Stage I-Project

PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN OF HIGH RISE

IREEGULAR BUILDING USING NON-LINEAR
PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Performance Based Design:

Performance based seismic design is a process of
designing new buildings or seismic up-gradation of existing buildings, which
includes a specific intent to achieve defined performance objectives in future
earthquakes. Performance objectives relate to expectations regarding the
amount of damage a building may experience in response to earthquake shaking
and the consequences of that damage. Performance objectives are operational
(O), immediate occupancy (IO), life safety (LS), collapse prevention (CP), in
which Life safety is the major focus to reduce the threats to the life safety of the
structure in Figure1.

Figure1 Different performance levels

Performance based design approach in which performance levels are described
in terms of displacement as damage is better correlated to displacements rather
than forces. The fundamental goal of PSBD is to obtain a structure which will
reach a target displacement profile when subjected to earthquakes consistent
with a given reference response spectrum. The performance levels of the
structure are governed through the selection of suitable values of the maximum
displacement and maximum inter storey drift.
These four performance levels are described below:

Operational Building Performance Level:

Buildings that meet this building performance
level are expected to sustain minimal or no damage to their structural and non
structural components. The building is able to continue its normal operations
with only slight adjustments for power, water, or other utilities that may need to
be provided from emergency sources.

Immediate Occupancy Building Performance:

Buildings that meet this building performance
level are expected to sustain minimal damage to their structural elements and
only minor damage to their non structural components. While it is safe to
reoccupy a building designed for this performance level immediately following
a major earthquake, non structural systems.

Life Safety Building Performance Level:

Buildings that meet this building performance
level may experience extensive damage to structural and non structural
components. Repairs may be required before re-occupancy, though in some
cases extensive restoration or reconstruction may not be cost effective. The risk
of casualties at this target performance level is low.

Collapse Prevention Building Performance Level:

Although buildings that meet this building
performance level may pose a significant hazard to life safety resulting from
failure of non structural components, significant loss of life may be avoided by
preventing collapse of the entire building. However, many buildings designed to
meet this performance level may be complete economic losses.
4. OBJECTIVES
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of G+20
RCC Building structure with and without vertical irregularities using
pushover analysis.

1. To Analyze High-rise Regular and Irregular RCC building by using

ETABS software.

2. To calculate the design lateral forces on regular and irregular buildings

using pushover analysis and to compare the results of different
Irregularities.

3. To compare the performance of structure with different irregularities

using non-linear static analysis with performance based criteria.

5. METHODOLOGY

 The analysis part of structures is carried out in ETABS.

 For validation and project work the plan of buildings which would be
taking will be based on case study of a particular project.
 Pushover curves for all the case are obtained. (Base shear Vs
Displacement)
 Nodes corresponding to different zones (<IO, (LS-CP),>CP) are
identified by carrying out the non linear static analysis of the structures
using ETAB software.
 Maximum base shear of different structures with and without
irregularities are identified and compared.
REFERENCES

 Kelly, T. E., & Chambers, J. D. (2000). Analysis procedures for

performance based design. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference
on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand. Paper no. 2400.
New Zealand.
 Midorikawa, M., Okawa, I., Iiba, M., & Teshigawara, M. (2003).
Performance-based seismic design code for buildings in
Japan. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, 4(1), 15-25.
 Bento, R., Falcao, S., & Rodrigues, F. (2004, August). Nonlinear Static
Procedures in performance based seismic design. In Proceedings of the
13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada.
 Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (2004). A modal pushover analysis
procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric‐ plan
buildings. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 33(8), 903-
927.
 BhattNakai, M., Koshika, N., Kawano, K., Hirakawa, K., & Wada, A.
(2012). Performance-based seismic design for high-rise buildings in
Japan. Int. J. High-Rise Build, 1, 155-167.
 i, A. Q., & Varum, H. (2012, September). Application of Performance
Based Nonlinear Seismic Design and Simulation Static Pushover
Analysis for Seismic Design of RC Buildings. In Proceedings of the 15th
World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
 “IS1893, B. I. S. "Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant design
of structures (part 1): general provisions and buildings (Sixth revision,
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.”(2016).