1. General system description -5-
General system descrij
1.1 Task
Fig. 1 shows the performance graph of a turbo compressor. The
enthalpy difference (also called compression work or delivery
head) above the suction volume flow. This presentation has the
advantage that it is independent of changes in the suction
condition or the gas composition.
The performance graph is divided by the surge limit into a stable
and an unstable area. In the unstable area surging occurs. This
is a process in which periodically conveyed fluid flows back from
the discharge side to the suction side, resulting in inadmissible
load reversals on the blading.
In order to avoid this surging, compressors are equipped with
blow-off or by-pass valves. By means of controlled opening of
these valves, the compressor throughput can be increased to such
an extent that the machine is operated in the stable range of the
performance map. For this purpose, a blow-off line is provided
parallel to the surge limit. It is the task of the anti-surge
control system to prevent values falling below this line.
For reasons of economy, the blow-off losses must be minimized.
This is why a special control system is necessary which opens the
blow-off valves only as far as is absolutely necessary for pro-
tection of the machine.
The control system must satisfy three requirements which partly
contradict each other.
If the compressor is operating to the right of the blow-off line,
there must be no intervention on the part of the control system.
With the machine operating on the blow-off line, stable behaviour
is required. This can be achieved by low controller gain.
In the case of operation to the left of the blow-off line, the
control system must react at high speed which requires high gain.
Control must be achieved quickly enough to prevent the compressor
from reaching the surge limit, even in the case of max. disturb-
ances from the process (such as operation of a trip valve in the
compressor discharge line).
For this purpose, a special control system was developed by MAN
GHH. It has been patented both at home and abroad.1. General system description -
1.2 Anti-surge control
1.2.1 The control principle
Fig. 2 shows the schematic of an anti-surge control system.
The minimal allowable compressor suction flowrate is a function
of the enthalpy difference delta h. This is calculated by the
formula shown in the control schematic from the compressor
pressure and suction pressure as well as from the suction
temperature.
In function generator FG the set-point for the anti-surge control
system (minimum permissible suction flowrate) is formed from the
enthalpy difference.
The control difference is not, as otherwise usual, formed in the
controller, but before it. Thus there is a possibility of in-
fluencing the control difference depending on the position of the
duty point.
A non-linear amplifier VG adjusts the control gain to the respec-
tive requirements. It is set in such a way that in normal control
operation the normal controller gain is effective on the blow-off
line or to the right of it. If the blow-off line is exceeded by
more than 2%, the controller switches to 5-fold gain. As a
result,
it is capable of correcting the deviation very quickly.
It is desirable to increase the safety margin from the surge
limit if the duty point changes towards the surge limit quickly.
Due to the high noise levels associated with the pressure drop
signal, a differentiating circuit in the controller cannot be
utilized, as it would cause instability of the control circuit.
By means of a special DYN function module, the blow-off line is
made "dynamic". The safety margin from the surge limit is varied
as a function of the rated change and the distance of the duty
point from the blow-off line. In this way, protection of the
machine set during critical operating phases is considerably
improved without the need for a wider safety margin when oper-
ating under stationary conditions.
The positioning speed of the blow-off valve is limited. In open-
ing direction the valve is to move as quickly as possible, in
closing direction the speed is limited to 5% of the stroke per
second. In order to prevent the output of the controller being
inadmissibly in advance of the valve position, the position of
the blow-off valve is measured and the controller output is
adjusted as required by control intervention to the current valve
position.
In addition to the dynamic blow-off line DYN already described,
the apaiget control system has a new dynamic blow-off line
(DYN + This device works in such a way that the absolute
aes speed of the duty point to the blow-off line is
determined and compared with the current distance of the dutyMAN
He
1. General system description -7-
point from the blow-off line. As a function of the particular
rated change there is a minimum distance from the blow-off line
at which by opening the blow-off valve at maximum positioning
speed exceeding of the blow-off line can be just prevented. The
higher the speed, the earlier the opening of the blow-off valve
must start.
As soon as the speed of the duty point has become so low that
the necessity for quick opening no longer prevails, the system
switches over to normal control and the blow-off valve is
steadily adjusted by the PI controller.
The flow signal (effective pressure) is superimposed by a
“roaring noise" due to eddy formation in the coppressor inlet.
In order that the new dynamic blow-off line DYN does not
& react to every small shifting of the duty point due to the
roaring noise, an adaptive filter is fitted. This filter allows
duty point shifts in the direction of the blow-off line to pass
without delay, then shifts in the opposite direction by means
of a low pass filter.
The blow-off controller itself has PI characteristics. Its output
acts on a proportionally functioning position controller which
controls the blow-off valve via an electro-hydraulic control
valve or an electro-pneumatic converter. The position reversal
is effected via a remote positioner. Fig. 2 shows an electro-
hydraulic positioner Turbolog EKU 432. For this device, there is
a separate operation manual. Naturally, other positioners can
also be used.
The anti-surge controller can also actuate several blow-off
valyes in parallel if for capacity reasons one valve is not
sufficient.
1.2.2 Discharge pressure limit control system
In order to protect plant parts downstream, a discharge pressure
limit control system is often demanded. A horizontally set
blow-off line cannot meet this demand. At constant end pressure,
the enthalpy difference delta h is in fact constant, but here no
definite allocation between the set value (end pressure/enthalpy
difference) and actual value (flowrate) prevails any longer.
The Turbolog control system therefore has a discharge pressure
limit control system. The measured discharge pressure is compared
with the set-point PS and the difference is signalled to the
maximum selection MAX. This allows the control difference from
the controller pass in each case which opens the blow-off valve
furthest. Thus it is ensured that neither the blow-off line nor
the discharge pressure limit line can be exceeded. The transition
from the one control type to the other takes place flexibly. |
The advantage of the discharge pressure limit of the anti-surge
control system is that the anti-surge control system as a safety
control system is in a position to balance out deviations very
quickly.