 10 10

IQRAM HAFIZ 10 10 10

33 | P a g e
  MOHD IQRAM HAFIZ BIN MAHAZIR

Overall , I could see all my group member ready to face any trouble and applying new
things very well. Everbody put an effort to finish this project as soon as possible. All of them are
alright when knowing there is mistake or any unwanted things happen to our levelling process.
Maybe sometimes we faced a really hard time in fieldwork practical and get some argument but
we try not to wasting time and overcome it soon. It is good to work with them.

MARK OF GROUP MEMBER

MEMBERS COMMITMENT LEADERSHIP ATTENDENCES

HARITH NAJMI 10 10 10

ARINA AZMI 10 10 10

INTAN MAISARAH 10 10 10

NURUL IZZAH 10 9 9

34 | P a g e
 ATTACHMENT

35 | P a g e